Dergiler / Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care / 2026 / Volume: 7 Issue: 3

Stoma-free subtotal and total colectomy for obstructed left-sided colon cancer: safety, functional outcomes, and oncological results

Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-06-25
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

STC may offer an advantage over TC in terms of lower long-term antidiarrheal requirement.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aims: The present study aims to evaluate the perioperative safety, postoperative bowel function, and oncological outcomes of stoma-free subtotal colectomy (STC) and total colectomy (TC) with primary anastomosis in patients with obstructed left-sided colon cancer, with particular focus on long-term bowel adaptation and antidiarrheal medication requirement.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: This retrospective single-center cohort study included consecutive patients who underwent STC or TC with primary anastomosis for obstructed left-sided colon cancer between June 2016 and August 2024.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:STC may offer an advantage over TC in terms of lower long-term antidiarrheal requirement.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2016 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Anastomosis · colectomy · colonic neoplasms

Abstract

Aims: The present study aims to evaluate the perioperative safety, postoperative bowel function, and oncological outcomes of stoma-free subtotal colectomy (STC) and total colectomy (TC) with primary anastomosis in patients with obstructed left-sided colon cancer, with particular focus on long-term bowel adaptation and antidiarrheal medication requirement. Methods: This retrospective single-center cohort study included consecutive patients who underwent STC or TC with primary anastomosis for obstructed left-sided colon cancer between June 2016 and August 2024. Patients who required end ileostomy or diverting loop ileostomy were excluded. Demographic, operative, pathological, and postoperative data were reviewed. Results: TC was performed in 41 patients (68.3%) and STC in 19 patients (31.7%). Minor complications occurred in 16 patients (26.7%), major complications in 8 (13.3%), and perioperative mortality in 5 (8.3%). No anastomotic leakage was observed. Follow-up beyond 12 months was available in 51 patients (85.0%). Median daily bowel movements decreased from 7 (range 3-12) at 3 months to 2 (range 2-3) at 12 months. Long-term antidiarrheal medication was required in 14 patients (23.3%) and was significantly more frequent after TC than after STC (31.7% vs. 5.3%, p <0.05). In stage II–III disease, the combined 3-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates were 82.4% and 80.2%, respectively. Conclusion: In selected patients with obstructed left-sided colon cancer, stoma-free STC and TC with primary anastomosis appear to be feasible and safe options with acceptable perioperative morbidity, progressive functional adaptation, and satisfactory oncological outcomes. STC may offer an advantage over TC in terms of lower long-term antidiarrheal requirement.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Kuşak, M., Gün, M., Şenol, S. (2026). Stoma-free subtotal and total colectomy for obstructed left-sided colon cancer: safety, functional outcomes, and oncological results. Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care, Volume: 7 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.47582/jompac.1927767

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (23)

  1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Weiderpass E, Soerjomataram I. Global cancer statistics 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(3):229-263. doi:10.3322/caac.21834
  2. Mikalonis M, Jensen K, Bulut O, et al. Danish guidelines for treating acute colonic obstruction. Front Surg. 2024;11:1400814. doi:10.3389/fsurg.2024
  3. Mauro A, Clemente G, Laracca GG, et al. Malignant acute colonic obstruction: multidisciplinary approach for endoscopic management. Cancers (Basel). 2024;16(4):821. doi:10.3390/cancers16040821
  4. an Hooft JE, Veld JV, Arnold D, et al. ESGE Guideline Update 2020: self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) for obstructing colonic cancer. Endoscopy. 2020;52(5):389-407. doi:10.1055/a-1140-3017
  5. Kim DH, Park SJ. Colon stenting as a bridge to surgery in obstructive colorectal cancer. Clin Endosc. 2024;57(4):424-433. doi:10.5946/ce.2023.138
  6. Pisano M, Zorcolo L, Merli C, et al. 2017 WSES guidelines on colon and rectal cancer emergencies: obstruction and perforation. World J Emerg Surg. 2018;13:36. doi:10.1186/s13017-018-0192-3
  7. Jin J, Zhang D, Xu H, Yu Z, Zhou M, Qian D. An evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of endoscopic colon stenting in the treatment of obstructive left colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025;410(1):175. doi:10.1007/s00423-025-03762-0
  8. Suzuki H, Suh YS, Sato Y, Miura T, Shibata C. Oncologic impact of colonic stents for obstructive left-sided CRC. World J Clin Oncol. 2023; 14(1):1-12. doi:10.5306/wjco.v14.i1.1
  9. McKechnie T, Lee Y, Ashktorab H, et al. Management of left sided malignant colorectal obstructions with curative intent: a network meta analysis. Surg Endosc. 2023;37:4159-4178. doi:10.1007/s00464-023-09929-4
  10. Pavlidis ET, Pavlidis TE. Management of obstructed colorectal carcinoma in an emergency setting: an update. J Clin Med. 2024;16(3):598-613. doi:10.1007/s00464-023-09929-4
  11. Cardoso PM, Rodrigues-Pinto E. Self-expandable metal stents for obstructing colon cancer and extracolonic cancer: a review of latest evidence. Cancers (Basel). 2024;17(1):87. doi:10.3390/cancers17010087
  12. Son JT, Kim YB, Kim HO, et al. Short- and long-term outcomes of subtotal/total colectomy in obstructed left colon cancer. Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(3):260-266. doi:10.3393/ac.2022.00101.0014
  13. Balciscueta I, Balciscueta Z, et al. Long-term outcomes of stent-related perforation in malignant colon obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020;35(8):1439-1451. doi:10.1007/s00384-020-03664-1
  14. Uehara H, Yamazaki T, Iwaya A, Kameyama H, Komatsu M, Hirai M. Comparison of the oncological outcomes of stenting as a bridge to surgery and surgery alone in stages II to III obstructive colorectal cancer: a retrospective study. Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(3):235-243. doi:10.3393/ac.2020.01067.0152
  15. Hennekinne-Mucci S, Tuech JJ, Bréhant O, et al. Emergency subtotal/total colectomy in the management of obstructed left colon carcinoma. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2006;21(6):538-541. doi:10.1007/s00384-005-0048-7
  16. Käser SA, Glauser PM, Künzli B, Dolanc R, Bassotti G, Maurer CA. Subtotal colectomy for malignant left-sided colon obstruction is associated with a lower anastomotic leak rate than segmental colectomy. Anticancer Res. 2012;32(8):3501-3505.
  17. Min CK, Kim HO, Lee D, et al. Obstructive left colon cancer should be managed by using a subtotal colectomy instead of colonic stenting. Ann Coloproctol. 2016;32(6):215-220. doi:10.3393/ac.2016.32.6.215
  18. Guo C, Wu J, Wang Y, Su H, Wang C, Liu H. Surveillance colonoscopies of synchronous colorectal cancer: what should we do? Turk J Gastroenterol. 2023;34(3):234-241. doi:10.5152/tjg.2022.22056
  19. Toh JWT, Hui N, Collins G, Phan K. Survival outcomes associated with Lynch syndrome colorectal cancer and metachronous rate after subtotal/total versus segmental colectomy: meta-analysis. Surgery. 2022;172(5):1315-1322. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2022.06.013
  20. Cazelles A, Pasinato G, Aubert M, et al. Obstructed colon cancer: review and perspectives. J Visc Surg. 2025;162(6):431-441. doi:10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2025.09.001
  21. Nehmeh WA, Gabriel M, Tarhini A, et al. Total or subtotal colectomy with primary anastomosis for occlusive left colon cancer: a safe, acceptable and applicable procedure. Gulf J Oncolog. 2019;1(30):57-60.
  22. Mege D, Manceau G, Bridoux V, et al. Surgical management of obstructive left colon cancer at a national level: results of a multicentre study of the French Surgical Association in 1500 patients. J Visc Surg. 2019;156(3):197-208. doi:10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2018.11.008
  23. Emmertsen KJ, Laurberg S. Low anterior resection syndrome score: development and validation of a symptom-based scoring system for bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2012;255(5):922-928. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824f1c21