KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / JOEEP: Journal of Emerging Economies and Policy / 2026 / Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1

Gelişmiş Bankacılık Sektörüne Sahip Ülkeler Arasındaki Ticari İlişkilerin Sosyal Ağ Analizi ile İncelenmesi

Analyzing Trade Relations Between Countries with Developed Banking Sectors Through Social Network Analysis

A. Selçuk Köylüoğlu(SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ, KULU MESLEK YÜKSEKOKULU)0000-0003-0359-1443
Fatma Gül Altın(BURDUR MEHMET AKİF ERSOY ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-9236-0502
Sayfa
40–56
Yayın Tarihi
2026-06-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Onu sırasıyla ABD ve Japonya takip etmiştir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Sosyal Ağ Analizi (SAA), ticari ilişkilerde aktörler arasındaki bağlantıları anlamak için güçlü bir araç sunar.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Bu nedenle, bankacılık sektörü ile ticaret ilişkilerinin sosyal ağ analizi kullanılarak incelenmesi, ticaretin finansmanı ve ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkilerin daha kapsamlı bir şekilde anlaşılmasına olanak tanır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Onu sırasıyla ABD ve Japonya takip etmiştir.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2023 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Bankacılık Sektörü · Gelişmiş Ülkeler · Sosyal Ağ Analizi

Özet

Sosyal Ağ Analizi (SAA), ticari ilişkilerde aktörler arasındaki bağlantıları anlamak için güçlü bir araç sunar. Bu nedenle, bankacılık sektörü ile ticaret ilişkilerinin sosyal ağ analizi kullanılarak incelenmesi, ticaretin finansmanı ve ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkilerin daha kapsamlı bir şekilde anlaşılmasına olanak tanır. Bu çalışma, gelişmiş ülkelerde bankacılık sektörü ile ticaret ilişkileri arasındaki etkileşimi sosyal ağ analiziyle bütüncül biçimde inceleyerek literatürdeki kuramsal tartışmaları ampirik olarak derinleştirmesiyle literatürden ayrılmakta ve kullandığı analizle yöntemsel bir yenilik kazandırmaktadır. Çalışmada, 2023 yılında bankacılık sektörünün gelişmiş olduğu ülkeler arasındaki ticari ilişkiler sosyal ağ analizi yöntemi kullanılarak incelenmiştir. Analizlerde ülkelerin birbirleriyle yaptıkları ihracat değerleri kullanılmış ve veriler Trade Map' ten elde edilmiştir. 2023 yılına ilişkin sosyal ağ analizleri Ucinet programı kullanılarak analiz edilmiş ve Gephi programıyla ticaret ağları görselleştirilmiştir. Analizler sonucunda, bankacılık sektörünün gelişmiş olduğu ülkeler arasındaki ticari ilişkiler bakımından Çin ilk sırada yer almıştır. Onu sırasıyla ABD ve Japonya takip etmiştir.

Abstract

Social Network Analysis (SNA) offers a powerful tool for understanding the connections between actors in trade relations. Therefore, examining trade relations with the banking sector using social network analysis allows for a more comprehensive understanding of the impacts on trade finance and economic growth. This study distinguishes itself from the literature by empirically deepening theoretical discussions in the literature by holistically examining the interaction between the banking sector and trade relations in developed countries through social network analysis, and introduces a methodological innovation with its analysis. This study uses social network analysis to examine trade relations between countries with developed banking sectors in 2023. The analyses used the value of countries' exports to each other, and data was obtained from Trade Map. Social network analyses for 2023 were analyzed using the Ucinet program, and trade networks were visualized using the Gephi program. The analyses revealed that China ranked first in terms of trade relations between countries with developed banking sectors, followed by the US and Japan.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Köylüoğlu, A. S., Altın, F. G. (2026). Gelişmiş Bankacılık Sektörüne Sahip Ülkeler Arasındaki Ticari İlişkilerin Sosyal Ağ Analizi ile İncelenmesi. JOEEP: Journal of Emerging Economies and Policy, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1, 40–56. https://ajindex.com/articles/1504058

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (70)

  1. Acemoglu, D., Carvalho, V., Ozdaglar, A., & Tahbaz-Salehi, A. (2015). Systemic risk and stability in financial networks. American Economic Review, 105(2), 564–608.
  2. Akinlo, A. E., & Egbetunde, T. (2010). Financial development and economic growth: The experience of 10 sub-Saharan African countries revisited. The Review of Finance and Banking, 2(1), 17–28.
  3. Alkhazaleh, A. (2017). Does banking sector performance promote economic growth? Case study of Jordanian commercial banks. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 15(2), 55–64.
  4. Alvarez, S. A., Barney, J. B., & Newman, A. M. (2015). The poverty problem and the industrialization solution. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(1), 23–37.
  5. Ataman, F., & Çelik, H. E. (2018). Entelektüel yapıların sosyal ağ analizi ile görselleştirilmesi: Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi üzerinde bibliyometrik bir analiz. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 23(1), 34–47.
  6. Bae, K.-H., Karolyi, G. A., & Stulz, R. M. (2003). A new approach to measuring financial contagion. Review of Financial Studies, 16(3), 717–763.
  7. Beck, T., Levine, R., & Loayza, N. (2000). Finance and the sources of growth. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1-2), 261–300.
  8. Benedictis, L. D., & Tajoli, L. (2011). The world trade network. The World Economy, 34(8), 1417–1454.
  9. Bloomberg. (2025, 10 Mart). Search: 2023 world export. https://www.bloomberg.com/search?query=2023%20world%20export
  10. Bonacich, P. (2007). Some unique properties of eigenvector centrality. Social Networks, 29(4), 555–564.
  11. Borgatti, S. P., Brass, D. J., & Halgin, D. S. (2014). Social network research: Confusions, criticisms, and controversies. D. J. Brass, G. J. Labianca, A. Mehra, D. S. Halgin, & S. P. Borgatti (Ed.), Contemporary Perspectives on Organizational Social Networks içinde (s. 1–29). Emerald Group.
  12. Boulmakoul, A., & Khanboubi, F. (2019). Digital transformation in the banking sector: Surveys exploration and analytics. International Journal of Information Systems and Change Management, 11(2), 93–127.
  13. Bruno, R. L., Douarin, E., Korosteleva, J., & Radosevic, S. (2015). Technology choices and growth: Testing new structural economics in transition economies. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 18(2), 131–152.
  14. Caporale, G. M., Rault, C., Sova, A. D., & Sova, R. (2015). Financial development and economic growth: Evidence from 10 new European Union members. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 20(1), 48–60.
  15. Cave, J., Chaudhuri, K., & Kumbhakar, S. C. (2019). Do banking sector and stock market development matter for economic growth? Empirical Economics, 59, 1513–1535.
  16. Chen, Z., Li, Y., Wu, Y., & Luo, J. (2017). The transition from traditional banking to mobile internet finance: An organizational innovation perspective - a comparative study of Citibank and ICBC. Financial Innovation, 3(1), 1–16.
  17. Corbet, S., & Larkin, C. (2017). Has the uniformity of banking regulation within the European Union restricted rather than encouraged sectoral development? International Review of Financial Analysis, 53, 48–65.
  18. Cuadros-Solas, P., Valverde, S., & Rodriguez-Fernandez, F. (2020). Un approccio di apprendimento automatico alla digitalizzazione dei clienti bancari: Prove da foreste casuali e causali. PLoS ONE, 15(10), Article e0240362.
  19. Dapp, T. F. (2017). Fintech: The digital transformation in the financial sector. T. Osburg & C. Lohrmann (Ed.), Sustainability in a Digital World içinde (s. 189–199). Springer.
  20. Das, K., Samanta, S., & Pal, M. (2018). Study on centrality measures in social networks: A survey. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 8, Article 13.
  21. Durusu-Ciftci, D., Ispir, M. S., & Yetkiner, H. (2017). Financial development and economic growth: Some theory and more evidence. Journal of Policy Modeling, 39(2), 290–306.
  22. Esteve-Pérez, J., & del Río-González, M. (2022). Assessment of the centrality of the cruise ship navigation networks in southern Europe through the application of social network analysis. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 10(8), 1072.
  23. Eti, S., Dinçer, H., & Yüksel, S. (2019). G20 ülkelerinde bankacılık sektörünün 5 yıllık geleceğinin ARIMA yöntemi ile tahmin edilmesi. Uluslararası Hukuk ve Sosyal Bilim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(1), 26–38.
  24. European Banking Authority. (2018a). Guide to assessments of Fintech credit institution licence applications. Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  25. European Banking Authority. (2018b). EBA report on the impact of Fintech on incumbent credit institutions’ business. Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  26. Future of Trade. (2025, 10 Şubat). Reports. https://www.futureoftrade.com/reports
  27. Global Finance Magazine. (2025, 15 Mart). Search: 2023 world export rates. https://gfmag.com/?s=2023+world+export+rates
  28. Gomber, P., Kauffman, R., Parker, C., & Weber, B. (2018). On the fintech revolution. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35(1), 12–44.
  29. Gomber, P., Koch, J.-A., & Siering, M. (2017). Digital finance and FinTech: Current research and future research directions. Journal of Business Economics, 87, 537–580.
  30. Gupta, T., Gupta, N., Agrawal, A., Agrawal, A., & Kansal, K. (2019). Role of big data analytics in banking. 2019 International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Informatics (IC3I) içinde. IEEE.
  31. Hernández‐Cánovas, G., & Martínez‐Solano, P. (2006). Banking relationships: Effects on debt terms for small Spanish firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(3), 315–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2006.00174.x
  32. Hidalgo, C., & Hausmann, R. (2009). The building blocks of economic complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 106(26), 10570–10575.
  33. Hou, X., Gao, Z., & Wang, Q. (2016). Internet finance development and banking market discipline: Evidence from China. Journal of Financial Stability, 22, 88–100.
  34. Howell, A. (2013). Is geography ‘dead’ or ‘destiny’ in a globalizing world? A network analysis and latent space modeling approach of the world trade network. Journal of Globalization Studies, 4(2), 3–20.
  35. Iacobucci, D., McBride, R., & Popovich, D. L. (2017). Eigenvector centrality: Illustrations supporting the utility of extracting more than one eigenvector to obtain additional insights into networks and interdependent structures. Journal of Social Structure, 18(1), 1–23.
  36. International Monetary Fund. (2023a). Financial Development Index Database. https://data.imf.org/?sk=F8032E80-B36C-43B1-AC26-493C5B1CD33B (Erişim tarihi: 01.12.2025).
  37. International Monetary Fund. (2023b). World Economic Outlook: Country groups and definitions. https://www.imf.org (Erişim tarihi: 30.11.2025).
  38. International Trade Centre. (2024). Trade Map: Trade statistics for international business development. https://www.trademap.org (Erişim tarihi: 02.12.2025).
  39. Japparova, I., & Rupeika-Apoga, R. (2017). Banking business models of the digital future: The case of Latvia. European Research Studies Journal, 20(3A), 840–860.
  40. Jeon, J. W., Duru, O., & Yeo, G. T. (2019). Cruise port centrality and spatial patterns of cruise shipping in the Asian market. Maritime Policy & Management, 46(3), 257–276.
  41. Kali, R., & Reyes, J. (2007). The structure of the global trade network. Journal of International Economics, 72(2), 295–319.
  42. Kim, D.-W., Yu, J.-S., & Hassan, M. K. (2018). Financial inclusion and economic growth in OIC countries. Research in International Business and Finance, 43, 1–14.
  43. Klioutchnikov, I. K., Sigova, M. V., & Klioutchnikova, A. I. (2019). Big data in digital-banks. 33rd International Business Information Management Association Conference (IBIMA 2019) içinde (s. 9594–9601). Granada, Spain.
  44. Knaack, P., & Gruin, J. (2020). From shadow banking to digital financial inclusion: China’s rise and the politics of epistemic contestation within the financial stability board. Review of International Political Economy, 28(6), 1–25.
  45. Koivu, T. (2002). Do efficient banking sectors accelerate economic growth in transition countries? (BOFIT Discussion Papers No. 14). Bank of Finland, Institute for Economies in Transition.
  46. Laporta, L., Afonso, J., & Mesquita, I. (2018). Interaction network analysis of the six game complexes in high-level volleyball through the use of Eigenvector Centrality. PLOS ONE, 13(9), Article e0203348.
  47. Li, Z., Wong, T. J., & Yu, G. (2020). Information dissemination through embedded financial analysts: Evidence from China. The Accounting Review, 95(2), 257–281.
  48. Lim, Y., & Jung, K. (2012). Conflict of interest or information sharing? Evidence from affiliated analyst performance in Korea. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(2), 505–537.
  49. Lin, J. Y., Sun, X., & Wu, H. X. (2015). Banking structure and industrial growth: Evidence from China. Journal of Banking & Finance, 58, 131–143.
  50. Lipunga, A. M. (2014). Determinants of profitability of listed commercial banks in developing countries: Evidence from Malawi. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 5(6), 41–49.
  51. Manova, K. (2013). Credit constraints, heterogeneous firms, and international trade. Review of Economic Studies, 80(2), 711–744.
  52. Milne, A. (2016). Competition policy and the financial technology revolution in banking. Communications & Strategies, 103, 145–161.
  53. Morselli, C., Masias, V. H., Crespo, F., & Laengle, S. (2013). Predicting sentencing outcomes with centrality measures. Security Informatics, 2(1), 1–9.
  54. Newman, M. E. J. (2010). Networks: An introduction (1. baskı). Oxford University Press.
  55. Okello Candiya Bongomin, G., Mpeera Ntayi, J., & Akol Malinga, C. (2020). Analyzing the relationship between financial literacy and financial inclusion by microfinance banks in developing countries: Social network theoretical approach. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 40(11/12), 1257–1277. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-12-2019-0262
  56. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2024). List of OECD member countries. https://www.oecd.org (Erişim tarihi: 28.11.2025).
  57. Park, C. K., Lee, C., & Jeon, J. Q. (2020). Centrality and corporate governance decisions of Korean chaebols: A social network approach. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 62, Article 101390.
  58. Scott, J. (2012). What is social network analysis? Bloomsbury Academic.
  59. Shaikh, A., & Karjaluoto, H. (2019). Marketing and mobile financial services: A global perspective on digital banking consumer behaviour. Routledge.
  60. Son, Y., Kwon, H. E., Tayi, G. K., & Oh, W. (2020). Impact of customers’ digital banking adoption on hidden defection: A combined analytical–empirical approach. Journal of Operations Management, 66(4), 418–440.
  61. Squartini, T., Fagiolo, G., & Garlaschelli, D. (2013). Randomizing world trade. II. A weighted network analysis. Physical Review E, 87(2), Article 022811.
  62. Statista. (2025, 3 Mart). Search: 2023 international export rates. https://www.statista.com/search/?q=2023+international+export+rates&p=1
  63. Streeter, C. L., & Gillespie, D. F. (1992). Social network analysis. Journal of Social Service Research, 16(1-2), 201–222.
  64. Suryono, R. R., Budi, I., & Purwandari, B. (2020). Challenges and trends of financial technology (Fintech): A systematic literature review. Information, 11(12), 1–20.
  65. Tongurai, J., & Vithessonthi, C. (2018). The impact of the banking sector on economic structure and growth. International Review of Financial Analysis, 56, 193–207.
  66. Trade Atlas. (2025, 20 Şubat). Global trade database. https://www.tradeatlas.com/en/global-trade-database
  67. World Bank. (2023). Global Financial Development Database (GFDD). (Erişim tarihi: 03.12.2025).
  68. Ye, J., Zhang, A., & Dong, Y. (2019). Banking reform and industry structure: Evidence from China. Journal of Banking & Finance, 104, 70–84.
  69. Zhao, Q., Tsai, P.-H., & Wang, J.-L. (2019). Improving financial service innovation strategies for enhancing China’s banking industry competitive advantage during the Fintech revolution: A hybrid MCDM model. Sustainability, 11(5), 1419.
  70. Zhuo, J., Li, X., & Yu, C. (2020). How to integrate financial big data and FinTech in a real application in banks: A case of the modeling of asset allocation for products based on data. Information, 11(10), 460.