Dergiler / Electrica / 2019 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2

Performance Analysis of a Secondary User in Cognitive Radio over Generalized-Gamma Fading Channels

Sayfa
166–172
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The final conclusion is that the BER performance of SUs improves as the interference power that PUs can tolerate increases..

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this paper, the performance of a secondary user (SU) in an underlay cognitive radio (CR) network over a generalized-gamma (GG) fading channel in terms of three performance metrics, namely, outage probability, ergodic capacity, and bit error rate (BER), is investigated.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The performance metrics of the SU in the underlay CR network are theoretically derived and also obtained with Monte Carlo simulations for a GG fading channel with different fading parameters.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The final conclusion is that the BER performance of SUs improves as the interference power that PUs can tolerate increases..
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

In this paper, the performance of a secondary user (SU) in an underlay cognitive radio (CR) network over a generalized-gamma (GG) fading channel in terms of three performance metrics, namely, outage probability, ergodic capacity, and bit error rate (BER), is investigated. According to the underlay approach, the transmit power of the SU should be limited to avoid interference to primary users (PUs). The performance metrics of the SU in the underlay CR network are theoretically derived and also obtained with Monte Carlo simulations for a GG fading channel with different fading parameters. To demonstrate the effect of limited power on the performance metrics, three different maximum transmit power levels (Pmax), namely, 10, 20, and 30 dB, are used. The simulation results lead to three conclusions: First, when high values are chosen for the fading parameters (α, c), the fading channel gets less distorted and the performance metrics improve. The second conclusion is that the BER performance gets better as the limited power increases. The final conclusion is that the BER performance of SUs improves as the interference power that PUs can tolerate increases..

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÇOLAK, S. A. (2019). Performance Analysis of a Secondary User in Cognitive Radio over Generalized-Gamma Fading Channels. Electrica, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2, 166–172. https://ajindex.com/articles/149934

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. J. III, Mitola, Cognitive radio: An integrated agent architecture for software defined radio. Ph.D. thesis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2000
  2. J. III, Mitola, Cognitive radio for flexible mobile multimedia communication. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Mobile Multimedia Communications (MoMuC), San Diego, CA, 1999. S. Haykin, “Cognitive radio: Brain-empowered wireless communications”, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Comm., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 201-220, 2005.
  3. I. F. Akyildiz, W. Y. Lee, M. C. Vuran, S. Mohanty, “Next generation/ dynamic spectrum access/cognitive radio wireless networks: A survey”, Computer Networks, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 2127-2159, 2006. [CrossRef] V. A. Aalo, T. Piboongungon, C. D. Iskander, “Bit-error rate of binary digital modulation schemes in generalized gamma fading channels”, IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 9, no. 2, pp.139-141, 2005.
  4. J. Malhotra, A.K. Sharma, R.S. Kaler. “On the performance analysis of wireless receiver using generalized-gamma fading model”, Annals of Telecommunications-Annales des Télécommunications, vol. 64, no. 1-2, pp. 147-153, 2009. O. Gazi, “Bounds for generalized gamma distributed fading channels”, IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 1347-1349, 2011.
  5. P.S. Bithas, G.P. Efthymoglou, D.S. Kalivas, “Outage probability of cognitive relay networks over generalized fading channels with interference constraints”, Procedia Computer Science, vol. 40 pp. 84-91, 2014.
  6. N. Kapucu, M. Bilim, I. Develi, “Outage probability analysis of dual-hop decode-and-forward relaying over mixed Rayleigh and generalized Gamma fading channels”, Wireless Personal Communications, vol. 71, no. 2, pp.947-954, 2013
  7. H. Lei, C. Gao, Y. Guo, G. Pan, G. “On physical layer security over generalized Gamma fading channels”, IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 1257-1260, 2015.
  8. E. Erdogan, A. Afana, S. Ikki, H. Yanikomeroglu, “Antenna selection in MIMO cognitive AF relay networks with mutual interference and limited feedback”, IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 1111-1114, 2017. E. Erdogan, “Cognitive AF Relay Networks over Asymmetric Shadowing/Fading Channels in the Presence of Low-Rate Feedback”, Electrica, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 172-176, 2018.
  9. Z. Gao, D. Chen, N. Yao, Z. Lu, B. Chen, G. Tan, “ Outage Probability of Cognitive Selective DF Relay Networks with Multiple Primary Nodes and Heterogenous Non-Identical Constraints”, Wireless Personal Communications, vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 969-992, 2017