Dergiler / EKEV Akademi Dergisi / 2019 / Sayı: 80

ATTITUDES OF TEACHERS TOWARDS L1 USE IN ENGLISH CLASSROOM IN THE CONTEXTS OF TURKEY AND KYRGYZSTAN

Sayfa
57–71
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Results also suggest that limited and judicious use of L1 can be served as a facilitating tool to improve TL proficiency.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In an attempt to achieve perfect English language proficiency, all learners face the same issue: the inevitable use of their L1 in an English classroom.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Various studies have identified different attitudes and reasons for teachers’ and students’ L1 use in English classroom.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Results also suggest that limited and judicious use of L1 can be served as a facilitating tool to improve TL proficiency.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Attitudes · L1 (Turkish and Kyrgyz) · TL (English)

Abstract

In an attempt to achieve perfect English language proficiency, all learners face the same issue: the inevitable use of their L1 in an English classroom. Various studies have identified different attitudes and reasons for teachers’ and students’ L1 use in English classroom. The aim of this paper is to identify teachers’ attitude towards L1 use and reveal the reason for their particular attitude through the use of the open-ended questionnaires. Teachers’ attitude was distinguished in terms of teachers’ and students’ L1 use. Apart from that teachers’ questionnaires attempted to identify activities that are best carried out through L1 and TL. As this study comprises teachers from universities of Turkey and Kyrgyzstan the difference between their attitudes has been also investigated. Qualitative data obtained from the questionnaires was collected, coded and analyzed with the help of the NVivo12 software program. The research findings revealed that overall attitude of teachers towards their own use of L1 is positive. However substantial difference has been observed between the attitudes of Turkish and Kyrgyz teachers. Results obtained from teachers’ survey revealed that majority of teachers from Turkish context tend to have positive attitude with regard to teachers’ L1 employment than their Kyrgyz colleagues. Moreover no considerable difference has been observed in terms of the teachers’ attitude towards students’ L1 use. Similarly no substantial difference has been observed between the attitudes of Turkish and Kyrgyz teachers towards students’ use of L1. Finally, activities best carried out through L1 and TL based on the teachers’ view have been listed and discussed. Research findings also revealed that teachers and students employed L1 mainly for pedagogical reasons. Results also suggest that limited and judicious use of L1 can be served as a facilitating tool to improve TL proficiency.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AKULOVA, B. (2019). ATTITUDES OF TEACHERS TOWARDS L1 USE IN ENGLISH CLASSROOM IN THE CONTEXTS OF TURKEY AND KYRGYZSTAN. EKEV Akademi Dergisi, Sayı: 80, 57–71. https://ajindex.com/articles/154235

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (2)

  1. Alshammari,M.M.(2011).The use ofthemothertongue in SaudiEFLclassrooms. Journal of International Education Research, 7(4), 95-102. https://doi.org/10.19030/jier. v7i4.6055 Amorim, R. (2012). Code switching in student-student interaction; functions and reasons! Revista de Estudos Linguísticos da Univerdade do Porto, 7, 177 – 195. Atkinson, D. (1987). The Mother tongue in the classroom: A neglected resource? ELT Journal, 41(4), 241-247. Retrieved January 29, 2015, from https://academic. oup.com/eltj/article-abstract/41/4/241/356996?redirectedFrom=fulltext Auerbach, E. R. (1993). Re-examining English Only in the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 27(1), 9-32. doi:10.2307/3586949 Çelik, S. (2008). Opening the door: An examination of Mother Tongue use in Foreign Language classrooms. Hacetepe University Journal of Education, 34, 75-85. Retrieved January 9, 2015, from https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/288549269_Opening_the_door_An_examination_of_mother_ tongue_use_in_foreign_language_classrooms Clyne, M., & Sharifian, F (2008). English as an international language: Challenges and possibilities. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 31(3), 28.1-28.16. doi: 10.2104/aral0828. Cook, V. (1999). Teachers of English to speakers of other languages. TESOL Quarterly, 33(2), 185-209. Retrieved April 18, 2019, from http://www.jstor.org/ stable/3587717 Hall, G., & Cook, G. (2012). Own-language use in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 45(03), 271-308. doi: 10.1017/S0261444812000067 Jingxia, L. (2010). Teachers’ Code-Switching to the L1 in EFL classroom. The Open Applied Linguistics Journal, 3, 10-23. Retrieved January, 9, 2015, from https:// benthamopen.com/contents/pdf/TOALJ/TOALJ-3-10.pdf Kim, Y., & Petraki, E. (2009). Students’ and Teachers’ Use of and Attitudes to L1 in the EFL Classroom. The Asian EFL Journal, 11(4), 59-89. Laufer,B,. & Shmueli, K.(1997). Memorizing NewWords: DoesTeaching HaveAnything To Do With It? RELC Journal, 28(89). doi: 10.1177/003368829702800106 Mahmutoğlu, H., & Kıcır, Z. (2013). The Use of Mother Tongue in EFLClassrooms. EUL Journal of Social Sciences, 4(1), 49-72.
  2. Miles, R. (2004). Evaluating the use of L1 in the English Language classroom. (Unpublished Master’s thesis, School of Humanities of the University of Birmingham). Retrieved April 25, 2015, from https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/ documents/collegeartslaw/cels/essays/matefltesldissertations/milesdiss.pdf Murakami, I. (2001, November). The 'Bridging strategy': Active u