Dergiler / The Eurasia Proceedings of Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics / 2017 / Issue: 1

A COMPARISON OF ECHO HIDING METHODS

Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2017-11-09
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Results show that bipolar backward-forward echo kernel is more robust against compression and gives a higher SNR (Signal-to-noise ratio). 

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Echo-based data hiding algorithms are known to be very popular in audio watermarking research.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this study, several echo kernels such as single, bipolar, backward-forward, bipolar backward-forward and time-spread, which are coded in Matlab, are compared in terms of robustness against mp3 compression, imperceptibility and capacity.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Results show that bipolar backward-forward echo kernel is more robust against compression and gives a higher SNR (Signal-to-noise ratio). 
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Audio steganography · watermarking · echo hiding

Abstract

Echo-based data hiding algorithms are known to be very popular in audio watermarking research. In this study, several echo kernels such as single, bipolar, backward-forward, bipolar backward-forward and time-spread, which are coded in Matlab, are compared in terms of robustness against mp3 compression, imperceptibility and capacity. Mixer signals with sinusoidal smoothing are used to improve imperceptibility. All kernels are tested on the same audio database for a fair comparison. Importance of parameters is discussed during comparison. Results show that bipolar backward-forward echo kernel is more robust against compression and gives a higher SNR (Signal-to-noise ratio). 

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Tekeli, K., Asliyan, R. (2017). A COMPARISON OF ECHO HIDING METHODS. The Eurasia Proceedings of Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics, Issue: 1. https://ajindex.com/articles/1551674

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Anderson, R., & Petitcolas, F. (1998). On the limits of steganography. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 16(4), 474-481.
  2. Bender, W., Gruhl, D., & Morimoto, N. (1996). Techniques for data hiding. IBM Systems Journal, 35(3), 313-336.
  3. Chen, B., & Wornell, G.W. (2001). Quantization index modulation: a class of provably good methods for digital watermarking and information embedding. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 47(4), 1423-1443.
  4. Gruhl, D., Lu, A., & Bender, W. (1996). Echo hiding. Proceeding from the Information Hiding Workshop, 295-315.
  5. Kim, H.J., & Choi, Y.H. (2003). A novel echo-hiding scheme with backward and forward kernels. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 13(8), 885-889.
  6. Kirovski, D., & Malvar, H.S. (2001). Robust spread spectrum audio watermarking. Proceeding from the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 3, 1345-1348.
  7. Ko, B., Nishimura, R., & Suzuki, Y. (2005). Time-spread echo method for digital audio watermarking. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 7(2), 212-221.
  8. Oh, O.H., Seok, W.J., Hong, W.J., & Youn, H.D. (2001). New echo embedding technique for robust and imperceptible audio watermarking. Proceeding from ICASSP, 3, 1341-1344.
  9. Tekeli, K. (2017). Matlab Codes for Several Basic Audio Steganography Algorithms. Retrieved from https://github.com/ktekeli/audio-steganography-algorithms
  10. Wu, W.-C., & Chen, O. T.-C., (2006). Analysis-by-synthesis echo hiding scheme using mirrored kernels. Proceeding from IEEE International Conf on Acoustic, Speech & Signal Processing, II 325-II 328. Yeo, I.K., & Kim, H.J. (2003). Modified Patchwork Algorithm: A novel audio watermarking scheme. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 11, 381-386.