KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Osmaniye Korkut Ata Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 3

Güvenlik İklimi ve Güvenlik Performansı Arasındaki İlişkide Örgütsel Bağlılık ve Güvenlik Motivasyonunun Aracılık Rollerinin İncelenmesi: Elektrik Sektörü Çalışanları Üzerine Bir İnceleme

Examining The Mediating Roles of Organizational Commitment and Safety Motivation in The Relationship Between Safety Climate and Safety Performance: A Study on Electricity Sector Employees

Hamdi Emre Bağıran(İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi)0000-0003-2395-9700
Reşit Erçetin(İSTANBUL AYDIN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-0432-6393
Sayfa
1610–1634
Yayın Tarihi
2026-06-16
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Örgütsel bağlılık ile güvenlik performansı arasında doğrudan bir ilişki bulunmazken, güvenlik motivasyonu aracılığıyla dolaylı bir etkisi tespit edilmiştir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışma, güvenlik iklimi, örgütsel bağlılık, güvenlik motivasyonu ve güvenlik performansı arasındaki ilişkileri incelemeyi ve örgütsel bağlılığın bu ilişkilerdeki aracılık rolünü değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Araştırmanın örneklemini Türkiye’de elektrik iletim ve dağıtım sektöründe görev yapan 455 çalışan oluşturmaktadır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Örgütsel bağlılık ile güvenlik performansı arasında doğrudan bir ilişki bulunmazken, güvenlik motivasyonu aracılığıyla dolaylı bir etkisi tespit edilmiştir.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Güvenlik İklimi · Güvenlik Motivasyonu · Güvenlik Performansı

Özet

Bu çalışma, güvenlik iklimi, örgütsel bağlılık, güvenlik motivasyonu ve güvenlik performansı arasındaki ilişkileri incelemeyi ve örgütsel bağlılığın bu ilişkilerdeki aracılık rolünü değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Araştırmanın örneklemini Türkiye’de elektrik iletim ve dağıtım sektöründe görev yapan 455 çalışan oluşturmaktadır. Veriler yapısal eşitlik modellemesi (YEM) yöntemiyle analiz edilmiş; alt boyutlar arasındaki ilişkiler korelasyon ve yol analizleriyle test edilmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda, güvenlik ikliminin hem güvenlik motivasyonu hem de güvenlik performansı üzerinde doğrudan ve dolaylı etkileri olduğu, ayrıca güvenlik motivasyonunun güvenlik performansı üzerindeki belirleyici rolü ortaya konmuştur. Örgütsel bağlılık ile güvenlik performansı arasında doğrudan bir ilişki bulunmazken, güvenlik motivasyonu aracılığıyla dolaylı bir etkisi tespit edilmiştir. Bu çalışma, iş sağlığı ve güvenliği alanına sektörel düzeyde ampirik katkı sunarken, örgütsel faktörlerin güvenli davranışlar üzerindeki etkisine dair literatürdeki boşlukları da doldurmayı hedeflemektedir.

Abstract

This study aims to examine the relationships between safety climate, organizational commitment, safety motivation, and safety performance, and to assess whether organizational commitment plays a mediating role in these relationships. The research sample consists of 455 employees working in the electricity transmission and distribution sector in Türkiye. Data were analysed using structural equation modelling (SEM), and the relationships among sub-dimensions were tested through correlation and path analysis. Findings indicate that safety climate has both direct and indirect effects on safety motivation and safety performance, while safety motivation plays a key role in enhancing performance. Although no direct effect was found between organizational commitment and safety performance, an indirect relationship was identified through safety motivation. This study provides sector-specific empirical insights into the connection between occupational safety and organizational factors, contributing to the literature by addressing existing gaps in understanding how organizational variables influence safety behaviours in high-risk industries.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Bağıran, H. E., Erçetin, R. (2026). Güvenlik İklimi ve Güvenlik Performansı Arasındaki İlişkide Örgütsel Bağlılık ve Güvenlik Motivasyonunun Aracılık Rollerinin İncelenmesi: Elektrik Sektörü Çalışanları Üzerine Bir İnceleme. Osmaniye Korkut Ata Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 3, 1610–1634. https://doi.org/10.47495/okufbed.1807382

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (74)

  1. Al-Madi FN., Assal H., Shrafat F., Zeglat D. The impact of employee motivation on organizational commitment. European Journal of Business and Management 2017; 9(15): 134-145.
  2. Alruqi WM., Hallowell MR., Techera U. Safety climate dimensions and their relationship to construction safety performance: a meta-analytic review. Safety Science 2018; 109: 165-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.05.019
  3. Amdan S., Rahman RA., Shahid SAM., Bakar SA., Khir MM., Demong NAR. The role of extrinsic motivation on the relationship between office environment and organisational commitment. Procedia Economics and Finance 2016; 37: 164-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30108-3
  4. Arzahan ISN., Ismail Z., Yasin SM. Safety culture, safety climate, and safety performance in healthcare facilities: a systematic review. Safety Science 2022; 147: 105624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105624
  5. Beus JM., Payne SC., Bergman ME., Arthur Jr W. Safety climate and injuries: an examination of theoretical and empirical relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology 2010; 95(4): 713-727. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019164
  6. Bilge H., Bal V., Gönlügür A. İçsel-dışsal motivasyon ile örgütsel bağlılık arasındaki ilişkinin araştırılması. Maliye Finans Yazıları 2015; 1(104): 83-104.
  7. Braunger P., Korunka C., Kubicek B., Frank H., Lueger M. The perspective of safety engineers on safety climate. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries 2015; 25(2): 198-210. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20538
  8. Brondino M., Silva SA., Pasini M. Multilevel approach to organizational and group safety climate and safety performance: co-workers as the missing link. Safety Science 2012; 50(9): 1847-1856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2012.04.010
  9. Brown SP., Leigh TW. A new look at psychological climate and its relationship to job involvement, effort, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 1996; 81(4): 358-366.
  10. Bunner J., Prem R., Korunka C. How work intensification relates to organization-level safety performance: the mediating roles of safety climate, safety motivation, and safety knowledge. Frontiers in Psychology 2018; 9(2575). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02575
  11. Burke MJ., Sarpy SA., Tesluk PE., Smith‐Crowe K. General safety performance: a test of a grounded theoretical model. Personnel Psychology 2002; 55(2): 429-457. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00116.x
  12. Caldwell DF., Chatman JA., O'Reilly CA. Building organizational commitment: a multifirm study. Journal of Occupational Psychology 1990; 63(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00525.x Cevahir E. SPSS ile nicel veri analizi rehberi. İstanbul: Kibele Yayınları; 2020.
  13. Chen CF., Chen SC. Measuring the effects of safety management system practices, morality leadership and self-efficacy on pilots’ safety behaviors: Safety motivation as a mediator. Safety Science 2014; 62: 376-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.09.013
  14. Choudhry RM., Fang D., Lingard H. Measuring safety climate of a construction company. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 2009; 135(9): 890-899. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000063
  15. Christian MS., Bradley JC., Wallace JC., Burke MJ. Workplace safety: a meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. Journal of Applied Psychology 2009; 94(5): 1103-1127. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016172
  16. Clarke S. An integrative model of safety climate: linking psychological climate and work attitudes to individual safety outcomes using meta‐analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 2010; 83(3): 553-578. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X452122
  17. Comrey A., Lee H. A first course in factor analysis. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Psychology Press; 2013.
  18. Dağlı A., Elçiçek Z., Han B. Örgütsel bağlılık ölçeği’nin Türkçeye uyarlanması: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 2018; 17(68): 1765-1777. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.445932
  19. Dejoy DM., Della LJ., Vandenberg RJ., Wilson MG. Making work safer: testing a model of social exchange and safety management. Journal of Safety Research 2010; 41(2): 163-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2010.02.001
  20. Dong RK., Li X., Roxas Hernan, B. Psychological safety and psychosocial safety climate in workplace: a bibliometric analysis and systematic review towards a research agenda. Journal of Safety Research 2024; 91: 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2024.08.001
  21. Dönmez D. Predicting job performance through personal factors: the mediating role of safety motivation and safety performance. Middle East Technical University The Graduate School of Social Sciences Master Thesis, Ankara, Türkiye, 2019.
  22. ELDER (Elektrik Dağıtım Hizmetleri Derneği). Türkiye’de elektrik dağıtım sektöründe kaza kök neden analizi ve nedensellik ilişkisi final raporu 2020. Website: https://www.elder.org.tr/ebulten/elder-ebrd-final-raporu-tr.pdf (Accessed on: April 10, 2025)
  23. ELDER (Elektrik dağıtım hizmetleri derneği). Sektör Raporu 2023. Website: https://www.elder.org.tr/Content/files/df7e73fd-07f2-4e84-b386-c846ecb499fa.pdf (Accessed on: April 10, 2025)
  24. Ge Y. An assessment of safety climate, job satisfaction and turnover intention relationships using a national sample of workers from the United States. Journal of Safety Research 2020; 74: 233–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2020.06.011
  25. Griffin MA., Neal A. Perceptions of safety at work: a framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 2000; 5(3): 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1037//1076-8998.5.3.347
  26. Guo BH., Yiu TW., González VA. Predicting safety behavior in the construction industry: development and test of an integrative model. Safety Science 2016; 84: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.11.020
  27. Haslam C., O’hara J., Kazi A., Twumasi R., Haslam R. Proactive occupational safety and health management: promoting good health and good business. Safety Science 2016; 81: 99-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.06.010
  28. Hedlund A., Åteg M., Andersson M., Rosén G. Assessing motivation for work environment improvements: internal consistency, reliability and factorial structure. Journal of Safety Research 2010; 41(2): 145-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2009.12.005
  29. Hedlund A., Gummesson K., Rydell A., Andersson M. Safety motivation at work: evaluation of changes from six interventions. Safety Science 2016; 82: 155-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.09.006
  30. Hon CK., Chan AP., Yam MC. Relationships between safety climate and safety performance of building repair, maintenance, minor alteration, and addition (RMAA) works. Safety Science 2014; 65: 10-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.12.012
  31. Hwang-Bo J. The effects of emotional burnout and empowerment, and organizational commitment on cooperation behavior and safety behavior: focus on railway controllers and railway engineers. Journal of The Korean Society for Railway 2013; 16(5): 430-438. https://doi.org/10.7782/JKSR.2013.16.5.430
  32. Jiang L., Probst TM. Transformational and passive leadership as cross-level moderators of the relationships between safety knowledge, safety motivation, and safety participation. Journal of Safety Research 2016; 57: 27-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2016.03.002
  33. Kalteh HO., Mortazavi SB., Mohammadi E., Salesi M. The relationship between safety culture and safety climate and safety performance: a systematic review. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics 2021; 27(1): 206–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2018.1556976
  34. Kargün S., Koç H. İşgörenlerin motivasyon düzeylerinin örgütsel bağlılık ve iş performansı üzerine etkileri: konaklama işletmelerinde bir inceleme. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi 2021; 13(4): 3786-3800. https://doi.org/10.20491/isarder.2021.1356
  35. Karimpour S., Jahani F., Shirali GA. The relationship between safety attitude and safety performance in the petrochemical industry: the mediating role of safety climate. Work 2021; 68(2): 507-517. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-203353
  36. Ko J., Jang H., Kim SY. The effect of corporate social responsibility recognition on organisational commitment in global freight forwarders. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics 2021; 37(2): 117-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2020.12.005
  37. Lallemand C. Contributions of participatory ergonomics to the improvement of safety culture in an industrial context. Work 2012; 41(Supplement 1): 3284-3290. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2012-0595-3284
  38. Lee YJ., Lee IC., Lin CL. The effects of employees’ satisfaction and leadership styles on organizational performance: organizational commitment as a dual mediator. Asian Journal of Empirical Research 2014; 4(2): 104-124.
  39. Li Y., Griffin MA. Safety behaviors and job satisfaction during the pandemic: the mediating roles of uncertainty and managerial commitment. Journal of Safety Research 2022; 80: 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2022.05.008
  40. Liu S., Yang X., Mei Q. The effect of perceived organizational support for safety and organizational commitment on employee safety behavior: a meta-analysis. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics 2020: 27(4): 1154-1165. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/10803548.2019.1694778
  41. Lu Y., Taksa L., Jia H. Influence of management practices on safety performance: the case of mining sector in China. Safety Science 2020; 132: 104947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104947
  42. Luo T. Safety climate: current status of the research and future prospects. Journal of Safety Science and Resilience 2020; 1(2): 106-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnlssr.2020.09.001
  43. Maneechaeye P., Potipiroon W. The impact of fleet-level and organization-level safety climates on safety behavior among Thai civilian pilots: the role of safety motivation. Safety Science 2022; 147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105614
  44. Mearns K., Hope L., Ford MT., Tetrick LE. Investment in workforce health: exploring the implications for workforce safety climate and commitment. Accident Analysis & Prevention 2010; 42(5): 1445-1454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.08.009
  45. Mengenci C., Gökçe SG., Kutanis RÖ., Emhan A. İş güvenliğinin geliştirilmesi ve yerleştirilmesinde iş memnuniyeti ve örgütsel bağlılığın önemi: havacılık sektöründe bir uygulama. Uluslararası Yönetim ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi 2019; 6(11): 85-102. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.31334.88646
  46. Meyer JP., Allen NJ., Smith CA. Commitment to organizations and occupations: extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology 1993; 78(4): 538-551. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.538
  47. Michael JH., Evans DD., Jansen KJ., Haight JM. Management commitment to safety as organizational support: relationships with non-safety outcomes in wood manufacturing employees. Journal of Safety Research 2005; 36(2): 171-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2005.03.002
  48. Nahrgang JD., Morgeson FP., Hofmann DA. Safety at work: a meta-analytic investigation of the link between job demands, job resources, burnout, engagement, and safety outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology 2011; 96(1): 71-94. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021484
  49. Neal A., Griffin MA. Safety climate and safety behaviour. Australian Journal of Management 2002; 2(1_suppl): 67-75. https://doi.org/10.1177/031289620202701S08
  50. Neal A., Griffin MA. A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior and accidents at the individual and group levels. Journal of Applied Psychology 2006; 91(4): 946-953. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.946
  51. Neal A., Griffin MA., Hart PM. The impact of organizational climate on safety climate and individual behavior. Safety Science 2000; 34(1-3): 99-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00008-4
  52. Örücü E., Tokyay M., Hasırcı I. İş motivasyonu-örgütsel bağlılık ilişkisi: bir alan araştırması. Akademik Hassasiyetler 2022; 9(8): 177-198.
  53. Paparisabet M., Jalalpour AH., Farahi F., Gholami Z., Shaygani F., Jalili N., Rashid Beigi, S., Marzaleh MA., Elyaderani HD. Investigating the organizational commitment and its associated factors among the staff of the health sector: a cross-sectional research. BMC Health Services Research 2023; 24: 1373. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913- 024-11893-1
  54. Parker SK., Axtell CM., Turner N. Designing a safer workplace: importance of job autonomy, communication quality, and supportive supervisors. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 2001; 6(3): 211-228.
  55. Peker M., Doğru OC., Meşe G. Role of supervisor behavioral integrity for safety in the relationship between top-management safety climate, safety motivation, and safety performance. Safety and Health at Work 2022; 13(2): 192-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2022.03.006
  56. Putra PS., Wijayanti R., Hadiwidjojo D. The effect of safety knowledge and workplace safety climate on safety performance with safety behavior as a mediator: a study on operations worker of Pindad. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science 2022; 11(3): 112-119. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i3.1705
  57. Rodríguez-Fernández M., Herrera J., de Las Heras-Rosas C., Ciruela-Lorenzo AM. Practical implications of the organizational commitment model in healthcare: the case of nurses. Journal of Nursing Management 2024; 1: 6455398. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/6455398
  58. Sakallı AE., Temur S., Badem M., Karataş E. Güvenlik ikliminin güvenlik performansına olan etkisi: Türkiye’deki çalışanlar arasında bir çalışma. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi 2022; 33: 93-106. https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.1023484
  59. Syed-Yahya SNN., Idris MA., Noblet AJ. The relationship between safety climate and safety performance: a review. Journal of Safety Research 2022; 83: 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2022.08.008
  60. Tabachnick BG., Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 5th ed. New York, NY: Pearson; 2007.
  61. TEİAŞ (Türkiye Elektrik İletim Anonim Şirketi). TEİAŞ Faaliyet Raporu 2023. Website: https://www.teias.gov.tr/faaliyet-raporlari (Last Access: 10.04.2025)
  62. Türen U., Gökmen Y., Tokmak İ., Bekmezci M. Güvenlik iklimi ölçeği'nin geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik çalışması. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 2014; 19(4): 171-190.
  63. Vinodkumar MN., Bhasi M. Safety management practices and safety behaviour: assessing the mediating role of safety knowledge and motivation. Accident Analysis & Prevention 2010; 42(6): 2082-2093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.06.021
  64. Wang D., Mao W., Zhao C., Wang F., Hu Y. The cross-level effect of team safety-specific transformational leadership on workplace safety behavior: the serial mediating role of team safety climate and team safety motivation. Journal of Safety Research 2023; 87: 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2023.05.001
  65. Wen Lim H., Li N., Fang D., Wu C. Impact of safety climate on types of safety motivation and performance: multigroup invariance analysis. Journal of Management in Engineering 2018; 34(3). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000595
  66. Wu TC., Chen CH., Li CC. A correlation among safety leadership, safety climate and safety performance. Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries 2008; 21(3): 307-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2007.11.001
  67. Xi Y., Hu S., Yang Z., Fu S., Weng J. Analysis of safety climate effect on individual safety consciousness creation and safety behaviour improvement in shipping operations. Maritime Policy & Management 2023; 50(7): 941–956. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2022.2059718
  68. Xia N., Xie Q., Hu X., Wang X., Meng H. A dual perspective on risk perception and its effect on safety behavior: a moderated mediation model of safety motivation, and supervisor’s and coworkers’ safety climate. Accident Analysis & Prevention 2020; 134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.105350
  69. Xia N., Ding S., Zhai F., Xia M. Sharing psychological safety climate at the group level among construction workers: the roles of group identification and interactional justice. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 2025; 151(5): 04025038. https://doi.org/10.1061/jcemd4.coeng-14933
  70. Yasım YK., Işık U. Taşeron işçilerin örgütsel bağlılık ile duygusal emekleri arasındaki ilişkide güvenlik ikliminin aracılık rolü: kamu hastaneleri örneği. Çalışma ve Toplum 2020; 1(64): 147-168.
  71. Yılmaz M., Vardarlıer P. Motivasyon araçlarının örgütsel bağlılık üzerine etkisi: perakende sektörü çalışanlarına yönelik bir araştırma. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal 2021; 9(4): 1347-1365. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v9i4.1900
  72. Yin C., Zhao G., Li Y. Impact of job control on hospital workers' safety performance: a moderated mediation analysis of the influences of hospital safety climate and social support. Nursing Open 2022; 9(1): 781–789. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1345
  73. Zhao W., Li S. How does psychosocial safety climate affect safety behavior in the construction industry? A cross-level analysis. Frontiers in Public Health 2024; 12: 1473449. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1473449
  74. Zohar D., Huang YH., Lee J., Robertson MM. Testing extrinsic and intrinsic motivation as explanatory variables for the safety climate–safety performance relationship among long-haul truck drivers. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 2015; 30: 84-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2015.01.014