Dergiler / E Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4

Aortic Stiffness Index and Aortic Distensibility Measured by Echocardiography May Help to Improve the Equivocal Results of Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy

Sayfa
189–198
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The equivocal group had similar number of patients with abnormal ASI compared to the normal group (p=0.262) while it had statistically a lower number of patients with abnormal ASI than the ischemia group (p<0.001) Conclusion: However, aortic stiffness and aortic AD indexes alone cannot diagnose coronary artery disease (CAD), but may help to discriminate patients with CAD from those without CAD whose MPS results are equivocal.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) is a well-established method for diagnosing coronary artery disease and risk stratification of individuals with chest pain.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:However, while MPS has high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of significant coronary artery disease, it has some drawbacks due to several technical difficulties.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The equivocal group had similar number of patients with abnormal ASI compared to the normal group (p=0.262) while it had statistically a lower number of patients with abnormal ASI than the ischemia group (p<0.001) Conclusion: However, aortic stiffness and aortic AD indexes alone cannot diagnose coronary artery disease (CAD), but may help to discriminate patients with CAD from those without CAD whose MPS results are equivocal.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2013 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objectives: Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) is a well-established method for diagnosing coronary artery disease and risk stratification of individuals with chest pain. However, while MPS has high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of significant coronary artery disease, it has some drawbacks due to several technical difficulties. We suggest that aortic stiffness indexes measured by echocardiography, which is a well-known marker of atherosclerotic burden, may improve the equivocal test results obtained in MPS. Materials and Methods: We prospectively enrolled 149 consecutive patients between the ages of 18 and 65 years without any previous cardiovascular disease with suspected coronary artery disease, who had undergone both SPECT MPS using Technetium-99m-sestamibi (99mTc MIBI) and transthoracic echocardiography between November 2013 and June 2014. Subjects were divided into three categories according to MPS results as normal, equivocal and ischemic groups. Results: Aortic stiffness index (ASI) and aortic distensibility (AD) of the normal and equivocal groups were similar, and the ischemic group had higher ASI values compared to the normal and equivocal groups. The equivocal group had statistically lower ASI and higher AD values compared to the ischemia group (p 3.05 was accepted as abnormal, the frequency of abnormal ASI in the normal, equivocal, and ischemia groups were 11%, 19%, and 98%, respectively. The equivocal group had similar number of patients with abnormal ASI compared to the normal group (p=0.262) while it had statistically a lower number of patients with abnormal ASI than the ischemia group (p<0.001) Conclusion: However, aortic stiffness and aortic AD indexes alone cannot diagnose coronary artery disease (CAD), but may help to discriminate patients with CAD from those without CAD whose MPS results are equivocal.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

EDE, H., KARAÇAVUŞ, S., VURGUN, V. K., TURAN, Y., GÜLTEKİN, S. S., ERBAY, A. R. (2019). Aortic Stiffness Index and Aortic Distensibility Measured by Echocardiography May Help to Improve the Equivocal Results of Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy. E Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4, 189–198. https://ajindex.com/articles/152845

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Fihn SD, Gardin JM, Abrams J, et al. American College of Cardiology Foundation. 2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation 2012
  2. Pakkal M, Raj V, McCann GP. Non-invasive imaging in coronary artery disease including anatomical and functional evaluation of ischaemia and viability assessment. Br J Radiol 2011
  3. S280-95. 3. Melikian N, De Bondt P, Tonino P, et al. Fractional Flow Reserve and Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Patients With Angiographic Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010
  4. Berman D, Kang X, Slomka P, et al. Underestimation of extent of ischemia by gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with left main coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol 2007
  5. DePuey EG. Artifacts Caused by and Clarified by Gated Myocardial Perfusion SPECT. Clinical Gated Cardiac SPECT: Blackwell Publishing. p. 173-187. 6. Ben-Haim S, Almukhailed O, Neill J, et al. Clinical value of supine and upright myocardial perfusion imaging in obese patients using the D-SPECT camera. J Nucl Cardiol 2014
  6. Karacavus S, Kula M, Oguzhan A, et al. A comparison between quantitative gated myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and strain echocardiography as indicators of ventricular functions in patients with anterior myocardial infarction. World J Nucl Med 2014
  7. Worden NE, Lindower PD, Burns TL, Chatterjee K, Weiss RM. A second look with prone SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging reduces the need for angiography in patients at low risk for cardiac death or MI. J Nucl Cardiol 2015
  8. Janić M, Lunder M, Šabovič M. Arterial Stiffness and Cardiovascular Therapy. Biomed Res Int 2014
  9. Liu C-S, Li C-I, Shih C-M, et al. Arterial Stiffness Measured as Pulse Wave Velocity is Highly Correlated with Coronary Atherosclerosis in Asymptomatic Patients. J Atheroscler Thromb 2011
  10. Coutinho T, Bailey KR, Turner ST, Kullo IJ. Arterial stiffness is associated with increase in blood pressure over time in treated hypertensives. J