KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine / 2026 / Volume: 9 Issue: 2

İklim değişikliğinin psikolojik sonuçları: Türk ergenlerde eko-kaygı, stres ve yaşam doyumu

Psychological costs of climate change: eco-anxiety, stress, and life satisfaction among Turkish adolescents

Selinay Dumanlı Yaşar(ISTANBUL AREL UNIVERSITY)0009-0001-3950-3954
Ece Alagöz(MALTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-4913-0944
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-03-12
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bulgular, eko-kaygı ve algılanan stresin ergenlerin yaşam doyumu üzerinde önemli etkileri olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:İklim değişikliği, özellikle uzun vadeli etkileri nedeniyle ergenlerde önemli psikolojik zorluklara yol açmaktadır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Bu çalışma, ergenlerde eko-kaygı, algılanan stres ve yaşam doyumu arasındaki ilişkileri inceleyerek bu değişkenlerin birbiriyle nasıl etkileşimde bulunduğunu açıklamayı amaçlamaktadır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bulgular, eko-kaygı ve algılanan stresin ergenlerin yaşam doyumu üzerinde önemli etkileri olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:416 katılımcı
⚙️Değişkenler:Climate change · eco-anxiety · perceived stress

Özet

İklim değişikliği, özellikle uzun vadeli etkileri nedeniyle ergenlerde önemli psikolojik zorluklara yol açmaktadır. Bu çalışma, ergenlerde eko-kaygı, algılanan stres ve yaşam doyumu arasındaki ilişkileri inceleyerek bu değişkenlerin birbiriyle nasıl etkileşimde bulunduğunu açıklamayı amaçlamaktadır. Türkiye’de bir ilçede öğrenim gören lise öğrencileri arasında kesitsel bir çalışma yürütülmüştür. Tabakalı rastgele örnekleme yöntemiyle 416 katılımcı seçilmiştir. Veriler Eko-Kaygı Ölçeği, Algılanan Stres Ölçeği ve Yaşam Doyumu Ölçeği kullanılarak toplanmıştır. İstatistiksel analizlerde korelasyon ve yol analizi uygulanmış; analizler SPSS 26 ve AMOS 23 programlarıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Eko-kaygı, algılanan stres ile pozitif yönde (r = 0.423, p < 0.001) ve yaşam doyumu ile negatif yönde (r = −0.298, p < 0.001) ilişkili bulunmuştur. Algılanan stres de yaşam doyumu ile negatif yönde ilişkili bulunmuştur (r = −0.530, p < 0.001). Yol analizi sonuçları, eko-kaygının algılanan stresi (β = 0.42, p < 0.001) ve yaşam doyumunu (β = −0.09, p = 0.047) anlamlı şekilde yordadığını göstermiştir. Ayrıca algılanan stres, yaşam doyumunun güçlü bir negatif yordayıcısıdır (β = −0.49, p < 0.001). Bulgular, eko-kaygı ve algılanan stresin ergenlerin yaşam doyumu üzerinde önemli etkileri olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. İklim değişikliği bağlamında ergenlerin iyilik hâlinin desteklenmesi için eko-kaygı ve stres yönetimine yönelik müdahalelerin geliştirilmesi kritik önem taşımaktadır.

Abstract

Aims: This study aimed to examine the relationships between eco-anxiety, perceived stress, and life satisfaction among Turkish adolescents and to explore the direct and indirect effects of eco-anxiety on life satisfaction. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 416 high school students selected through stratified random sampling. Data were collected using the Eco-Anxiety Scale, Perceived Stress Scale, and Life Satisfaction Scale. Statistical analyses, including correlation and structural equation modeling, were performed using SPSS 26 and AMOS 23. Results: Eco-anxiety was positively correlated with perceived stress (r=0.423, p<0.001; moderate association) and negatively correlated with life satisfaction (r=−0.298, p<0.001; small-to-moderate association). Perceived stress was negatively correlated with life satisfaction (r=−0.530, p<0.001; moderate-to-strong association). Structural equation modeling demonstrated acceptable model fit (CFI=.95, RMSEA=.045) and showed that eco-anxiety strongly predicted perceived stress (β=0.42, p<0.001) and had a small but statistically significant direct association with life satisfaction (β=−0.09, p=0.047), whereas perceived stress was a strong negative predictor of life satisfaction (β=−0.49, p<0.001). Conclusion: Eco-anxiety and perceived stress were significantly associated with adolescents’ life satisfaction. Interventions targeting eco-anxiety and stress management may be helpful for supporting adolescents’ psychological well-being in the context of climate-related concerns (eco-anxiety), although causal inferences cannot be drawn from this cross-sectional design. The conclusions drawn from this study are supported by an adequately fitting structural model and consistent patterns of small-to-moderate associations among the key variables.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Yaşar, S. D., Alagöz, E. (2026). İklim değişikliğinin psikolojik sonuçları: Türk ergenlerde eko-kaygı, stres ve yaşam doyumu. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine, Volume: 9 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1831083

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (39)

  1. Pihkala P. Anxiety and the ecological crisis: an analysis of eco-anxiety and climate anxiety. Sustainability. 2020;12(19):7836. doi:10.3390/su 12197836
  2. Berry HL, Waite TD, Dear KB, Capon AG, Murray V. The case for systems thinking about climate change and mental health. Nat Clim Chang. 2018;8(4):282 290. doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0102-4
  3. Hickman C. We need to (find a way to) talk about eco-anxiety. J Soc Work Pract. 2020;34(4):411 424. doi:10.1080/02650533.2020.1844166
  4. Verplanken B, Marks E, Dobromir AI. On the nature of eco-anxiety: how constructive or unconstructive is habitual worry about global warming? J Environ Psychol. 2020;72:101528. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101528
  5. Pittaway CR, Fielding KS, Louis WR. Pathways to conventional and radical climate action: the role of temporal orientation, environmental cognitive alternatives, and eco-anxiety. Glob Environ Change. 2024;87: 102886. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2024.102886
  6. Nadarajah K, David J C, Brun L, et al. “we are running out of time”: temporal orientation and information seeking as explanatory factors of climate anxiety among young people. Psych. 2022;4(3):560 573. doi:10. 3390/psych4030043
  7. Ojala M, Cunsolo A, Ogunbode CA, Middleton J. Anxiety, worry, and grief in a time of environmental and climate crisis: a narrative review. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 2021;46(1):35 58. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ- 012220-022716
  8. Clayton S, Karazsia BT. Development and validation of a measure of climate change anxiety. J Environ Psychol. 2020;69:101434. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101434
  9. Hogg TL, Stanley SK, O’Brien LV, et al. The Hogg eco-anxiety scale: development and validation of a multidimensional scale. OSF Preprints. 2021. doi:10.31219/osf.io/rxudb
  10. Stewart AE. Psychometric properties of the climate change worry scale. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(2):494. doi:10.3390/ijerph 18020494
  11. Stanley SK, Hogg TL, Leviston Z, Walker I. From anger to action: differential impacts of eco-anxiety, eco-depression, and eco-anger on climate action and wellbeing. J Clim Chang Health. 2021;1:100003. doi: 10.1016/j.jocch.2021.100003
  12. Ojala M. Hope and anticipation in education for a sustainable future. Futures. 2017;94:76 84. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2017.01.004
  13. Hickman C. Children and climate change: exploring children’s feelings about climate change using free association narrative interview methodology. In: Climate Psychology: On Indifference to Disaster. 2019:41 59. Routledge.
  14. Pihkala P. Eco-anxiety and environmental education. Sustainability. 2020;12(23):10149. doi:10.3390/su122310149
  15. Arslan G, Yıldırım M, Karataş Z, Kabasakal Z, Kılınç M. Meaningful living to promote complete mental health among university students in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2022; 20(2):930 942. doi:10.1007/s11469-020-00416-8
  16. Crandon TJ, Scott JG, Charlson FJ, Thomas HJ. A social–ecological perspective on climate anxiety in children and adolescents. Nat Clim Chang. 2022;12:123 131. doi:10.1038/s41558-021-01295-3
  17. Helldén D, Andersson C, Nilsson M, Ebi KL, Friberg P, Alfvén T. Climate change and child health: a scoping review and an expanded conceptual framework. Lancet Planet Health. 2021;5:e164 e175. doi:10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00059-3
  18. Boluda Verdú I, Senent Valero M, Casas Escolano M, Matijasevich A, Pastor Valero M. Fear for the future: eco-anxiety and health implications, a systematic review. J Environ Psychol. 2022;84:101904. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101904
  19. Franzen A, Vogl D. Two decades of measuring environmental attitudes: a comparative analysis of 33 countries. Glob Environ Change. 2013;23: 1001 1008. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.009
  20. Searle K, Gow K. Do concerns about climate change lead to distress? Int J Clim Chang Strat Manag. 2010;2(4):362 379. doi:10.1108/ 17568691011089891
  21. Whitmarsh L, Player L, Jiongco A, et al. Climate anxiety: what predicts it and how is it related to climate action? J Environ Psychol. 2022;83:101866. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101866
  22. Heeren A, Mouguiama Daouda C, Contreras A. On climate anxiety and the threat it may pose to daily life functioning and adaptation: a study among European and African French speaking participants. Clim Change. 2022;173:15. doi:10.1007/s10584-022-03347-3
  23. Hickman C, Marks E, Pihkala P, et al. A global survey of climate anxiety in children and young people and their beliefs about government responses to climate change. Lancet Planet Health. 2021;5:e863 e873. doi:10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00278-3
  24. Jones CA, Davison A. Disempowering emotions: the role of educational experiences in social responses to climate change. Geoforum. 2021;118: 190 200. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.12.018
  25. Uzun K, Öztürk AF, Karaman M, et al. Adaptation of the Eco Anxiety Scale to Turkish: a validity and reliability study. Arch Health Sci Res. 2022;9(2):110 115. doi:10.17681/hsp.1076767
  26. Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983;24(4):385 396. doi:10.2307/2136404
  27. Eskin M, Harlak H, Demirkiran F, Dereboy Ç. The adaptation of the perceived stress scale into Turkish: a reliability and validity analysis. Yeni Sempozyum. 2013;51(3):132 140.
  28. Gadermann AM, Schonert Reichl KA, Zumbo BD. Investigating validity evidence of the Satisfaction with Life Scale adapted for children. Soc Indic Res. 2010;96(2):229 247. doi:10.1007/s11205-009-9476-6
  29. Altay D, Ekşi H. Validity and reliability study of the life satisfaction scale for children. Presented at: 5th International Educational Sciences Symposium; October 2018; Istanbul, Turkey. p.354 362.
  30. Wang J, Wang X. Structural equation modeling: applications using mplus: methods and applications. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons; 2012:5 9.
  31. Meydan H, Şeşen H. Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi AMOS Uygulamaları. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık; 2011.
  32. Schermelleh Engel K, Moosbrugger H. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness of fit measures. Methods Psychol Res Online. 2003;8(2):23 74.
  33. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using Multivariate Statistics. 4th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2001.
  34. DeVellis RF. Scale development: theory and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2003.
  35. Verplanken B, Marks E, Dobromir AI. On the nature of eco anxiety: how constructive or unconstructive is habitual worry about global warming? J Environ Psychol. 2020;72:101528. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101528
  36. Stewart AE. Psychometric properties of the Climate Change Worry Scale. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(2):494. doi:10.3390/ijerph 18020494
  37. Gifford R. Environmental psychology matters. Annu Rev Psychol. 2014; 65:541 579. doi:10.1146/annurev psych 010213 115048
  38. Hayes K, Blashki G, Wiseman J, Burke S, Reifels L. Climate change and mental health: risks, impacts, and priority actions. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2018;12(1):28. doi:10.1186/s13033-018-0180-7
  39. Reser JP, Swim JK. Adapting to and coping with the threat and impacts of climate change. Am Psychol. 2011;66(4):277 289. doi:10.1037/a0023412