KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Manas Journal of Agriculture Veterinary and Life Sciences / 2026 / Cilt: 13 Sayı: 1

Domates Yetiştiriciliğinde Tuz Stresinin Olumsuz Etkilerine Karşı Kitosan Uygulaması

Chitosan Application Against the Negative Effects of Salt Stress in Tomato Cultivation

Hüseyin Bulut(ERZİNCAN BİNALİ YILDIRIM ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SAĞLIK YÜKSEKOKULU)0000-0003-3424-7012
Halil İbrahim Öztürk(ERZİNCAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-8977-0831
Sayfa
31–39
Yayın Tarihi
2023-07-01
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Tuz stresi için uygulanan kitosanın anlamlı derecede SOD, CAT ve MDA enzim seviyelerini etkilediği tespit edilmiştir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Küresel düzeyde meydana gelen iklim değişiklikleri, savaşlar, nüfus artışı, tarım arazilerindeki azalma gibi nedenlere toprak tuzluluğu da eklenince üretim verimliliği giderek önem kazanmıştır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Tuzluluk bitki gelişmesini önemli derecede etkilemektedir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Tuz stresi için uygulanan kitosanın anlamlı derecede SOD, CAT ve MDA enzim seviyelerini etkilediği tespit edilmiştir.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Abiyotik stres · CAT · MDA

Özet

Küresel düzeyde meydana gelen iklim değişiklikleri, savaşlar, nüfus artışı, tarım arazilerindeki azalma gibi nedenlere toprak tuzluluğu da eklenince üretim verimliliği giderek önem kazanmıştır. Tuzluluk bitki gelişmesini önemli derecede etkilemektedir. Bundan dolayı bu konuda çalışmalar yoğunlaşmıştır. Bitki gelişimini tuz stresinden korumak için organik çözümlere odaklanılmıştır. Bu çalışmada domates fidelerinde tuz stresini hafifletmek için kitosan biyopolimeri uygulanmıştır. Tuz stresine karşı bitki savunma refleksleri Süperoksit Dismutaz (SOD), Katalaz (CAT) ve Malondialdehit (MDA) enzim seviyelerindeki değişim ile incelenmiştir. Tuz stresi için uygulanan kitosanın anlamlı derecede SOD, CAT ve MDA enzim seviyelerini etkilediği tespit edilmiştir. Kitosanın abiyotik streslerden korunmak için kullanışlı ve makul bir araç olduğu ifade edilebilir. Ayrıca enzim değerlerinin bitkilerde strese neden olan etkenlerin tespitinde ve bitkisel yanıt mekanizmalarının aydınlatılmasında kullanışlı olduğu belirlenmiştir.

Abstract

Production efficiency has become increasingly important when soil salinity is added to causes such as climate changes, wars, population growth, and a decrease in agricultural lands. Salinity significantly affects plant growth. Therefore, studies on this subject have intensified. Organic solutions are focused on protecting plant growth from salt stress. In this study, chitosan biopolymer was applied to alleviate salt stress in tomato seedlings. Plant defense reflexes against salt stress were investigated by changes in the enzyme levels of Superoxide Dismutase (SOD), Catalase (CAT), and Malondialdehyde (MDA). It was determined that chitosan applied for salt stress significantly affected SOD, CAT, and MDA enzyme levels. It can be stated that chitosan is a valuable and reasonable tool for protection from abiotic stresses. In addition, it has been determined that enzyme values are helpful in determining the factors that cause stress in plants and in elucidating the vegetative response mechanisms.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Bulut, H., Öztürk, H. İ. (2023). Domates Yetiştiriciliğinde Tuz Stresinin Olumsuz Etkilerine Karşı Kitosan Uygulaması. Manas Journal of Agriculture Veterinary and Life Sciences, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 1, 31–39. https://doi.org/10.53518/mjavl.1288502

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (49)

  1. Aebi, H. (1984). B. Isolation, purification, characterization, and assay of antioxygenic enzymes, Catalase in vitro. Methods in Enzymology, 105, 121-126
  2. Ahmad, P., Alyemeni, M. N., Abass Ahanger, M., Wijaya, L., Alam, P., Kumar, A. ve Ashraf, M. (2018). Upregulation of antioxidant and glyoxalase systems mitigates NaCl stress in Brassica juncea by supplementation of zinc and calcium. J. Plant Interact., 13 (x), pp. 151-162, Doi: 10.1080/17429145.2018.1441452
  3. Alcázar, R., Bueno, M. ve Tiburcio, A. F. (2020). Polyamines: small amines with large effects on plant abiotic stress tolerance. Cells, 9, p. 2373, doi: 10.3390/CELLS9112373
  4. Amri, S. M. (2013). Improved growth, productivity and quality of tomato plants through application of skimmic acid. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 20, pp. 339-345
  5. Asim, A., Gökçe, Z. N. Ö., Bakhsh, A., Çayli, İ. T., Aksoy, E., Çalişkan, S., Çalişkan, M. E. ve Demirel, U. (2021). Individual and combined effect of drought and heat stresses in contrasting potato cultivars overexpressing miR172b-3p. Turk J. Agric., 45, 651-668, doi: 10.3906/tar-2103-60
  6. Beauchamp, C. ve Fridovich, I. (1971) Superoxide Dismutase: Improved Assays and an Assay Applicable to Acrylamide Gels. Analytical Biochemistry, 44, 276-287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(71)90370-8
  7. Buetter, C. L., Specht, C. A. ve Levitz, S. M. (2013). Innate sensing of chitin and chitosan. PLOS Pathogens, 9, Article e1003080
  8. Bulut, H. (2020). Arpada Tuz Stresine Karşı Zingeronun Koruyucu Etkisi. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 10 (4), 2932-2942. DOI: 10.21597/jist.686577
  9. Chaudhry, U. K., Gökçe, Z. N. ve Gökçe, A. F. (2020). Effects of salinity and drought stresses on the physio- morphological attributes of onion cultivars at bulbification stage. Int. J. Agric. Biol., 24, 1681-1689, doi:10.17957/IJAB/15.1611
  10. Chen, D., Shao, Q., Yin, L., Younis ve A., Zheng, B. (2019). Polyamine function in plants: Metabolism, regulation on development, and roles in abiotic stress responses. Front. Plant Sci., 9, 1945, doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.01945
  11. Colman, S. L., Salcedo, M. F., Mansilla, A. Y., Iglesias, M. J., Fiol, D. F., Saldana, S. M., …, ve Casalongue, C. A. (2019). Chitosan microparticles improve tomato seedling biomass and modulate hormonal, redox and defense pathways. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 143, pp. 203-211
  12. Demirel, U., Morris, W. L., Ducreux, L. J., Yavuz, C., Asim, A., Tindas, I., Campbell, R., Morris, J. A., Verrall, S. R., Hedley, P. E. ve Gokce, Z. N. (2020). Physiological, biochemical, and transcriptional responses to single and combined abiotic stress in stress-tolerant and stress-sensitive potato genotypes. Front. Plant Sci., 11 (), p. 169
  13. Du, Z. ve Bramlage. W. J. (1992). Modified thiobarbituric acid assay for measuring lipid oxidation in sugar-rich plant tissue extracts. J. Agric. Food Chem., 40, pp. 1566-1570
  14. Escudero, N., Lopaz-Moya, F., Ghahrimani, Z., Zavala, E. A., Cordovilla, A., Ibanez, C. R., … ve Luis, V. (2017). Chitosan increases tomato root colonization by Pochonia chlamydosporia and their combination reduces root-knot nematode damage. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, p. 1415
  15. FAO, The Future of Food and Agriculture, Food Agric. Organ. United Nations., 2017, 1–52. 〈http://www.fao.org/3/I8429EN/i8429en.pdf〉 (accessed January 03, 2023).
  16. Farooq, M., Gogoi, N., Hussain, M., Barthakur, S., Paul, S., Bharadwaj, N., Migdadi, H. M., Alghamdi, S.S. ve Siddique, K. H. M. (2017). Effects, tolerance mechanisms and management of salt stress in grain legumes. Plant Physiol. Biochem., 118, pp. 199-217, 10.1016/J.PLAPHY.2017.06.020
  17. Hidangmayum, A., Dwivedi, P., Katiyar, D. ve Hemantaranjan, A. (2019). Application of chitosan on plant responses with special reference to abiotic stress. Physiology and molecular biology of plants, 25(2), 313-326.
  18. Hussain, M. I., Elnaggar, A., El-Keblawy, A. (2021). Eco-physiological adaptations of Salsola drummondii to soil salinity: role of reactive oxygen species, ion homeostasis, carbon isotope signatures and anti-oxidant feedback. Plant Biosyst., 155 (x), pp. 1133-1145
  19. Hipolito, H. H., Morales, S. G., Mendoza, A. B., Ortis, H. O., Pliego, G. C., Maldonado, A. J. (2018). Effects of chitosan- PVA and Cu nanoparticles on the growth and antioxidant capacity of tomato under saline stress. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 23, p. 178
  20. Kang, L. Y., Lu, Q. S., Shao, H. B. ve Shi, P. (2017). Effects of drought on NDVI of winter wheat growth in Binzhou irrigation region, Jiangsu J. Agric. Sci., 33, pp. 83-93
  21. Kashyap, R. L., Xiang, X. ve Heiden, P. (2015). Chitosan nanoparticle based delivery systems for sustainable agriculture. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 77, pp. 36-51
  22. Kheiri, A., Moosawijorf, S. A., Malipour, A., Saremi, H. ve Nikkhah, M. (2016). Application of chitosan and chitosan nanoparticles for the control of Fusarium head blight of wheat (Fusarium graminearum) in vitro and green house. International Journal for Biological Macromolecules, 93, pp. 1261-1272
  23. Leisner, C. P. (2020). Review: climate change impacts on food security- focus on perennial cropping systems and nutritional value. Plant Sci., 293, doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2020.110412
  24. Li, Y., Wang, H., Zhang, Y. ve Martin, C. (2018). Can the world’s favorite fruit, tomato, provide an effective biosynthetic chassis for high-value metabolites?. Plant Cell Reports, 37, pp. 1443-1450
  25. Li, X. X., Huang, P., Zhuang, H. D., Du, Y. P. (2016). Research advances of stress tolerance in sweet sorghum, Jiangsu J. Agric. Sci., 32, pp. 1429-1433
  26. Liang, W., Ma, X., Wan, P. ve Liu, L. (2018).Plant salt-tolerance mechanism: a review. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 495, pp. 286-291, doi:10.1016/J.BBRC.2017.11.043
  27. Liu, Y., Wisniewski, M., Kennedy, J. F., Jiang, Y., Tang, J. ve Liu, J. (2016). Chitosan and oilgochitosan enhance ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) resistance to rhizome rot caused by Fusarium oxysporum in storage. Carbohydrate Polymers, 151, pp. 474-479
  28. Malafaia, C. B., Silva, T. D., Jordao, D. O., Almeida, C. M., Silva, M. L., Corretia, M. T. ve Silva, M. V. (2013). Evaluation of the resistance and differential induction of chitinase in tomato in response to inoculation with Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Lycopersici. Journal of Plant Physiology and Pathology, 1, p. 3
  29. Manonga, T. ve Kumar, A. (2017). Effect of growth promoting and resistance inducing chemicals on yield attributing characteristics of Tomato. Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology, 11, pp. 1479-1485
  30. Mittler, R., Zandalinas, S. I., Fichman, Y. ve Van Breusegem, F. (2022). Reactive oxygen species signalling in plant stress responses. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 23, pp. 663-679
  31. Mukta, J. A., Rahman, M., Sabir, A. A., Gupta, D. R., Sunvy, M. Z., … ve Tofazzal Islam, M. (2017). Chitosan as plant probiotics application enhance growth and yield of strawberry. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, 11, pp. 9-18
  32. Muley, A. B., Shingote, P. R., Patil, A. P., Dalvi, S. G. ve Suprasanna, P. (2019). Gamma radiation degradation of chitosan for application in growth promotion and induction of stress tolerance in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Carbohydrate polymers, 210, 289-301.
  33. Murshed, R., Lopez-Lauri, F. ve Sallanon, H. (2014). Effect of salt stress on tomato fruit antioxidant systems depends on fruit development stage. Physiol Mol Biol Plants. Jan; 20(1): 15–29.
  34. Pichyangkura, R. ve Chandchawan, S. (2015). Biostimulant activity of chitosan in horticulture. Scientia Horticulture, 196, pp. 49-65
  35. Rendina, N., Nuzzaci, M., Sofo, A., Campiglia, P., Scopa, A., Sommella, E., … ve Manfra, M. (2019). Yield parameters and antioxidant compounds of tomato fruit: the role of plant defence inducers with or without cucumber mosaic virus infection. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 99, pp. 5541-5549
  36. Romanazi, G., Feliziani, E. ve Sivakumar, D. (2018). Chitosan, a biopolymer with triple action on postharvest decay of fruit and vegetables: eliciting, antimicrobial and film forming properties. Frontiers of Microbiology, 9, p. 2745
  37. Saharan, V., Sharma, G., Yadav, M., Choudhary, M. K., Sharma, S. S., Pal, A. (2015). Synthesis and in vitro antifungal efficacy of Cu-chitosan nanoparticles against pathogenic fungi of Tomato. International Journal for Biological Maromolecule, 75, pp. 346-353
  38. Santos, V. P., Marques, N. S. S., Maia, P. S. V., Lima, M. A. B., Franco, L. O. ve Takaki, G. M. (2020). Seafood waste as attractive source of chitin and chitosan production and their applications. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21, p. 4290
  39. Semida, W. M., El-Mageed, A., Taia, A., Abdelkhalik, A., Hemida, K. A., Abdurrahman, H. A., Howladar, S. M., Leilah, A. A. ve Rady, M. O. (2021). Selenium modulates antioxidant activity, osmoprotectants, and photosynthetic efficiency of onion under saline soil conditions. Agronomy, 11, p. 855
  40. Shams, P. L. (2018). Effect of chitosan on antioxidant enzyme activity, proline, and malondialdehyde content in Triticum aestivum L. and Zea maize L. under salt stress condition. Plant Physiology, 9(1), 2661-2670.
  41. Siegel, K. R., Ali, M. K., Srinivasiah, A., Nugent, R. A. ve Narayan, K. M V. (2014). Do we produce enough fruits and vegetables to meet global health need?. Plos One, 9, Article e104059
  42. Tandra, S. Z., Hassan, L., Hannan, A., Jahan, J. ve Sagor, G. H. M. (2022). Screening and biochemical responses of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum L.) genotypes for salt tolerance. Acta Physiol. Plant., 44, pp. 1-13
  43. Wang, M., Chen, Y., Zhang, R., Wang, W., Zhao, X., Du, Y.ve Yin, H. (2015). Effects of chitosan oligosaccharides on the yield components and production quality of different wheat cultivars in northwest China. Field Crops Research, 172, pp. 11-20
  44. Zehra, A., Meena, M., Dubey, M. K., Aamir, M. ve Upadhyay, R. S. (2017). Synergistic effects of plant defense elicitors and Trichoderma harzianum on enhanced induction of antioxidant defense system in tomato against Fusarium wilt disease. Botanical Studies, 58, p. 44
  45. Zhou, J., Wu, J. C., Du, B. M., Li, P. L. (2016). A comparative study on drought resistances of four species of lianas, Jiangsu J. Agric. SCI, 32, pp. 674-679
  46. Bulut, H. (2020). Arpada Tuz Stresine Karşı Zingeronun Koruyucu Etkisi. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 10 (4), 2932-2942. DOI: 10.21597/jist.686577
  47. Chaudhry, U. K., Gökçe, Z. N. ve Gökçe, A. F. (2020). Effects of salinity and drought stresses on the physio- morphological attributes of onion cultivars at bulbification stage. Int. J. Agric. Biol., 24, 1681-1689, doi:10.17957/IJAB/15.1611
  48. Malafaia, C. B., Silva, T. D., Jordao, D. O., Almeida, C. M., Silva, M. L., Corretia, M. T. ve Silva, M. V. (2013). Evaluation of the resistance and differential induction of chitinase in tomato in response to inoculation with Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Lycopersici. Journal of Plant Physiology and Pathology, 1, p. 3
  49. Rendina, N., Nuzzaci, M., Sofo, A., Campiglia, P., Scopa, A., Sommella, E., … ve Manfra, M. (2019). Yield parameters and antioxidant compounds of tomato fruit: the role of plant defence inducers with or without cucumber mosaic virus infection. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 99, pp. 5541-5549