KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / The Online Journal of Recreation and Sports / 2026 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 3

RURAL MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS’ ATTITUDES TOWARDS SPORTS

Hüseyin Öztürk(Gaziantep University, Physical Education and Sport Department, Gaziantep/TURKEY)
Sayfa
14–22
Yayın Tarihi
2019-07-01
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

A significant difference was found between the variables of gender and engagement in sports and the sub-scale of the attitude scale, while no significant difference was found between the grade variable, the attitude scale, and all of its sub-scales.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study was conducted in order to determine Turkish rural middle school students’ attitudes towards sports.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A total of 464 middle school students were included in the study sample.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:A significant difference was found between the variables of gender and engagement in sports and the sub-scale of the attitude scale, while no significant difference was found between the grade variable, the attitude scale, and all of its sub-scales.
🔬Tür:Makale
📍Kapsam:2014 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:student · sports · attitude

Abstract

This study was conducted in order to determine Turkish rural middle school students’ attitudes towards sports. A total of 464 middle school students were included in the study sample. Data was obtained using a scale previously developed by Kocak 2014 , consisting of 22 items and three sub-scales; psychosocial development, physical development, and mental development. Statistical analyses were performed on the data obtained in the study using the SPSS 23.0 package program. The Kolmogorov Smirnov test was used to determine the statistical test methods and it was concluded that the study is of normal distribution.Therefore the t-test was used to compare two independent groups and ANOVA and Bonferroni multiple comparison tests were used to compare more than two independent groups. Most of the participants of the study were male students in 6th grade and the majority of these students do not regularly practice a sport. A significant difference was found between the variables of gender and engagement in sports and the sub-scale of the attitude scale, while no significant difference was found between the grade variable, the attitude scale, and all of its sub-scales.

Anahtar kelimeler
🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Öztürk, H. (2019). RURAL MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS’ ATTITUDES TOWARDS SPORTS. The Online Journal of Recreation and Sports, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 3, 14–22. https://doi.org/10.22282/ojrs.2019.51

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (28)

  1. Aicinena S (1991): The teacher and student attitudes toward physical education. The Physical Educator, 48(1): 28-32.
  2. Alıncak, F. (2016a). Attitudes of secondary school students including physical activity involving playing games. European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science. 2(3), 1-14.
  3. 3,. Alıncak, F. (2016b). Evaluation of opinions of primary school teachers on the method of education with game. European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science. 2(3), 81-96.
  4. Alıncak, F. (2017). Attitudes of primary school teachers towards playing games that involve physical activity. European Journal of Education Studies. 3(1), 202-216.
  5. Atalay A, Akbulut KA, Karatas O, Hacıcaferoglu S, Yücel AS. (2015). Analysis of thePerceptions of Student-Athletes Playing In the Universities Volleyball 2nd League in Turkeytowards the Event Quality. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 3(3): 61-67.
  6. Balyan M. (2009). İlköğretim 2. Kademe ve Ortaöğretim Kurumlarındaki Öğrencilerin Beden Eğitimi Dersine Yönelik Tutumları, Sosyal Beceri ve Özyeterlik Düzeylerinin Karşılaştırılması. Ege Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, İzmir.
  7. Carlson TB. (1995). We hate gym: Student alienation from physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 14: 467-477.
  8. Celep C. (2000). Eğitimde Örgütsel Adanma ve Öğretmenler, Anı Yayıncılık, Ankara.
  9. Chellodurai P, Chank K. (2000). Targets and Standarts of quality in sport services. Sport management review, 3: 1-22.
  10. Cookley J. (2001). Sport in Society. Issues and Controversies. Mac Graw-Hill, Boston.
  11. Ennis C. (1996). Students’ experiences in sport based physical education: [more than] apologies are necessary. Quest, 48: 453-456.
  12. Erkmen G, Tekin M, Tasgın Ö. (2006). Özel İlköğretim Okullarında Öğrenim Gören Öğrencilerin Çeşitli Değişkenlere Göre Beden Eğitimi Dersi hakkındaki Tutum ve Görüşleri, Uluslar arası Spor Bilimleri Kongresi, Kasım, Muğla.
  13. Güllü, M. (2007). Ortaöğretim Öğrencilerinin Beden Eğitimi Dersine İlişkin Tutumlarının Araştırılması. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  14. Hardman K. (2007). An International Perspective Physical Education in Schools: Issues, Messages and Policy Recommendations” Uluslar arası AB-Bologna Sürecinde Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Öğretmenliği Eğitimi Sempozyumu, Canakkale.
  15. Hatten JD. (2004). Racial Differences in Student’s interest and Attitudes Toward Physical Education Considering Grade Level and Gender, Ph.D Thesis, The Florida State University.
  16. Hologlu OG. (2006). İlköğretim İkinci Kademede Öğrenim Gören Kız Öğrencilerin Beden Eğitimi Dersine Karşı Tutumları, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Uludağ Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Bursa.
  17. Hünük D and Demirhan G. (2003). İlköğretim Sekizinci Sınıf, Lise Birinci Sınıf ve Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Beden Eğitimi ve Spora İlişkin Tutumlarının Karşılaştırılması, Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 14, (4): 175-184.
  18. Koca C and Asci FH. (2006). An Examination of Self-Presentational Concern ofTurkish Adolescents: An Example of Physical Education Setting. Adolescence, 41(161): 185- 197.
  19. Morris CG. (2002). Understanding Psychology. [Psikolojiyi anlamak: Psikolojiye giriş]. (Çeviri: H.B. Ayvaşık, M. Sayıl), Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları, Ankara.
  20. Portman PA. (1995). Who is having fun in physical education classes? Experiences of six grade students in elementary and middle school. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 14: 445-453.
  21. Rikard L ve Banville D. (2006). High school student attitudes about physical education. Sport, Education and Society, 11 (4): 385-400.
  22. Solmon M and Lee A. (1996). Entry characteristics, practice variables, and cognition: student mediation of instruction. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 15: 136- 151.
  23. Solmaz B and Aydın BO. (2012). Popüler Kültür ve Spor Merkezlerine Yönelik Bir Araştırma, Gümüşhane Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(4): 67-82.
  24. Trudeau,F and Shephard RJ. (2005). Contribution of school programmes to physical activity levels and attitudes in children and adults. Sports Medicine, 35(2): 89-105
  25. United Nations, (2003). Inter-Agency Task Force on Sport for Development and Peace, Sport for Development and Peace: Towards Achieving the Millennium Development Goals,Geneva.
  26. Walhead TL, Buckworth J. (2004). The role of physical education in the promotion of youth physical activity, Quest, 56: 285-301.
  27. Yagci I. (2012). Ortaöğretim öğrencilerinin beden eğitimi dersine ilişkin tutumlarının incelenmesi (Afyonkarahisar ili örneği). Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Afyon.
  28. Chellodurai P, Chank K. (2000). Targets and Standarts of quality in sport services. Sport management review, 3: 1-22.