KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Dilbilim / 2024 / Sayı: 43

Speech Acts and Personal Narrative: Analysing Meghan Markle’s Use of Speech Acts

Sevim Inal(Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Faculty of Education, Department of Foreign Languages, English Language Education)0000-0003-0424-9666
Nalan Erçin Kamburoğlu(Kocaeli University, Foreign Languages College)0000-0001-7794-0437
Sayfa
57–73
Yayın Tarihi
2025-03-16
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Additionally, the authors analyse the significance of Meghan Markle’s use of ‘I’ in her statements and draw conclusions based on these observations.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study describes the types and functions of speech acts performed by Meghan Markle during an interview with Oprah Winfrey in 2021.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The results indicate that mostly four types of speech acts were performed in her 364 utterances consisting of 318 utterances of representative, 26 utterances of directive, 15 utterances of expressive, and 5 utterances of commissive.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Additionally, the authors analyse the significance of Meghan Markle’s use of ‘I’ in her statements and draw conclusions based on these observations.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2021 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Speech acts · representative · declarative

Abstract

This study describes the types and functions of speech acts performed by Meghan Markle during an interview with Oprah Winfrey in 2021. The script of the interview constitutes the data. The data analysis is based on five classifications of Searl and Austin’s speech actc theory: declarative, assertive, expressive, directive and commissive. The data was analysed via MAXQDA through coding. The results indicate that mostly four types of speech acts were performed in her 364 utterances consisting of 318 utterances of representative, 26 utterances of directive, 15 utterances of expressive, and 5 utterances of commissive. Based on this finding, it was concluded that Meghan Markel used representative speech act most and that she mainly gave statements of fact or described things that she believed to be true. Additionally, the authors analyse the significance of Meghan Markle’s use of ‘I’ in her statements and draw conclusions based on these observations.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Inal, S., Kamburoğlu, N. E. (2025). Speech Acts and Personal Narrative: Analysing Meghan Markle’s Use of Speech Acts. Dilbilim, Sayı: 43, 57–73. https://doi.org/10.26650/jol.2024.1624083

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (38)

  1. Austin, J., L. (1962). How to do things with words (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. google scholar
  2. Azhari, A., S. (2018). Speech acts of classroom interaction. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 4(2), 24-45. google scholar
  3. Baker, A. A. (2011). The impact of personal pronoun usage on psychological health. Website Name. Retrieved: 10.07.2023 from http://www.example.com google scholar
  4. Barron, A. (2017). The speech act of ‘offers’ in Irish English. World Englishes. 36(2), 224-238. google scholar
  5. Beard, R. (2000). The Language of Politics. London: Routledge. google scholar
  6. Bello, A. B. (2013). Self-reference as a confidence-building device in discourse. Journal of Language and SocialPsychology, 32(4), 450-465. google scholar
  7. Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse: A critical introduction. Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  8. Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  9. Chilton, P. (2004). Analyzing political discourse: Theory and practice. Routledge. google scholar
  10. Culpeper, J., & Haugh, M. (2014). Pragmatics and the English language. Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
  11. Cutting, J. (2002). Pragmatics and discourse. London: Routledge. google scholar
  12. Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. Routledge. google scholar
  13. Fetzer, A., & Bull, P. (2012). An introduction to pragmatics: Social action and discourse analysis. Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
  14. Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality andSocialPsychology, 59(6), 1216-1229. google scholar
  15. Goodwin, J. (2014). “Conceptions of speech acts in the theory and practice of argumentation: a case study of a debate about advocating.” Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 79-93. google scholar
  16. Handayani, N., D. (2015). The use of expressive speech acts in Hannah Montana session 1. Journal of English Education. google scholar
  17. Hashempour, Z. (2016). A study on Iranian funeral posters: speech acts analysis. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(5), 946-952. google scholar
  18. Hashim, S. S. M. (2016). Speech acts in selected political speeches. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, Volume 3, Issue 1, June 2016. google scholar
  19. Haucsa, G, M., Marzuki, A., G., Alek A. & Hidayat, D. N. (2020). “Illocutionary Speech Acts Analysis in Tom Cruise’s Interview. Academic Journal Perspective: Education, Language, and Literature, 8(1), 11-19. google scholar
  20. Horn, L. R., & Ward, G. (Eds.). (2004). The handbook of pragmatics. Blackwell Publishing. google scholar
  21. John, P., Brooks, B., & Schriever, U. (2019). Speech acts in professional maritime discourse: A pragmatic risk analysis of bridge team communication directives and commissives. google scholar
  22. Kiuk, P., Y., & Ghozali, I. (2018). Speech Act Analysis in Desmond’sConversation in Hacksaw Ridge Movie. Journal JELLT, 2(1). google scholar
  23. Levinson, S. C. 2017. Speech acts. In Oxford handbook of pragmatics (pp. 199-216). Oxford University Press. google scholar
  24. Mey, J. L. (2001). Pragmatics: An introduction. UK: Blackwell Publishing. google scholar
  25. Muhartoyo, M., & Kristani, K. (2013). Directive Speech Act in The Movie “Sleeping Beauty”. Humaniora, 4(2), 949-966. google scholar
  26. Norrick, N. R. (2015). Narrative illocutionary acts direct and indirect. Journal of Pragmatics, 86, 94-99. google scholar
  27. Okoro, C. N. (2017). A speech act analysis of the formal declaration of interest for presidency and inaugural speeches of President Muhammadu Buhari. Language in India, 17(10), 49-66. google scholar
  28. Peneva, D. (2018). Modality markers in the speech acts of assurance in english and Bulgarian spoken discourse. Knowledge International Journal, 22(6), 1529-1534. google scholar
  29. Rafli, Z. (2018). English speech acts of illocutionary force in class interaction. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9(3), 113-120. google scholar
  30. Ramayanti, D., & Marlina, L. (2018). The analysis of types illocutionary acts in “tangled” movie. E-Journal English Language and Literature, 7(1), 14-23. google scholar
  31. Searle, J. R. (1979). Semantics. T.J. Press google scholar
  32. Sobola, E. (2018). An analysis of illocutionary force of metaphor of abuse in a Bollywood movie-house of trouble. EKSU Studies in Language and Literature (ESILL), 6, 104-111. google scholar
  33. Witek, M. (2015). Mechanisms of illocutionary games. Language & Communication, 42, 11-22. google scholar
  34. Wodak, R. & Meyer, M. (2015). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. google scholar
  35. Yu, X., Liu, Y., Chen, W., & Zhang, H. (2015). Personal pronoun usage and self-focused attention in online discourse: A quantitative analysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 85, 1-12. google scholar
  36. Weintraub, W. (1981). Verbal behavior: Adaptation and psychopathology. Springer Publishing Company. google scholar
  37. Yule, G. (1996). The study of language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  38. Zimmermann, J., Wolf, M., Bock, A., Peham, D., & Benecke, C. (2013). The way we refer to ourselves reflects how we relate to others: Associations between first-person pronoun use and interpersonal problems. Journal ofResearch in Personality, 47(3), 218-225. google scholar