KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / KTO Karatay Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: 3

COVID-19 TANISI ALMIŞ GEBELERİN KAYGI DÜZEYİ İLE PRENATAL BAĞLANMA İLİŞKİSİ

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ANXIETY LEVELS OF PREGNANT WOMEN DIAGNOSISED WITH COVID-19 AND PRENATAL ATTACHMENT

Emine Aksüt Akçay(KAHRAMANMARAS SUTCU IMAM UNIVERSITY, HEALTH ACADEMY)0000-0002-2056-4597
Demet Çakır(TOKAT GAZİOSMANPAŞA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TOKAT SAĞLIK YÜKSEKOKULU)0000-0003-4794-516X
Ghaith Hejazi(BİNGÖL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, BİNGÖL TEKNİK BİLİMLER MESLEK YÜKSEKOKULU)0000-0001-8246-5108
Sayfa
461–476
Yayın Tarihi
2025-12-31
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bulgular: Katılımcıların yaş ortalaması 29,45 ± 5,59 olup, %48,9’u 19-28 yaş arasında ve gebelik haftası ortalaması 34,24 ± 4,13’tür.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Amaç: Çalışmada, COVID-19 tanısı almış gebelerin kaygı düzeyinin prenatal bağlanma ile ilişkisini değerlendirmek amaçlanmıştır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Gereç ve Yöntem: Kesitsel, tanımlayıcı tipte geçekleştirilen çalışma 15.10.2021-31.12.2021 tarihlerinde yapılmıştır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bulgular: Katılımcıların yaş ortalaması 29,45 ± 5,59 olup, %48,9’u 19-28 yaş arasında ve gebelik haftası ortalaması 34,24 ± 4,13’tür.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2021 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:COVID-19 · Durumluluk · Kaygı

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmada, COVID-19 tanısı almış gebelerin kaygı düzeyinin prenatal bağlanma ile ilişkisini değerlendirmek amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Kesitsel, tanımlayıcı tipte geçekleştirilen çalışma 15.10.2021-31.12.2021 tarihlerinde yapılmıştır. Çalışmanın örneklemini bir Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesinde kadın doğum servisine yatışı yapılan 278 gebe oluşturmuştur (n=278). Veriler; Kişisel Bilgi Formu, Prenatal Bağlanma Envanteri (PBE), Durumluluk Kaygı Ölçeği (DKÖ) ve Sürekli Kaygı Ölçeği (SKÖ) ile aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Bulgular: Katılımcıların yaş ortalaması 29,45 ± 5,59 olup, %48,9’u 19-28 yaş arasında ve gebelik haftası ortalaması 34,24 ± 4,13’tür. DKÖ puan ortalaması 48,61 ± 11,42; SKÖ puan ortalaması 43,67 ± 8,49; PBE puan ortalaması 68,08 ± 12,35’tir. COVID-19 tanısı alındığında yaşadığı düşünce durumu ile PBE, DKÖ ve SKÖ puan ortalamaları arasında anlamlı farklılık bulunmuştur. Ölçekler arasındaki ilişki değerlendirildiğinde durumluluk kaygı düzeyi ile sürekli kaygı düzeyi arasında yüksek düzeyde, pozitif yönlü, anlamlı; prenatal bağlanma ile süreklilik kaygı düzeyi arasında oldukça düşük ve negatif bir korelasyon gözlenmiştir. Sonuç: Durumluluk kaygı düzeyi arttıkça süreklilik kaygı düzeyinin arttığı, prenatal bağlanma arttıkça süreklilik kaygı düzeyinin azaldığı belirlenmiştir. COVID-19 tanısı almış gebelerde durumluluk ve sürekli kaygı düzeyinin ölçek ortalama puanından daha yüksek olduğu belirlenmiştir. Anahtar Kelimeler: COVID-19, Durumluluk, Kaygı, Prenatal bağlanma, Sürekli

Abstract

Aim: The study aimed to evaluate the relationship between the anxiety level of pregnant women diagnosed with COVID-19 and prenatal attachment. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional, descriptive design was used. The study was conducted between 15.10.2021-31.12.2021. The sample included 278 pregnant women who were admitted to a gynecology service in a hospital. Data; The Personal Information Form was collected using the State Anxiety Inventory (SAI) and Trait Anxiety Inventory (TAI) and the Prenatal Attachment Inventory (PAI). Results: The average age of the participants was 29.45 ± 5.59, 48.9% were between 19-28 years old, the average gestational week was 34.24 ± 4.13. SAI mean score was 48.61 ± 11.42; TAI mean score was 43.67 ± 8.49; PAI mean score is 68.08 ± 12.35. There was a significant difference between the thought state experienced when diagnosed with COVID-19 and the mean SAI, TAI and SCQ scores. When the relationship between the scales is evaluated, state anxiety level, trait anxiety level is high, positive and significant. Conclusion: As the state anxiety increased, trait anxiety level increased, as prenatal attachment increased, the trait anxiety level decreased. Additionally, state and trait anxiety levels of pregnant women with COVID-19 were higher compared to the scale average score. Keywords: Anxiety, COVID-19, Prenatal attachment, State, Trait

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Akçay, E. A., Çakır, D., Hejazi, G. (2025). COVID-19 TANISI ALMIŞ GEBELERİN KAYGI DÜZEYİ İLE PRENATAL BAĞLANMA İLİŞKİSİ. KTO Karatay Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 3, 461–476. https://doi.org/10.59244/ktokusbd.1741126

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (28)

  1. Albloushi, M., Innab, A., Mofdy Almarwani, A., Alqahtani, N., Anazi, M., Roco, I., & Alzahrani, N. S. (2023). The influence of internship year on nursing students’ perceived clinical competence: A multi-site study. Sage Open, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231193198.
  2. Alharbi, H. F., Alzahrani, J., Hamed, A., Althagafi, A., & Alkarani, A. S. (2023). The experiences of newly graduated nurses during their first year of practice. Healthcare, 11(14), 2048. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11142048
  3. Çınar, F. İ., Özen, N., & Yüksel, Ç. (2019). Evaluation of the relationship between senior nursing students’ perceptions of the transition from being a student to assuming the nursing role and their self-confidence. SBÜ Journal of Nursing, 1(1), 17–26. George, D., & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 17.0 update (10th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
  4. Gök Uğur, H., Orak, O. S., & Tekgül, A. T. (2020). Readiness of final year nursing students for the profession and the affecting factors: Eastern Black Sea region sample. Samsun Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(2), 143–151. https://doi.org/10.47115/jshs.770942
  5. Güner, P. (2015). Preparedness of final-year Turkish nursing students for work as a professional nurse. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 24(5–6), 844–854. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12673
  6. Huang, F. F., Shen, X. Y., Chen, X. L., He, L. P., Huang, S. F., & Li, J. X. (2020). Self-reported confidence in patient safety competencies among Chinese nursing students: A multi-site cross-sectional survey. BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-1945-8
  7. Kim, E. Y., & Yeo, J. H. (2019). Effects of pre-graduation characteristics and working environments on transition shock of newly graduated nurses: A longitudinal study. Nurse Education Today, 78, 32–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.04.002
  8. Kim, J. H., Lee, J. L., & Kim, E. M. (2020). Patient safety culture and handoff evaluation of nurses in small and medium-sized hospitals. International Journal of Nursing Sciences, 8(1), 58–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2020.12.007
  9. Kong, L. N., Zhu, W. F., He, S., Chen, S. Z., Yang, L., Qi, L., & Peng, X. (2019). Attitudes towards patient safety culture among postgraduate nursing students in China: A cross-sectional study. Nurse Education in Practice, 38, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2019.05.014
  10. Labrague, L. J., & De Los Santos, J. A. A. (2020). Transition shock and newly graduated nurses' job outcomes and select patient outcomes: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Nursing Management, 28(5), 1070–1079. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13033
  11. Lee, N. J., An, J. Y., Song, T. M., Jang, H., & Park, S. Y. (2014). Psychometric evaluation of a patient safety competency self-evaluation tool for nursing students. Journal of Nursing Education, 53(10), 550–562. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20140922-01
  12. Lukewich, J., Edge, D. S., Tranmer, J., Raymond, J., Miron, J., Ginsburg, L., & VanDenKerkhof, E. (2015). Undergraduate baccalaureate nursing students' self-reported confidence in learning about patient safety in the classroom and clinical settings: An annual cross-sectional study (2010–2013). International Journal of Nursing Studies, 52(5), 930–938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.01.010
  13. Masso, M., Sim, J., Halcomb, E., & Thompson, C. (2022). Practice readiness of new graduate nurses and factors influencing practice readiness: A scoping review of reviews. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 129, 104208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104208
  14. Murray, M., Sundin, D., & Cope, V. (2020). A mixed-methods study on patient safety insights of new graduate registered nurses. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 35(3), 258–264. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000443
  15. Özdemir, Ü., Taşcı, S., Tekinsoy Kartın, P., Göriş, S., et al. (2019). Hemşirelik öğrencilerinin hasta güvenliği konusundaki bilgi düzeyleri. Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 28(2), 81–86. https://doi.org/10.34108/eujhs.485845
  16. Saghafi, F., Bromley, P., Guzys, D., Harkness, L., Phillips, M., Mather, C., Saunders, A., Say, R., Teare, C., & Tori, K. (2023). Graduate nurses' capability upon entering the workforce: An integrative review. Nurse Education Today, 121, 105659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105659
  17. Sharma, S. K., Kalal, N., & Rani, R. (2021). Clinical practice readiness of nursing graduates. Clinics in Mother and Child Health, 18, 381. Retrieved from https://www.longdom.org/abstract/clinical-practice-readiness-of-nursing-graduates-58780.html
  18. Suliman, M. (2019). Measuring patient safety competence among nursing students in the classroom and clinical settings. Nursing Education Perspectives, 40(3), E3–E7. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000460
  19. Sun, Y., Yin, Y., Wang, J., Ding, Z., Wang, D., Zhang, Y., Zhang, J., & Wang, Y. (2023). Critical thinking abilities among newly graduated nurses: A cross-sectional survey study in China. Nursing Open, 10(3), 1383–1392. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1388
  20. Svitlica, B. B., Šajnović, M., Simin, D., Ivetić, J., & Milutinović, D. (2021). Patient safety: Knowledge and attitudes of medical and nursing students: Cross-sectional study. Nurse Education in Practice, 53, 103089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103089
  21. Teresa-Morales, C., Rodríguez-Pérez, M., Araujo-Hernández, M., & Feria-Ramírez, C. (2022). Current stereotypes associated with nursing and nursing professionals: An integrative review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(13), 7640. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137640
  22. Tosunöz, İ. K. (2024). Professional readiness perceptions and causes of professional concerns of senior nursing students: A descriptive and cross-sectional study in Turkey. Teaching and Learning in Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2024.06.015
  23. Toygar, İ., Hançerlioğlu, S., & Gacaner, S. (2020). Hemşirelik öğrencilerinin hasta güvenliği konusunda bilgi ve yeterlilikleri. İnönü Üniversitesi Sağlık Hizmetleri Meslek Yüksek Okulu Dergisi, 8(3), 618–629. https://doi.org/10.33715/inonusaglik.747782
  24. Ulupınar, S., & Aydogan, Y. (2021). New graduate nurses' satisfaction, adaptation and intention to leave in their first year: A descriptive study. Journal of Nursing Management, 29(6), 1830–1840. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13296
  25. Ulupınar, S., & Şen, Y. (2022). The adaptation process of newly graduated nurses to the profession: Expectations and realities. Journal of Health and Nursing Management, 9(3), 515–521. World Health Organization. (2020). State of the world’s nursing report. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240003279
  26. Yılmaz, A., & Erdem, Ö. (2024). Patient safety competence of nursing students and affecting factors. Journal of Patient Safety and Risk Management, 29(1), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/25160435231213302
  27. Çınar, F. İ., Özen, N., & Yüksel, Ç. (2019). Evaluation of the relationship between senior nursing students’ perceptions of the transition from being a student to assuming the nursing role and their self-confidence. SBÜ Journal of Nursing, 1(1), 17–26.
  28. Ulupınar, S., & Şen, Y. (2022). The adaptation process of newly graduated nurses to the profession: Expectations and realities. Journal of Health and Nursing Management, 9(3), 515–521.