Dergiler / Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine / 2026 / Volume: 9 Issue: 2

Noise exposure and its perceived effects on hearing and work performance among dental professionals in a high-volume dentistry hospital

Yasemin Akçaalan(ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0003-0011-3489
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-03-12
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This exposure is associated with a high prevalence of hearing-related symptoms and perceived impairment in work performance among dental professionals.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aims: This study aimed to identify noise sources in a high-volume level 1 dentistry hospital and to evaluate the perceived effects of noise exposure on dental professionals.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: This questionnaire-based cross-sectional study included dental professionals working in a level 1 dentistry hospital.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This exposure is associated with a high prevalence of hearing-related symptoms and perceived impairment in work performance among dental professionals.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Noise exposure · dental professionals · occupational health

Abstract

Aims: This study aimed to identify noise sources in a high-volume level 1 dentistry hospital and to evaluate the perceived effects of noise exposure on dental professionals. Methods: This questionnaire-based cross-sectional study included dental professionals working in a level 1 dentistry hospital. A structured survey consisting of 18 questions (3 demographic, 2 open-ended, and 13 multiple-choice), developed by the authors based on relevant literature, was used. Data regarding demographic characteristics, working conditions, noise sources, hearingrelated symptoms, and perceived effects of noise on work performance were collected. Chi-square tests were used for statistical analysis, with p<0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 237 participants were included. The most frequently reported noise sources were environmental noise (85.7%), aspirators (84.0%), external noise (83.1%), and high-speed handpieces (81.0%). Difficulty understanding speech in noisy environments was reported by 59.1% of participants, while 57.8% reported tinnitus or ringing sensations. Difficulty understanding speech (p=0.008) and the perceived negative impact of noise on work motivation and quality (p=0.022) differed significantly across age groups. Although 68.4% of participants were aware of the risk of noise-induced hearing loss, only 2.5% reported using hearing protection during clinical practice. Conclusion: Noise exposure in high-volume dental hospitals is a prevalent occupational issue arising not only from dental instruments but also from environmental and organizational factors. This exposure is associated with a high prevalence of hearing-related symptoms and perceived impairment in work performance among dental professionals.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Akçaalan, Y., Kocaoğlu, M. H., Orhan, K. (2026). Noise exposure and its perceived effects on hearing and work performance among dental professionals in a high-volume dentistry hospital. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine, Volume: 9 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1847651

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (23)

  1. Thompson R, Smith RB, Bou Karim Y, et al. Noise pollution and human cognition: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of recent evidence. Environ Int. 2022;158:106905. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2021.106905
  2. Stucken EZ, Hong RS. Noise-induced hearing loss: an occupational medicine perspective. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014; 22(5):388-393. doi:10.1097/MOO.0000000000000079
  3. Blomkvist V, Eriksen CA, Theorell T, Ulrich R, Rasmanis G. Acoustics and psychosocial environment in intensive coronary care. Occup Environ Med. 2005;62(3):e1. doi:10.1136/oem.2004.017632
  4. Katz JD. Noise in the operating room. Anesthesiology. 2014;121(4):894-898. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000000319
  5. Rogers CM, Palmerton H, Saway B, Tomlinson D, Simonds G. Effect of various OR noise on fine motor skills, cognition, and mood. Surg Res Pract. 2019;2019:5372174. doi:10.1155/2019/5372174
  6. Wright BAL, Peters ER, Ettinger U, Kuipers E, Kumari V. Moderators of noise-induced cognitive change in healthy adults. Noise Health. 2016; 18(82):117-132. doi:10.4103/1463-1741.181995
  7. Basner M, Babisch W, Davis A, et al. Auditory and non-auditory effects of noise on health. Lancet. 2014;383(9925):1325-1332. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61613-X
  8. Solet DJ, Norvell JM, Rutan GH, Frankel RM. Lost in translation: challenges and opportunities in physician-to-physician communication during patient handoffs. Acad Med. 2005;80(12):1094-1099. doi:10.1097/ 00001888-200512000-00005
  9. Keller S, Tschan F, Beldi G, Kurmann A, Candinas D, Semmer NK. Noise peaks influence communication in the operating room: an observational study. Ergonomics. 2016;59(12):1541-1552. doi:10.1080/00140139.2016. 1159736
  10. Drzymalski DM, Ceruzzi J, Camann WR. Noise in the obstetric operating room. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2017;29:87-88. doi:10.1016/j.ijoa. 2016.10.008
  11. Cheriyan S, Mowery H, Ruckle D, et al. The impact of operating room noise upon communication during percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. J Endourol. 2016;30(10):1062-1066. doi:10.1089/end.2016.0498
  12. Liu M, Yi C, Yin F, Dai Y. Noise in the outpatient operating room. Gland Surg. 2020;9(2):380-384. doi:10.21037/gs.2020.04.09
  13. Ray CD, Levinson R. Noise pollution in the operating room: a hazard to surgeons, personnel, and patients. J Spinal Disord. 1992;5(4):485-488. doi:10.1097/00002517-199212000-00015
  14. Busch-Vishniac IJ, West JE, Barnhill C, Hunter T, Orellana D, Chivukula R. Noise levels in Johns Hopkins Hospital. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005;118(6):3629-3645. doi:10.1121/1.2118327
  15. Lehto TU, Laurikainen ET, Aitasalo KJ, Pietilä TJ, Helenius HY, Johansson R. Hearing of dentists in the long run: a 15-year follow-up study. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1989;17(4):207-211. doi:10.1111/ j.1600-0528.1989.tb00613.x
  16. Lau VW, Kwan SA, Graham J, et al. Are orthopaedic trauma surgeons at risk of occupational noise-induced hearing loss? OTA Int. 2025;8:e422. doi:10.1097/OI9.0000000000000422
  17. Wang Y, Wu T. Effect of operating room noise on occupational burnout, perceived stress, and life satisfaction of operating room nurses. Noise Health. 2025;27(131):305-312. doi:10.4103/NAH.NAH_9_25
  18. Smith GK, Ulin MA, Ganjineh BM, Ramezanzadeh M, Kuller JA. The effect of shift timing on cesarean delivery outcomes and operative noise levels. Am J Perinatol. 2025;42(10):113-119. doi:10.1055/s-0044-1787738
  19. Dağcı M, Öztekin SD, Yeşiltaş S. Managing sounds in the operating room: improving patient care using active and passive noise control. Orthop Nurs. 2025;44(4):225-230. doi:10.1097/NOR.0000000000001109
  20. Jiang P, Atherton MA, Millar BJ. A passive noise attenuation earplug designed to minimise unwanted air turbine driven high-speed dental drill noise. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2023;31(4):262-277.
  21. Mohan KM, Chopra A, Guddattu V, Bhat V, Bhat S. Should dentists mandatorily wear ear protection device to prevent occupational noise-induced hearing loss? A randomized case–control study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2022;12(5):513-519. doi:10.4103/JISPCD.JISPCD_28_22
  22. Shea LO, El Refaie A, Moloney C, O’Connor N, Cronin M, O’Neill C. Noise exposure in a dental teaching hospital: investigations and recommendations for dental personnel. Eur J Dent Educ. 2025. doi:10. 1111/eje.70058
  23. Ghaffar RSA, Sheikh M, Kidwai M, Khan S, Ahmed A. Impact of high-speed handpiece noise-induced dental anxiety on heart rate: analyzing experienced and non-experienced patients—a comparative study. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24:4017. doi:10.1186/s12903-024-04017-y