KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / MetaZihin: Yapay Zeka ve Zihin Felsefesi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1

IQ Testleri ve Bilimsel Irkçılık

IQ Tests and Scientific Racism

Gökhan Akbay(CYPRUS INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-1062-8793
Sayfa
1–24
Yayın Tarihi
2024-09-01
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Makalede, bu varsayımlar eleştirilecektir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışmada ABD’deki IQ test hareketinin siyasi etkileri ve dayandığı teorik temel incelenecektir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:İlk IQ testinin ABD’de İngilizceye çevrilmesinden hemen sonra, bu testler, 1924 göç yasası gibi ırkçı ve ayrımcı politikalara alet edilmiştir. 1996’daki Sosyal Güvenlik Reformu da bu eğilimin bir başka örneğidir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Makalede, bu varsayımlar eleştirilecektir.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:genel zekâ · genetik · ırkçılık

Özet

Bu çalışmada ABD’deki IQ test hareketinin siyasi etkileri ve dayandığı teorik temel incelenecektir. İlk IQ testinin ABD’de İngilizceye çevrilmesinden hemen sonra, bu testler, 1924 göç yasası gibi ırkçı ve ayrımcı politikalara alet edilmiştir. 1996’daki Sosyal Güvenlik Reformu da bu eğilimin bir başka örneğidir. IQ test hareketinin ırkçı ve ayrımcı yönleri, alandaki önemli figürlerin savunduğu kalıtımcı teoriye dayanmanın yanında, ABD’de halen etkili olan ırkçı politik fikirlerden de etkilenmiştir. Bilimsel ırkçılık ise kalıtımcı teorinin, bireyleri kıyaslamanın ötesine geçen ve tüm “ırkları” tek bir sürekli ölçek üzerinde sıralayan bir yan dalıdır. Böyle bir fikrin geçerliliği, tek bir ölçeğin zekâyı yansıtabileceği, zekânın büyük ölçüde genetik olarak belirlendiği ve ırk kavramının biyolojik bir gerçekliğe denk düştüğü varsayımına dayanır. Makalede, bu varsayımlar eleştirilecektir.

Abstract

In this study, the political impacts and the theoretical roots of IQ testing movement in the US will be examined. Just after the first translation of the first IQ test into English in the US, it became an instrument of racist and discriminatory policies, such as the immigration act of 1924. The Welfare Reform of the 1996 was another instance of this trend. Racist and discriminatory aspects of IQ testing movement rely heavily on the hereditarian theory defended by most of the prominent figures in the movement, besides being influenced by the racist political ideas still strong in the US. Scientific racism is an offshoot of the hereditarian theory, which goes beyond comparing individuals, and ranks entire “races” on a continuous scale of intelligence. The feasibility of this idea depends on certain assumptions, such as that a single measure can represent intelligence, that it is genetically determined, and that the concept of race corresponds to a biological reality. These assumptions will be challenged in the paper.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Akbay, G. (2024). IQ Testleri ve Bilimsel Irkçılık. MetaZihin: Yapay Zeka ve Zihin Felsefesi Dergisi, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.51404/metazihin.1481555

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (49)

  1. ABD Kongre Kaydı-Senato. (1924, 8 Nisan). Cilt 65. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  2. APA Dictionary of Psychology. (2024, 26 Mart). Alındığı URL: https://dictionary.apa.org/
  3. Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1980). The development of intelligence in children. Nashville, Tenn: Williams Printing Co.
  4. Brigham, C. C. (1923). A Study of American Intelligence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  5. Brigham, C. C. (1930). “Intelligence Tests of Immigrant Groups.” Psychological Review, 37(2): 158–165. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0072570
  6. Broder, J. M. (1994, 22 Ekim). “Clinton Rejects Racially Based Theory on IQs”. Los Angeles Times. Alındığı URL: https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1994-10-22-mn-53249-story.html
  7. Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. (1995). The Great Human Diasporas: The History of Diversity and Evolution. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley.
  8. Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. (2000). Genes, peoples, and languages (1st ed.). New York: North Point Press.
  9. Chamlin, M. B., & Denney, J. E. (2019). “An Impact Assessment of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996.” Journal of Crime and Justice, 42(4): 382–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2019.1580603
  10. Coolidge, C. (1921). “Whose country is This?” Good Housekeeping, 72(2): 13–14, 109. Alındığı URL: https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015024014428&seq=179
  11. Davenport, C. B. (1915). “The Feebly Inhibited. II. Nomadism or the Wandering Impulse, with Special Reference to Heredity.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1(2): 120–122. Alındığı URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/83917
  12. Eysenck, H. J. (1973). The Inequality of Man. London: Temple Smith.
  13. Fisher, R. A. (1919). XV.—The Correlation between Relatives on the Supposition of Mendelian Inheritance. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 52(2), 399–433. Cambridge Core. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0080456800012163
  14. Gillette, A. (2007). Eugenics and the Nature-nurture Debate in the Twentieth Century. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  15. Goddard, H. H. (1912). The Kallikak Family: A Study in the Heredity of Feeble-Mindedness. Alındığı URL: https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/53958/pg53958-images.html
  16. Goddard, H. H. (1920). Human efficiency and levels of intelligence, lectures delivered at Princeton University April 7,8,10,11, 1919. Princeton: Princeton University Press
  17. Gould, S. J. (1996). The mismeasure of man (Rev. and expanded.). New York: W.W. Norton.
  18. Hearnshaw, L. S. (1979). Cyril Burt, Psychologist. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  19. Herrnstein, R. (1971). “I.Q.” The Atlantic. Alındığı URL: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1971/09/iq/664713/
  20. Herrnstein, R. J. (1990). “Still an American Dilemma.” The Public Interest, 98(98): 3–17. Alındığı URL: https://www.nationalaffairs.com/public_interest/detail/still-an-american-dilemma
  21. Herrnstein, R. J. & Murray, C. A. (1994). The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life. New York: Free Press.
  22. Howe, M. J. A. (1997). IQ in Question the Truth About İntelligence. London: SAGE.
  23. Jensen, A. R. (1969). “How Much Can We Boost IQ and Scholastic Achievement? Harvard Educational Review, 39(1): 1–123. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.39.1.l3u15956627424k7
  24. Kaufman, A. S. (2009). IQ testing 101. New York: Springer Pub. Co.
  25. Kevles, D. J. (1986). In the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  26. Lawrence, E. M. (1931). An Investigation into the Relation Between Intelligence and Inheritance. Cambridge: The University Press.
  27. Layzer, D. (1974). Heritability Analyses of IQ Scores: Science or Numerology? Science, 183(4131): 1259–1266. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.183.4131.1259
  28. Lewontin, R. C. (1974). “Annotation: The Analysis of Variance and the Analysis of Causes.” American Journal of Human Genetics, 26(3): 400–411. Alındığı URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1762622/
  29. Lewontin, R. C., Rose, S. P. R. & Kamin, L. J. (1984). Not in Our Genes: Biology, Ideology, and Human Nature. New York: Pantheon Books.
  30. Lynn, R. & Vanhanen, T. (2002). IQ and the Wealth of Nations. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.
  31. Lynn, R. (2006). Race Differences in Intelligence: An Evolutionary Analysis. Augusta, GA: Washington Summit Publishers.
  32. Mackintosh, N. J. (1998). IQ and human intelligence. Oxford University Press.
  33. Miele, F. (2019). Intelligence, Race, And Genetics: Conversations with Arthur R. Jensen. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429499753
  34. Murray, C. A. (1984). Losing ground: American social policy, 1950-1980. New York: Basic Books.
  35. Panofsky, A., Dasgupta, K. & Iturriaga, N. (2021). “How White Nationalists Mobilize Genetics: From Genetic Ancestry and Human Biodiversity to Counterscience and Metapolitics.” American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 175(2): 387–398. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.24150
  36. Prifitera, A., Saklofske, D. H., & Weiss, L. G. (Der.) (2005). WISC-IV Clinical Use and İnterpretation Scientist-Practitioner Perspectives (1st ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press.
  37. Reynolds, C. R. & Livingston, R. B. (2012). Mastering Modern Psychological Testing: Theory & Methods (1st ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
  38. Richardson, K. (2000). The Making of Intelligence. New York: Columbia University Press.
  39. Rushton, J. Philippe. (1994). Race, Evolution, and Behavior: A Life History Perspective. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
  40. Saini, A. (2019). Superior: The return of race science. Boston: Beacon Press.
  41. Sarkar, S. (1998). Genetics and Reductionism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  42. Snyderman, M., & Herrnstein, R. J. (1983). “Intelligence tests and the Immigration Act of 1924.” The American Psychologist, 38(9): 986–995. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.38.9.986
  43. Spearman, C. (1904). “’General Intelligence,’ Objectively Determined and Measured.” The American Journal of Psychology, 15(2): 201–292. https://doi.org/10.2307/1412107
  44. Spearman, C. (1927). The Abilities of Man; Their Nature and Measurement. New York: The Macmillan Company.
  45. Templeton, A. R. (2013). “Biological Races in Humans.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 44(3): 262–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2013.04.010
  46. Terman, L. M. (1916a). The Measurement of İntelligence: An Explanation of and a Complete Guide for the Use of the Stanford Revision and Extension of the Binet-Simon İntelligence Scale. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
  47. Terman, L. M. (1916b). “The Binet Scale and the Diagnosis of Feeble-Mindedness.” Journal of the American Institute of Criminal Law and Criminology, 7(4): 530–543. https://doi.org/10.2307/1133997
  48. Terman, L. M. (1919). The İntelligence of School Children: How Children Differ in Ability, The Use of Mental Tests in School Grading and the Proper Education of Exceptional Children. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
  49. “Zekâ.” (2024, 8 Mart). TDK Güncel Türkçe Sözlük. Alındığı URL: https://sozluk.gov.tr/?kelime=zekâ.