KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / İzmir Katip Çelebi Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 11 Sayı: 3

Genç Yetişkinlerde Suboksipital Miyofasyal Gevşeme Tekniğinin Servikal Propriosepsiyon, Eklem Hareket Açıklığı ve Denge Üzerindeki Anlık Etkileri: Crossover Randomize Kontrollü Çalışma

Immediate Effects of Suboccipital Myofascial Release Technique on Cervical Proprioception, Joint Range of Motion and Balance in Young Adults: Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial

Erhan Kızmaz(MUNZUR UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF HEALTH SCIENCES)0000-0003-1973-4146
Aziz Dengız(MUŞ ALPARSLAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-3492-7448
Mücahit Öztop(BURDUR MEHMET AKİF ERSOY ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-9369-3381
Fatih Tekin(PAMUKKALE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-7829-7957
Sayfa
534–541
Yayın Tarihi
2026-09-30
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bulgular: Suboksipital miyofasiyal gevşetme uygulanan grupta, servikal ekstansiyon, sağ rotasyon ve sol lateral fleksiyon hareket açıklığında anlamlı artış, geriye denge skorlarında ise belirgin bir düşüş gözlenmiştir (p<0,05).

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Amaç: Proprioseptif reseptörler açısından zengin bir bölge olan suboksipital bölgeye yönelik miyofasiyal gevşetme tekniklerinin etkileri sınırlı ölçüde araştırılmıştır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Bu çalışma, suboksipital miyofasiyal gevşetme tekniğinin genç erişkin bireylerde servikal propriosepsiyon, eklem hareket açıklığı ve denge üzerine olan anlık etkilerini incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bulgular: Suboksipital miyofasiyal gevşetme uygulanan grupta, servikal ekstansiyon, sağ rotasyon ve sol lateral fleksiyon hareket açıklığında anlamlı artış, geriye denge skorlarında ise belirgin bir düşüş gözlenmiştir (p<0,05).
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2000 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Denge · miyofasyal gevşeme · propriosepsiyon

Özet

Amaç: Proprioseptif reseptörler açısından zengin bir bölge olan suboksipital bölgeye yönelik miyofasiyal gevşetme tekniklerinin etkileri sınırlı ölçüde araştırılmıştır. Bu çalışma, suboksipital miyofasiyal gevşetme tekniğinin genç erişkin bireylerde servikal propriosepsiyon, eklem hareket açıklığı ve denge üzerine olan anlık etkilerini incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu randomize kontrollü çapraz desenli çalışmaya, yaşları 18-25 arasında değişen 24 sağlıklı birey dahil edilmiştir. Katılımcılar rastgele şekilde suboksipital miyofasiyal gevşetme müdahalesi ya da plasebo kontrol grubuna atanmış, bir etki sıfırlama (wash-out) süresinin ardından müdahaleler değiştirilerek çapraz uygulanmıştır. Servikal propriosepsiyon, eklem pozisyon hatası ölçümü ile; servikal eklem hareket açıklığı, gonyometre yardımıyla; denge ise taşınabilir bilgisayarlı kinestetik denge ölçüm cihazı SportKAT-2000 kullanılarak değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular: Suboksipital miyofasiyal gevşetme uygulanan grupta, servikal ekstansiyon, sağ rotasyon ve sol lateral fleksiyon hareket açıklığında anlamlı artış, geriye denge skorlarında ise belirgin bir düşüş gözlenmiştir (p<0,05). Kontrol grubunda ise toplam denge skorlarında artış saptanırken, propriosepsiyon değerlerinde azalma meydana gelmiştir (p<0,05). Gruplar arası karşılaştırmalarda, sağ rotasyon, sol lateral fleksiyon ve propriosepsiyon açısından SMR grubunda kontrol grubuna kıyasla daha fazla iyileşme kaydedilmiştir (p<0,05). Sonuç: Suboksipital miyofasiyal gevşetme tekniği, servikal bölgedeki hareket açıklığını ve propriosepsiyonu artırmakta ve klinik uygulamalarda kullanılabilir bir yöntem olarak öne çıkmaktadır. Denge, propriosepsiyon ve hareket açıklığı bozuklukları olan bireylerde bu tekniğin etkinliğini değerlendirmek amacıyla ileri düzey çalışmalara ihtiyaç vardır.

Abstract

Objective: The effects of myofascial release techniques on the suboccipital region, a proprioceptive receptor-rich area, remain underexplored. This study investigates the immediate effects of the suboccipital myofascial release technique on cervical proprioception, joint range of motion, and balance in young adults Material and Methods: This randomized controlled-crossover study included 24 healthy individuals aged 18–25. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either the suboccipital myofascial release or placebo control, followed by a one-week washout to alternate intervention. The cervical proprioception was assessed through joint position error measurements, cervical range of motion using a goniometer, and balance with the SportKAT-2000, a portable computerized kinesthetic balance device. Results: The suboccipital myofascial release group showed significant improvements in cervical extension, right rotation, and left lateral flexion, along with a notable decline in backward balance scores (p<0.05). The control group exhibited improved total balance scores but reduced proprioception (p<0.05). Between-group analysis revealed greater enhancements in right rotation, left lateral flexion, and proprioception for the suboccipital myofascial release group compared to controls (p<0.05). Conclusions: The suboccipital myofascial release technique enhances cervical range of motion and proprioception and is applicable in clinical practice. Further research is warranted to explore its efficacy in impairments in balance, proprioception, and range of motion.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Kızmaz, E., Dengız, A., Öztop, M., Tekin, F. (2026). Genç Yetişkinlerde Suboksipital Miyofasyal Gevşeme Tekniğinin Servikal Propriosepsiyon, Eklem Hareket Açıklığı ve Denge Üzerindeki Anlık Etkileri: Crossover Randomize Kontrollü Çalışma. İzmir Katip Çelebi Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 3, 534–541. https://doi.org/10.61399/ikcusbfd.1675281

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (42)

  1. Rodríguez-Huguet M, Gil-Salú JL, Rodríguez-Huguet P, Cabrera-Afonso JR, Lomas-Vega R. Effects of myofascial release on pressure pain thresholds in patients with neck pain: a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;97(1):16-22.
  2. McPartland JM, Brodeur RR, Hallgren RC. Chronic neck pain, standing balance, and suboccipital muscle atrophy—a pilot study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1997;20(1):24-9.
  3. Jeong ED, Kim CY, Kim S, Lee JH, Hwangbo G. Short-term effects of the suboccipital muscle inhibition technique and cranio-cervical flexion exercise on hamstring flexibility, cranio-vertebral angle, and range of motion of the cervical spine in subjects with neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2018;31(6):1025-34.
  4. Antolinos Campillo P, Oliva-Pascual Vaca Á, Rodríguez Blanco C, Heredia Rizo AM, Rabal P, Achalandabaso Ochoa A. Short-term changes in median nerve neural tension after a suboccipital muscle inhibition technique in subjects with cervical whiplash: a randomized controlled trial. Physiotherapy. 2014;100(3):249-55.
  5. Aparicio EQ, Quirante LB, Blanco CR, Sendín FA. Immediate effects of the suboccipital muscle inhibition technique in subjects with short hamstring syndrome. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009;32(4):262-9.
  6. Heredia Rizo AM, Oliva-Pascual-Vaca Á, Cabello MA, Achalandabaso Ochoa A, Ruiz Rico P, Fernández Carnero J. Immediate effects of the suboccipital muscle inhibition technique in craniocervical posture and greater occipital nerve mechanosensitivity in subjects with a history of orthodontia use: a randomized trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2012;35(6):446-53.
  7. Oliveira-Campelo NM, Rubens-Rebelatto JR, Martín-Vallejo NV, Ortega-Santiago R, Fernández-de-las-Peñas C. The immediate effects of atlanto-occipital joint manipulation and suboccipital muscle inhibition technique on active mouth opening and pressure pain sensitivity over latent myofascial trigger points in the masticatory muscles. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010;40(5):310-7.
  8. Peck D, Buxton DF, Nitz A. A comparison of spindle concentrations in large and small muscles acting in parallel combinations. J Morphol. 1984;180(2):243-52.
  9. Hack GD, Koritzer RT, Robinson WL, Hallgren RC, Greenman PE. Anatomic relation between the rectus capitis posterior minor muscle and the dura mater. Spine. 1995;20(4):248-51.
  10. Roya M, Reza OG, Azadeh S, Ahmad G, Abbas S. Changes of joint position sense in responses to upper trapezius muscle fatigue in subclinical myofascial pain syndrome participants versus healthy control. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2018;8(4):534-43.
  11. Reddy RS, Tedla JS, Dixit S, Abohashrh M, Pullagura M, Sami MM. Cervical proprioception and its relationship with neck pain intensity in subjects with cervical spondylosis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20(1):447.
  12. Reddy RS, Meziat-Filho N, Ferreira AS, Tedla JS, Kakaraparthi VN, Buddhadev HH. Comparison of neck extensor muscle endurance and cervical proprioception between asymptomatic individuals and patients with chronic neck pain. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2021; 26:180-6.
  13. Stanton TR, Leake HB, Chalmers KJ, Moseley GL. Evidence of impaired proprioception in chronic, idiopathic neck pain: systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Ther. 2016;96(6):876-87.
  14. Peng B, Yang L, Li Y, Pang X, Zhao L. Cervical proprioception impairment in neck pain: pathophysiology, clinical evaluation, and management: a narrative review. Pain Ther. 2021;10(1):143-64.
  15. Alahmari KA, Reddy RS, Silvian PS, Ahmad I, Alshahrani MS, Rengaramanujam K. Intra- and inter-rater reliability for deep neck flexor and neck extensor muscle endurance tests in subjects with and without subclinical neck pain. Phys Med Rehabil Kurortmed. 2019;58(6):310-6.
  16. De Pauw R, Coppieters I, Kregel J, De Meulemeester K, Danneels L, Cagnie B. Does muscle morphology change in chronic neck pain patients? A systematic review. Man Ther. 2016; 22:42-9.
  17. Raizah A, Reddy RS, Alshahrani MS, Tedla JS, Alqahtani BA, Ahmad I. A cross-sectional study on mediating effect of chronic pain on the relationship between cervical proprioception and functional balance in elderly individuals with chronic neck pain: mediation analysis study. J Clin Med. 2023;12(9):3140.
  18. Cerritelli F, Verzella M, Cicchitti L, Vanacore N, Cozzolino V, Barlafante G. The paradox of sham therapy and placebo effect in osteopathy: a systematic review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(35):e4728.
  19. Rodríguez-Fuentes I, De Toro FJ, Rodríguez-Fuentes G, Rodríguez-Fuentes MJ, Waller BJ. Myofascial release therapy in the treatment of occupational mechanical neck pain: a randomized parallel group study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;95(7):507-15.
  20. Burke S, Lynch K, Moghul Z, Young C, Saviola K, Schenk R. The reliability of the cervical relocation test on people with and without a history of neck pain. J Man Manip Ther. 2016;24(4):210–4.
  21. Audette I, Dumas JP, Côté JN, De Serres SJ. Validity and between-day reliability of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010;40(5):318-23.
  22. Hansen MS, Dieckmann B, Jensen K, Jakobsen BW. The reliability of balance tests performed on the kinesthetic ability trainer (KAT 2000). Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2000;8(3):180-5.
  23. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41(4):1149-60.
  24. The jamovi project. jamovi (Version 2.3) [computer software]. Available from: https://www.jamovi.org. Accessed [September 15, 2023].
  25. Chen X, Treleaven J. The effect of neck torsion on joint position error in subjects with chronic neck pain. Man Ther. 2013;18(6):562-7.
  26. Wibault J, Vaillant J, Vuillerme N, Dedering A, Peolsson A. Using the cervical range of motion (CROM) device to assess head repositioning accuracy in individuals with cervical radiculopathy in comparison to neck-healthy individuals. Man Ther. 2013;18(5):403-9.
  27. Pérez-Martínez C, Gogorza-Arroitaonandia K, Heredia-Rizo AM, Salas-González J, Oliva-Pascual-Vaca Á. INYBI: a new tool for self-myofascial release of the suboccipital muscles in patients with chronic non-specific neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Nov 1;45(21):E1367-E1375. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003605.
  28. Arab AM, Ramezani E. Sub occipital myofascial release technique for the treatment of cervicogenic headache. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2018;22(4):859-64.
  29. Kage V, Joshi P. Immediate effects of triplanar myofascial release vs suboccipital release in subjects with non-specific neck pain: a clinical trial. Int J Physiother Res. 2017;5(3):2056-60.
  30. Aggarwal A, Nair A, Palekar TJ, Sharma A, Krishnan V. Effect of suboccipital release technique in forward head posture: a comparative study. Med J DY Patil Vidyapeeth. 2022;15(4):534-7.
  31. Shabbir M, Rafique S, Majeed R, Mahjabeen H, Waris M, Hamza U. Comparison of sub-occipital myofascial release and cervical mobilization in managing cervicogenic headache. Med Forum. 2021;32(9):110-114.
  32. Pontell ME, Scali F, Marshall E, Enix DE. The obliquus capitis inferior myodural bridge. Clin Anat. 2013;26(4):450-4. DOI:10.1002/ca.22134.
  33. Mortazavi MM, Tubbs RS, Cohen-Gadol AA. The cranial dura mater: a review of its history, embryology, and anatomy. Childs Nerv Syst. 2012;28(5):827-37.
  34. Ischebeck BK, de Vries J, Janssen M, van der Meer K, Groen GJ. Eye stabilization reflexes in traumatic and non-traumatic chronic neck pain patients. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2017; 29:72-7.
  35. Treleaven J. Dizziness and unsteadiness following whiplash injury: characteristic features and relationship with cervical joint position error. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45(5):653-62.
  36. Şekeröz S, Aslan Telci E, Buke M. Comparison of effectiveness of Mulligan mobilization technique and cervical stabilization training in patients with chronic neck pain: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Die Rehabilitation. 2025. DOI: 10.1055/a-2618-6281
  37. Field S, Treleaven J, Jull G. Standing balance: a comparison between idiopathic and whiplash induced neck pain. Man Ther. 2008;13(3):183-91.
  38. Jørgensen MB, Skotte JH, Holtermann A, Mortensen OS, Søgaard K. Neck pain and postural balance among workers with high postural demands—a cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011; 12:176.
  39. Paulus I, Brumagne S. Altered interpretation of neck proprioceptive signals in persons with subclinical recurrent neck pain. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40(6):426-32.
  40. Cho SH, Kim SH, Park DJ. The comparison of the immediate effects of application of the suboccipital muscle inhibition and self-myofascial release techniques in the suboccipital region on short hamstring. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(1):195-7.
  41. Peng B, Yang L, Li Y, Pang X, Zhao L. Cervical proprioception impairment in neck pain: pathophysiology, clinical evaluation, and management—a narrative review. Pain Ther. 2021;10(1):143-64.
  42. Mazza A, Cariola M, Capiotto F, Pontil L, D'Antoni F, Cibelli F. Hedonic and autonomic responses in promoting affective touch. Sci Rep. 2023; 13:11201. DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-37471-9.