KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / MSGSÜ Sosyal Bilimler / 2026 / Cilt: 1 Sayı: 23

Experiences of Teachers Regarding School Leadership: A Case Study

Sakine Sincer(HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, YABANCI DİLLER YÜKSEKOKULU)0000-0001-8929-3652
Murat Özdemir(HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-1166-6831
Sayfa
176–200
Yayın Tarihi
2021-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Lastly, teachers’ opinions about the effects of experiences and perceptions regarding administrator’s leadership fall under three themes; task, school-context and adaptation performance.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:School administrators’ leadership affects how much schools reach their goals besides teachers.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A case study design was adopted in this study, whose study group included 16 public school teachers in 2020-2021 academic year.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Lastly, teachers’ opinions about the effects of experiences and perceptions regarding administrator’s leadership fall under three themes; task, school-context and adaptation performance.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2020-2021 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Leadership · school administrators · teachers’ experiences and perceptions

Abstract

School administrators’ leadership affects how much schools reach their goals besides teachers. Literature review shows many studies addressing school leaders’ impact on teachers. However, there are few studies on how teachers perceive administrators’ leadership and how this affects their psychological world. This study aims at exploring how teachers perceive their experiences with school leaders. A case study design was adopted in this study, whose study group included 16 public school teachers in 2020-2021 academic year. The data were analysed via content analysis. The results show participants’ views on their experiences regarding administrators’ leadership fall under six themes; vision, environmental analysis, unconventional behaviour, personal risk, sensitivity and institutionalization. Teachers’ opinions on their experiences about administrators’ leadership fall under three themes; feelings towards school administrator, colleagues and students. Lastly, teachers’ opinions about the effects of experiences and perceptions regarding administrator’s leadership fall under three themes; task, school-context and adaptation performance.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Sincer, S., Özdemir, M. (2021). Experiences of Teachers Regarding School Leadership: A Case Study. MSGSÜ Sosyal Bilimler, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 23, 176–200. https://ajindex.com/articles/1529753

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (102)

  1. Adepoju, T. L., & Akinwumi, F. S. (2001). Location of secondary schools as a factor in determining academic performance of students. Ibadan Journal of Educational Studies, 1(2), 410-420.
  2. Ayık, A., & Şayir, G. (2014). Okul müdürlerin öğretimsel liderlik davranışları ile örgüt iklimi arasındaki ilişki. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 13(49), 253-279.
  3. Akca, M. (2020). Girişimcilikten girişimci liderliğe. International Anatolia Academic Online Journal Social Sciences Journal, 6(2), 80-89.
  4. Akcakoca, A., & Bilgin, K. U. (2016). Okul müdürlerinin liderlik stilleri ve öğretmen performansı. Çağdaş Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(2), 1-23.
  5. Aksel, N., & Elma, C. (2018). Ortaokul müdürlerinin dönüşümcü liderlik davranışları ile öğretmenlerin motivasyonu arasındaki ilişki. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(3), 1252-1268.
  6. Allen, N., Grigsby, B., & Peters, M. L. (2015). Does leadership matter? Examining the relationship among transformational leadership, school climate, and student achievement. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 10(2), 1-22.
  7. Aslan, M., & Bakır, A. A. (2015). Okullarda paylaşılan liderlik ve örgütsel bağlılık etkileşimi: Nitel bir çalışma. Electronic International Journal of Education, Arts, and Science, 1(2), 1-30.
  8. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1990). Developing transformational leadership: 1992 and beyond. Journal of European Industrial Training 14(5), 21-27.
  9. Berkovich, I., & Eyal, O. (2019). School leaders’ emotional support of teachers through emotional transformation: Qualitative insights into the maintenance of teachers’ occupational identity. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 1-15.
  10. Black, G. L. (2010). Correlational analysis of servant leadership and school climate. Journal of Catholic Education, 13(4), 437-466. doi: 10.15365/joce.1304032013
  11. Bogler, R. (2001). The influence of leadership style on teacher job satisfaction. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(5), 662-683. doi: 10.1177/00131610121969460
  12. Brown, L., & Iyengar, S. (2008). Parenting styles: The impact on student achievement. Marriage & Family Review, 43(1-2), 14-38. doi: 10.1080/01494920802010140
  13. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2011). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. (10. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  14. Can, N. (2006). Öğretmen liderliğinin geliştirilmesinde müdürün rol ve stratejileri. Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 1(21), 349-363.
  15. Cansoy, R., & Parlar, H. (2018). Examining the relationship between school principals’ instructional leadership behaviours, teacher self-efficacy, and collective teacher efficacy. International Journal of Educational Management, 32(4), 550-567. doi: 10.1108/IJEM-04-2017-0089
  16. Cantaş, C., & Kavas, E. (2015). Ortaokullarda görev yapan öğretmenlerin örgütlerine duydukları güvenin motivasyonları üzerindeki etkileri: Afyonkarahisar ili uygulaması. Journal of International SocialResearch, 8(41), 920-932.
  17. Cemaloğlu, N. (2007). Okul yöneticilerinin liderlik stillerinin farklı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 5(1), 73-112.
  18. Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1987). Toward a behavioural theory of charismatic leadership in organizational settings. Academy of Management Review, 12(4), 637-647. doi: 10.5465/amr.1987.4306715
  19. Conger, J. A., &Kanungo, R. N. (1988). Charismatic Leadership: The Elusive Factor in Organizational Effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  20. Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1994). Charismatic leadership in organizations: Perceived behavioural attributes and their measurement. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 15(5), 439-452. doi: 10.1002/job.4030150508
  21. Creswell, J.W. & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design. (5th edition). London: Sage Publications.
  22. Cruickshank, V. (2017). The influence of school leadership on student outcomes. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 5(9), 115-123. doi: 10.4236/jss.2017.59009.
  23. Çelikten, M. (2003). Okul kültürünün şekillendirilmesinde müdürün rolleri. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(4), 0-0.
  24. Çetin, Ş., Korkmaz, M., & Çakmakçı, C. (2012). Dönüşümsel ve etkileşimsel liderlik ile liderüye etkileşiminin öğretmenlerin örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı üzerindeki etkisi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 1(1), 7-36.
  25. Day, C., Sammons, P., Hopkins, D., Harris, A., Leithwood, K., Gu, Q.,. & Kington, A. (2009). The impact of school leadership on pupil outcomes. Final report.
  26. deMarrais, K. (2014). Qualitative interview studies: Learning through experience. In
  27. K. deMarrais & S.D. Lapan (Eds.). Foundations for Research (p. 51-68). Mahvvah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  28. Demir, S. (2019). Okul yöneticisi motivasyonel dilinin lider-üye etkileşimindeki rolü üzerine yapısal eşitlik modellemesi. Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 39(1), 431-456.
  29. Demirbilek, N. (2018). Okul müdürlerinin kayırmacı davranışlarının öğretmenlerin örgütsel adalet algıları ile müdüre güvene etkisi. (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). İnönü Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Malatya.
  30. Dumay, X., & Galand, B. (2012). The multilevel impact of transformational leadership on teacher commitment: Cognitive and motivational pathways. British Educational Research Journal, 38(5), 703-729. doi: 10.1080/01411926.2011.577889
  31. Durnalı, M. (2019). Ortaokul öğretmenlerinin görüşlerine göre okul müdürlerinin sergilediği teknolojik liderlik davranış düzeyi. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi, 12(2), 401-430. doi: 10.30831/akukeg.449484
  32. Easen, P., & Bolden, D. (2005). Location, location, location: what do league tables really tell us about primary schools?. Education 3-13, 33(3), 49-55. doi: 10.1080/03004270585200341
  33. Eyal, O., & Roth, G. (2011). Principals' leadership and teachers' motivation: selfdetermination theory analysis. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(3), 256-275. doi.org/10.1108/09578231111129055
  34. Finnigan, K. S. (2010). Principal leadership and teacher motivation under high-stakes accountability policies. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9(2), 161-189. doi: 10.1080/15700760903216174
  35. Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (1996). Educational Research. White Plains, NY: Longman Publishers.
  36. Gallagher, S. (2012). What Is Phenomenology? London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  37. Gerras, S. J., Clark, M., Allen, C., Keegan, T., Meinhart, R., Wong, L.,. & Reed, G. (2010). Strategic Leadership Primer. Carlisle Barracks: Army War College.
  38. Glesne, C. (2013). Nitel Araştırmaya Giriş. (2. Baskı). (Çev. Ali Ersoy-Pelin Yalçınoğlu). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
  39. Greenleaf, R. K. (1979). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. Business Horizons, 22(3), 91-92.
  40. Greenwald, R., Hedges, L. V., & Laine, R. D. (1996). The effect of school resources on student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 66(3), 361-396. doi: 10.3102/00346543066003361
  41. Griffith, J. (1999). The school leadership/school climate relation: Identification of school configurations associated with change in principals. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(2), 267-291. doi: 10.1177/00131619921968545
  42. Gronn, P. (1996). From transactions to transformations: a new world order in the study of leadership?. Educational Management & Administration, 24(1), 7-30. doi: 10.1177/0263211X96241002
  43. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1982). Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. ECTJ, 30(4), 233-252.
  44. Güler, A., Halıcıoğlu, M.B., & Taşğın, S. (2015). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma. Ankara: Seçkin Yayınları.
  45. Hallinger, P., Bickman, L., & Davis, K. (1996). School context, principal leadership, and student reading achievement. The Elementary School Journal, 96(5), 527-549.
  46. Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1985). Assessing the instructional management behaviour of principals. The Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 217-247.
  47. Handford, V., & Leithwood, K. (2013). Why teachers trust school leaders. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(2), 194-212. doi: 10.1108/09578231311304706
  48. Harris, A. (2005). Distributed leadership. In Brent Davies (Ed.), The Essentials of School Leadership (160-172). London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
  49. Hara, S. R., & Burke, D. J. (1998). Parent involvement: The key to improved student achievement. School Community Journal, 8(2), 9-19.
  50. Hanushek, E. A. (1996). School resources and student performance. IN Gary Burtless (Ed.), Does Money Matter? The Effect of School Resources on Student Achievement and Adult Success (43-73). Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
  51. Hanushek, E. A. (2006). School resources. Handbook of the Economics of Education, 2, 865-908. doi: 10.1016/S1574-0692(06)02014-9
  52. Harris, A., & Goodall, J. (2008). Do parents know they matter? Engaging all parents in learning. Educational research, 50(3), 277-289. doi: 10.1080/00131880802309424
  53. Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, P. (2009). Assessing the contribution of distributed leadership to school improvement and growth in math achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 659-689. doi: 10.3102/0002831209340042
  54. Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, P. (2010). Collaborative leadership effects on school improvement: Integrating unidirectional-and reciprocal-effects models. The Elementary School Journal, 111(2), 226-252.
  55. Houser, J. (2016). Nursing Research: Reading, Using and Creating Evidence. Burlington: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
  56. Ireland, R. D., & Hitt, M. A. (1999). Achieving and maintaining strategic competitiveness in the 21st century: The role of strategic leadership. Academy of Management Perspectives, 13(1), 43-57. doi: 10.5465/ame.1999.1567311
  57. İşginöz, R., & Bülbül, T. (2012). Okulda diyalog: Okul yönetiminin rolü. Eğitim Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(1), 125-146.
  58. Kara, E. (2018). Örgütlerde stratejik liderliğin önemi üzerine bir araştırma. International Journal of Disciplines Economics & Administrative Sciences Studies, 4(9), 423-436.
  59. Keller, T. (1999). Images of the familiar: Individual differences and implicit leadership theories. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(4), 589-607. doi: 10.1016/S1048-9843(99)00033-8
  60. Kelley, R. C., Thornton, B., & Daugherty, R. (2005). Relationships between measures of leadership and school climate. Educatıon-Indıanapolıs Then Chula Vısta, 126(1), 1-7.
  61. Koçak, S., & Özdemir, M. (2019). Examining teachers’ opinions on social justice leadership. Journal of Human Sciences, 16(4), 1164-1179. doi: 10.14687/jhs.v16i4.5871
  62. Korkmaz, M. (2005). Duyguların ve liderlik stillerinin öğretmenlerin performansı üzerinde etkisi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 43(43), 401-422.
  63. Köybaşı, F., Beycioğlu, K., Uğurlu, C. T., & Özer, N. (2017). Müdürlerin okul liderliği davranışları: Öğretimsel destek, ilişki ve açıklık düzeyleri. Bayburt Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(24), 781-808.
  64. Krefting, L. (1991). Rigor in qualitative research: The assessment of trustworthiness. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(3), 214-222. doi: 10.5014/ajot.45.3.214
  65. Kurland, H., Peretz, H., & Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (2010). Leadership style and organizational learning: The mediate effect of school vision. Journal of Educational administration, 48(1), 7-30. doi: 10.1108/09578231011015395
  66. Kurt, B. (2013). İlkokul ve ortaokul yöneticilerinin öğretim liderliği davranışlarının öğretmen motivasyonuna etkisi. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Marmara Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
  67. Leithwood, K. (1994). Leadership for school restructuring. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30(4), 498-518. doi: 10.1177/0013161X94030004006
  68. Ling, S., & Ling, M. (2012). The influence of transformational leadership on teacher commitment towards organization, teaching profession, and student learning in secondary schools in Miri, Sarawak, Malaysia. Educare, 4(2), 155-178. doi: 10.2121/edu-ijes.v4i2.254
  69. Liu, S., & Hallinger, P. (2018a). Principal instructional leadership, teacher self-efficacy, and teacher professional learning in China: Testing a mediated-effects model. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(4), 501-528. doi: 10.1177/0013161X18769048
  70. Liu, S., & Hallinger, P. (2018b). Teacher development in rural China: how ineffective school leadership fails to make a difference. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 21(6), 633- 650. doi: 10.1080/13603124.2017.1294266
  71. Mast, M. S., Jonas, K., Cronauer, C. K., & Darioly, A. (2012). On the importance of the superior's interpersonal sensitivity for good leadership. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(5), 1043- 1068. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00852.x
  72. McCarley, T. A., Peters, M. L., & Decman, J. M. (2016). Transformational leadership related to school climate: A multi-level analysis. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(2), 322-342. doi: 10.1177/1741143214549966
  73. McMillan, J.H. (2000). Educational Research: Fundamentals for The Consumer. USA: Longman. Meriam, S.B. (1998). Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. Revised and Expanded Form. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  74. Miles, M, B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  75. Mulford, B. (2013). Successful school leadership for improved student outcomes: capacity building and synergy. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 1(1), 7-32. doi: 10.4471/ijelm.2013.01
  76. Ninković, S. R., & Knežević Florić, O. Č. (2018). Transformational school leadership and teacher self-efficacy as predictors of perceived collective teacher efficacy. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(1), 49-64. doi: 10.1177/1741143216665842
  77. Nir, A. E., & Hameiri, L. (2014). School principals’ leadership style and school outcomes. Journal of Educational Administration, 52(2), 210-227. doi: 10.1108/JEA-01-2013-0007
  78. Normianti, H., Aslamiah, A., & Suhaimi, S. (2019). Relationship of transformational leaders of principal, teacher motivation, teacher organization commitments with performance of primary school teachers in Labuan Amas Selatan, Indonesia. European Journal of Education Studies, 5(11), 123-141. doi: 10.46827/ejes.v0i0.2308
  79. OECD. (2005). School factors related to quality and equity: Results from PISA 2000. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
  80. Özdemir, M. (2017). Sosyal adalet liderliği, okula yönelik tutum ve okul bağlılığı arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 42(191), 267-281. doi: 10.15390/EB.2017.6281
  81. Özdemir, M., & Demircioğlu, E. (2015). Distributed leadership and contract relations: Evidence from Turkish high schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(6), 918-938. doi: 10.1177/1741143214543207
  82. Özdemir, M., & Pektaş, V. (2017). Sosyal adalet liderliği ve okul akademik iyimserliği ilişkisinin öğretmen görüşlerine göre incelenmesi. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 18(2), 576-601. doi: 10.12984/egeefd.328458
  83. Özdemir, M., & Pektaş, V.(2020) Conger-Kanungo karizmatik liderlik ölçeğinin türk kültürüne uyarlama çalışması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2(1), 2-18.
  84. Özdemir, M., & Yirmibeş, A. (2016). Okullarda liderlik ekibi uyumu ve öğretmen performansı ilişkisinde iş doyumunun aracı etkisi. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 36(2), 323-348.
  85. Özdemir, M. (2018). Liderlik yönelimi ve politik beceri arasındaki ilişkinin okul müdürlerinin görüşlerine göre incelenmesi. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 19(1), 116-134. doi: 10.12984/egeefd.347616
  86. Özer, N., & Çağlayan, Z. A. (2016). Öğretmenlerin müdürlerine duydukları güven ve kronizm algıları arasındaki ilişki. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 3(5), 16-27.
  87. Özgenel, M., & Aktaş, A. (2020). Okul müdürlerinin liderlik stillerinin öğretmen performansına etkisi. Uluslararası Liderlik Çalışmaları Dergisi: Kuram ve Uygulama, 3(2), 1-18.
  88. Paşa, Ö., & Negiş Işık, A. (2017). Öğretmenlerin okul müdürüne güven düzeyleri ve okul müdürü tarafından sergilenen etik liderlik davranışlarının örgütsel sessizlik üzerindeki etkisi. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 16(60), 134-144.
  89. Robinson, V. (2007). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: Making sense of the evidence. Australian Council for Educational Research Archive, 11-16.
  90. Ross, J. A., & Gray, P. (2006). School leadership and student achievement: The mediating effects of teacher beliefs. Canadian Journal of Education/Revue canadienne de l'éducation, 798-822. doi: 10.2307/20054196
  91. Shernoff, E. S., Mehta, T. G., Atkins, M. S., Torf, R., & Spencer, J. (2011). A qualitative study of the sources and impact of stress among urban teachers. School Mental Health, 3(2), 59-69. doi: 10.1007/s12310-011-9051-z
  92. Silins, H. C., Mulford, W. R., & Zarins, S. (2002). Organizational learning and school change. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(5), 613-642. Doi: 10.1177/0013161X02239641
  93. Şentürk, C., & Sağnak, M. (2012). İlköğretim okulu müdürlerinin liderlik davranışları ile okul iklimi arasındaki ilişki. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 10(1), 29-43.
  94. Şimşek, H., & Yıldırım, A. (2016). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  95. Tahaoğlu, F., & Gedikoğlu, T. (2009). İlköğretim okulu müdürlerinin liderlik rolleri. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 15(2), 274-298.
  96. Tek, B. A. (2014). An investigation of the relationship between school leadership, teacher job satisfaction, and student achievement. (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer
  97. Yeşilyurt, R. (2015). Okul müdürlerinin etkileşimci liderlik stilleri ile öğretmenlerin okula bağlılık düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Eskişehir.
  98. Yıldız, T., & Aykanat, Z. (2016). Karizmatik liderlik ve örgütsel yenilikçilik ilişkisi üzerine bir araştırma. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, 11(2), 198-228.
  99. Yılmaz, A., & Ceylan, Ç. B. (2011). İlköğretim okul yöneticilerinin liderlik davranış düzeyleri ile öğretmenlerin iş doyumu ilişkisi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 2(2), 277-394.
  100. Yin, R. K. (2017). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. CA: Sage publications.
  101. Day, C., Sammons, P., Hopkins, D., Harris, A., Leithwood, K., Gu, Q.,. & Kington, A. (2009). The impact of school leadership on pupil outcomes. Final report.
  102. Gerras, S. J., Clark, M., Allen, C., Keegan, T., Meinhart, R., Wong, L.,. & Reed, G. (2010). Strategic Leadership Primer. Carlisle Barracks: Army War College.