Dergiler / The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences / 2026 / Volume: 4

AN INVESTIGATION OF UNIVERSTY CHEMISTRY STUDENTS’ UNDERSTANDING OF PRECIPITATION TITRATIONS AND RELATED CONCEPTS THOROUGH VEE-DIAGRAMS

Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2016-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It was found that the students were insufficient to define some concepts such as argentometry, precipitation, back titration and indicator.  It was also concluded that the students had the calculation difficulties, especially for the back titration.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, second-year chemistry students’ understanding of essential concepts related to precipitation titration was investigated by using Vee-diagrams which are completed during the analytical laboratory course.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Three Vee-diagrams concerning three argentometric titration methods were constructed prior to the laboratory study by taking into laboratory manual by the researchers.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It was found that the students were insufficient to define some concepts such as argentometry, precipitation, back titration and indicator.  It was also concluded that the students had the calculation difficulties, especially for the back titration.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Precipitation titrations · vee-diagram · analytical chemistry laboratory

Abstract

In this study, second-year chemistry students’ understanding of essential concepts related to precipitation titration was investigated by using Vee-diagrams which are completed during the analytical laboratory course. Three Vee-diagrams concerning three argentometric titration methods were constructed prior to the laboratory study by taking into laboratory manual by the researchers. Vee- diagrams delivered to the students after completing each experiment one by one in the laboratory. Sixteen analytic chemistry students from two faculties participated in the study. It was found that the students were insufficient to define some concepts such as argentometry, precipitation, back titration and indicator.  It was also concluded that the students had the calculation difficulties, especially for the back titration.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Nakiboğlu, N., Nakiboğlu, C. (2016). AN INVESTIGATION OF UNIVERSTY CHEMISTRY STUDENTS’ UNDERSTANDING OF PRECIPITATION TITRATIONS AND RELATED CONCEPTS THOROUGH VEE-DIAGRAMS. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences, Volume: 4. https://ajindex.com/articles/1550424

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Abraham, M.R., Williamson, V.M., & Westbrook, S.L. (1994). A cross-aged study of the understanding of five chemistry concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 147165. Ault, R.C., Novak, J.D. & Gowin, D.B. (1984). Constructing ve maps for clinical interviews on molecule concepts. Science Education, 68(44), 441-462.
  2. Harvey, D. (2000). Modern analytical chemistry,Chapter 9 titrimetric methods of analysis McGraw-Hill Companies,Inc. p350-358. Nakiboğlu,C., Benlikaya, B. ve Kalın, Ş. (2002). Kimya öğretmen adaylarının “kimyasal kinetik” konusu ile ilgili yanlış kavramalarının belirlenmesinde V-diyagramlarının kulanılması. Nakiboğlu, C. ve Arık, R. (2006). 4. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin “ Gazlar” İle İlgili Kavram Yanılgılarının V-Diyagramı Kullanılarak Belirlenmesi. Yedi Tepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi EDU7, Cilt 1(2). Nakiboğlu, C., Ertem, H., Laboratuvar Yöntemi Kullanılarak 7. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Bilimsel Süreç Becerileri Düzeylerinin Belirlenmesi, Eğitimde Yeni Yönelimler-5: “Öğrenmenin Doğası Ve Değerlendirme Sempozyumu, İzmir, 2009.
  3. Nakiboğlu, C. (2003). Instructional misconceptions of Turkish prospective chemistry teachers about atomic orbitals and hybridization. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 4 (2), 171-188.
  4. Novak, J.D., & Gowin, D.B. (1984).
  5. Learning how to learn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Passmore, G.G. (1998). Using the Vee diyagrams to facilate meaningful learning and misconceptions. Radiologic Science and Education, 4(1), 11-28.
  7. Abraham, M.R., Williamson, V.M., & Westbrook, S.L. (1994). A cross-aged study of the understanding of five chemistry concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 147165. Ault, R.C., Novak, J.D. & Gowin, D.B. (1984). Constructing ve maps for clinical interviews on molecule concepts. Science Education, 68(44), 441-462.
  8. Harvey, D. (2000). Modern analytical chemistry,Chapter 9 titrimetric methods of analysis McGraw-Hill Companies,Inc. p350-358. Nakiboğlu,C., Benlikaya, B. ve Kalın, Ş. (2002). Kimya öğretmen adaylarının “kimyasal kinetik” konusu ile ilgili yanlış kavramalarının belirlenmesinde V-diyagramlarının kulanılması. Nakiboğlu, C. ve Arık, R. (2006). 4. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin “ Gazlar” İle İlgili Kavram Yanılgılarının V-Diyagramı Kullanılarak Belirlenmesi. Yedi Tepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi EDU7, Cilt 1(2). Nakiboğlu, C., Ertem, H., Laboratuvar Yöntemi Kullanılarak 7. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Bilimsel Süreç Becerileri Düzeylerinin Belirlenmesi, Eğitimde Yeni Yönelimler-5: “Öğrenmenin Doğası Ve Değerlendirme Sempozyumu, İzmir, 2009.
  9. Nakiboğlu, C. (2003). Instructional misconceptions of Turkish prospective chemistry teachers about atomic orbitals and hybridization. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 4 (2), 171-188.
  10. Novak, J.D., & Gowin, D.B. (1984).
  11. Learning how to learn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  12. Passmore, G.G. (1998). Using the Vee diyagrams to facilate meaningful learning and misconceptions. Radiologic Science and Education, 4(1), 11-28.