KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 3

The Effect of Water Stress on Nutrient Elements in Soil and Leaf of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

Sultan KIYMAZ
Ahu Alev ABACI-BAYAR
Ramazan BEYAZ
Sayfa
130–140
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

As a result, based on the data obtained in this study, it may be stated that cv. "Gina" is more tolerant to water stress in comparison to the other varieties in the pot experiment.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Water resources are a scarce and limiting factor for expanding cultivation and plant production in many arid and semi-arid areas.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The treatments consisted of three irrigation regimes to which 100% (I1.00), 75% (I0.75) and 50% (I0.50) of depleted water from field capacity and four bean varieties ("Sarıkız", "Sazova", "Kırk Günlük", and "Gina").
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:As a result, based on the data obtained in this study, it may be stated that cv. "Gina" is more tolerant to water stress in comparison to the other varieties in the pot experiment.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Common bean · water deficit · leaf

Abstract

Water resources are a scarce and limiting factor for expanding cultivation and plant production in many arid and semi-arid areas. This study was conducted to investigate the effects of different water deficit levels on soil and plant (leaf) concentration of macro and micro nutrients of four common bean cultivars and was carried out in a pot in a greenhouse. The treatments consisted of three irrigation regimes to which 100% (I1.00), 75% (I0.75) and 50% (I0.50) of depleted water from field capacity and four bean varieties ("Sarıkız", "Sazova", "Kırk Günlük", and "Gina"). It was determined that leaf macro and micro nutrients reduced from the full irrigation treatment (I1.00) to the treatment exposed the highest water stress (I0.50). The highest values of the macro and micro parameters in the soil under the highest water constraint were obtained in cv. "Gina". However, the highest values in the cv. "Sazova" were obtained in terms of micro elements in the leaf, and the highest values were obtained from the cv. "Gina" in terms of macro elements in the treatments of the highest water constraint (I0.50). As a result, based on the data obtained in this study, it may be stated that cv. "Gina" is more tolerant to water stress in comparison to the other varieties in the pot experiment.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KIYMAZ, S., ABACI-BAYAR, A. A., BEYAZ, R. (2020). The Effect of Water Stress on Nutrient Elements in Soil and Leaf of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 3, 130–140. https://ajindex.com/articles/157098

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Abaci AA (2009). Comparison of The Ecophysiologıcal Properties of C4 Haloxylon Persicum and C3 Tamarix Parviflora By Eczotic Specıes Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Unıversıty Graduate School of Natural And Applied Scıences Master Of Science Thesis pp:72. Abu-Muriefah SS (2013). Effect of chitosan on common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants grown under water stress conditions. International Research Journal of Agricultural Science and Soil Science, 3(6): 192-199.
  2. Abdalla, MM and El-Khoshiban, NH (2007). The Influence of Water Stress on Growth, Relative Water Content, Photosynthetic Pigments, Some Metabolic and Hormonal Contents of Two Triticium aestivum Cultivars. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 3 (12): 2062-2074.
  3. Alam SM (1999). Nutrient uptake by plants unders stress conditions. In: Pessaraki M (ed) Handbook of plant and crop stress. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp: 285-314.
  4. Amtmann A and Blatt MR (2009). Regulation of macronutrient transport. New Phytologist, 181: 35 MR-32. Ankenbauer, KJ and Loheide SP (2017). The effects of soil organic matter on soil water retention and plant water use in a meadow of the Sierra Nevada, CA. Hydrological Processes, 31: 891-901.
  5. Ashraf MY, Ala SA and Bhatti AS (1998). Nutritional imbalance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes grown under soil water deficit. Acta physiologiae plantarum, 20: 307-311.
  6. Ashraf MY, Mahmood K, Ashraf M, Akhter J and Hussain F (2016). Optimal Supply of Micronutrients Improves Drought Tolerance in Legumes, 25: 637-657.
  7. Badiane A, Ndour NYB, Guèye F, Faye S, Ndoye I and Masse D (2012). Effects of different inputs of organic matter on the response of plant production to a soil water stress in Sahelian region. Natural Science, 4(12): 969-975.
  8. Barker AV and Pilbeam DV (2007). Handbook of Plant Nutrition (1nd Edn), CRC Taylor and Francis, NY, pp: 636. Bhadoria PBS, Prakash YS and Rakshit A (2003). Relative efficacy of organic manures on rice production in lateritic soil. Soil Use and Management, 19: 80-82.
  9. Bouyocous GL (1951). A Recalibration of Hydrometer Method for Making Mechanical Analysis of soils. Agronomy Journal, 43: 434-438.
  10. Cakmak I (2005). Role of potassium in alleviating the detrimental effects of abiotic stress plants. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 168: 521-530.
  11. Camoglu G (2013). The effects of water stress on evapotranspiration and leaf temperatures of two olive cultivars. Zemdirbyste, 100(1): 91-98.
  12. Demiralay İ (1981). Some Physical Analysis Methods in Soil. Atatürk Un