KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of Turkish Operations Management / 2023 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2

Sürdürülebilir İnsani Yardım Lojistiği Alanındaki Yayınların İçerik ve Bibliometrik Açıdan Analizi

Content and Bibliometric Analysis of Publications in the Field of Sustainable Humanitarian Logistics

Ayca Özceylan(GAZİANTEP ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-0537-6886
Mehmet Tanyaş(MALTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-8934-3787
Sayfa
1644–1671
Yayın Tarihi
2023-12-29
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Sürdürülebilir afet yönetimi lojistiği konusunda son yıllarda akademik çalışma sayılarında gözle görülür bir artış gözlemlenmiştir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Afetler, bir toplumun işleyişinde kendi kaynaklarını kullanarak başa çıkma kapasitesini aşan ciddi aksamalardır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Afetler, doğal, insan yapımı ve teknolojik tehlikelerin yanı sıra bir topluluğun maruziyetini ve savunmasızlığını etkileyen çeşitli faktörlerden kaynaklanabilir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Sürdürülebilir afet yönetimi lojistiği konusunda son yıllarda akademik çalışma sayılarında gözle görülür bir artış gözlemlenmiştir.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Afet yönetimi lojistiği · Sürdürülebilirlik · Literatür taraması

Özet

Afetler, bir toplumun işleyişinde kendi kaynaklarını kullanarak başa çıkma kapasitesini aşan ciddi aksamalardır. Afetler, doğal, insan yapımı ve teknolojik tehlikelerin yanı sıra bir topluluğun maruziyetini ve savunmasızlığını etkileyen çeşitli faktörlerden kaynaklanabilir. Afet risklerinin azaltılması, toplulukların daha hazırlıklı, dirençli olması ve verdiği zararların azaltılabilmesi için etkin bir afet yönetimi ve lojistiği gerekmektedir. Birçok konuda olduğu gibi afet yönetim lojistiği sürecinin de çevreye ve topluma uyumlu olması aynı zamanda da ekonomik boyutu dikkate alması artık bir zorunluluktur. Bu nedenle ülkelerin/organizasyonların etkin, verimli ve sürdürülebilir afet lojistiği politikalarına sahip olmaları önem arz etmektedir. Sürdürülebilir afet yönetimi lojistiği konusunda son yıllarda akademik çalışma sayılarında gözle görülür bir artış gözlemlenmiştir. Bu artış aynı zamanda bu alanda kapsamlı bir literatür taraması ihtiyacı doğurmuştur. Bu çalışmanın amacı sürdürülebilir afet yönetimi üzerine yapılmış akademik çalışmaları hem içerik hem de bibliometrik açıdan analiz etmek, literatürdeki boşlukları göstermek ve ileriye dönük araştırma potansiyeli olan konuları irdelemektir.

Abstract

Disasters are serious disruptions that transcend constraints by using their own characteristics on a community scale. Disasters can be caused by a variety of factors, including natural, man-made, and technological hazards, as well as a community and its general characteristics. Effective disaster management and logistics are required to reduce disaster risks, make communities more prepared and resilient, and reduce damage to the environment. As in many other issues, it is now a necessity for the disaster management logistics process to be compatible with the environment and society, as well as to take into account the economic dimension. For this reason, it is important for countries/organizations to have effective, efficient, and sustainable disaster logistics policies. A significant increase has been observed in the number of academic studies on sustainable disaster management logistics in recent years. This increase also necessitated a comprehensive literature review in this field. The aim of this study is to analyze academic studies on sustainable disaster management both in terms of content and bibliometrics, to show gaps in the literature, and to examine topics with potential for future research.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Özceylan, A., Tanyaş, M. (2023). Sürdürülebilir İnsani Yardım Lojistiği Alanındaki Yayınların İçerik ve Bibliometrik Açıdan Analizi. Journal of Turkish Operations Management, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 1644–1671. https://doi.org/10.56554/jtom.1214269

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (173)

  1. Abbas, H., Asim, Z., Ahmed, Z., & Moosa, S. (2022). Exploring and establishing the barriers to sustainable humanitarian supply chains using fuzzy interpretive structural modeling and fuzzy MICMAC analysis. Social Responsibility Journal, 188(8), 1463–1484. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2023.06.001
  2. Abidi, H., Kandel, C., Klumpp, M., & Zinnert, S. (2015). Sustainable Humanitarian Logistics Optimization—A Hub Concept for Germany Based on the Shapley Value. In Humanitarian Logistics and Sustainability, 129–148. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-15455-8_8 Abidi, H., & Scholten, K. (2015). Applicability of performance measurement systems to humanitarian supply chains. In Humanitarian logistics and sustainability, 235-260. Springer, Cham. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3-319-15455-8_13
  3. Bilau, A. A., Witt, E., Malalgoda, C., Lill, I., & Amaratunga, D. (2018). Integrated measures for managing permanent housing reconstruction. Procedia engineering, 212, 403-410. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.052
  4. Adeiza, M. A., Wachekwa, I., Nuta, C., Donato, S., Koomson, F., Whitney, J.,. & Ogbuagu, O. (2021). Gaps and Opportunities in HIV Service Delivery in High Volume HIV Care Centers in Liberia: Lessons From the Field. Annals of Global Health, 87(1). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/aogh.3246
  5. Ali, I., & Kannan, D. (2022). Mapping research on healthcare operations and supply chain management: a topic modelling-based literature review. Annals of Operations Research, 1-27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04596-5
  6. Amini, M., Bienstock, C. C., & Golias, M. (2020). Management of supply chains with attribute-sensitive products: a comprehensive literature review and future research agenda. The International Journal of Logistics Management.31(4), 885–903. doi: 10.1108/IJLM-11-2019-0306
  7. Amorim, A., de Holanda Barbosa, A., & do Amaral Sobral, P. J. (2021). Hunger, Obesity, Public Policies, and Food-Based Dietary Guidelines: A Reflection Considering the Socio-Environmental World Context. Frontiers in Nutrition, 8. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.805569
  8. Anjomshoae, A., Banomyong, R., Mohammed, F., & Kunz, N. (2022). A systematic review of humanitarian supply chains performance measurement literature from 2007 to 2021. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 102852. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102852
  9. Asgari, N., Nikbakhsh, E., Hill, A., & Farahani, R. Z. (2016). Supply chain management 1982–2015: a review. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 27(3), 353-379. https://doi.org/10.1093/imaman/dpw004
  10. Asgary, R., Staderini, N., Mthethwa-Hleta, S., Lopez Saavedra, P. A., Garcia Abrego, L., Rusch, B.,. & Kerschberger, B. (2020). Evaluating smartphone strategies for reliability, reproducibility, and quality of VIA for cervical cancer screening in the Shiselweni region of Eswatini: A cohort study. PLoS medicine, 17(11), 1–16. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003378
  11. Atasu, A., Toktay, B., Yeo, W. M., & Zhang, C. (2017). Effective medical surplus recovery. Production and Operations Management, 26(6), 1142-1162. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/poms.12641
  12. Baba, H., Watanabe, T., Miyata, K., & Matsumoto, H. (2015). Area business continuity management, a new approach to sustainable local economy. Journal of Disaster Research, 10(2), 204-209. doi: https://doi.org/10.20965/jdr.2015.p0204
  13. Baffoe, B. O. K., & Luo, W. (2021). South African Executives Propensity to Use, Diffuse, and Adopt the Humanitarian Logistics Digital Business Ecosystem (HLDBE). SAGE Open, 11(3). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21582440211047246
  14. Bag, S., Arnesh, T. (2019) Barriers to BDPA applications in sustainable HSC practices. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, 319–334.
  15. Bag, S., Gupta, S., & Wood, L. (2020). Big data analytics in sustainable humanitarian supply chain: Barriers and their interactions. Annals of Operations Research, 1-40. Erişim adresi: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10479-020-03790-7
  16. Bag, S., Luthra, S., Venkatesh, V. G., & Yadav, G. (2020). Towards understanding key enablers to green humanitarian supply chain management practices. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 31(5), 1111-1145. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-06-2019-0124
  17. Bala, R., Sarangee, K. R., He, S., & Jin, G. (2022). Get Us PPE: A Self-Organizing Platform Ecosystem for Supply Chain Optimization during COVID-19. Sustainability, 14(6), 3175. Erişim adresi: https://www.mdpi.com/1533510
  18. Banomyong, R., Varadejsatitwong, P., & Oloruntoba, R. (2019). A systematic review of humanitarian operations, humanitarian logistics and humanitarian supply chain performance literature 2005 to 2016. Annals of Operations Research, 283(1), 71-86. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102852
  19. Battini, D., Peretti, U., Persona, A., & Sgarbossa, F. (2016). Sustainable humanitarian operations: closed-loop supply chain. International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 25(1), 65-79. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJSOM.2016.078067
  20. Behl, A., & Pal, A. (2019). Sustainability of environmentally sound technologies using interpretive structural modelling. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 13(1), 1-19. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJISD.2019.10017235
  21. Beresford, A., & Pettit, S. (2021). Humanitarian aid logistics: a Cardiff University research perspective on cases, structures and prospects. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JHLSCM-06-2021-0052
  22. Besiou, M., Pedraza‐Martinez, A. J., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2021). Humanitarian operations and the UN sustainable development goals. Production and Operations Management, 30(12), 4343-4355. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/poms.13579
  23. Bhushan, S. (2017). System dynamics base-model of humanitarian supply chain (HSCM) in disaster prone ecocommunities of India: A discussion on simulation and scenario results. International Journal of System Dynamics Applications (IJSDA), 6(3), 20-37. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-6195-8.ch012
  24. den Boer, J., Lambrechts, W., & Krikke, H. (2020). Additive manufacturing in military and humanitarian missions: Advantages and challenges in the spare parts supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 257, 120301. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120301
  25. Boostani, A., Jolai, F., & Bozorgi-Amiri, A. (2021). Designing a sustainable humanitarian relief logistics model in pre-and postdisaster management. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 15(8), 604-620. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2020.1773975
  26. Cabicarová, M., Ullrich, D. (2016). The impact of transport infrastructure on the success of humanitarian operations. Proceedings of the 28th International Business Information Management Association Conference -
  27. Vision 2020: Innovation Management, Development Sustainability, and Competitive Economic Growth, 3748– 3757. Erişim adresi: https://ibima.org/accepted-paper/impact-transport-infrastructure-success-humanitarianoperations/
  28. Cesari, G., Johnson, S. O., Cancelliere, G., Von Medeazza, G. (2019). How a water trucking governance mechanism in the West Bank enhances equity and sustainability. Waterlines, 38(4), 305–315. doi: https://doi.org/10.3362/1756-3488.18-00036
  29. Cesari, G., Johnson, S. O., Cancelliere, G., Von Medeazza, G. (2022) How a water trucking governance mechanism in the West Bank enhances equity and sustainability. Waterlines, 41(1), 24–34. Erişim adresi: https://practicalactionpublishing.com/article/3069/how-a-water-trucking-governance-mechanism-in-the-westbank-enhances-equity-and-sustainability Chen, H.S.Y., Van Wassenhove, L.N., Cheng, T.C.E. (2020). Designing sustainable humanitarian supply chains, Erişim adresi: https://osf.io/m82ar/download.
  30. Chen, F., Liu, S., & Appolloni, A. (2020). Horizontal coordination of I-LNGOs in the humanitarian supply chain: an evolutionary game approach. Sustainability, 12(15), 5953. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12155953
  31. Cherkesly, M., & Maïzi, Y. (2020, December). A simulation model for short and long term humanitarian supply chain operations management. In 2020 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC) (pp. 1360-1371). IEEE. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/WSC48552.2020.9384003
  32. Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J., Sobreiro, V. A., Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A. B., de Souza Campos, L. M., Mariano, E. B., & Renwick, D. W. S. (2019). An analysis of the literature on humanitarian logistics and supply chain management: paving the way for future studies. Annals of Operations Research, 283(1), 289-307. Erişim adresi: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10479-017-2536-x
  33. Chingono, T. T., & Mbohwa, C. (2015, May). Humanitarian Logistics in Zimbabwe: A taxonomic literature review. In Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science, 925–929. Erişim adresi: https://www.iaeng.org/publication/WCECS2015/WCECS2015_pp925-929.pdf
  34. Clark, L. F., & Hobbs, J. E. (2015, May). Innovations in international food assistance strategies and therapeutic food supply chains. In Food security in an uncertain world. Emerald Group Publishing Limited,111–128. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/S1574-871520150000015016
  35. Connelly, E. B., Lambert, J. H., & Thekdi, S. A. (2016). Robust investments in humanitarian logistics and supply chains for disaster resilience and sustainable communities. Natural Hazards Review, 17(1), 04015017. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000187
  36. Cookson, S. T., Abaza, H., Clarke, K. R., Burton, A., Sabrah, N. A., Rumman, K. A.,. & Naoum, M. (2015). Impact of and response to increased tuberculosis prevalence among Syrian refugees compared with Jordanian tuberculosis prevalence: case study of a tuberculosis public health strategy. Conflict and health, 9(1), 1-7. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13031-015-0044-7
  37. Coombes, P. H., & Nicholson, J. D. (2021). Building an entrepreneurial business model: The case of MKM Building Supplies Ltd. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 22(4), 275-283. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/14657503211012383
  38. Cozzolino, A. (2021). Platforms enhancing the engagement of the private sector in humanitarian relief operations. Sustainability, 13(6), 3024. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13063024
  39. Cred. (2021). Disasters in numbers, Erişim adresi: https://cred.be/sites/default/files/2021_EMDAT_report.pdf.
  40. Çelik, İ.H., Galip, U.S.T.A., Yılmaz, G., & Yakupoğlu, M. (2020). Türkiye’de Yaşanan Teknolojik Afetler (2000- 2020) Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme. Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(2), 49-57. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.22466/acusbd.776580
  41. Das, D., Datta, A., Kumar, P., Kazancoglu, Y., & Ram, M. (2022). Building supply chain resilience in the era of COVID-19: An AHP-DEMATEL approach. Operations Management Research, 15(1), 249-267. Erişim adresi: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12063-021-00200-4
  42. Dubey, R., Bryde, D. J., Foropon, C., Tiwari, M., & Gunasekaran, A. (2021). How frugal innovation shape global sustainable supply chains during the pandemic crisis: lessons from the COVID-19. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. 27(2), 295–311. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/SCM-02-2021-0071
  43. Dubey, R., & Gunasekaran, A. (2016). The sustainable humanitarian supply chain design: agility, adaptability and alignment. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 19(1), 62-82. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2015.1015511
  44. Eggersdorfer, M., & Bird, J. K. (2016). How to achieve transparency in public-private partnerships engaged in hunger and malnutrition reduction. Hidden Hunger, 115, 224-232. doi: 10.1159/000442109
  45. Eligüzel, N., Çetinkaya, C., & Dereli, T. (2020). Comparison of different machine learning techniques on location extraction by utilizing geo-tagged tweets: A case study. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 46, 101151. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2020.101151 Emdat. (2020). The OFDA/CRED-International Disaster Database Université catholique de Louvain Brussels, Belgium. Erişim adrsi: https://www.emdat.be
  46. Ertem, M. A., Buyurgan, N., & Rossetti, M. D. (2010). Multiple‐buyer procurement auctions framework for humanitarian supply chain management. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/09600031011035092
  47. Erturgut, R., & Yılmaz, B. (2020). Afet ve insani yardım lojistiği alanında yapılan çalışmaların bibliyometrik analizi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (40), 105-123. doi: https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.667908
  48. Farooq, M. U., Hussain, A., Masood, T., & Habib, M. S. (2021). Supply chain operations management in pandemics: a state-of-the-art review inspired by COVID-19. Sustainability, 13(5), 2504. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13052504
  49. Fernando, Y., & Chukai, C. (2018). Value co-creation, goods and service tax (GST) impacts on sustainable logistic performance. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 28, 92-102. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2018.10.001
  50. Formaneck, S. (2019). A Study of Sustainable Facilities Management From A Green Supply Chain Perspective In The United Arab Emirates. Journal of Turkish Operations Management, 3(2), 314-323. Erişim adresi: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jtom/issue/51652/587607
  51. Garner, A. A., & Harrison, K. (2006). Early post‐tsunami disaster medical assistance to Banda Aceh: a personal account. Emergency Medicine Australasia, 18(1), 93-96. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-6723.2006.00811.x
  52. Gebre, B., Biadgilign, S., Taddese, Z., Legesse, T., & Letebo, M. (2018). Determinants of malnutrition among pregnant and lactating women under humanitarian setting in Ethiopia. BMC nutrition, 4(1), 1-8. Erişim adresi: https://bmcnutr.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40795-018-0222-2
  53. Green, J. L., de Weck, O. L., & Suarez, P. (2013). Evaluating the economic sustainability of sanitation logistics in Senegal. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 3(1), 7–21. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/20426741311328484
  54. Grest, M., Lauras, M., & Montreuil, B. (2019, September). Toward Humanitarian Supply Chains Enhancement by using Physical Internet Principles. In 2019 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Systems Management, 1-6. IEEE. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/IESM45758.2019.8948187
  55. Grest, M., Montreuil, B., & Lauras, M. (2020, April). Toward Assessing Physical Internet Potential Benefits for Humanitarian Supply Chains. In ILS 2020-8th International Conference on Information Systems, Logistics and Supply Chain, 276-283. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2021.251
  56. Haavisto, I., & Goentzel, J. (2015). Measuring humanitarian supply chain performance in a multi-goal context. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 5(3), 300–324. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JHLSCM-07-2015-0028
  57. Haavisto, I., & Kovács, G. (2014). Perspectives on sustainability in humanitarian supply chains. Disaster Prevention and Management, 23(5), 610–631. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/DPM-10-2013-0192
  58. Harke, J., & Leeuw, S. D. (2015). Enhancing sustainability in managing inventory prepositioning networks for disaster relief through a simulation game. In Humanitarian Logistics and Sustainability, 215-233. Springer, Cham. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15455-8_12
  59. Harpring, R., Maghsoudi, A., Fikar, C., Piotrowicz, W. D., & Heaslip, G. (2021). An analysis of compounding factors of epidemics in complex emergencies: a system dynamics approach. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 11(2), 198–226. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JHLSCM-07-2020-0063
  60. Hartranft, T.J. (2009, May). Sustainable energy for deployed military bases. 2008 Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Energy Sustainability, 1, 69–77. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/ES2008-54136
  61. Hatzell, K. B., Hatzell, M. C., Pack, M. Y., Hatzell, J. G., Patel, S. N., Sulewski, T. L.,. & Mehta, K. (2012, June). Overview of the First Year of an Innovative Science Education and Entrepreneurship Venture. In 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 25-1019. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18260/1-2--21776
  62. Hirsch, P. (2017). Recent planning approaches and mobility concepts for home health care services in Austria–A review. Die Bodenkultur: Journal of Land Management, Food and Environment, 68(4), 205-222. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/boku-2017-0017
  63. Hirschinger, M., Moser, R., Schaefers, T., Hartmann, E. (2016). No Vehicle Means No Aid—A Paradigm Change for the Humanitarian Logistics Business Model. Thunderbird International Business Review, 58(5), 373–384. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tie.21745
  64. Hossain, M. K., Thakur, V. (2021). Benchmarking health-care supply chain by implementing Industry 4.0: a fuzzyAHP-DEMATEL approach. Benchmarking, 28(2), 556–581. Erişim adresi: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/BIJ-05-2020-0268/full/html
  65. Idigbe, E. O., Odutolu, O., Okonkwo, P., Folayan, M., Audu, R., Makanjuola, O., Jolayemi, O. (2006). Evaluation of the Nigerian national antiretroviral, ARV treatment training programme. Sahara J, 3(3), 488–502. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17290376.2006.9724876
  66. Ittmann, H. W. (2020). Lessons gained from four case studies of operations research for sustainable development in South Africa. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 28(4), 1187-1217. Erişim adresi: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10100-019-00644-x
  67. Jermsittiparsert, K., & Kampoomprasert, A. (2019). The agility, adaptability, and alignment as the determinants of the sustainable humanitarian supply chain design. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 7(2), 539-547. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7264
  68. Jilani, A., Ali, Y., & Khan, M. W. (2018). Greening of humanitarian supply chain with focus on logistics. International Journal of Business Performance and Supply Chain Modelling, 10(1), 49-66. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJBPSCM.2018.093319
  69. Johnstone, P.W., Eder, M.K., Newton, A., Bentley, N., & Rufus, I. (2019). The west African Ebola emergency and reconstruction; lessons from Public Health England. British Medical Bulletin, 129(1), 79-89. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldz005
  70. Kaminsky, J.A. (2018). National culture shapes private investment in transportation infrastructure projects around the globe. Journal of construction engineering and management, 144(2), 04017098. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001416
  71. Karl, A.A., & Karl, J.S. (2022). Human rights for refugees: enhancing sustainable humanitarian supply chain to guarantee a health environment in refugee settlements. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JHLSCM-07-2017-0029
  72. Karuppiah, K., Sankaranarayanan, B., Ali, S. M., & Paul, S.K. (2021). Key challenges to sustainable humanitarian supply chains: lessons from the covid-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 13(11), 5850. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13115850
  73. Khan, M., Ishaque, A., Shah, S. F. A., Hussain, A., Zeeshan, M., Khan, J. A., & Rehman, A. (2020). The teaching of humanitarian logistics at university level. Int. J. Innov., Creativity Change, 12(11), 485-500.
  74. Khan, M., Sarmad, M., Ullah, S., & Bae, J. (2020). Education for sustainable development in humanitarian logistics. Journal of humanitarian logistics and supply chain management. 10(4), 573–602. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JHLSCM-03-2020-0022
  75. Klumpp, M. (2015). Sustainable humanitarian logistics research—A conceptualization. In Humanitarian Logistics and Sustainability, 49-63, Springer, Cham. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15455-8_4
  76. Klumpp, M., Leeuw, S. D., Regattieri, A., & Souza, R. D. (2015). Sustainability in Humanitarian Logistics—Why and How?. In Humanitarian Logistics and Sustainability, 3-9, Springer, Cham. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978- 3-319-15455-8_1 Klumpp, M., & Loske, D. (2021). Long-term economic sustainability of humanitarian logistics—a multi-level and time-series data envelopment analysis. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(5), 2219. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052219
  77. Kovács, G., & Spens, K.M. (2007). Humanitarian logistics in disaster relief operations. International journal of physical distribution & logistics management, 37(2), 99–114. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09600030710734820
  78. Kretschmer, A., Spinler, S., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2014). A school feeding supply chain framework: Critical factors for sustainable program design. Production and Operations Management, 23(6), 990-1001. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/poms.12109
  79. Kumar, A., Srivastava, S. K., & Singh, S. (2022). How blockchain technology can be a sustainable infrastructure for the agrifood supply chain in developing countries. Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JGOSS-08-2021-0058
  80. Kurbanova, M., & Cavlak, H. Blokzincir ve denetim alanındaki makalelerin bibliyometrik analizi. TIDE AcademIA Research, 3(2), 213-246. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/2188149
  81. Kunz, N., & Gold, S. (2017). Sustainable humanitarian supply chain management–exploring new theory. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 20(2), 85-104. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2015.1103845
  82. Kwapong Baffoe, B., & Luo, W. (2020). Humanitarian relief sustainability: A framework of humanitarian logistics digital business ecosystem. Transportation Research Procedia, 48, 363-387. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2020.08.032
  83. Laguna-Salvadó, L., Lauras, M., Okongwu, U., & Comes, T. (2019). A multicriteria Master Planning DSS for a sustainable humanitarian supply chain. Annals of Operations Research, 283(1), 1303-1343. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10479-018-2882-3
  84. Larson, P. D. (2021). Security, sustainability and supply chain collaboration in the humanitarian space. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JHLSCM-06-2021-0059
  85. Le Cozannet, G., Kervyn, M., Russo, S., Ifejika Speranza, C., Ferrier, P., Foumelis, M.,. & Modaressi, H. (2020). Space-based earth observations for disaster risk management. Surveys in geophysics, 41(6), 1209-1235. Erişim adresi: https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/link_gateway/2020SGeo.41.1209L/doi:10.1007/s10712-020-09586-5
  86. Lecadet, C. (2020). The IOM’s Crisis Management and the Expulsion of Ethiopians from Saudi Arabia. In The International Organization for Migration, 271-292. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32976-1_12
  87. Leiras, A., de Brito Jr, I., Peres, E.Q., Bertazzo, T.R., & Yoshizaki, H.T.Y. (2014). Literature review of humanitarian logistics research: trends and challenges. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 4(1), 95–130. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JHLSCM-04-2012-0008
  88. Li, C., Zhang, F., Cao, C., Liu, Y., & Qu, T. (2019). Organizational coordination in sustainable humanitarian supply chain: An evolutionary game approach. Journal of cleaner production, 219, 291-303. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.233
  89. Lipman, T.E., & Maier, P. (2022). Advanced materials supply considerations for electric vehicle applications. MRS Bulletin, 46(12), 1164–1175. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1557/s43577-022-00263-z
  90. Liu, J. (2011). Supply Chain Management and Transport Logistics. Supply Chain Management and Transport Logistics. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203805862
  91. Lom, M., Pribyl, O., & Svitek, M. (2016, May). Industry 4.0 as a part of smart cities. In 2016 Smart Cities Symposium Prague (SCSP), 1-6. IEEE. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SCSP.2016.7501015
  92. MacCarthy, M. F., Berns, H. F., Monty, R., Brett, M. E., Martin, Z. L., Dimopoulos, K. C.,. & Schultz, S. (2018, June). Global Humanitarian Engineering Solutions: A Partnership Between Mercer University and the United Nations Humanitarian Response Depot. In 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.
  93. Malmir, B., & Zobel, C. W. (2021). An applied approach to multi-criteria humanitarian supply chain planning for pandemic response. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 11(2), 320–346. Erişim adresi: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JHLSCM-08-2020-0064/full/html
  94. Mangla, S. K., & Luthra, S. (2022). When challenges need an evaluation: for operational excellence and sustainability orientation in humanitarian supply and logistics management. Production Planning & Control, 33(6-7), 539-557. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2020.1834129
  95. Matopoulos, A., Kovács, G., & Hayes, O. (2014). Local resources and procurement practices in humanitarian supply chains: An empirical examination of large‐scale house reconstruction projects. Decision Sciences, 45(4), 621-646. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/deci.12086
  96. McDonald, L., Freese, A., Lucena, J., Maya, C., Gamarra, M., Restrepo, O. J. (2021). Beyond social licensing: Employing creative capacity building to develop problem solving and design capabilities among mining communities in Colombia. 2021 SME Annual Conference and Expo and CMA 123rd National Western Mining Conference.
  97. Medel, K., Kousar, R., & Masood, T. (2020). A collaboration–resilience framework for disaster management supply networks: a case study of the Philippines. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JHLSCM-09-2019-0066
  98. Meduri, Y., & Ahmed, F. A. (2016). Key focus areas in emergency relief: a conceptual framework aligned with triple bottom line. International Journal of Emergency Management, 12(4), 392-402. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJEM.2016.079845
  99. Miro, E. D., Martin, J. L., Lopez, L., Secson, J., Oracion, C., & Loanzon, J. (2018). A Supply Chain Profile of a School-based Feeding Program using the Centralized Kitchen Model, 9(7), 1394–1404. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v9i7.2073
  100. Mora-Vargas, J., Buzón-Cantera, I. E., Thierry-Aguilera, R., & Valdivia-Beutelspacher, R. (2015). Optimization for Humanitarian Logistics, a Sustainable Model. In IIE Annual Conference. Proceedings, 343, Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE). Erişim adresi: https://www.proquest.com/openview/15b4103286e4d1646dd1f6bc36b01eed/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=51908
  101. Moysey, S. (2010, October). The importance of stakeholders in community-based geophysics programs. In 2010 SEG Annual Meeting. OnePetro, 3858–3862. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/1.3513653
  102. Nappi, M. M. L., & Souza, J. C. (2017). Temporary shelters: An architectural look at user-environment relationships. Arquitetura Revista, 13(2), 112-120. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4013/arq.2017.132.05
  103. Natarajarathinam, M., Capar, I., & Narayanan, A. (2009). Managing supply chains in times of crisis: a review of literature and insights. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 39(7), 535–573. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09600030910996251
  104. Nedjalkov, A., Meyer, J., Göken, H., Reimer, M. V., & Schade, W. (2019). Blueprint and implementation of rural stand-alone power grids with second-life lithium ion vehicle traction battery systems for resilient energy supply of tropical or remote regions. Materials, 12(16), 2642.
  105. Ni, C., Souza, R. D., Lu, Q., & Goh, M. (2015). Emergency Preparedness of Humanitarian Organizations: A System Dynamics Approach. In Humanitarian Logistics and Sustainability, 113–127. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15455-8_7
  106. Novoszel, L., & Wakolbinger, T. (2022, March). Meta-analysis of supply chain disruption research. In Operations research forum, 3(1),1-25. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43069-021-00118-4
  107. Oberhofer, P., Blanco, E. E., & Craig, A. J. (2015). Carbon efficiency of humanitarian supply chains: evidence from French Red Cross operations. In Logistics management, 53-66. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319- 13177-1_5
  108. OCHA. Global humanitarian overview 2022 (2022), Erişim adresi: https://reliefweb.int/report/world/globalhumanitarian-overview-2022-abridged-report.
  109. Oloruntoba, R. (2015). A planning and decision-making framework for sustainable humanitarian logistics in disaster response. In Humanitarian logistics and sustainability, 31-48. Overstreet, R. E., Hall, D., Hanna, J. B., & Rainer, R. K. (2011). Research in humanitarian logistics. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 1(2), 114–131. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/20426741111158421
  110. Önsüz, M., & Atalay, B. (2015). Afet lojistiği. Osmangazi Tıp Dergisi, 37(3), 1-6. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.20515/otd.45606
  111. Öztürkel, M. (2021). Afet yönetimi, afet lojistiği ve insani yardım lojistiği alanında yapılan tez çalışmalarının bibliyometrik analizi (Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Tarsus Üniversitesi Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü Uluslararası Ticaret ve Lojistik Ana Bilim Dalı, Yayınlamamış. Erişim adresi: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13099/102
  112. Parisi, S., Achillas, C., Aidonis, D., & Folinas, D. (2016). Conceptual design of a telecommunications equipment container for humanitarian logistics. International Journal of Business Science & Applied Management (IJBSAM), 11(2), 12-23. Erişim adresi: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317304612_Conceptual_design_of_a_telecommunications_equipment _container_for_humanitarian_logistics
  113. Pascucci, E. (2021). More logistics, less aid: Humanitarian-business partnerships and sustainability in the refugee camp. World Development, 142, 105424. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105424
  114. Patel, S., & Mehta, K. (2011). Life's principles as a framework for designing successful social enterprises. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 2(2), 218-230. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2011.592407
  115. Patil, A., Madaan, J., Shardeo, V., Charan, P., & Dwivedi, A. (2021). Material convergence issue in the pharmaceutical supply chain during a disease outbreak. The International Journal of Logistics Management. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-11-2020-0425
  116. Patil, A., Shardeo, V., Dwivedi, A., Madaan, J., & Varma, N. (2021). Barriers to sustainability in humanitarian medical supply chains. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 1794-1807. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.04.022
  117. Heller Pérache, A., Leeuwen, C. V., & Fall, C. (2020). The politics of exclusion: fighting for patients with kidney failure in Yemen’s war. Journal of Public Health, 42(3), e311-e315. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdz133
  118. Peretti, U., Tatham, P., Wu, Y., & Sgarbossa, F. (2015). Reverse logistics in humanitarian operations: challenges and opportunities. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 5(2), 253–274. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JHLSCM-07-2014-0026
  119. Pullman, M., Longoni, A., & Luzzini, D. (2018). Emerging discourse incubator: The roles of institutional complexity and hybridity in social impact supply chain management. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 54(2), 3-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12163
  120. Queiroz, M. M., Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., & Fosso Wamba, S. (2020). Impacts of epidemic outbreaks on supply chains: mapping a research agenda amid the COVID-19 pandemic through a structured literature review. Annals of operations research, 1-38. Erişim adresi: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10479-020-03685-7
  121. Ramos, A. C. S., & Pereira, N. N. (2021). Reducing the response time to the homeless with the use of Humanitarian Logistics Bases (BLHs) composed of shipping containers adapted as temporary shelters, 10(1), 1–28.
  122. Regattieri, A., Piana, F., Bortolini, M., Gamberi, M., & Ferrari, E. (2016). Innovative portable solar cooker using the packaging waste of humanitarian supplies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 57, 319-326. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.199
  123. Rehr, M., Shoaib, M., Ellithy, S., Okour, S., Ariti, C., Ait-Bouziad, I.,. & Lenglet, A. (2018). Prevalence of noncommunicable diseases and access to care among non-camp Syrian refugees in northern Jordan. Conflict and health, 12(1), 1-14. Erişim adresi: https://conflictandhealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13031-018- 0168-7
  124. Rejeb, A., & Rejeb, K. (2020). Blockchain and supply chain sustainability. Logforum, 16(3), 363–372. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17270/J.LOG.2020.467
  125. Rejeb, A., Rejeb, K., Simske, S., & Treiblmaier, H. (2021). Humanitarian drones: A review and research agenda. Internet of Things, 16, 100434. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2021.100434
  126. Rejeb, A., Rejeb, K., Simske, S. J., & Treiblmaier, H. (2021). Drones for supply chain management and logistics: a review and research agenda. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 1-24. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2021.1981273 Remida, A. (2015). A systemic approach to sustainable humanitarian logistics. In Humanitarian Logistics and Sustainability, 11-29. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15455-8_2
  127. Sabri, Y., Zarei, M. H., & Harland, C. (2019). Using collaborative research methodologies in humanitarian supply chains. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 9(3), 371–409. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JHLSCM-06-2018-0041
  128. Sahay, B. S., Gupta, S., Vinod Chandra Menon, N. (2015). Managing humanitarian logistics. Managing Humanitarian Logistics, 1–311. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2416-7
  129. Sahebi, I. G., Masoomi, B., & Ghorbani, S. (2020). Expert oriented approach for analyzing the blockchain adoption barriers in humanitarian supply chain. Technology in Society, 63, 101427. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101427
  130. Salvadó, L. L., Lauras, M., & Comes, T. (2018, May). A Sustainability Maturity Assessment Method for the Humanitarian Supply Chain. In ISCRAM, 277–290. Erişim adresi: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324169465_A_Sustainability_Maturity_Assessment_Method_for_the_ Humanitarian_Supply_Chain
  131. Salvadó, L. L., Lauras, M., & Comes, T. (2017, May). Sustainable Performance Measurement for Humanitarian Supply Chain Operations. In ISCRAM, 775-783. Erişim adresi: https://idl.iscram.org/files/lauralagunasalvado/2017/2064_LauraLagunaSalvado_etal2017.pdf
  132. Savino, M. M., Mazza, A., & Marchetti, B. (2015). Lean manufacturing within critical healthcare supply chain: an exploratory study through value chain simulation. International Journal of Procurement Management, 8(1-2), 3- 24. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJPM.2015.066285
  133. Schön, A. M., Al-Saadi, S., Grubmueller, J., & Schumann-Bölsche, D. (2018). Developing a camp performance indicator system and its application to Zaatari, Jordan. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 8(3), 346–373. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JHLSCM-10-2017-0047
  134. Shafiq, M., & Soratana, K. (2020). Lean readiness assessment model–a tool for Humanitarian Organizations' social and economic sustainability. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 10(2), 77–99. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JHLSCM-01-2019-0002
  135. Shafiq, M., & Soratana, K. (2019). Lean and Agile paradigms in humanitarian organizations' logistics and supply chain management. LogForum, 15(1), 139–153. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17270/J.LOG.2019.294
  136. Shafiq, M., & Soratana, K. (2019). Humanitarian logistics and supply chain management-a qualitative study. LogForum, 15(1), 19–38. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17270/J.LOG.2019.325
  137. Shaluf, I. M. (2007). Disaster types. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 16(5), 704– 717. Erişim adresi: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/09653560710837019/full/html
  138. Sienou, A., & Karduck, A. P. (2012, June). Logistics challenges in developing countries: An analyis of Burkina Faso's national plan for disaster prevention and response. In 2012 6th IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies (DEST),1-4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/DEST.2012.6227938
  139. Singh, R. K., Gupta, A., & Gunasekaran, A. (2018). Analysing the interaction of factors for resilient humanitarian supply chain. International Journal of Production Research, 56(21), 6809-6827. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1424373
  140. Soneye, A. (2014). An overview of humanitarian relief supply chains for victims of perennial flood disasters in Lagos, Nigeria (2010-2012). Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 4(2), 179–197. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JHLSCM-01-2014-0004
  141. Soosay, C. A., & Hyland, P. (2015). A decade of supply chain collaboration and directions for future research. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 20(6), 613–630. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/SCM-06-2015-0217
  142. Soyöz, H., & Özyörük, B. (2021). Afet Lojistiğinde Üç Aşamalı Karma Tamsayılı Bir Model Önerisi. Journal of Turkish Operations Management, 5(1), 641-661. Erişim adresi: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jtom/issue/63460/913244
  143. Sperling, L. (2020). Seed security response during COVID-19: building on evidence and orienting to the future. Food security, 12(4), 885-889. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12571-020-01068-1 Sucharitha, R. S., & Lee, S. (2019). New Policy Design for Food Accessibility to the People in Need. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.08648, 1867–1872. Erişim adresi: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335926448_New_Policy_Design_for_Food_Accessibility_to_the_Peo ple_in_Need
  144. Şen, G., & Esmer, S. (2017). Afet lojistiği: Bir literatür taraması. The International New Issues in Social Sciences, 5(5), 231-250. Erişim adresi: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/tinisos/issue/52902/699385 Tachaudomdach, S., Upayokin, A., Kronprasert, N., & Arunotayanun, K. (2021). Quantifying Road-Network Robustness toward Flood-Resilient Transportation Systems. Sustainability, 13(6), 3172. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13063172
  145. Tanyaş, M., Günalay, Y., Aksoy, L., & Küçük, Ö.G.B. (2013). İstanbul ili afet lojistik planı kılavuzu. Lojistik Derneği Yayınları, 20, 481-487. Erişim adresi: https://www.kalkinmakutuphanesi.gov.tr/dokuman/istanbul-iliafet-lojistik-plani-kilavuzu-pdf/574
  146. Tasnim, Z., Hamid, A.B.A., Dwivedi, Y.K., & Shareef, M.A. (2022). Sustainable disaster supply chain management for relief operations in Bangladesh. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 12(2), 285–304. Erişim adresi: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JHLSCM07-2021-0062/full/html
  147. Toyasaki, F., Arikan, E., Silbermayr, L., & Falagara Sigala, I. (2017). Disaster relief inventory management: Horizontal cooperation between humanitarian organizations. Production and Operations Management, 26(6), 1221-1237. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/poms.12661
  148. UNHCR. (2022). Mid-Year trends 2022, Erişim adresi: https://reliefweb.int/report/world/unhcr-mid-year-trends2022-0.
  149. Van Barneveld, K., Quinlan, M., Kriesler, P., Junor, A., Baum, F., Chowdhury, A.,. & Rainnie, A. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons on building more equal and sustainable societies. The economic and labour relations review, 31(2), 133-157. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1035304620927107
  150. Van Kempen, E. A., Spiliotopoulou, E., Stojanovski, G., & De Leeuw, S. (2017). Using life cycle sustainability assessment to trade off sourcing strategies for humanitarian relief items. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 22(11), 1718-1730. Erişim adresi: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11367-016-1245-z
  151. Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2006). Humanitarian aid logistics: supply chain management in high gear. Journal of the Operational research Society, 57(5), 475-489. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602125
  152. Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2019). Sustainable innovation: Pushing the boundaries of traditional operations management. Production and Operations Management, 28(12), 2930-2945. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/poms.13114
  153. Vicente-Oliva, S., & Martínez-Sánchez, Á. (2021). Remote, informal, and ephemeral communities for testing technologies. Futures, 126, 102675. Erişim adresi: 10.1016/j.futures.2020.102675
  154. Wang, D., Yih, Y., Service, J., Lajous, L., & Robbins-Penniman, S. (2016). Web-based, multi-platform, centralized, offline-compatible supply chain management system for emergency responses. In 2016 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC), 248-253. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/GHTC.2016.7857288
  155. Wei, X., Al-Refaie, A., Robles, M., & Noche, B. (2015). A sustainable humanitarian relief network study for the Wenchuan earthquake. In Humanitarian logistics and sustainability, 193-213. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978- 3-319-15455-8_11
  156. Wesana, J., De Steur, H., Dora, M. K., Mutenyo, E., Muyama, L., & Gellynck, X. (2018). Towards nutrition sensitive agriculture. Actor readiness to reduce food and nutrient losses or wastes along the dairy value chain in Uganda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 182, 46-56. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.021
  157. Wiens, M., Schätter, F., Zobel, C. W., & Schultmann, F. (2018). Collaborative emergency supply chains for essential goods and services. In Urban Disaster Resilience and Security, 145-168. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68606-6_10
  158. Witherspoon, T., & Harris, E. (2011, October). Avoiding the 30-pound paperweight: Success via contextually appropriate technologies. In 2011 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference, 402-408. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/GHTC.2011.44
  159. Wood, E. X., & Frazier, T. (2019). Decentralized humanitarian aid deployment: Reimagining the delivery of aid. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 10(1), 1–20. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JHLSCM-05-2019-0037 WREC. (2022). Environmental sustainability in humanitarian logistics, Erişim adresi: https://logcluster.org/wrec/green-logistics.
  160. Yadav, D. K., & Barve, A. (2016). Modeling post-disaster challenges of humanitarian supply chains: A TISM approach. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 17(3), 321-340. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40171-016-0134-4
  161. Yadav, D. K., & Barve, A. (2019). Prioritization of cyclone preparedness activities in humanitarian supply chains using fuzzy analytical network process. Natural Hazards, 97(2), 683-726. Erişim adresi: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11069-019-03668-3
  162. Yılmaz, Ş. F., Aktaş, N., & Demirel, N. (2022). Novel last mile delivery models in terms of sustainable urban logistics. Journal of Turkish Operations Management, 6(1), 1076-1091. Erişim adresi: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jtom/issue/70951/1020570 Zaitseva, A., Bogomolova, A., Damiani, L., & Revatria, R. (2018). Risk analyses of danger sources and humanitarian aid supply chains due to emergencies. In Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists. doi: https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.160615
  163. Zakir Hossain, A.N.M. (2021). Sustainable development and livelihoods of Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh: The effects of COVID-19. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 16(6), 1141-1152. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.160615
  164. Zarei, M. H., Carrasco-Gallego, R., & Ronchi, S. (2019). To greener pastures: An action research study on the environmental sustainability of humanitarian supply chains. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 39(11), 1193-1225. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-12-2018-0703
  165. Zarei, M. H., Carrasco‐Gallego, R., & Ronchi, S. (2019). On the role of regional hubs in the environmental sustainability of humanitarian supply chains. Sustainable Development, 27(5), 846-859. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sd.194
  166. Adeiza, M. A., Wachekwa, I., Nuta, C., Donato, S., Koomson, F., Whitney, J.,. & Ogbuagu, O. (2021). Gaps and Opportunities in HIV Service Delivery in High Volume HIV Care Centers in Liberia: Lessons From the Field. Annals of Global Health, 87(1). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/aogh.3246
  167. Asgary, R., Staderini, N., Mthethwa-Hleta, S., Lopez Saavedra, P. A., Garcia Abrego, L., Rusch, B.,. & Kerschberger, B. (2020). Evaluating smartphone strategies for reliability, reproducibility, and quality of VIA for cervical cancer screening in the Shiselweni region of Eswatini: A cohort study. PLoS medicine, 17(11), 1–16. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003378
  168. Cookson, S. T., Abaza, H., Clarke, K. R., Burton, A., Sabrah, N. A., Rumman, K. A.,. & Naoum, M. (2015). Impact of and response to increased tuberculosis prevalence among Syrian refugees compared with Jordanian tuberculosis prevalence: case study of a tuberculosis public health strategy. Conflict and health, 9(1), 1-7. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13031-015-0044-7
  169. Hatzell, K. B., Hatzell, M. C., Pack, M. Y., Hatzell, J. G., Patel, S. N., Sulewski, T. L.,. & Mehta, K. (2012, June). Overview of the First Year of an Innovative Science Education and Entrepreneurship Venture. In 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 25-1019. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18260/1-2--21776
  170. Le Cozannet, G., Kervyn, M., Russo, S., Ifejika Speranza, C., Ferrier, P., Foumelis, M.,. & Modaressi, H. (2020). Space-based earth observations for disaster risk management. Surveys in geophysics, 41(6), 1209-1235. Erişim adresi: https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/link_gateway/2020SGeo.41.1209L/doi:10.1007/s10712-020-09586-5
  171. MacCarthy, M. F., Berns, H. F., Monty, R., Brett, M. E., Martin, Z. L., Dimopoulos, K. C.,. & Schultz, S. (2018, June). Global Humanitarian Engineering Solutions: A Partnership Between Mercer University and the United Nations Humanitarian Response Depot. In 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.
  172. Rehr, M., Shoaib, M., Ellithy, S., Okour, S., Ariti, C., Ait-Bouziad, I.,. & Lenglet, A. (2018). Prevalence of noncommunicable diseases and access to care among non-camp Syrian refugees in northern Jordan. Conflict and health, 12(1), 1-14. Erişim adresi: https://conflictandhealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13031-018- 0168-7
  173. Van Barneveld, K., Quinlan, M., Kriesler, P., Junor, A., Baum, F., Chowdhury, A.,. & Rainnie, A. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons on building more equal and sustainable societies. The economic and labour relations review, 31(2), 133-157. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1035304620927107