KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / İmgelem / 2026 / Sayı: 19

Kadınların Siyasal Temsili: Cinsiyet Eşitliği Politikaları Bağlamında Ruanda ve Yeni Zelanda Karşılaştırması

Women’s Political Representation: A Comparative Analysis of Gender Equality Policies in Rwanda and New Zealand

Başak Akal Türk0009-0008-1328-9997
Pelin Dinçer(HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-8999-0535
Sayfa
143–168
Yayın Tarihi
2026-05-31
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bulgular, kadınların sayısal olarak temsil edilmesinin tek başına yeterli olmadığını; nitel temsilin gerçekleşebilmesi için demokratik unsurların destekleyici rol oynadığını göstermektedir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışma, kadınların parlamentodaki nicel artışının cinsiyet eşitliği politikalarına ve nitel temsile etkisini Ruanda ve Yeni Zelanda örnekleri üzerinden incelemektedir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Tarihsel süreçteki anayasal düzenlemeler ve uygulamadaki sorunlar değerlendirilerek, demokrasinin kadın temsiline katkısı tartışılmıştır. 1990’lardan günümüze uzanan dönemi kapsayan analizde, iki ülkenin farklı toplumsal ve yönetimsel yapıları dikkate alınmıştır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bulgular, kadınların sayısal olarak temsil edilmesinin tek başına yeterli olmadığını; nitel temsilin gerçekleşebilmesi için demokratik unsurların destekleyici rol oynadığını göstermektedir.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Kadınların Siyasi Temsili · Ruanda · Yeni Zelanda

Özet

Bu çalışma, kadınların parlamentodaki nicel artışının cinsiyet eşitliği politikalarına ve nitel temsile etkisini Ruanda ve Yeni Zelanda örnekleri üzerinden incelemektedir. Tarihsel süreçteki anayasal düzenlemeler ve uygulamadaki sorunlar değerlendirilerek, demokrasinin kadın temsiline katkısı tartışılmıştır. 1990’lardan günümüze uzanan dönemi kapsayan analizde, iki ülkenin farklı toplumsal ve yönetimsel yapıları dikkate alınmıştır. Bulgular, kadınların sayısal olarak temsil edilmesinin tek başına yeterli olmadığını; nitel temsilin gerçekleşebilmesi için demokratik unsurların destekleyici rol oynadığını göstermektedir. Yeni Zelanda’da demokrasinin uzun vadede nitel temsili güçlendirdiği, Ruanda’da ise “demokrasi” söylemi altında artan kadın temsiline rağmen otoriter uygulamaların bu temsili sınırladığı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Böylece, nicel temsilin her zaman nitel temsili sağlamadığı, rejim türünün belirleyici bir unsur olduğu vurgulanmaktadır.

Abstract

This study examines how the quantitative increase of women in parliament contributes to gender equality policies and qualitative representation, focusing on the cases of Rwanda and New Zealand. By evaluating constitutional developments and practical challenges over time, it explores the role of democracy in enhancing women’s representation. Covering the period from the 1990s to the present, the analysis considers the distinct social and administrative structures of both countries. The findings indicate that women’s numerical presence alone is insufficient, as qualitative representation requires supportive democratic elements. While democracy in New Zealand has strengthened substantive representation in the long term, Rwanda’s increased female representation under the guise of “democracy” has been constrained by authoritarian practices. The study thus concludes that descriptive representation does not always ensure substantive representation, highlighting the regime type as a decisive factor.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Türk, B. A., Dinçer, P. (2026). Kadınların Siyasal Temsili: Cinsiyet Eşitliği Politikaları Bağlamında Ruanda ve Yeni Zelanda Karşılaştırması. İmgelem, Sayı: 19, 143–168. https://doi.org/10.53791/imgelem.1882154

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (47)

  1. Abbott, P., & Malunda, D. (2016). The promise and the reality: Women's rights in Rwanda. African Journal of International and Comparative Law, 24(4), 561-581. https://doi.org/10.3366/ajicl.2016.0173
  2. Ainge Roy, E. (2017, August 2). ‘Unacceptable’: New Zealand’s Labour leader asked about baby plans seven hours into the job. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/aug/02/unacceptable-new-zealands-labour-leader-asked-about-baby-plans-six-hours-into-job
  3. Barnes, T. D., & Burchard, S. M. (2012). “Engendering” politics: The impact of descriptive representation on women’s political engagement in sub-Saharan Africa. Comparative Political Studies, 46(7), 767-790. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414012463884
  4. Bauer, G., & Burnet, J. E. (2013). Gender quotas, democracy, and women’s representation in Africa: Some insights from democratic Botswana and autocratic Rwanda. Women’s Studies International Forum, 41, 103-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2013.05.012
  5. Burnet, J. E. (2008). Gender balance and the meanings of women in governance in post-genocide Rwanda. African Affairs, 107(428), 361-386. https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/adn024
  6. Busari, S. (2017, August 4). Fake nude photos were used to ‘silence me’, disqualified Rwandan candidate says. CNN. https://edition.cnn.com/2017/08/04/africa/rwanda-election-nude-photos-candidate
  7. Celis, K., & Childs, S. (2008). Introduction: The descriptive and substantive representation of women: New directions. Parliamentary Affairs, 61(3), 419-425. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsn006
  8. Coffé, H. (2011). Conceptions of female political representation: Perspectives of Rwandan female representatives. Women’s Studies International Forum, 35(4), 286-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2012.05.004
  9. Curtin, J. (2008a). Gendering parliamentary representation: A mixed system producing mixed results. In M. Tremblay (Ed.), Women and legislative representation (pp. 191-204).
  10. Curtin, J. (2008b). Comparing pathways to power: Women and political leadership in New Zealand. In Public leadership: Perspectives and practices (pp. 265-274). https://doi.org/10.22459/PL.11.2008.22
  11. Curtin, J. (2008c). Women, political leadership and substantive representation: The case of New Zealand. Parliamentary Affairs, 61(3), 490-504. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsn014
  12. Curtin, J., & Teghtsoonian, K. (2010). Analyzing institutional persistence: The case of the Ministry of Women’s Affairs in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Politics & Gender, 6, 545-572. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X1000036X
  13. Dahlerup, D. (1988). From a small to a large minority: Women in Scandinavian politics. Scandinavian Political Studies, 11(4), 275-298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.1988.tb00372.x
  14. Devlin, C., & Elgie, R. (2008). The effect of increased women’s representation in parliament: The case of Rwanda. Parliamentary Affairs, 61(2), 237-254. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsn007
  15. Electoral Commission of New Zealand. (2023). New Zealand election results. https://archive.electionresults.govt.nz/
  16. Freedom House. (2025a). Freedom in the world: New Zealand. https://freedomhouse.org/country/new-zealand/freedom-world/2024
  17. Freedom House. (2025b). Freedom in the world: Rwanda. https://freedomhouse.org/country/rwanda/freedom-world/2025
  18. Grey, S. (2006). Do women represent women? Rethinking the “critical mass” debate. Politics & Gender, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X06211140
  19. Hayward, M. (2014). The influence of party leaders on women’s representation in parliament, 1935-1975: The case of New Zealand. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 52(2), 254-270. https://doi.org/10.1080/14662043.2014.894279
  20. Hogg, C. L. (2009). Women’s political representation in post-conflict Rwanda: A politics of inclusion or exclusion? Journal of International Women’s Studies, 11(3), 34-55.
  21. Humayun, S., & Chaturvedi, A. (2023). Gender security in South Asia: Does the regionalism approach really address them? İmgelem, 7(12), 207-224. https://doi.org/10.53791/imgelem.1295128
  22. IPU & UN Women. (2023). Women in politics: 2023.
  23. IPU & UN Women. (2025). Women in politics: 2025.
  24. Kanter, R. M. (1977). Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 965-990. https://doi.org/10.1086/226425
  25. Mackay, F. (2008). ‘Thick’ conceptions of substantive representation: Women, gender and political institutions. Representation, 44(2), 125-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344890802079607
  26. Mansbridge, J. (1999). Should blacks represent blacks and women represent women? A contingent “yes”. The Journal of Politics, 61(3), 628-657. https://doi.org/10.2307/2647821
  27. McLeay, E. (2006). Climbing on: Rules, values and women’s representation in the New Zealand parliament. In Representing women in parliament: A comparative study (pp. 67–82). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203965672
  28. Meehan, E. (1985). Women’s rights at work: Campaigns and policy in Britain and the United States. Macmillan.
  29. Metin, O., & Ünal, Ş. (2022). İçerik analizi tekniği: İletişim bilimlerinde ve sosyolojide doktora tezlerinde kullanımı. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 22(2), 273-294. https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.1227356
  30. Mills, M. B. (2016). Gendered division of labour. In L. J. Disch & M. E. Hawkesworth (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of feminist theory (pp. 283-303). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199328581.013.15
  31. National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda. (2024). National gender statistics report 2024.
  32. Örs, B. (2006). Siyasal temsil. İstanbul Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, (35), 1-22.
  33. Papaoikonomou, A. (2024). A multiple regression model on the relationship between deliberative democracy and political equity: The cases of Greece and Turkey. İmgelem, 401-424. https://doi.org/10.53791/imgelem.1489925
  34. Parliament of New Zealand. (2024). Women members of the New Zealand Parliament, 1933 onwards. https://www.parliament.nz/en/visit-and-learn/mps-and-parliaments-1854-onwards/women-members-of-the-new-zealand-parliament-1933-onwards/
  35. Phillips, A. (1995). Demokrasinin Cinsiyeti. Metis.
  36. Pitkin, H. F. (1972). The concept of representation. University of California Press.
  37. Powley, E. (2005). Rwanda: Women hold up half the parliament. In Women in parliament: Beyond numbers (pp. 154-163).
  38. Reuters. (2017). Rwanda disqualifies only female presidential candidate. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-rwanda-election-idUSKBN19S2L6/
  39. Strickland, R. S. (2004). Women’s property and inheritance rights in the context of HIV/AIDS in Sub-Saharan Africa. International Center for Research on Women.
  40. Sundberg, J. (1995). Women in Scandinavian party organizations. In L. Karvonen & P. Selle (Eds.), Women in Nordic politics. Dartmouth.
  41. UNDP. (2025). Gender inequality index (GII). https://hdr.undp.org/data-center/thematic-composite-indices/gender-inequality-index#/indicies/GII
  42. Wallace, C., Haerpfer, C., & Abbott, P. (2009). Women in Rwandan politics and society. International Journal of Sociology, 111-125. https://doi.org/10.2753/IJS0020-7659380406
  43. Wängnerud, L. (2000). Testing the politics of presence: Women’s representation in the Swedish Riksdag. Scandinavian Political Studies, 23(1), 67-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.00031
  44. Wolchik, S. (1995). Democratization in Central and Eastern Europe: Progress or regression for women? Atlantic Council of the United States.
  45. World Bank. (2023). GDP per capita. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD?end=2023&locations=RW-NZ&most_recent_value_desc=false&start=1960&view=chart
  46. World Bank. (2024). Labor force, female. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.TLF.TOTL.FE.ZS?locations=RW-NZ&most_recent_value_desc=false
  47. Yıldız, A. (2022). Bir araştırma metodolojisi olarak sistematik literatür taramasına genel bakış. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 22(2), 367-386. https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.1227366