Dergiler / Kıbrıs Türk Psikiyatri ve Psikoloji Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1

Exploring the Needs and Profiles of Gifted Children: An Analysis of WISC-R Results and Test Administrators' Recommendations

Savaş Akgül(ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY-CERRAHPASA)0000-0003-0436-2765
Nüket Afat(İSTANBUL SABAHATTİN ZAİM ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-4247-025X
Sayfa
39–47
Yayın Tarihi
2025-03-21
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The qualitative findings regarding test administrators’ reports are also documented under three main themes: children’s characteristics, information and recommendations for the family, and information and recommendations for the school.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Gifted individuals play a significant and indispensable role in the development of any society.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Their education, however, bears certain challenges, one of which is the accurate determination and exploration of their needs.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The qualitative findings regarding test administrators’ reports are also documented under three main themes: children’s characteristics, information and recommendations for the family, and information and recommendations for the school.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:wisc-r · gifted · administrator

Özet

Gifted individuals play a significant and indispensable role in the development of any society. Since it has a vital importance that gifted individuals are identified and provided with appropriate educational opportunities so that their capabilities can be channeled into productivity and their wellbeing is supported accordingly. Their education, however, bears certain challenges, one of which is the accurate determination and exploration of their needs. The current study, in that sense, was conducted to contribute to the literature and diagnosis process by analyzing Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (Wisc-R) profiles, which are commonly used in diagnosing gifted children and recommendations by test administrators. Convergent parallel research design, one of the mixed methods approaches, was employed in the current study. Within the scope of the study, 99 gifted students’ WISC-R intelligence test results were analyzed. Descriptive statistics, dependent and independent t tests were used in the quantitative part while content analysis was used in the qualitative part. The quantitative findings indicate that gifted children’s intelligence scores show heterogeneous distribution; their performance scores are relatively higher than their verbal scores; and there is significant difference between their verbal scores and performance scores. The qualitative findings regarding test administrators’ reports are also documented under three main themes: children’s characteristics, information and recommendations for the family, and information and recommendations for the school.

Abstract

Gifted individuals play a significant and indispensable role in the development of any society. It is vital importance that gifted individuals are identified and provided with appropriate educational opportunities so that their capabilities can be channeled into productivity and their well-being is supported accordingly. Their education, however, bears certain challenges, including accurately determining and exploring their needs. In that sense, the current study was conducted to contribute to the literature and diagnosis process by analyzing Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (Wisc-R) profiles, commonly used in diagnosing gifted children and recommendations by test administrators. The current study employed a convergent parallel research design, one of the mixed methods approaches. Within the scope of the study, 99 gifted students’ WISC-R intelligence test results were analyzed. Descriptive statistics and dependent and independent t-tests were used in the quantitative part, while content analysis was used in the qualitative part. The quantitative findings indicate that gifted children’s intelligence scores show heterogeneous distribution; their performance scores are relatively higher than their verbal scores; and there is significant difference between their verbal scores and performance scores. The qualitative findings regarding test administrators’ reports are also documented under three main themes: children’s characteristics, information and recommendations for the family, and information and recommendations for the school.

Anahtar kelimeler
🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Sayı, A. K., Akgül, S., Afat, N. (2025). Exploring the Needs and Profiles of Gifted Children: An Analysis of WISC-R Results and Test Administrators' Recommendations. Kıbrıs Türk Psikiyatri ve Psikoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 39–47. https://doi.org/10.35365/ctjpp.2025.1.05

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (18)

  1. Ayraler Taner, H., Çetin, F. H., Işık, Y., & İşeri, E. (2015). Psychopathology in abused children and adolescents and related risk factors. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatr 16(4).
  2. Buzinkai, D. (2013). Cognitive and Academic Profiles of Gifted and Talented Children. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine Department of School Psychology, Philadelphia.
  3. Clark, B. (2007). Growing up gifted.(7th edt.). New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc De Lemos, M. M. (1994). Not so straightforward: Interpreting the scores. Evaluation & Research in Education, 8(1-2), 69-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500799409533355
  4. Kanaya, T. & Ceci SJ. (2018). Longitudinal IQ trends in children diagnosed with emotional disturbance: an analysis of historical data. Journal of Intelligence; 6(4):45. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence6040045
  5. Kaplan Sayı, A. (2018). Examining participants' views about an enrichment program for disadvantaged gifted and talented. Turkish Studies, 13(4), 749-770. DOI:: http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.1310
  6. Kaufman, A. S. (1976). Verbal performance IQ discrepancies on the WISC-R. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44(5), 739-744.
  7. LaFrance, E. D. (1997). The gifted/dyslexic child: Characterizing and addressing strengths and weaknesses. Annals of Dyslexia, 47, 163-182.
  8. Nader, A. M., Jelenic, P., & Soulières, I., (2015). The discrepancy between WISC-III and WISC-IV cognitive profile in the autism spectrum: What does it reveal about autistic cognition? PloS one, 10 (12), e0144645. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144645
  9. Özkardeş, O. G. (2013). Descriptive analysis of studies conducted on specific learning disabilities in Turkey. Boğaziçi University Journal of Education, 30(2), 123-153. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/buje/issue/14782/327987
  10. Poletti, M. (2016). WISC-IV intellectual profiles in Italian children with specific learning disorders and related reading, written expression, and mathematics impairments. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(3), 320–335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219414555416
  11. Rogers, K. B. (2002). Grouping the gifted and talented: Questions and answers. Roeper Review, 24(3), 103-107. DOI:: https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190209554140
  12. Saccuzzo, D. P., Johnson, N. E., & Russell, G. (1992). Verbal versus performance IQs for gifted African-American, Caucasian, Filipino, and Hispanic children. Psychological Assessment, 4(2), 239–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.4.2.239
  13. Sak, U. (2010). Gifted characteristics, diagnosis, education. Ankara: Maya Academy Publishing.
  14. Silver, S. J., & Clampit, M. K. (1990). WISC-R profiles of high ability children: interpretation of verbal-performance discrepancies. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34(2), 76–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629003400205
  15. Taddei, S., Contena, B., Caria, M., Venturini, E., & Venditti, F. (2011). Evaluation of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and specific learning disability on the WISC and Cognitive Assessment System (CAS). Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 574-582. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.278
  16. Taşdemir, Ö. M., & Ergül, C. (2015). The giftedness profile analysis based on WISC-R in Ankara city sample. Journal of Special Education,16(3), 271.
  17. Toffalini, E., Pezzuti, L., & Cornoldi, C. (2017). Einstein and dyslexia: Is giftedness more frequent in children with a specific learning disorder than in typically developing children?. Intelligence, 62, 175-179.
  18. Uluç, S., Öktem, F., Erden, G., Gençöz, T., & Sezgin, N. (2011). Wechsler ıntelligence scale for children-IV: in a clinical context a new era for the evaluation of Turkey intelligence. Turkish Psychology Writings,14(28), 49.