KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of Turkish Operations Management / 2026 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1

Investigation of a Non-Linear Cramér-Lundberg Risk Model

Zulfiye Hanalioglu(KARABUK UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-1197-9421
Yusup Allyyev(TOBB UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND TECHNOLOGY)0000-0001-5410-2705
Tahir Khanıyev(TOBB UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND TECHNOLOGY)0000-0003-1974-0140
Sayfa
1065–1075
Yayın Tarihi
2022-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Then Lundberg type upper bound was calculated for the ruin probability for the model under investigation.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, a non-linear version of a Cramér-Lundberg risk model is examined.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Because an insurance company's premium income cannot always increase linearly.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Then Lundberg type upper bound was calculated for the ruin probability for the model under investigation.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Cramér-Lundberg risk model · Ruin probability · Non-linear risk model

Abstract

In this study, a non-linear version of a Cramér-Lundberg risk model is examined. The objective of this work is to evaluate the ruin probability of a non-linear risk model. The classical linear Cramér-Lundberg model has been widely studied in the literature. However, the linear model is not always realistic. Because an insurance company's premium income cannot always increase linearly. Therefore, it is recommended to adapt premium income as a function which increases monotonically and yet its rate of growth decreases over time. Thus, to account for this, a more realistic non-linear mathematical model has been constructed and investigated, when the premium income function is p(t)=c√t. Then Lundberg type upper bound was calculated for the ruin probability for the model under investigation.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Hanalioglu, Z., Allyyev, Y., Khanıyev, T. (2022). Investigation of a Non-Linear Cramér-Lundberg Risk Model. Journal of Turkish Operations Management, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 1065–1075. https://ajindex.com/articles/1515741

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (20)

  1. Asmussen, S., Rolski, T., (1994), “Risk Theory in a Periodic Environment: The Cramér-Lundberg Approximation and Lundberg's Inequality”, Mathematics of Operations Research, 19 (2), 410-433.
  2. Boikov, A.V., (2002), “The Cramér-Lundberg model with stochastic premium process”, Theory of Probability and Applications, 47, 489-493.
  3. Chadjiconstantinidis, S., Politis, K., (2007), "Two-sided bounds for the distribution of the deficit at ruin in the renewal risk model", Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 41(1), 41-52.
  4. Cohen, A., R.Young, V., (2020), “Rate of convergence of the probability of ruin in the Cramér-Lundberg model to its diffusion approximation”, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 93, 333-340.
  5. Constantinescu, C., Samorodnitsky, G., Zhu, W., (2018), “Ruin probabilities in classical risk models with gamma claims”, Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 2018(7), 555-575.
  6. Cramér, H., (1930), “On the mathematical theory of risk”, Skandinavia Jubilee Volume, Stockholm. Reprinted in: martin-Löf, A. (Ed.) Cramér, H. (1994) Collected Works. Springer, 155-166.
  7. Gaier, J., Grandits, P., Schachermayer, W., (2003), “Asymptotic Ruin Probabilities and Optimal Investment”, The Annals of Applied Probability, 13 (3), 1054-1076.
  8. Gauchonab, R., Loisela, S., Rullièrea, J., Trufinc, J., (2020), “Optimal prevention strategies in the classical risk model”, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 91, 202-208.
  9. Gerber, H.U. (1988), “Mathematical fun with ruin theory”, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 7(1), 15-23.
  10. Kaas R., Goovaerts M., Dhaene J., Denuit M., (2001), “Modern Actuarial Risk Theory”, Kluwer, Boston.
  11. Lundberg, F., (1903), “Approximerad framställning av sannolikhetsfunktionen”, Återförsäkring av kollektivrisker. Akad. Afhandling. Almqvist och Wiksell, Uppsala, 7-9.
  12. Malinovskii, V.K, (2014), “Improved asymptotic upper bounds on the ruin capital in the Lundberg model of risk”, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 55, 301-309.
  13. Mikosch, T. (2004), “Non-life insurance mathematics: An Introduction with Stochastic Processes”, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
  14. Mishura, Y., Perestyuk, M., Ragulina, O., (2014), “Ruin probability in a risk model with variable premium intensity and risky investments”, Opuscula Mathematica, 35(2).
  15. Rolski, T., Schmidli, H., Schmidt, V., Teugels, J., (1999), “Stochastic Processes for Insurance and Finance”, Wiley, New York.
  16. Straub E. (1988), “Non-Life Insurance Methematics”, Springer, New York.
  17. Temnov, G., (2014), “Risk Models with Stochastic Premium and Ruin Probability Estimation”, Journal of Mathematical Sciences, 196, 84-96.
  18. Willmot, G.E., Lin, X.S., (2001), “Lundberg Approximations for Compound Distributions with Insurance Applications”, Springer, Berlin.
  19. Yang H. (1998), “Non-exponential Bounds for Ruin Probability with Interest Effect Included”, Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 1999(1), 66-79.
  20. Zhang, Z., Yang, H., (2009), “On a risk model with stochastic premiums income and dependence between income and loss”, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 234(1), 44-57.