KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / The International Journal of Energy and Engineering Sciences / 2020 / Volume: 5 Issue: 2

AERODYNAMIC ANALYSES OF NACA 63-215

Ümit Korkmaz(GAZİANTEP ÜNİVERSİTESİ, HAVACILIK VE UZAY BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0001-6839-1587
İbrahim Göv(GAZİANTEP ÜNİVERSİTESİ, HAVACILIK VE UZAY BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-5513-0158
Mehmet Hanifi Doğru(GAZİANTEP ÜNİVERSİTESİ, HAVACILIK VE UZAY BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0001-6038-8308
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2020-10-16
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Also, flow separation was investigated at different AoA values.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, aerodynamic performance of NACA 63-215 airfoil was investigated.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Aerodynamic performance of the airfoils is changed with respect to angle of attack (AoA) values.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Also, flow separation was investigated at different AoA values.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Airfoil · Aerodynamic · CFD

Abstract

In this study, aerodynamic performance of NACA 63-215 airfoil was investigated. Aerodynamic performance of the airfoils is changed with respect to angle of attack (AoA) values. The AoA increases, the separation of the boundary layers on the upper and lower surface of the wing increases. This situation is effect on the aerodynamic performance. So aerodynamic parameters (lift coeff. and drag coeff.) at different AoA values were investigated. Also, flow separation was investigated at different AoA values.

Anahtar kelimeler
🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Korkmaz, Ü., Göv, İ., Doğru, M. H. (2020). AERODYNAMIC ANALYSES OF NACA 63-215. The International Journal of Energy and Engineering Sciences, Volume: 5 Issue: 2. https://ajindex.com/articles/1551727

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. Doğru, M. H. 2017. Investigation of Velocity Distribution and Turbulent Energy for the Different Tip Shaped Projectiles. Çukurova University Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, 32(3), 39-46.
  2. Göv İ. and Korkmaz Ü., 2016. Comparison of Aerodynamic Performance of NACA 4412 and S809 Airfoil Profile. International Mechanical Engineering and Technologies Conference.
  3. Göv, I., Dogru, M. H., & Korkmaz, U. 2019. Improvement of the aerodynamic performance of NACA 4412 using the adjustable airfoil profile during the flight. Journal of The Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 34(2), 1110-1125.
  4. Holst T. L., 1994. Computational Fluid Dynamics Uses in Fluid Dynamics/Aerodynamics Education. NASA Technical Memorandum 108834.
  5. Hossain, MD. S., Raiyan, M. F., Akanda, M. N. U., Jony, N. H. (2014). A Comparative Flow Analysis of NACA 6409 and NACA 4412 Airfoil. IJRET: International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology. 03, 342-350.
  6. Kavya G., Reddy B.C.R., 2015. Design and Finite Element Analysis of Aircraft Wing Using Ribs and Spars. International Journal & Magazine of Engineering Technology, Management and Research. 2, 11.
  7. Kumar B. S. A., Ramalingaiah, Manjunath S., Ganganna R., 2015. Computational Investigation of Flow Separation over Naca 23024 Airfoil at 6 Million Free Stream Reynolds Number. International Journal of Science, Technology and Society 3,6.
  8. Patel K.S., Patel S. B., Patel U. B., Ahuja A. P., 2014. CFD Analysis of an Aerofoil. International Journal of Engineering Research 3,3.