KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Central Bank Review / 2003 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

Macroeconomic Performance of Currency Boards in Transition Economies

İ. Anıl TALASLI
Sayfa
27–55
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

According to the currency board experiences in transition economies, it can be stated that currency boards in Estonia, Lithuania and Bulgaria brought lower inflation and higher real GDP growth to these countries relative to the pre-currency board period.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The link between the exchange rate regime and macroeconomic performance has always been'a debatable issue in international economics.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This paper takes a critical look at this debate by focusing on the relative macroeconomic performance of currency boards against other exchange rate regimes in transition economies.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:According to the currency board experiences in transition economies, it can be stated that currency boards in Estonia, Lithuania and Bulgaria brought lower inflation and higher real GDP growth to these countries relative to the pre-currency board period.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:performans · performance

Abstract

The link between the exchange rate regime and macroeconomic performance has always been'a debatable issue in international economics. This paper takes a critical look at this debate by focusing on the relative macroeconomic performance of currency boards against other exchange rate regimes in transition economies. The empirical findings of this paper show that, relative to floating regimes, currency boards in transition economies are associated with lower inflation and higher real GDP percapita growth. Additionally, transition economies with currency boards experience higher real GDP per-capita growth compared to both pegged and floating regimes. According to the currency board experiences in transition economies, it can be stated that currency boards in Estonia, Lithuania and Bulgaria brought lower inflation and higher real GDP growth to these countries relative to the pre-currency board period.

Anahtar kelimeler
🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TALASLI, İ. A. (2003). Macroeconomic Performance of Currency Boards in Transition Economies. Central Bank Review, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 27–55. https://ajindex.com/articles/154585

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (4)

  1. Aizenman, J. 1991.
  2. Foreign Direct Investment, Productive Capacity and Exchange Rate Regimes. NBER Working Paper No. 3767. Balino, T., Enoch, C, Ize, A., Santiprabhob, V. and Stella, P. 1997. Currency Board Arrangements: Issues and Experiences. IMF Occasional Paper 151. Bennett, A. 1994. Currency Boards: Issues and Experiences. IMF Paper on Policy Analysis and Assessment 94/18. Berg, A., Borensztein, E., Sahay, R. and Zettelmeyer, J. 1999. The Evolution of Output in Transition in Central and Eastern Europe. IMF Working Paper 99/73. Christoffersen, P. and Doyle P. 1998. From Inflation to Growth: Eight Years of Transition. IMF Working Paper 98/100, Washington, DC. Domaç, İ., Peters, K. and Yuzefovich, Y. (2001), Does the Exchange Rate Regime affect Macroeconomic Performance? Evidence from Transition Economies, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series, No. 2642. Edwards, S. 1993. Exchange Rates as Nominal Anchors. Weltwirtschaftliches Archtv 129(l):l-32. -------- 1996. The Determinants of the Choice Between Fixed and Flexible Exchange Rate Regimes.NBER Working Paper No. 5756. Enoch, C. and Gulde, A-M. 1998. Are Currency Boards a Cure for All Monetary Problems?. Finance and Development, 35(4): 40-43.
  3. Fisher, S., Sahay, R. and Verg, C. 1996. Stabilization and Growth in Transition Economies: The Early Experience. Journal of Economic Perspective 10(2):45-66.
  4. Ghosh A., Gulde, A-M., Ostry, J. and Wolf, H.C. 1996. Does the Nominal Exchange Rate Regime Matter for Inflation and Growth. IMF Economic Issues Series No.2, September. -------- 1997. Does the Nominal Exchange Rate Regime Matter. NBER Working Paper No. 5874. Ghosh A., Pesenti P. 1994. Real Effects of Nominal Exchange Rate Regimes. IGIER Working Paper. Ghosh, A., Guide, A-M. and Wolf, H.C. 1998. Currency Boards: The Ultimate Fix?. IMF Working Paper WP/98/8, January. -------- 2000. Currency Boards: More than a Quick Fix?. Economic Policy Vol. 31, October, pp. 271-335. -------- 2002. Exchange Rate Regimes: Classification and Consequences, London School of Economics, Centre for Economic Performance, unpublished manuscript. Gulde, A-M., Kahkönen, J. and Keller, P. 2000. Pros and Cons of Currency Board Arrangements in the Lead-Up to EU Accession and Participation in the Euro Zone. IMF Policy Discussion Paper PDP/00/1. Haan, J. de, Berger, H. and Fraassen, E. van 2001. How to Reduce Inflation: An Independent Central Bank or A Currency Board: The Experience of the Baltic Countries. LICOS Discussion Papers 96/20