Dergiler / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2019 / Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 6

Biomechanical comparison of humeral nails with different distal locking mechanisms: Insafelock nails versus conventional locking nails

Sayfa
490–496
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The reliability of the newly developed InSafeLOCK humeral nail system, which does not require fluoroscopic control and an additional incision for distal locking, supports its use in the clinic.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical resistance to rotational and axial forces of a conventional locking nail with a newly designed intramedullary humeral nail developed for humeral shaft fractures with a secure locking mechanism through the distal part of the nail.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: InSafeLOCK humeral nail system (group 1, TST, Istanbul, Turkey) and Expert humeral nail system (group 2, DePuy Synthes, Bettlach, Switzerland) of the same size (9 300 mm) were examined.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The reliability of the newly developed InSafeLOCK humeral nail system, which does not require fluoroscopic control and an additional incision for distal locking, supports its use in the clinic.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2055 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical resistance to rotational and axial forces of a conventional locking nail with a newly designed intramedullary humeral nail developed for humeral shaft fractures with a secure locking mechanism through the distal part of the nail. Methods: InSafeLOCK humeral nail system (group 1, TST, Istanbul, Turkey) and Expert humeral nail system (group 2, DePuy Synthes, Bettlach, Switzerland) of the same size (9 300 mm) were examined. In total, 24 fourth-generation humerus sawbones were used in the experiment. Osteotomy was performed at the humerus shaft, and a defect was created by removing 1 cm of bone. After pre-loading 5000 cycles at a frequency of 2 Hz and a force of 50e250 N for axial loading and 5000 torsion torques between 0.5 Nm and 6.5 Nm at a 2 Hz frequency for torsional loading, the failure load values of each load were recorded. Distal interlocking was performed with an endopin in group 1, while a double cortex screw was used in group 2. Results: All samples successfully passed the cyclic loading. The initial and final stiffness values were similar between the groups after axial loading (p ¼ 0.873 and p ¼ 0.522, respectively). The mean axial failure load values in groups 1 and 2 were 2627 ± 164 N and 7141 ± 1491 N, respectively. A significant difference was found in the axial failure load values (p ¼ 0.004). Significant differences were observed between the initial and final torsional stiffness between the two groups (p ¼ 0.004 and p ¼ 0.004, respectively). No significant difference was found in the failure load values after torsional loading (11791 ± 2055 N.mm and 16997 ± 5440 N.mm) (p ¼ 0.055). Conclusion: These results provide a biomechanical demonstration of the adequate stability of both nails after axial and rotational loading. The reliability of the newly developed InSafeLOCK humeral nail system, which does not require fluoroscopic control and an additional incision for distal locking, supports its use in the clinic.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ERDEN, T., KAPICIOĞLU, M., DEMİRTAŞ, A., BİLSEL, K., AKPINAR, F., KUDUZ, H. (2019). Biomechanical comparison of humeral nails with different distal locking mechanisms: Insafelock nails versus conventional locking nails. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 6, 490–496. https://ajindex.com/articles/151216

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Walker M, Palumbo B, Badman B, Brooks J, Van Gelderen J, Mighell M. Humeral shaft fractures: a review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011;20(5):833e844. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2010.11.030
  2. Ouyang H, Xiong J, Xiang P, Cui Z, Chen L, Yu B. Plate versus intramedullary nail fixation in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures: an updated meta-analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013;22(3):387e395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2012. 06.007
  3. Benegas E, Ferreira Neto AA, Gracitelli ME, et al. Shoulder function after surgical treatment of displaced fractures of the humeral shaft: a randomized trial comparing antegrade intramedullary nailing with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014;23(6):767e774. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jse.2014.02.010
  4. Chapman JR, Henley MB, Agel J, Benca PJ. Randomized prospective study of humeral shaft fracture fixation: intramedullary nails versus plates. J Orthop Trauma. 2000;14(3):162e166. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200003000- 00002
  5. Putti AB, Uppin RB, Putti BB. Locked intramedullary nailing versus dynamic compression plating for humeral shaft fractures. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2009;17(2):139e141.
  6. Kurup H, Hossain M, Andrew JG. Dynamic compression plating versus locked intramedullary nailing for humeral shaft fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;6(6):CD005959. https://doi.org/10.1002/ 14651858.CD005959.pub2
  7. Turken MA, Akdemir M, Uzun B, Ozkan M. Biomechanical evaluation of different internal fixation methods for humerus shaft fractures with medial butterfly fragment. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2013;47(3):173e178. https:// doi.org/10.3944/AOTT.2013.2701
  8. Blum J,Machemer H, Baumgart F, Schlegel U,Wahl D, Rommens PM. Biomechanical comparison of bending and torsional properties in retrograde intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1999;13(5):344e350. https:// doi.org/10.1097/00005131-199906000-00004
  9. Gottschalk MB, Carpenter W, Hiza E, Reisman W, Roberson J. Humeral shaft fracture fixation: incidence rates and complications as reported by American board of orthopaedic surgery Part II candidates. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98(17):e71.
  10. Augat P, Merk J, Ignatius A, et al. Early, full weightbearing with flexible fixation delays fracture healing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;328(7):194e202. https:// doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199607000-00031