KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

Risk perception in Istanbul: An earthquake-prone city

SEDA KUNDAK
Handan TÜRKOĞLU
ALPER İLKİ
Sayfa
117–137
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The findings of both surveys underline that there is an improvement in risk perception and measures taken to reduce risks related with earthquakes

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Risk perception on natural hazards in Turkey has been an emerging topic after of 1999 Kocaeli and Duzce earthquakes.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The results of two recent surveys on risk perception which were conducted in 2008 and 2013 are evaluated according to measures taken, willingness to pay for a safer house and trust to authorities.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The findings of both surveys underline that there is an improvement in risk perception and measures taken to reduce risks related with earthquakes
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2008 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Risk perception on natural hazards in Turkey has been an emerging topic after of 1999 Kocaeli and Duzce earthquakes. The motivation lies behind the fact that it was the first time in the Turkish history, disaster mitigation had been considered as the responsibility of not only the government, but also all stake holders. Therefore, awareness campaigns, public participation, volunteering and increasing individual capacity against earthquakes have become hot topics to have a fresh start in building resilient communities. This paper aims to reveal earthquake risk perception and preparedness level of Istanbul residents. The results of two recent surveys on risk perception which were conducted in 2008 and 2013 are evaluated according to measures taken, willingness to pay for a safer house and trust to authorities. The findings of both surveys underline that there is an improvement in risk perception and measures taken to reduce risks related with earthquakes

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KUNDAK, S., TÜRKOĞLU, H., İLKİ, A. (2014). Risk perception in Istanbul: An earthquake-prone city. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 117–137. https://ajindex.com/articles/151567

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Ambraseys, N.N., Finkel, C.F. (1991), Long-term seismicty of Istanbul and of the Marmara Sea region. Terra Nova, 3, 527-539.
  2. Arvai, J.L., (2003), Using Risk Communication to Disclose the Outcome of a Participatory Decision-Making Process: Effects on the Perceived Acceptability of Risk-Policy Decisions. Risk Analysis 23:2, 281-289.
  3. Asgary, A., Willis, K.G. (1997), “Household Behaviour in Response to Earthquake Risk: An Assessment of Alternative Theories”, Disasters, 21(4)354-365.
  4. Barnett, J., Breakwell, G.M. (2001), Risk Perception and Experience: Hazard Personality Profiles and Individual Differences. Risk Analysis 21:1, 171-177.
  5. Bontempo, R.N., Bottom, W.P., Weber, E.U. (1997), Cross-Cultural Differences in Risk Perception: A Model-Based Approach. Risk Analysis 17:4, 479-488.
  6. Carlino, S., Somma, R., Mayberry, G.C. (2008), Volcanic risk perception of young people in the urban areas of Vesuvius: Comparisons with other volcanic areas and implications for emergency management, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 172 (2008), 229-243.
  7. Dooley, D., R. Catalano, S. Mishra and S. Serxner (1992), Earthquake Preparedness: Predictions in a Community Survey. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 22(6): 451–470.
  8. Eraybar, K., İlki, A., Okazaki, K. (2007), Avcılar İlçesinde Sismik Risk Algılaması, 6. Ulusal Deprem Mühendisliği Konferansı, 16-20 Ekim 2007, İstanbul (6th National Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Eraybar, K., Okazaki, K., İlki, A. (2010), An exploratory study on risk perceptions of seismic risk and mitigation in two districts of Istanbul, Disasters, 34(1) 71-92.
  9. Erdik, M., Durukal, E., Biro, Y. ve Birgören, G., (2000), İstanbul’da Binalar için Deprem Riski ve Risk Azaltımına Yönelik Somut bir Öneri, İkinci İstanbul ve Deprem Sempozyumu, TMMOB İnşaat Mühendisleri Odası İstanbul Şubesi, 27 Mayıs 2000, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Maçka Kampüsü, 131-149.
  10. Fişek, G.O., Yeniceri, N., Muderrisoglu, S. (2002), Risk Perception and Attitudes Towards Mitigation, IIASA-DPRI Meeting, July 29-31 2002
  11. Laxenburg Austria. Green, A.R. (2008), Unauthorized development and seismic hazard vulnerability: a study of squatters and engineers in Istanbul, Turkey, Disasters, 32(3) 358-376.
  12. Horst, M., Kuttschreuter, M., Gutteling, J.M. (2007), Perceived usefulness, personal experiences, risk perception and trust as determinants of adoption of e-government services in The Netherlands. Computers in Human Behavior. Vol:23 Issue: 4, pp: 1838-1852
  13. Inal-Cekic, T., Oney Yazici