KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Türk Bilim ve Mühendislik Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1

Maş Fasulyesinde Gama Işını Uygulamalarının M3 Generasyonunda Bazı Agronomik Özellikler Üzerine Etkilerinin Belirlenmesi

Determination of the Effects of Gamma Radiation Applications on Some Agronomic Characteristics in the M3 Generation of Mung Bean

Cengiz Türkay(ISPARTA UYGULAMALI BİLİMLER ÜNİVERSİTESİ ZİRAAT FAKÜLTESİ TARLA BİTKİLERİ BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0003-3857-0140
İlknur Akgün(ISPARTA UYGULAMALI BİLİMLER ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ZİRAAT FAKÜLTESİ, TARLA BİTKİLERİ BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0002-7476-7226
Sayfa
11–20
Yayın Tarihi
2026-06-29
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Mutant hatların, kontrol (07 G 03) ve Partow çeşide kıyasla verim ve verim öğeleri açısından geniş bir varyasyon aralığı tespit edilmiştir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışma, gama ışını uygulamalarıyla oluşturulan mutant maş fasulyesi hatlarının M3 generasyonunda bazı agronomik özellikler yönünden değerlendirilmesi amacıyla yürütülmüştür.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Araştırmada, M3 generasyonuna ait 15 mutant hat ile 07 G 03 genotipi ve Partow çeşidi ile karşılaştırılmıştır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Mutant hatların, kontrol (07 G 03) ve Partow çeşide kıyasla verim ve verim öğeleri açısından geniş bir varyasyon aralığı tespit edilmiştir.
🔬Tür:Deneysel Tarla Denemesi
📍Kapsam:2020 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Maş fasulyesi · Mutasyon · Gama ışını

Özet

Bu çalışma, gama ışını uygulamalarıyla oluşturulan mutant maş fasulyesi hatlarının M3 generasyonunda bazı agronomik özellikler yönünden değerlendirilmesi amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Araştırmada, M3 generasyonuna ait 15 mutant hat ile 07 G 03 genotipi ve Partow çeşidi ile karşılaştırılmıştır. Deneme, 2020 yılında tesadüf blokları deneme desenine göre üç tekerrürlü olarak yürütülmüştür. Çalışmada bitki boyu, ilk bakla yüksekliği, bitkide bakla sayısı, baklada tane sayısı, bitki tane verimi, tane verimi ve bin tane ağırlığı özellikleri incelenmiştir. İncelenen özellikler bakımından genotipler arasında istatistiksel olarak önemli farklılıklar belirlenmiştir. Mutant hatların, kontrol (07 G 03) ve Partow çeşide kıyasla verim ve verim öğeleri açısından geniş bir varyasyon aralığı tespit edilmiştir. Tane verimi açısından T25-2-14, T25-1-10 ve T75-3-1 mutant hatları sırasıyla 255.10, 243.39 ve 239.81 kg da-1 değerleri ile öne çıkmıştır. Bu mutant hatlar, kontrol genotipine kıyasla sırasıyla %18.93, %13.46 ve %11.79 oranında daha yüksek tane verimi göstermiştir. Belirlenen mutant hatların, verim potansiyelleri bakımından ileri ıslah çalışmalarında değerlendirilebilecek ümitvar materyaller olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlar, gama ışını uygulamasının maş fasulyesinde M3 generasyonunda etkili bir genetik varyasyon oluşturduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.

Abstract

This study evaluated certain agronomic traits in mutant mung bean lines from the M3 generation, which were developed through gamma irradiation. Fifteen mutant lines from the M3 generation were compared with the 07 G 03 genotype and the Partow variety. The trial was conducted in 2020 using a randomized complete block design with three replications. Plant height, first pod height, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, plant seed yield, grain yield, and thousand seed weight were evaluated. Statistically significant differences were observed among the genotypes for the examined traits. A wide range of variation was observed in the mutant lines compared to the control (07 G 03) and the Partow variety in terms of yield and yield components. In terms of grain yield, the mutant lines T25-2-14, T25-1-10, and T75-3-1 stood out with values of 255.10, 243.39, and 239.81 kg da-1, respectively. These mutant lines exhibited grain yields that were 18.93%, 13.46%, and 11.79% higher than the control genotype, respectively. It was concluded that the identified mutant lines are promising materials that can be evaluated in advanced breeding programs with regard to their yield potential. The results obtained reveal that gamma irradiation creates effective genetic variation in the M3 generation of mung beans.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Türkay, C., Akgün, İ. (2026). Maş Fasulyesinde Gama Işını Uygulamalarının M3 Generasyonunda Bazı Agronomik Özellikler Üzerine Etkilerinin Belirlenmesi. Türk Bilim ve Mühendislik Dergisi, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.55979/tjse.1848101

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (70)

  1. Ahmad, H. B., Rauf, S., Rafiq, M., Mohsin, A. U., Shahbaz, U., & Sajjad, M. (2014). Genetic variability for yield contributing traits in mung bean (Vigna radiata L.). Global Innovations in Agricultural and Social Sciences, 2(2), 52-54.
  2. Akgün, İ., Karaman, R., & Türkay, C. (2022). İki ve altı sıralı arpa (Hordeum vulgare conv. distichon ve Hordeum vulgare conv. hexastichon) çeşitlerinde kolçisin uygulamasının meydana getirdiği varyasyonlar. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 37(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.20479/bursauludagziraat.1107397
  3. Amir Sohail, A. S., Rozina Gul, R. G., Fakharuddin, F., Sheraz Ahmed, S. A., & Qamaruddin, Q. (2016). Genetic variability and trait association for morphological and yield parameters of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.). Pure and Applied Biology, 5(3), 622-631.
  4. Arulbalachandran, D., Mullainathan, L., & Velu, S. (2009). Genetic variation in quantitative traits of black gram (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper) induced by gamma rays treatment in M3 generation. Journal of Phytology, 1(5), 308–312.
  5. Asaduzzaman, M. D., Karim, M. F., Ullah, M. J., & Hasanuzzaman, M. (2008). Response of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) to nitrogen and irrigation management. American-Eurasian Journal of Scientific Research, 3(1), 40-43
  6. Auti, S. G. (2012). Induced morphological and quantitative mutations in mungbean. Bioremediation, Biodiversity and Bioavailability, 6(1), 27-39.
  7. Azam, M. G., Hossain, M. A., Alam, M. S., Rahman, K. S., & Hossain, M. (2018). Genetic variability, heritability and correlation path analysis in mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek). Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research, 43(3), 407-416. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjar.v43i3.38389
  8. Baraki, F., Gebregergis, Z., Belay, Y., Berhe, M., & Zibelo, H. (2020). Genotype x environment interaction and yield stability analysis of mung bean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) genotypes in Northern Ethiopia. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 6(1), 1729581. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2020.1729581
  9. Bisht, I. S., & Singh, M. (2013). Asian Vigna. In Genetic and Genomic Resources of Grain Legume Improvement. (pp. 237-267)
  10. Çancı, H., & Toker, C. (2005). The broad-sense heritability for yield and yield components in mung bean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. GAP IV. Agriculture Congress. 21-13 Eylül, Şanlıurfa, 21-23.
  11. Dewanjee, S., & Sarkar, K. K. (2018). Evaluation of performance of induced mutants in mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. Legume Research-An International Journal, 41(2), 213-217. https://doi.org/10.18805/lr.v0iOF.9098
  12. Dhole, V. J., & Reddy, K. S. (2018). Genetic analysis and variability studies in mutants induced through electron beam and gamma rays in mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek). Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding, 9(1), 304-312. https://doi.org/10.5958/0975-928X.2018.00035.2
  13. Gül, E. (2019). Diyarbakır Ekolojik Koşullarında Farklı Ekim Sıklıklarının Bazı Maş Fasulyesi (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) Çeşitlerinde Verim ve Verim ile İlgili Özelliklere Etkisi. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Çukurova Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü)
  14. Hapsari, R. T., & Iswanto, R. (2018). Diversity of local Indonesian mungbean germplasm based on morphological quantitative and qualitative traits. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 197(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/197/1/012036
  15. Hemavathy, A. T., Shunmugavalli, N., & Anand, G. (2015). Genetic variability, correlation and path co-efficient studies on yield and its components in mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilezek]. Legume Research-An International Journal, 38(4), 442-446. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-0571.2015.00050.8
  16. Kalim, A., Zaheer, M., Siddiqui, M. U. A., Ahmed, S., & Hassan, M. M. (2021). Nutritional value, ethnomedicine, phytochemistry and pharmacology of Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 10(2), 54-58. https://doi.org/10.22271/phyto.2021.v10.i2a.13821
  17. Karakoca, T. A., & Akgün, İ. (2020). Farklı gama radyasyon dozu uygulamalarının M2 generasyonunda bazı tarımsal özellikler üzerine mutagenik etkilerinin belirlenmesi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 24(1), 96-104. https://doi.org/10.19113/sdufenbed.580095
  18. Karaman, R. (2019). Maş Fasulyesi (Vigna radiata Wilczek) Genotiplerinin/Yerel Populasyonlarının Isparta Koşullarında Fenolojik, Morfolojik, Agronomik ve Bazı Teknolojik Özellikler Yönünden Karakterizasyonu. (Doktora Tezi, Isparta Uygulamalı Bilimler Üniversitesi Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü)
  19. Karaman, R., & Kaya, M. (2020). Maş fasulyesi [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] genotiplerinin Isparta koşullarında fenolojik özellikler yönünden karakterizasyonu. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 8(11), 2307-2312. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v8i11.2307-2312.3232
  20. Karaman, R., & Turkay, C. (2024). Agronomic and quality properties and mineral contents of mung bean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] genotypes grown at different altitudes. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 56(2), 523-530. http://doi.org/10.30848/PJB2024-2(2)
  21. Kaya, M., Karaman, R., & Şener, A. (2017). Influence of different zinc application methods on yield and mineral composition of grains in mungbeans (Vigna radiata Wilczek). International Journal of Agriculture & Biology, 19(4), 805-811. https://doi.org/10.17957/IJAB/15.0360
  22. Khajudparn, P., & Tantasawat, P. (2011). Relationships and variability of agronomic and physiological characters in mungbean. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10(49), 9992-10000. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB11.1288
  23. Khan, F. U., Khan, M., Hassan, M., & Gul, R. (2017). Genotypic differences among mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) genotypes for yield and associated traits. International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences, 3(2), 47-50. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20170302.13
  24. Khan, S., & Goyal, S. (2009). Improvement of mungbean varieties through induced mutations. African Journal of Plant Science, 3(8), 174-180.
  25. Khan, S., & Wani, M. R. (2006). Induced mutations for yield contributing traits in green gram. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 8(4), 528-530.
  26. Kharkwal, M. C. (2023). Role of mutation breeding in crop improvement with special reference to Indian subcontinent. In Mutation Breeding for Sustainable Food Production and Climate Resilience. (pp. 355-428)
  27. Kim, D. S., Lee, I. S., Jang, C. S., Lee, S. J., Song, H. S., Lee, Y. I., & Seo, Y. W. (2004). AEC resistant rice mutants induced by gamma-ray irradiation may include both elevated lysine production and increased activity of stress related enzymes. Plant Science, 167(2), 305-316.
  28. Kumar, A., Sharma, N. K., Kumar, R., Sanadya, S. K., & Sahoo, S. (2024). Correlation and path analysis studies in mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] under arid environment of Western Rajasthan. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, 58, 1003-1010. https://doi.org/10.18805/IJARe.A-6195
  29. Kumar, R., & Sharma, N. K. (2024). Influence of gamma radiation and EMS on chlorophyll and macro-mutation in mungbean (Vigna radiata). The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 94(5), 501-506. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v94i5.136543
  30. Kuzbakova, M., Khassanova, G., Oshergina, I., Ten, E., Jatayev, S., Yerzhebayeva, R., & Shavrukov, Y. (2022). Height to first pod: A review of genetic and breeding approaches to improve combine harvesting in legume crops. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.948099
  31. Majhi, P. K., Mogali, S. C., & Abhisheka, L. S. (2020). Enhancement of genetic variability for yield and component traits through recombination followed by induced mutagenesis in greengram [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. Current Journal of applied science and Technology, 39(25), 38-48.
  32. Makeen, K., Abrahim, G., Jan, A., & Singh, A. K. (2007). Genetic variability and correlations studies on yield and its components in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Journal of Agronomy, 6(1), 216-218.
  33. Mehandi, S., Singh, C. M., & Kushwaha, V. K. (2013). Estimates of genetic variability and heritability for yield and yield component traits in mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. The Bioscan, 8(4), 1481-1484.
  34. Mohan N. G., Abhirami, P., & Venkatachalapathy, N. (2020). Mung bean. In Pulses: Processing and Product Development. (pp. 213-228)
  35. Mondal, M. M. A., & Sen, A. (2024). Relationships between flowering behavior and seed yield in mungbean mutants. Bangladesh Journal of Nuclear Agriculture, 38(1), 111-117. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjnag.v38i1.76573
  36. Nair, R., & Schreinemachers, P. (2020). Global status and economic importance of mungbean. In The Mungbean Genome. (pp. 1-8)
  37. Narale, S. B., Gore, V. B., Ambhure, S., Kumar, A., Thombre, P. R., Suryawanshi, A. M., & Palghadmal, R. (2024). Antinutrients in mungbean and strategy for reduction: an overview. European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety, 16(9), 275-289. https://doi.org/10.9734/ejnfs/2024/v16i91546
  38. Ngampongsai, S., Watanasit, A., Srisombun, S., Srinives, P., & Masari, A. (2009). Current status of mungbean and the use of mutation breeding in Thailand. In Induced Plant Mutations in the Genomics Era. (pp. 355-357)
  39. Ong, P. W., Lin, Y. P., Chen, H. W., Lo, C. Y., Burlyaeva, M., Noble, T., & Lee, C. R. (2023). Environment as a limiting factor of the historical global spread of mungbean. Elife, 12, e85725. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.85725
  40. Pekşen, E., Toker, C., Ceylan, F., Aziz, T., & Farooq, M. (2015). Determination of promising high yielded mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) genotypes under Middle Black Sea Region of Turkey. Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 30(2), 169-175. https://doi.org/10.7161/anajas.2015.30.2.169-175
  41. Penas, E., Gomez, R., Frias, J., & Vidal-Valvered, C. (2010). Effect of combined treatments of high pressure, temperature and antimicrobial products on germination of mung bean seeds and microbial quality of sprouts. Food Control, 21(1), 82-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2009.04.008
  42. Perera, U. I. P., Chandika, K. K. J., & Ratnasekera, D. (2017). Genetic variation, character association and evaluation of mungbean genotypes for agronomic and yield components. Journal of the National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka, 45(4), 347-353. https://doi.org/10.4038/jnsfsr.v45i4.8228
  43. Rahevar, P. M., Chauhan, R. M., Patel, P. T., Patel, M. P., Bhadauria, H. S., Solanki, S. D., & Viradiya, Y. A. (2024). Exploring population genetics for mutant mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek] lines: Insights from augmented block design. Agronomy Journal, 116(5), 2435-2445. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.21637
  44. Roslim, D. I., & Fiatin, I. S. R. O. (2015). Lethal dose 50 (LD 50) of mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) cultivar kampar. SABRAO Journal of Breeding & Genetics, 47(4), 510-516.
  45. Sağel, Z., Tutluer, M. İ., & Peşkircioğlu, H. (1994). Bitki ıslahında mutasyonlar. Tarla Bitkileri Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, 3(1-2), 95-112.
  46. Samyuktha, S. M., Malarvizhi, D., Karthikeyan, A., Dhasarathan, M., Hemavathy, A. T., Vanniarajan, C., & Senthil, N. (2020). Delineation of genotype× environment interaction for identification of stable genotypes to grain yield in mungbean. Frontiers in Agronomy, 2, 577911.
  47. Sánchez-Hernández, M. Á., Morales-Terán, G., García-Pérez, F., Villanueva-Sánchez, E., & Sánchez-Hernández, C. (2024). Grain yield of Vigna radiata L. At different plant densities in humid tropics. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana, 47(3), 243-251. https://doi.org/10.35196/rfm.2024.3.243.
  48. Sarkar, K. K., Maji, A., & Roy, S. S. (2009). Performance of some elite mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] mutant families in M7 generation. Journal of Crop and Weed, 5(1), 174-177.
  49. Sarkar, M., & Kundagrami, S. (2018). Selection of high yielding, extra short duration lines of mungbean derived through gamma radiation. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, 78(02), 233-241.
  50. Sarsu, F., Bimpong, I. K., & Jankuloski, L. (2020). Contribution of induced mutation in crops to global food security. Avances en Ciencias e Ingenierías, 12(3), 2-11. https://doi.org/10.18272/aci.v12i3.2031
  51. SAS (1999). INC SAS/STAT User’s Guide Release 7.0, Cary, NC, USA.
  52. Singh, G., Sareen, P. K., Saharan, R. P., & Singh, A. (2001). Induced variability in mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. Indian Journal of Genetics, 61, 281-282.
  53. Singh, G., Virk, H. K., Aggarwal, N., Khanna, V., & Gill, K. K. (2018). Growth environment effect on phenology, agroclimatic indices, symbiotic parameters and yield of kharif mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] genotypes. Journal of Food Legumes, 31(4), 205-208.
  54. Sohail, A., Gul, R., & Ahmed, S. (2016). Genetic variability and trait association for morphological and yield parameters of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.). Pure and Applied Biology, 5(3), 622.
  55. Suresh, S., Malathi, D., Arulselvi, S., Dhole, V., & Jebaraj, S. (2025). Induced morphological mutants and mutagenic efficiency of gamma-irradiated mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) M2 populations. Plant Science Today, 12(3), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.2025.12.3
  56. Svetleva, L. (2005). Effect of ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) and N-nitrose-N-ethyl Urea (ENU) on callus growth of common bean. Journal of Central European Agriculture, 6(1), 59–64. https://doi.org/10.5513/jcea.v6i1.247
  57. Tabasum, A., Saleem, M., & Aziz, I. (2010). Genetic variability, trait association and path analysis of yield and yield components in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Pakistan Journal of Botany, 42(6), 3915-3924.
  58. Tah, P. R. (2006). Studies on gamma ray induced mutations in mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilezek]. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 5(1), 61-70.
  59. Tickoo, J. L., & Chandra, N. (1999). Mutagen induced polygenic variability in mungbean (Vigna radiata Wilczek L.). Indian Journal of Genetics & Plant Breeding, 59(2), 193-201.
  60. Türkay, C., Akgün, İ., & Karaman, R. (2025). Maş fasulyesinde mutasyon ıslahının önemi ve uygulamaları. In Tarımsal Araştırmalar II. (pp. 59–83). https://doi.org/10.37609/akya.3807
  61. Usharani, K. S., & Kumar, C. A. (2015). Mutagenic effects of gamma rays and EMS on frequency and spectrum of chlorophyll mutations in urdbean (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper). Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 8(10), 927. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2015/v8i10/54201
  62. Virupakshappa, K., Hiremath, S. R., Shivashankar, G., & Chikkadevaiah, C. (1980). Note on correlations in different segregating generations of cowpea. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 50(12), 979-981.
  63. Wani, M. R. (2025). Genetic variability for seed yield and its related traits in M3 mutants of green gram (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 63(I&II), 36-42.
  64. Wani, M. R., Dar, A. R., Tak, A., Amin, I., Shah, N. H., Rehman, R., & Khan, S. (2017). Chemo-induced pod and seed mutants in mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek). SAARC Journal of Agriculture, 15(2), 57-67. https://doi.org/10.3329/sja.v15i2.35161
  65. Wani, M. R., Khan, S., & Kozgar, M. I. (2011). An assessment of high yielding M3 mutants of green gram (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Romanian Journal of Biology, 56(1), 29-36.
  66. Wi, S. G., Chung, B. Y., Kim, J. H., Baek, M. H., Yang, D. H., Lee, J. W., & Kim, J. S. (2005). Ultrastructural changes of cell organelles in Arabidopsis stems after gamma irradation. Journal of Plant Biology, 48(2), 195-200.
  67. Wongpiyasatid, A., Chotechuen, S., Hormchan, P., Ngampongsai, S., & Promcham, W. (2000). Induced mutations in mungbean breeding: regional yield trial of mungbean mutant lines. Agriculture and Natural Resources, 34(4), 443-449.
  68. Zafar, S. H., Umair, M., & Akhtar, M. (2023). Nutritional evaluation, proximate and chemical composition of mungbean varieties/cultivars pertaining to food quality characterization. Food Chemistry Advances, 2, 100160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.focha.2022.100160
  69. Zaid, I. U., Khalil, I. H., & Khan, S. (2012). Genetic variability and correlation analysis for yield components in mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek). Journal of Agriculture and Biology Science, 7(11), 1990-1997.
  70. Zuge Sopan, S., & Sao, T. N. A. A., (2019). Genetic variability of yield and yield related traits in mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) genotypes. Agricultural Research Journal, 56(1), 163-165. https://doi.org/10.5958/2395-146X.2019.00024.3