KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Uluslararası Ekonomi Siyaset İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 5

Türkiye'de Enerji Yoksulluğunun Toplumsal Cinsiyet Boyutları: Yeşil Dönüşüm ve Jeopolitik Dönüşüm

Gender Dimensions of Energy Poverty in Türkiye: Green Transformation and the Geopolitical Conversion

Bedriye Tunçsiper(İZMİR DEMOKRASİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-6063-218X
İbrahim Horoz(İZMİR DEMOKRASİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-9589-964X
Ahmet Yetik(İzmir Gaz)0000-0002-7583-8874
Sayfa
376–396
Yayın Tarihi
2026-10-15
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Sonuç bölümünde ise ekonomik ve jeopolitik faktörlere dayalı olarak 2035 ve 2050 ufuklarına yönelik senaryo analizlerine yer verilmektedir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Türkiye'de çok yönlü yapısal bir sorun olan enerji yoksulluğu, döviz krizleri, iklim değişikliği ve uluslararası enerji fiyatlarındaki dalgalanmalarla daha da iç içe geçtikçe giderek daha da şiddetlenmektedir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Türkiye'nin birincil enerji arzının yaklaşık %75'i ithal edilmektedir; bu dışa bağımlılığa siyasi ve ekonomik kırılganlıklar da eklendiğinde, ortaya enerji yoksulluğundan en temel düzeyde orantısız şekilde etkilenen kesimleri, özellikle de kırsal kesimdeki kadınları ön plana çıkaran bir tablo çıkmaktadır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Sonuç bölümünde ise ekonomik ve jeopolitik faktörlere dayalı olarak 2035 ve 2050 ufuklarına yönelik senaryo analizlerine yer verilmektedir.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2025 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Enerji yoksulluğu · Yeşil dönüşüm · Enerji güvenliği

Özet

Türkiye'de çok yönlü yapısal bir sorun olan enerji yoksulluğu, döviz krizleri, iklim değişikliği ve uluslararası enerji fiyatlarındaki dalgalanmalarla daha da iç içe geçtikçe giderek daha da şiddetlenmektedir. Türkiye'nin birincil enerji arzının yaklaşık %75'i ithal edilmektedir; bu dışa bağımlılığa siyasi ve ekonomik kırılganlıklar da eklendiğinde, ortaya enerji yoksulluğundan en temel düzeyde orantısız şekilde etkilenen kesimleri, özellikle de kırsal kesimdeki kadınları ön plana çıkaran bir tablo çıkmaktadır. Bu araştırmanın amacı, 2025 yılına ait güncel veri ve koşulları kullanarak, Türkiye'de enerji yoksulluğuna toplumsal cinsiyet perspektifinden kapsamlı bir analiz yapmak ve bu doğrultuda politika önerileri geliştirmektir. Makale sistematik olarak hane halkının enerjiye erişimindeki eşitsizlikleri, kırsal kesimdeki kadınların biyokütleye olan bağımlılığını, konutlarda ısınma yoksulluğunu ve temiz enerji teknolojilerine erişimdeki cinsiyet farkını incelemektedir. Bu bağlamda, Rusya-Ukrayna savaşının enerji güvenliği üzerindeki devam eden etkileri, Türkiye'nin AB Yeşil Mutabakatı'na uyum süreci, yüksek enflasyon ortamının enerji yoksulluğunu şiddetlendirici katkısı ve ülkenin güneş enerjisi potansiyelinin gerisinde kalan yatırım açığı da değerlendirilmektedir. Çalışma, mevcut politika araçlarının toplumsal cinsiyet körü niteliğine ve eksikliklerine dikkat çekerken, Türkiye'ye özgü çok boyutlu bir politika çerçevesi önermektedir. Bu çerçeve; yeşil beceri programlarını, toplumsal cinsiyete duyarlı enerji tarifelerini, kırsal kesimdeki kadınlara yönelik enerji girişimciliğini ve hane halkının enerji kullanımını merkeze alan finansal içerme araçlarını kapsamaktadır. Sonuç bölümünde ise ekonomik ve jeopolitik faktörlere dayalı olarak 2035 ve 2050 ufuklarına yönelik senaryo analizlerine yer verilmektedir.

Abstract

As a multifaceted structural issue in Türkiye, energy poverty is becoming more acute as it gets more connected to currency crises, climate change, and swings in international energy prices. Around 75% of Turkey's main energy supplies are imported; When political and economic vulnerabilities are coupled with this external dependency, a picture emerges that primarily affects those areas, mainly rural women, who disproportionately suffer from energy poverty at its most basic level. The goal of this research is to create policy recommendations for energy poverty in Türkiye from a gender perspective, using updated data and circumstances from 2025. It also intends to conduct a thorough analysis. The paper methodically explores inequities in household energy access, rural women's reliance on biomass, housing heating poverty, and the gender difference in access to clean energy technologies. The continuous impacts of the Russia-Ukraine war on energy security, Türkiye's alignment process with the EU Green Deal, the contribution of a high-inflation environment to exacerbated energy poverty, and the investment gap that falls short of the country's solar potential are all assessed in this context. The study proposes a multi-pronged policy framework tailored to Turkey while highlighting the gender-blind nature of current policy instruments and their flaws. This structure covers green skills programmes, gender-sensitive energy tariffs, energy entrepreneurship for rural women, and financial inclusion tools focusing on household energy usage. The conclusion uses scenario analyses for the 2035 and 2050 horizons based on economic and geopolitical factors.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Tunçsiper, B., Horoz, İ., Yetik, A. (2026). Türkiye'de Enerji Yoksulluğunun Toplumsal Cinsiyet Boyutları: Yeşil Dönüşüm ve Jeopolitik Dönüşüm. Uluslararası Ekonomi Siyaset İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 5, 376–396. https://doi.org/10.59445/ijephss.1967726

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (77)

  1. Adamecz, A., Lovász, A., & Vujić, S. (2025). Beyond the degree: Fertility outcomes of “first in family” graduates. Review of Economics of the Household, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-025-09788-z
  2. Andabaka, A., et al. (2026). National policies and the challenge of coherence. In L. Bragança et al. (Eds.), Shaping circular transitions in the built environment (Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-02834-1_5
  3. Apergis, N., Polemis, M., & Soursou, S. E. (2022). Energy poverty and education: Fresh evidence from a panel of developing countries. Energy Economics, 106, Article 105430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105430
  4. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297.
  5. Balcı, A. (2023). Enerji güvenliğinde Türkiye’nin rolü ve yenilenebilir enerji kaynakları. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 44, 200–233. https://doi.org/10.14520/adyusbd.1319770
  6. Bentley, R., Daniel, L., Li, Y., Baker, E., & Li, A. (2023). The effect of energy poverty on mental health, cardiovascular disease and respiratory health: A longitudinal analysis. The Lancet Regional Health – Western Pacific, 35, Article 100734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100734
  7. Bloomer, J., & Boateng, D. (2024). Prepaid into poverty? Exploring energy poverty and access to alternative electricity sources among urban poor households in Ghana. Energy Research & Social Science, 112, Article 103510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103510
  8. Bouzarovski, S., Brajković, J., Robić, S., Brown, C., & Vuchkova, I. (2024). Energy poverty in the Energy Community region: Interrogating policy formulation and coverage. European Urban and Regional Studies, 31(2), 184–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/09697764231162229
  9. Brown, R. L., Durbin, J., & Evans, J. M. (1975). Techniques for testing the constancy of regression relationships over time. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series B), *37*(2), 149–192.
  10. Cheng, L., Walshe, N., & Mi, Z. (2025). Reducing gender inequalities in education helps mitigate climate change. Energy Economics, 145, Article 108494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108494
  11. Cin, R., & Onaygil, S. (2025). Energy poverty and a possible energy efficiency obligation scheme in Türkiye: Comparing income and energy expenditure-based definitions and policy implications. Energy Policy, 207, Article 114400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114400
  12. Desai, S., & Joshi, O. (2019). The paradox of declining female work participation in an era of economic growth. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 62(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41027-019-00162-z
  13. Di Leo, P., Malgaroli, G., Spertino, F., & Ciocia, A. (2026). Renewable energy integration in emerging electricity grids: Technologies, challenges, and system-level perspectives. Applied Sciences, 16(10), Article 5124. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16105124
  14. Dobrowolski, Z., Adamišin, P., Sługocki, W., & Kotylak, S. (2025). Energy ladder, decarbonisation and energy poverty: The European Union inside. Energies, 18(5), Article 1180. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18051180
  15. Dong, K., Dou, Y., & Jiang, Q. (2022). Income inequality, energy poverty, and energy efficiency: Who cause who and how? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 179, Article 121622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121622
  16. Duzgun, B., Aydinalp Koksal, M., & Bayindir, R. (2022). Assessing drivers of residential energy consumption in Turkey: 2000–2018. Energy for Sustainable Development, 70, 371–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2022.08.016
  17. Edmond, C. (2025, April 14). Renewable energy capacity surged around the world in 2024. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/04/renewable-energy-capacity-2024/ [Note: URL inferred; original lacked full link – please add if known]
  18. Elasu, J., Kusemererwa, C., Mujabi, S., et al. (2026). Women’s ownership and control of household resources and cooking fuel transition in Uganda. Discovery Global Society, 4, Article 85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44282-026-00417-3
  19. Emre, T., & Sözen, A. (2024). Combatting energy poverty in eastern Turkey: Innovative debt solutions and the power-cut index. Sustainable Energy Research, 11, Article 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40807-023-00095-8
  20. Enerji ve Çevre Bulletin. (2019). Türkiye’de 30.4 milyar dolarlık enerji verimliliği sağlanabilir. http://www.enerji-dunyasi.com/yayin/902/turkiye-de-30-4-milyar-dolarlik-enerji-verimliligi-saglanabilir_25732.html#.Xv-DiigzZPY
  21. Erkök, B., & Kütük, Y. (2023). Dependency on imported energy in Turkey: Input-output analysis. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 45(1), 47–70. https://doi.org/10.14780/muiibd.1317197
  22. European Commission. (2023). Energy Poverty Advisory Hub indicators and data. https://www.energypoverty.eu/indicators-data
  23. European Environment Agency. (2025, September 29). Health impacts of air pollution. https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/europe-environment-2025/countries/turkiye/health-impacts-of-air-pollution
  24. European Union. (2019). Time to eradicate energy poverty in Europe. The EU’s Assembly of Regional and Local Representatives. https://cor.europa.eu/en/news/Pages/time-to-eradicate-energy-poverty-in-europe.aspx
  25. Eurostat. (2021). Population unable to keep home adequately warm by poverty status [Data set]. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/sdg_07_60/default/table?lang=en
  26. Gammage, S., Joshi, S., & Rodgers, Y. V. D. M. (2020). The intersections of women’s economic and reproductive empowerment. Feminist Economics, 26(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2019.1674302
  27. Gunawardena, T. (2020, July 7). To what extent can renewable energy empower women in rural communities? World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2020/07/to-what-extent-can-renewable-energy-empower-women-in-rural-communities/
  28. Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251–1271.
  29. Horoz, İ., & Ince Yenilmez, M. (2026). The Green Divide: How sustainable solutions can close the energy poverty gap. International Journal of Energy Studies, 11(1), 681–701. https://doi.org/10.58559/ijes.1838687
  30. İklim Değişikliği Başkanlığı. (2023). İklim değişikliği uyum stratejisi ve eylem planı (2024-2030). T.C. Çevre,
  31. Şehircilik ve İklim Değişikliği Bakanlığı. https://iklim.gov.tr/db/turkce/icerikler/files/Uyum.pdf
  32. Şehircilik ve İklim Değişikliği Başkanlığı. (2024). The 2053 net-zero target and Türkiye’s long-term climate change strategy. https://netsifirturkiye.org/en/the-2053-net-zero-target-and-turkiyes-long-term-climate-change-strategy/
  33. İşleyen, Ş., & Kantar, G. (2025). COVID-19 Döneminde Almanya ve Polonya’da Toplumsal Cinsiyet Rollerinin Yeniden Yapılanması. Izmir Democracy University Social Sciences Journal, 8(2), 138-150. https://doi.org/10.61127/idusos.1810384
  34. Jabeen, S., Haq, S., Jameel, A., Hussain, A., Asif, M., Hwang, J., & Jabeen, A. (2020). Impacts of rural women’s traditional economic activities on household economy: Changing economic contributions through empowered women in rural Pakistan. Sustainability, 12(7), Article 2731. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072731
  35. Jaspers, E., Van der Lippe, T., & Evertsson, M. (2023). Gender inequality, households, and work. In Handbook of Sociological Science (pp. 176–195). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789909432.00018
  36. Jessel, S., Sawyer, S., & Hernández, D. (2019). Energy, poverty, and health in climate change: A comprehensive review of an emerging literature. Frontiers in Public Health, 7, Article 357. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00357
  37. Kantar, G., & Bostancı, S. H. (2026). Alternative climate change policies: Learning from Indigenous peoples and traditions. In Empowering resilient communities through climate action, renewable energy, and waste management (pp. 39–56). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-0862-3.ch003
  38. Koirala, D. P., & Rahut, D. (2024). Multidimensional energy poverty and its effects on household consumption and savings: Evidence from Nepal. Heliyon, 10(21), Article e39801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39801
  39. Liu, G., Guo, T., Wang, P., Jiang, H., Wang, H., Zhao, X., Wei, X., & Xu, Y. (2024). Economic analysis of hydrogen energy systems: A global perspective. Heliyon, 10(18), Article e36219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36219
  40. Liu, J., Quddoos, M. U., Akhtar, M. H., Amin, M., Yu, Z., & Janjua, L. R. (2022). Investigating the impact of transport services and renewable energy on macro-economic and environmental indicators. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, Article 916176. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.916176
  41. Lu, Y., Khan, Z. A., Alvarez-Alvarado, M. S., Zhang, Y., Huang, Z., & Imran, M. (2020). A critical review of sustainable energy policies for the promotion of renewable energy sources. Sustainability, 12(12), Article 5078. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125078
  42. MacKinnon, J. G. (1996). Numerical distribution functions for unit root and cointegration tests. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11(6), 601–618.
  43. Meng, F., & Li, T. (2025). The impact of chronic diseases on labor participation among rural older adults in China. Frontiers in Public Health, 13, Article 1677445. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1677445
  44. Merendino, A., & Monacelli, T. (2026). Supply chain uncertainty, energy prices, and inflation (ECB Working Paper Series No. 3230). European Central Bank. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecb.wp3230~cd08ddc4c6.en.pdf
  45. Mir, A. A., Alghassab, M., Ullah, K., Khan, Z. A., Lu, Y., & Imran, M. (2020). A review of electricity demand forecasting in low and middle income countries: The demand determinants and horizons. Sustainability, 12(15), Article 5931. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12155931
  46. Newey, W. K., & West, K. D. (1987). A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica, 55(3), 703–708.
  47. Njenga, M., Gitau, J. K., & Mendum, R. (2021). Women’s work is never done: Lifting the gendered burden of firewood collection and household energy use in Kenya. Energy Research & Social Science, 77, Article 102071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102071
  48. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). Driving low-carbon innovations for climate neutrality. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2023/03/driving-lowcarbon-innovations-for-climate-neutrality_4260ec80/8e6ae16b-en.pdf
  49. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2025). OECD skills outlook 2025: Building the skills of the 21st century for all. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/26163cd3-en
  50. Özen, K., Levent, C., Darıcı, B., & Ince Yenilmez, M. (2024). The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment and R&D Expenditures on Climate Change: The Case Of BRICS-T and Selected OECD Member Countries. Politik Ekonomik Kuram, 8(4), 1052-1062. https://doi.org/10.30586/pek.1540208
  51. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326.
  52. Petrova, S., & Simcock, N. (2021). Gender and energy: Domestic inequities reconsidered. Social & Cultural Geography, 22(6), 849–867. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2019.1645200
  53. Phillips, P. C. B., & Hansen, B. E. (1990). Statistical inference in instrumental variables regression with I(1) processes. The Review of Economic Studies, 57(1), 99–125.
  54. Phillips, P. C. B., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 75: 335–346.
  55. Pradhan Shrestha, R., Mainali, B., Mokhtara, C., & Lohani, S. P. (2025). Bearing the burden: Understanding the multifaceted impact of energy poverty on women. Sustainability, 17(5), Article 2143. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17052143
  56. Rákos, M., Mihály-Karnai, L., Fróna, D., & Csetneki, C. (2025). Examination of the factors of multidimensional energy poverty in a Hungarian rural settlement. Energies, 18(16), Article 4287. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18164287
  57. Rizal, R. N., Hartono, D., Dartanto, T., & Gultom, Y. M. L. (2024). Multidimensional energy poverty: A study of its measurement, decomposition, and determinants in Indonesia. Heliyon, 10(3), Article e24135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24135
  58. Şahanoğulları, N., Seçkin, A., & Georges, P. (2024). Unpaid work, paid work and gender inequality: An analysis of time transfer accounts for Turkey. Acta Oeconomica, 74(2), 241–257. https://doi.org/10.1556/032.2024.00012
  59. Shrestha, B., Tiwari, S., Bajracharya, S., & Keitsch, M. (2021). Role of gender participation in urban household energy technology for sustainability: A case of Kathmandu. Discovery Sustainability, 2(1), Article 19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-021-00027-w
  60. Siddharthan, T., Grigsby, M. R., Goodman, D., Chowdhury, M., Rubinstein, A., Irazola, V., Gutierrez, L., Miranda, J. J., Bernabe-Ortiz, A., Alam, D., Kirenga, B., Jones, R., van Gemert, F., Wise, R. A., & Checkley, W. (2018). Association between household air pollution exposure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease outcomes in 13 low- and middle-income country settings. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 197(5), 611–620. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201709-1861OC
  61. Siwela, B., & Shumba, K. (2026). Women in the renewable energy sector within G20 countries: A bibliometric analysis. Administrative Sciences, 16(3), Article 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci16030119
  62. Statista. (2026). Public opinion on the reasons for rising gas bills in Turkey 2022 [Data set].
  63. Stevens, M., Raat, H., Ferrando, M., et al. (2022). A comprehensive urban programme to reduce energy poverty and its effects on health and wellbeing of citizens in six European countries: Study protocol of a controlled trial. BMC Public Health, 22, Article 1578. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13968-2
  64. Stock, J. H., & Watson, M. W. (1993). A simple estimator of cointegrating vectors in higher order integrated systems. Econometrica, 61(4), 783–820.
  65. Sultana, A. (2025). Does financial inclusion gender gap persist in the digital world? Asian Journal of Empirical Research, 15(3), 65–75. https://doi.org/10.55493/5004.v15i3.5499
  66. Sunikka-Blank, M., & Galvin, R. (2024). Extending the prebound effect: The gap between healthy and actual energy consumption among low-income households in the global south. Energy Research & Social Science, 129, Article 104390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.104390
  67. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. (2019). Konutun izolasyonundan dolayı ısınamama en çok karşılaşılan konut ve çevre problemi oldu (Haber Bülteni). https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Gelir-ve-Yasam-Kosullari-Arastirmasi-2019-33820
  68. TUIK (2022a). Hanehalkı Nihai Enerji Tüketim İstatistikleri KKR 2022. https://veriportali.tuik.gov.tr/tr/press/53805/metadata
  69. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. (2023a). Enerji hesapları, 2023. https://veriportali.tuik.gov.tr/en/press/54135
  70. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. (2023b). İşgücü istatistikleri, 2023. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=IsgucuIstatistikleri-2023-53521
  71. UN Women & UNIDO. (2023). Gender equality and the sustainable energy transition. United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women and United Nations Industrial Development Organization. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change - UNFCCC. (2023). Eighth national communication and fifth biennial report of Türkiye under the UNFCCC.
  72. Wang, Z. (2024). Sociopolitical impacts of the Russia-Ukraine conflict on Poland, Germany, and Turkey: A comparative analysis of national responses and public sentiment. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 64, 107–113. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/64/20241258
  73. Wankar, R. L., & Deo, D. S. (2022). Impact of biomass fuels on the respiratory functions of women in rural India. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 11(11), 7212–7216. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_644_22
  74. World Intellectual Property Organization. (2024). Global Innovation Index 2024. WIPO. https://www.wipo.int/web-publications/global-innovation-index-2024/en/
  75. Wu, D. (1973). Alternative tests of independence between stochastic regressors and disturbances. Econometrica, 41(4), 733–750.
  76. Yadav, S., & Anand, R. (2025). Analysis of advancing paradigms of smart grid innovations, applications, challenges, future trends and strategic implementations. Discovery Applied Sciences, 7, Article 1380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-025-07905-2
  77. Zivot, E., & Andrews, D. W. K. (1992). Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 10(3), 251–270