Dergiler / International Journal on Lifelong Education and Leadership / 2026 / Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1

The Research on the Effects of Training Based on Lifelong Learning Skills the Reading- Writing Skills of the First Graders in Elementary School

Sayfa
36–41
Yayın Tarihi
2016-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

As a result of the study while a significant difference was defined in students’ reading skills, no significant difference was defined in their Writing Skills.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, the effects of training with advanced toys on the reading writing skills of the first graders in elementary school were investigated.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The research was carried out with a sample of 122 6- year-old elemantary school students in Duzce (61 experimental group, 61 control group) .
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:As a result of the study while a significant difference was defined in students’ reading skills, no significant difference was defined in their Writing Skills.
🔬Tür:Makale
📍Kapsam:2015 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Reading- writing skills · Toy · Lifelong Learning

Abstract

In this study, the effects of training with advanced toys on the reading writing skills of the first graders in elementary school were investigated. Pre test-education-post test were applied to the pre-determined study and control groups. The research was carried out with a sample of 122 6- year-old elemantary school students in Duzce (61 experimental group, 61 control group) . To the experimental group, a 12 week trainning with toys devised according to the lifelong learning principles based on the expert opinions was given. As data accumulation tools, “Writing Scale” and “Reading Scale” designed by Tutal and Oral (2015) aiming to reveal reading and writing skills (Erhan, 2012) in Ministry of Education Guide Book was applied to the students before and after the training. As a result of the study while a significant difference was defined in students’ reading skills, no significant difference was defined in their Writing Skills.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Danacı, M. Ö., Deniz, M. E., Eran, N. (2016). The Research on the Effects of Training Based on Lifelong Learning Skills the Reading- Writing Skills of the First Graders in Elementary School. International Journal on Lifelong Education and Leadership, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1, 36–41. https://ajindex.com/articles/1499318

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (25)

  1. Acat, B. (1996). The relations’ level betwixt reading disability and undertand the reading. Unpublished Master Thesis, Hacettepe University, Social Sciences Institute, Ankara.
  2. Akkoyunlu, B., Kurbanoglu, S. (2002). Readness of information. Journal of TBD Data Processing Culture, 83, 20–40. Beycioglu, K. ve Konan, N.(2008).
  3. Lifelong learning and Europe education politics.
  4. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, C.7, S.24 369-382.
  5. De La Harpe, B., & Radloff, A. (2000). Informed teachers and learners: The importance of accessing the characteristics needed for lifelong learning. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(2), 169-182.
  6. Demirel, M. (2009). Lifelong learning and technology. Hacettepe University. http://www.iet- c.net/publications/ietc2009.pdf (Acces Date: 11.03.2015).
  7. Ersoy, A., & Yilmaz, B. (2009). Lifelong learning and public libraries in Turkey. Turkish Libraries, 23(4), 803-834.
  8. Ferah, A. (2007). Learning first reading writing on Turkish. Ankara: Nobel Publishing.
  9. Fletcher, E. B. (1997). The relationship between visual – motor development and handwriting in kindergarten children. Unpublished Master Thesis, Bufallo University.
  10. Goksan, T. S., Uzundurukan, S., Keskin, S. N. (2009). Lifelong learning and Europe’s programmes of lifelong learning, 1. Construction Engineering Education Symposium, Antalya, pp.143–151.
  11. Gulec, I., Celik, S., Demirhan, B. (2012). What ist he lifelong learning? A evaluation of its’ concept and extent. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 2(3), 34-48.
  12. Karakus, C. (2013). Lifelong learning efficiency of vaccational students. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 2(3), 26-35.
  13. Knapper, C. & Cropley, A. J. (2000). Lifelong learning in higher education. London: Kogan, pp.130-175.
  14. MEB (2005). The Turkish learning programme. Ankara.
  15. The Project of Powering to Voccational Education and Learning Sytem MEGEP (2007). Lifelong Learning Strateji Form (Junk):Ankara. http://www.megep.meb.gov.tr/megep/genel/hayatboyu/ (Acces Date: 23.03.2015).
  16. Ozen, Y. (2011). Learning perceptional learning theory, lifelong learning with changement and developmental. Dicle University Social Sciences Journal, 3(6), 1-16.
  17. Polat, C., & Odabas, H. (2012). The clue of lifelong learning in the information society: Information readness. Symposium on Globalization, Democratization and Turkey Proceedings, pp.596-606.
  18. Poyraz, H., Titrek, O. (2015).
  19. Developing of lifelong learning in Turkey. The Journal of Abant Izzet Baysal
  20. University Faculty of Education, 13(1), 1-17.
  21. Senel, H. (2004). The readness methods which the teachers prefer. Primary School-online. 3(2), 48-53. versity, Bufallo. pp:15.
  22. Turan, S., (2005). Lifelong learning on Europe Union upward the learning communities. Journal of Ankara Europe Studies, 5(1), 87–98.
  23. Tutal, O., & Oral, O. (2015). The effect of the age of admission to the students’ initial literacy achievement. Dicle University, Journal of Ziya Gokalp Education Faculty, 24, 96
  24. Unalan, S. (2001). Teaching Turkish. Ankara: Nobel Publishing.
  25. Temizkan, M. ve Sallabas, E. (2009). Comparing the candidate of teachers readness attitude. Journal of Electronic Social Sciences. pp:155-176.