KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2

Kent Güvenliği Bağlamında Çatışma Teorilerinin İncelenmesi

Exploring Conflict Theories in the Context of Urban Security

Omar Abdi Jimale(NECMETTIN ERBAKAN UNIVERSITY, INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES)0000-0002-6043-7250
Esra Banu Sipahi(NECMETTIN ERBAKAN UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF POLITICAL SCIENCES)0000-0001-6277-8027
Sayfa
165–185
Yayın Tarihi
2023-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The study's contribution to the literature is its thorough examination and analysis of different conflict theories and how they relate to urban security, shedding light on the complex interplay and interaction of race, inequality, discourse, power and colonialism in shaping urban security outcomes.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Until today, urban security has been studied from various theoretical perspectives, indicating its cruciality and complexity.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:However, there is a gap in understanding how conflict theories relate to urban security, particularly how structural injustice and inequalities shape its outcome and determine its consequences.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The study's contribution to the literature is its thorough examination and analysis of different conflict theories and how they relate to urban security, shedding light on the complex interplay and interaction of race, inequality, discourse, power and colonialism in shaping urban security outcomes.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Urban Security · Conflict Theories · Inequality

Özet

Until today, urban security has been studied from various theoretical perspectives, indicating its cruciality and complexity. However, there is a gap in understanding how conflict theories relate to urban security, particularly how structural injustice and inequalities shape its outcome and determine its consequences. This study will explore the significance of conflict theories and how they contribute to understanding the complex issue of urban security. By using conflict theories, the study focuses on the role of power, gender inequalities and capitalist structures in determining and shaping social structures and relations. According to the study, traditional approaches related to urban security became insufficient. Hence, conflict theories propose alternative solutions that can provide a more thorough understanding of the urban security issue. The study's contribution to the literature is its thorough examination and analysis of different conflict theories and how they relate to urban security, shedding light on the complex interplay and interaction of race, inequality, discourse, power and colonialism in shaping urban security outcomes.

Abstract

Until today, urban security has been studied from various theoretical perspectives, indicating its cruciality and complexity. However, there is a gap in understanding how conflict theories relate to urban security, particularly how structural injustice and inequalities shape its outcome and determine its consequences. This study explores the significance of conflict theories and how they contribute to understanding the complex issue of urban security. Using conflict theories, this study focuses on the role of power, gender inequalities, and capitalist structures in determining and shaping social structures and relations. According to the study, traditional approaches related to urban security have become insufficient. Hence, conflict theories propose alternative solutions that can provide a more thorough understanding of urban security issues. The study’s contribution to the literature is its thorough examination and analysis of different conflict theories and how they relate to urban security, shedding light on the complex interplay and interaction of race, inequality, discourse, power, and colonialism in shaping urban security outcomes. This study opens the door to empirical, comparative, and interdisciplinary studies that will contribute to conflict theories on urban security. In addition, it emphasizes the importance of analyzing governance structures, institutions, and longitudinal data to establish effective interventions and policies in urban security.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Jimale, O. A., Sipahi, E. B. (2023). Kent Güvenliği Bağlamında Çatışma Teorilerinin İncelenmesi. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2, 165–185. https://ajindex.com/articles/1532323

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (20)

  1. Abraham, S. (2008). What Does Mumbai Have to Do with Rome? Postcolonial Perspectives on Globalization and Theology. Theological Studies, 69(2), 376–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/004056390806900208
  2. Adeniyi Ogunyankin, G. (2019a). Postcolonial Approaches to the Study of African Politics. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.830
  3. Allan, J. V., Kenway, S. J., & Head, B. W. (2021). Urban water security priorities – an Australian industry perspective. Water Supply, 21(2), 710–722. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2020.348
  4. Allan, J., Kenway, S., & Head, B. (2018). Urban water security - what does it mean?. Urban Water Journal, 15(9), 899-910. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062x.2019.1574843
  5. Benna, U., & Benna, I. (2018). Revisiting Urban Theories. In E-Planning and Collaboration (pp. 279–300). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5646-6.ch013
  6. Bernstein, J. M. (2017). Horkheimer, Max (1895–1973). In Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780415249126-N073-1
  7. Bohm, r. M. (1982). Radical criminology: an explication. Criminology, 19(4), 565–589. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1982.tb00439.x
  8. Busbridge, R. (2021). Postcolonial Political Theory. In Political Science. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199756223-0334
  9. Çakmak, C. (2015). Suçu Açiklayan Sosyo-Ekonomik Temelli Yaklaşimlar. International Journal of Political Science Researches, 1(1), 1–49.
  10. Carpenter, R. C. (2006). Recognizing gender-based violence against civilian men and boys in conflict situations. Security Dialogue, 37(1), 83-103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010606064139
  11. Ceccato, V. (2021). Crime and Safety in Rural Contexts: Innovative Methods. International Criminal Justice Review, 31(4), 365–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/10575677211041941
  12. Chao, Y.-H. (2022). Critical Criminology: Past, Present, and Future. Contemporary Challenges: The Global Crime, Justice and Security Journal, 3, 28–44. https://doi.org/10.2218/ccj.v3.7032
  13. Chase-Dunn, C., & Grell-Brisk, M. (2019). World-System Theory. In International Relations. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199743292-0272
  14. Cheng, T., & Chen, T. (2021). Urban Crime and Security (pp. 213–228). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8983-6_14
  15. Churruca Muguruza, C. (2017). Human Security as a policy framework: Critics and Challenges. Deusto Journal of Human Rights, 4, 15–35. https://doi.org/10.18543/aahdh-4-2007pp15-35
  16. Cohen, S. (2019). Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 48(1), 29-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094306118815499a
  17. Cole, M. (2017). Critical Race Theory and Education. Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95079-9
  18. Copson, L. (2013). Towards a utopian criminology. Crime, Critique and Utopia, 114-135. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137009807_7
  19. Cvjetkovic, M. (2015). David Harvey’s contribution to urban sociology. Zbornik Matice Srpske Za Drustvene Nauke, 150, 157–169. https://doi.org/10.2298/ZMSDN1550157C
  20. d’Amour, C. B., Reitsma, F., Baiocchi, G., Barthel, S., Güneralp, B., Erb, K., … & Seto, K. C. (2016). Future urban land expansion and implications for global croplands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(34), 8939-8944. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1606036114