KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Eastern Journal of Medicine / 2020 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of Pap-smear and Colposcopy in the Absence of HPV Test for the Diagnosis of Premalignant and Malignant Cervical Lesions

Süleyman Cemil OĞLAK
Mehmet OBUT
Sayfa
299–304
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The combined use of Pap-smear and colposcopy in the detection of premalignant and malignant lesions of the cervix increases the success and enables early diagnosis and appropriate treatment in the absence of HPV test.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, we aimed to evaluate the Pap-smear results and colposcopic findings of 163 patients admitted to the colposcopy unit of our hospital with the histopathological examination results of cervical sampling for abnormal Pap-smear and/or colposcopy findings in the absence of HPV test.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity and specificity of Pap-smear were 88.1%, 13.3%, 28.5% and 74%, respectively.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The combined use of Pap-smear and colposcopy in the detection of premalignant and malignant lesions of the cervix increases the success and enables early diagnosis and appropriate treatment in the absence of HPV test.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the Pap-smear results and colposcopic findings of 163 patients admitted to the colposcopy unit of our hospital with the histopathological examination results of cervical sampling for abnormal Pap-smear and/or colposcopy findings in the absence of HPV test. All patients underwent gynaecological examination, and Pap-smear test was performed. Subsequently, the cervix was examined by colposcopy. Local medical treatment, Pap-smear follow up, cervical sampling or surgery was recommended according to Pap-smear, colposcopic examination results and other clinical examination findings. Negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity and specificity of Pap-smear were 88.1%, 13.3%, 28.5% and 74%, respectively. NPV, PPV, sensitivity and specificity of colposcopy were 93.3%, 14.3%, 85.7 and 76.2%, respectively. The combined use of Pap-smear and colposcopy in the detection of premalignant and malignant lesions of the cervix increases the success and enables early diagnosis and appropriate treatment in the absence of HPV test.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

OĞLAK, S. C., OBUT, M. (2020). Comparison of Pap-smear and Colposcopy in the Absence of HPV Test for the Diagnosis of Premalignant and Malignant Cervical Lesions. Eastern Journal of Medicine, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2, 299–304. https://ajindex.com/articles/152077

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Tsikouras P, Zervoudis S, Manav B, et al. Cervical cancer: screening, diagnosis and staging. J BUON 2016; 21: 320-325.
  2. Basu P, Taghavi K, Hu SY, Mogri S, Joshi S. Management of cervical premalignant lesions. Curr Probl Cancer 2018; 42: 129-136.
  3. Smith RA, Andrews KS, Brooks D, et al. Cancer screening in the United States, 2017: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin 2017; 67: 100-121.
  4. Nayar R, Wilbur DC. The Pap test and Bethesda 2014. Cancer Cytopathol 2015; 123: 271-281.
  5. Chase DM, Kalouyan M, DiSaia PJ. Colposcopy to evaluate abnormal cervical cytology in 2008. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 200: 472-480.
  6. Trimble CL, Genkinger JM, Burke AE, et al. Active and passive cigarette smoking and the risk of cervical neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105: 174-181.
  7. Insinga RP, Glass AG, Rush BB. Diagnoses and outcomes in cervical cancer screening: a population-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 105-113.
  8. Cheng JX, Yao LL, Xiang H, et al. Cervical cytology ASCUS patients with HPV detection and clinical value. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2016; 43: 592-596.
  9. Bornstein J, Bentley J, Bösze P, et al. 2011 colposcopic terminology of the International Federation for Cervical Patholgy and Colposcopy. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120: 166-172. MacLean AB. Acetowhite epithelium. Gynecol Oncol 2004; 95: 691-694.
  10. Jahic M, Jahic E. Diagnostic Approach to Patients with Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance Cytologic Findings on Cervix. Med Arch 2016; 70: 296-298.
  11. Yang M, Zachariah S. ASCUS on cervical cytologic smears. Clinical significance. J Reprod Med 1997; 42: 329-331. Rojsangruang S. Prevalence of Abnormal Cervical Cytology based on the Bethesda System, at Phetchabun Hospital. J Health Sci 2006; 15: 67-74.
  12. Sankaranarayanan R, Thara S, Sharma A, et al. Accuracy of conventional cytology: results from a multicentre screening study in India. J Med Screen 2004; 11: 77-84.
  13. Fahey MT, Irwig L, Macaskill P. Meta-analysis of Pap test accuracy. Am J Epidemiol 1995; 141: 680-689.
  14. Ghaemmaghami F, Behtash N, Modares Gilani M, Mousavi A, Marjani M, Moghimi R. Visual inspection with acetic acid as a feasible screening test for cervical neoplasia in Iran. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2004; 14: 465-469.
  15. Rieck GC, Bhaumik J, Beer HR, Leeson SC. Repeating cytology at initial colposcopy does not improve detection of high-grade abnormalities: a retrospective cohort study of 6595 women. Gynecol Oncol 2006; 101: 28-33.
  16. Taylor RR, G