KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Türkiye Uzaktan Algılama Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 8

A-GIS based disaster risk assessment: The case of Muğla

Doğukan Dikbıyık(PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY)0009-0008-2795-1152
Nur Sinem Partigöç Şüyün(PAMUKKALE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-9905-2761
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-03-25
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

As a result, it has been seen that the determinations put forward for disaster risks have shown consistency and the disaster risk varies by districts throughout Muğla city

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Disasters are events occurring under the influence of natural and human-caused factors and leading to significant losses of life and property in a short period of time.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Spatial analyses are performed for disaster risk by using Geographical Information Systems (GIS) tools and Weighted Overlay method considering the natural elements (slope, solar radiation, precipitation, etc.) and built environment elements (land use pattern, etc.) that significantly affect the disaster risk.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:As a result, it has been seen that the determinations put forward for disaster risks have shown consistency and the disaster risk varies by districts throughout Muğla city
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Disaster risk · Disaster management · Geographic information system (GIS)

Abstract

Disasters are events occurring under the influence of natural and human-caused factors and leading to significant losses of life and property in a short period of time. So, the determination of the local disaster risks and minimizing their destructive effects have an importance both for urban planning and disaster management processes. It is necessary to manage these processes correctly and effectively to ensure environmental, social, and economic sustainability in urban areas which has a dense population and building stock. From this viewpoint, the study aims to reveal the current disaster risks in settlements and coastal areas. Muğla city is determined as the study area. Spatial analyses are performed for disaster risk by using Geographical Information Systems (GIS) tools and Weighted Overlay method considering the natural elements (slope, solar radiation, precipitation, etc.) and built environment elements (land use pattern, etc.) that significantly affect the disaster risk. In addition, satellite images (CORINE Land Cover) are significantly utilized in the analysis process which are obtained through Remote Sensing (RS). The data obtained from these images have provided significant contributions to determining the spatial distribution of the natural and built environment elements and comprising the thematic layers required for risk analysis. The findings obtained from the study and the determinations made within the scope of the Muğla Provincial Disaster Risk Reduction Plan (IRAP) prepared by the Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency (AFAD) are evaluated comparatively. As a result, it has been seen that the determinations put forward for disaster risks have shown consistency and the disaster risk varies by districts throughout Muğla city

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Dikbıyık, D., Şüyün, N. S. P. (2026). A-GIS based disaster risk assessment: The case of Muğla. Türkiye Uzaktan Algılama Dergisi, Volume: 8. https://doi.org/10.51489/tuzal.1695508

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (34)

  1. AFAD. (2018). Retrieved January 10, 2025, from https://www.afad.gov.tr/kurumlar/afad.gov.tr/35429/xfiles/turkiye_de_afetler.pdf.
  2. AFAD. (2023). Retrieved January 10, 2025, from https://www.afad.gov.tr/kurumlar/afad.gov.tr/39499/xfiles/deprem_haritasi.pdf.
  3. AFAD. 2024). Retrieved January 11, 2025, from https://www.afad.gov.tr/kurumlar/afad.gov.tr/e_Kutuphane/Istatistikler/2023yilidogakaynakliolayistatistikleri-_1_.pdf.
  4. Atalay, İ. (2015). Türkiye’nin toprak coğrafyası. Meta.
  5. Başara, A. C., & Şişman, Y. (2021). Landslide susceptibility mapping of Tokat (Turkey) province using weight of evidence and random forest. Advanced GIS, 1(1), 1–7. https://izlik.org/JA55MM27SW.
  6. CRED. (2024). Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED). Annual disaster statistical review. Retrieved January 15, 2025, from https://files.emdat.be/2024/04/CredCrunch74.pdf
  7. Çitfçi, H., & Kuşak, L. (2021). Determination of unsuitability points on the route of Van Gölü-Kapıköy railway line by using GIS and AHP method. Advanced GIS, 1(1), 27–37. http://publish.mersin.edu.tr/index.php/agis/index.
  8. Çolak, E., Bediroğlu, G., & Memişoğlu Baykal, T. (2024). GIS-based determination of potential snow avalanche areas: A case study of Rize province of Türkiye. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 9(2), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.1367334.
  9. Demirkıran, S. (2023). Akıllı ve dirençli şehirler için teknoloji ve yenilik yönetimi. Afete dirençli kentler ve afet yönetimi. Nobel Publisher.
  10. Eastman, J. R. (2012). IDRISI TerrSet manual: Weighted overlay procedures. Clark Labs.
  11. ESRI. (2023). Weighted overlay tool in ArcGIS Pro. Software manual. Retrieved January 20, 2025, from https://pro.arcgis.com.
  12. EEA. (2023). European Environment Agency (EEA). CORINE land cover technical guidelines (Report No. 17/2023). Retrieved January 25, 2025, https://www.eea.europa.eu
  13. Eyi, G., & Buğdaycı, İ. (2024). Determination of fire severity with remote sensing methods after forest fire Greece Rhodes Island forest fire case study. Journal of Geomatics, 9(3), 348–360. https://doi.org/10.29128/geomatik.1481708.
  14. Guha, S., & Govil, H. (2021). Relationship between land surface temperature and normalized difference water index on various land surfaces: A seasonal analysis. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 6(3), 165–173. https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.821730.
  15. Gull, A., & Mahmood, S. (2022). Spatio-temporal analysis and trend prediction of land cover changes using Markov chain model in Islamabad, Pakistan. Advanced GIS, 2(2), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2021.100609.
  16. Ilgar, R. (2022). Doğal afetler ve afet yönetimi: EMDAT kriterlerine göre. Paradigma Akademi.
  17. Kankanamge, H. P. N. K., & Mahmood, S. (2024). Post-flood disaster management challenges and issues in the Bulathsinghala Divisional Secretariat Division, Sri Lanka: A comprehensive analysis and strategic framework for resilience and recovery. Advanced Geomatics, 4(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.29128/geomatik.1652700.
  18. Khorrami, B., Gunduz, O., Patel, N., & Ghouzlane, S. (2019). Land surface temperature anomalies in response to changes in forest cover. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 4(3), 149–156. https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.549944.
  19. Konukseven, C., Öğütcü, S., & Alçay, S. (2022). GNSS frequency availability analysis. Advanced Geomatics, 2(1), 14–16. https://doi.org/10.31202/ecjse.1095911.
  20. MTA. (2024). Retrieved February 5, 2025, from https://www.mta.gov.tr/v3.0/arastirmalar/cografi-bilgi-sistemleri.
  21. Meşin, V., & Demir, V. (2023). Site selection for the technology development zone in Konya city center using geographic information systems-based analytical hierarchy method. Journal of Geomatics, 8(3), 208–221. https://doi.org/10.29128/geomatik.1161059.
  22. MEUC. (2023). Ministry of Environment, Urbanization and Climate Change (MEUC). Retrieved February 7, 2025, from https://webdosya.csb.gov.tr/db/ced/icerikler/mugla_-cdr2022-20240301095753.pdf
  23. Muğla AFAD. (2021). Muğla Provincial Disaster and Emergency Directorate (Muğla AFAD) İRAP. Retrieved February 7, 2025, from https://mugla.afad.gov.tr/il-planlari.
  24. Muğla GPDED. (2022). Muğla Governorship Provincial Disaster and Emergency Directorate (Muğla GPDED). Retrieved February 8, 2025, from https://www.afad.gov.tr/kurumlar/afad.gov.tr/Mevzuat/Kilavuzlar/IRAP-KILAVUZ_tum_v7.pdf.
  25. Muğla MD. (2024). Muğla Meteorological Directorate (Muğla MD). Retrieved February 8, 2025, from http://www.mugla.gov.tr/meteoroloji-mudurlugu.
  26. Muğla PDAF. (2024). Muğla Provincial Directorate of Agriculture and Forestry (Muğla PDAF). Retrieved February 8, 2025, from https://mugla.tarimorman.gov.tr/.
  27. Niray, N. (2002). Urbanization phenomenon throughout history and the case of Muğla. Muğla Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9, 1-27. https://izlik.org/JA37HS77RZ.
  28. Partigöç, N. S., & Dinçer, C. (2024a). Geographic information system (GIS) based disaster risk assessment: A case of Denizli. Journal of Geomatics, 9(1), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.29128/geomatik.1261051.
  29. Partigöç, N. S., & Dinçer, C. (2024b). The multi–disaster risk assessment: A-GIS based approach for Izmir City. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 9(1), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.1295657.
  30. Patil, R., & Datta, M. (2022). Spatio-temporal analysis of climate change in India: A theoretical perspective. Advanced Geomatics, 2(1), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.26853/ag.2022.02.07.
  31. QGIS. (2023). Raster calculator and overlay operations in QGIS (Version 3.28).
  32. Sezer, S. (2004). Muğla’da kentlileşme ve kent yönetimine katılım (Publication No. 191787) [Master’s Thesis, Muğla University]. YÖK National Thesis Center.
  33. UNDDR. (2015). United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDDR). Retrieved February 15, 2025, from https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/2020/01/gis-book-english_resized.pdf.
  34. Yıldız, E., & Er, F. (2023). Geographic information systems and multi-criteria decision analysis: Siirt case with hybrid solution approach. Journal of Geomatics, 8(3), 222–234. https://doi.org/10.29128/geomatik.1228779