Dergiler / Uluslararası İşletme ve Ekonomi Çalışmaları Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1

Technological transport-adjusted environmental Kuznets curve dynamics: New insights for global carbon emission mitigation

Muhammad Javeed Akhter(Ghazi University, Dera Ghazi Khan, Pakistan)0000-0001-9786-7396
Nabila Asghar(University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan)0000-0002-5425-4140
Hafeez Ur Rehman(University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan)0000-0002-5071-7750
Muhammad Asif Amjad(University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan)0000-0002-7625-5902
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-09-11
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This comparison shows that a region’s total emissions curve can conceal a long-term mismatch between growth and decarbonization rates, particularly in transport, and that transport-sector decoupling lags behind the economy’s apparent progress in advanced economies.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Transportation services play a key role in the operation of the modern economy, but their environmental impacts are also becoming more and more challenging to reconcile with the global decarbonization targets.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This paper investigates the trends in the economic growth-carbon emissions relationship from two complementary angles: the conventional Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) and a transport-adjusted EKC that separates the moderating effect of the transport sector’s competitiveness.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This comparison shows that a region’s total emissions curve can conceal a long-term mismatch between growth and decarbonization rates, particularly in transport, and that transport-sector decoupling lags behind the economy’s apparent progress in advanced economies.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:2007 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Transport-adjusted EKC · Regions · Marginal effect

Özet

Transportation services play a key role in the operation of the modern economy, but their environmental impacts are also becoming more and more challenging to reconcile with the global decarbonization targets. This paper investigates the trends in the economic growth-carbon emissions relationship from two complementary angles: the conventional Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) and a transport-adjusted EKC that separates the moderating effect of the transport sector’s competitiveness. The Westerlund (2007) cointegration test is conducted on 121 countries categorized regionally based on their emissions data, in the panel between 2014 and 2024, and the results validate the existence of a stable long-run relationship in each panel. We use Driscoll-Kraay estimation as the main methodology, and panel quantile regression (PQR) as a robustness check to account for possible cross-sectional dependence and distributional heterogeneity. We find significant regional variation, with the traditional inverted-U relationship between growth and emissions for Africa and the Americas, and the turning points already surmounted by higher-income economies, but a positive growth-emissions relationship throughout for European countries, a reflection, we show, of the omission of the transport channel. The transport-adjusted model corrects this by showing the same inverted-U pattern for Africa, the Americas and Asia and Pacific at broadly similar turning points as the baseline model but showing that the turning point for transport-sector emissions in Europe is not observed, even at the highest incomes. This comparison shows that a region’s total emissions curve can conceal a long-term mismatch between growth and decarbonization rates, particularly in transport, and that transport-sector decoupling lags behind the economy’s apparent progress in advanced economies.

Abstract

Transportation services play a key role in the operation of the modern economy, but their environmental impacts are also becoming more and more challenging to reconcile with the global decarbonization targets. This paper investigates the trends in the economic growth-carbon emissions relationship from two complementary angles: the conventional Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) and a transport-adjusted EKC that separates the moderating effect of the transport sector’s competitiveness. The Westerlund (2007) cointegration test is conducted on 121 countries categorized regionally based on their emissions data, in the panel between 2014 and 2024, and the results validate the existence of a stable long-run relationship in each panel. We use Driscoll-Kraay estimation as the main methodology, and panel quantile regression (PQR) as a robustness check to account for possible cross-sectional dependence and distributional heterogeneity. We find significant regional variation, with the traditional inverted-U relationship between growth and emissions for Africa and the Americas, and the turning points already surmounted by higher-income economies, but a positive growth-emissions relationship throughout for European countries, a reflection, we show, of the omission of the transport channel. The transport-adjusted model corrects this by showing the same inverted-U pattern for Africa, the Americas and Asia and Pacific at broadly similar turning points as the baseline model but showing that the turning point for transport-sector emissions in Europe is not observed, even at the highest incomes. This comparison shows that a region’s total emissions curve can conceal a long-term mismatch between growth and decarbonization rates, particularly in transport, and that transport-sector decoupling lags behind the economy’s apparent progress in advanced economies.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Akhter, M. J., Asghar, N., Rehman, H. U., Amjad, M. A. (2026). Technological transport-adjusted environmental Kuznets curve dynamics: New insights for global carbon emission mitigation. Uluslararası İşletme ve Ekonomi Çalışmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1. https://doi.org/10.54821/bes.1936752

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (40)

  1. Abdullah, M. A., Han, X., Amjad, M. A., Aslam, B., & Dong, X. (2026). Interconnections between economic growth, human, and sustainable development: Implications for carbon intensity reduction in upper‐middle and high‐income countries. Sustainable Development, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.71216
  2. Afzal, M., An-Vo, D. A., Mushtaq, S., Mai, T., & Amjad, M. A. (2026). Achieving sustainable development through electrification: A non-linear analysis of electrification and health vulnerability in developing countries. Energy Reports, 16, 109445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2026.109445
  3. Akhter, M. J., ur Rehman, H., & Abbas, Q. (2022). The multidimensional assessment of sustainable energy poverty and its impact on economic development. Journal of Business & Economics, 14(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.5311/JBE.2022.27.6
  4. Andrés, L., & Padilla, E. (2018). Driving factors of GHG emissions in the EU transport activity. Transport Policy, 61, 60-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.10.008
  5. Asghar, N., Amjad, M. A., & ur Rehman, H. (2023). An asymmetric analysis of renewable energy in mitigating carbon emissions in Pakistan. iRASD Journal of Economics, 5(3), 713-724. https://doi.org/10.52131/joe.2023.0503.0156
  6. Becattini, V., Gabrielli, P., & Mazzotti, M. (2021). Role of carbon capture, storage, and utilization to enable a net-zero-CO2-emissions aviation sector. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 60(18), 6848-6862. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.0c05392
  7. Becken, S., & Shuker, J. (2019). A framework to help destinations manage carbon risk from aviation emissions. Tourism Management, 71, 294-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.10.023
  8. Bradshaw, S. (2023). Next generation aircraft propulsion: A Pratt & Whitney approach. AM&P Technical Articles, 181(2), 12-16. https://doi.org/10.31399/asm.amp.2023-02.p012
  9. Brooks, K. P., Snowden-Swan, L. J., Jones, S. B., Butcher, M. G., Lee, G. S., Anderson, D. M.,. & Shonnard, D. (2016). Low-carbon aviation fuel through the alcohol to jet pathway. In Biofuels for aviation: Feedstocks, technology and implementation (pp. 109-150). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804568-8.00006-8
  10. Christodoulakis, J., Karinou, F., Kelemen, M., Kouremadas, G., Fotaki, E. F., & Varotsos, C. A. (2022). Assessment of air pollution from Athens international airport and suggestions for adaptation to new aviation emissions restrictions. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 13(6), 101441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2022.101441
  11. Dewan, M. H., & Godina, R. (2023). Effective training of seafarers on energy efficient operations of ships in the maritime industry. Procedia Computer Science, 217, 1688-1698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.369
  12. Dietz, T., & Rosa, E. A. (1997). Effects of population and affluence on CO2 emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 94(1), 175-179. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.1.175
  13. Dray, L., Schäfer, A. W., Grobler, C., Falter, C., Allroggen, F., Stettler, M. E., & Barrett, S. R. (2022). Cost and emissions pathways towards net-zero climate impacts in aviation. Nature Climate Change, 12(10), 956-962. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01485-4
  14. Driscoll, J. C., & Kraay, A. C. (1998). Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(4), 549-560. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465398557825
  15. Golpîra, H., Sadeghi, H., & Magazzino, C. (2023). Examining the energy-environmental Kuznets curve in OECD countries considering their population. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(41), 94515-94536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28923-w
  16. Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353-377. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118443
  17. Khoso, W. M., Akher, M. J., Ahmed Laghari, A., Jamali, R., Tunio, R. A., & Laghari, M. A. (2025). Energy accessibility gap: A key barrier to human development. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 32(7), 827-841. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2025.2562436
  18. Klenner, J., Muri, H., & Strømman, A. H. (2022). High-resolution modeling of aviation emissions in Norway. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 109, 103379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103379
  19. Koenker, R. (2004). Quantile regression for longitudinal data. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 91(1), 74-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmva.2004.05.006
  20. Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. The American Economic Review, 45(1), 1-28. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1811581
  21. Laghari, M. A., & Akhter, M. J. (2026). Evaluating global carbon emission trajectories: Transport-adjusted and traditional EKC approaches. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 68, 101792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2026.101792
  22. Liao, W., Fan, Y., Wang, C., & Wang, Z. (2021). Emissions from intercity aviation: An international comparison. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 95, 102818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102818
  23. Lin, B., & Omoju, O. E. (2017). Does private investment in the transport sector mitigate the environmental impact of urbanisation? Evidence from Asia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 153, 331-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.064
  24. Magazzino, C., Gallegati, M., & Giri, F. (2023). The environmental Kuznets curve in a long-term perspective: Parametric vs semi-parametric models. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 98, 106973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106973
  25. Magazzino, C., Mele, M., & Schneider, N. (2022). A new artificial neural networks algorithm to analyze the nexus among logistics performance, energy demand, and environmental degradation. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 60, 315-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2021.11.018
  26. Magazzino, C., Pakrooh, P., & Abedin, M. Z. (2024). A decomposition and decoupling analysis for carbon dioxide emissions: Evidence from OECD countries. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(11), 28539-28566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03824-7
  27. Marsad, A., Zhang, G., Aslam, B., Asif Amjad, M., Soomro, A., & Hisbani, F. (2026). Heterogeneous energy-GDP nexus in transition economies: MG/PMG and ARDL-ECM evidence. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 21(1), 2709514. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2026.2709514
  28. Murdock, H. E., Staffell, I., Jansen, M., & de Nazelle, A. (2025). Expert views diverge on how to decarbonize transport. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 21(1), 2569499. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2025.2569499
  29. Ni, P., Wang, X., & Li, H. (2020). A review on regulations, current status, effects and reduction strategies of emissions for marine diesel engines. Fuel, 279, 118477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118477
  30. Nosheen, F., Kouser, R., Anjum, S., & Akhter, M. J. (2021). Control of carbon emissions by promoting economic growth and renewable energy in newly emerging economic block. Review of Education, Administration & LAW, 4(2), 409-420. https://doi.org/10.47067/real.v4i2.153
  31. Pesaran, M. H. (2021). General diagnostic tests for cross-sectional dependence in panels. Empirical Economics, 60(1), 13-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-020-01875-7
  32. Pesaran, M. H., & Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of Econometrics, 142(1), 50-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010
  33. Quadros, F. D., Snellen, M., & Dedoussi, I. C. (2020). Regional sensitivities of air quality and human health impacts to aviation emissions. Environmental Research Letters, 15(10), 105013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abb2c5
  34. Sgouridis, S., Bonnefoy, P. A., & Hansman, R. J. (2011). Air transportation in a carbon constrained world: Long-term dynamics of policies and strategies for mitigating the carbon footprint of commercial aviation. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 45(10), 1077-1091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2010.03.019
  35. Solaymani, S., & Botero, J. (2025). Reducing carbon emissions from transport sector: Experience and policy design considerations. Sustainability, 17(9), 3762. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17093762
  36. Wang, L., Akhtar, M. J., Khan, M. N., Asghar, N., ur Rehman, H., & Xu, Y. (2024). Assessing the environmental sustainability gap in G20 economies: The roles of economic growth, energy mix, foreign direct investment, and population. Heliyon, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26535
  37. Westerlund, J. (2007). Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and statistics, 69(6), 709-748. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2007.00477.x
  38. Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (Vol. 108, No. 2, pp. 245-254). Cambridge, MA: MIT press. Available at: https://doc1.bibliothek.li/aca/FLMF024129.pdf
  39. Yu, G., Hao, A., & Liu, C. (2022). Research on development strategy of Henan aviation economy under the background of regional economy. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2022(1), 4212090. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4212090
  40. Brooks, K. P., Snowden-Swan, L. J., Jones, S. B., Butcher, M. G., Lee, G. S., Anderson, D. M.,. & Shonnard, D. (2016). Low-carbon aviation fuel through the alcohol to jet pathway. In Biofuels for aviation: Feedstocks, technology and implementation (pp. 109-150). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804568-8.00006-8