KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / International Journal on Lifelong Education and Leadership / 2026 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1

Always Full Performance! The Relationship between Burnout, Organizational Commitment and Job Performance in School Administrators

Sevgi Yıldız(ORDU ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-1116-7896
Sevda Katıtaş(MİLLİ EĞİTİM BAKANLIĞI)0000-0003-3512-6677
Sibel Doğan(MİLLİ EĞİTİM BAKANLIĞI)0000-0003-0687-203X
Sayfa
25–40
Yayın Tarihi
2023-06-30
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Recommendations were made in the light of relevant findings and literature.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, the job performance of school administrators, a significant factor of school effectiveness, was discussed.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Accordingly, the aim of the survey is to examine the relationship between burnout, commitment to school and the job performance of school administrators. 320 school administrators working in public schools in Turkey participated in the research.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Recommendations were made in the light of relevant findings and literature.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:School administrators · job performance · organizational commitment

Abstract

In this study, the job performance of school administrators, a significant factor of school effectiveness, was discussed. Accordingly, the aim of the survey is to examine the relationship between burnout, commitment to school and the job performance of school administrators. 320 school administrators working in public schools in Turkey participated in the research. In the research, causal comparative design and correlational survey model, which are among the quantitative research methods, were used. The data of the study were collected using the "Burnout Measure", "Organizational Commitment Scale" and "Job Performance Scale". Descriptive and evidential statistics techniques were used in the analysis of the data. As a result of the research, it was determined that especially the job performances were at a very high level according to the perceptions of school administrators. School administrators' level of burnout was found to be low despite their medium level of commitment to school. A negative and very weak correlation was found between school administrators' burnout and their organizational commitment. When analyzed in terms of demographic variables, the job performance of the principals was higher than that of the assistant principals. Burnout of assistant principals was found to be higher than that of principals. In addition, it was revealed that female school administrators' burnout was higher than that of male school administrators. Demographic variables did not make a significant difference on the organizational commitment of school administrators. In the study, it was also founded that the burnout of school administrators and the continuance commitment dimension of their organizational commitment to their schools are significant predictors of their job performance. Recommendations were made in the light of relevant findings and literature.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Yıldız, S., Katıtaş, S., Doğan, S. (2023). Always Full Performance! The Relationship between Burnout, Organizational Commitment and Job Performance in School Administrators. International Journal on Lifelong Education and Leadership, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 25–40. https://doi.org/10.25233/ijlel.1300816

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (87)

  1. Açıkalın, A. (1998). Teknik ve toplumsal yönleriyle okul yöneticiliği [School administration with its technical and social aspects]. Pegem A Pub.
  2. Adeyemi, T. O. (2011). Principals’ leadership styles and teachers’ job performance in senior secondary schools in Ondo State, Nigeria. Current Research Journal of Economic Theory, 3(3), 84–92.
  3. Akcakoca, A. & Bilgin, K. U. (2016). Okul müdürlerinin liderlik stilleri ve öğretmen performansı [Leadership styles of school principals and teacher performance]. The Journal of Contemporary Administrative Sciences, 3(2), 1-23. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/cybd/issue/34551/381719
  4. Aksanaklu, P. & İnandı, Y. (2018). Okul yöneticilerinin örgütsel bağlılıkları ile tükenmişlik düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [Examining the relationship between school administrators' organizational commitment and burnout levels]. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 14(3), 937-955. https://doi.org/10.17860/mersinefd.469769
  5. Aktaş, A. & Özgenel, M. (2020). Okul müdürlerinin liderlik stillerinin öğretmen performansına etkisi [The effect of school principals' leadership styles on teacher performance]. International Journal of Leadership Studies: Theory and Practice, 3(2), 1-18. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ijls/issue/56102/721883
  6. Alkan, E. (2022). Okul müdürlerinin çatışma yönetimi stilleri ile öğretmen performansı ve okul mutluluğu arasındaki ilişki [The relationship between school principals' conflict management styles, teacher performance and school happiness]. [ Unpublished Master Thesis]. İstanbul Sabahattin Zaim University.
  7. Allen, N. J. & Meyer, J. P. (1990). Organizational socialization tactics: A longitudinal analysis of links to newcomers’ commitment and role orientation. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 847-858. Babaoğlan, E. (2006). İlköğretim müdürlerinde tükenmişlik [Burnout in primary school principals]. [Unpublished PhD Thesis].Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi.
  8. Bafadal, I. Nurabadi, A. Soepriyanto, Y. & Gunawan, I. (2020). Primary school principal performance measurement. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 487(Ecpe), 19–23. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201112.004
  9. Baltacı, A. (2017). İş yükü ve performans arasındaki ilişkiler: Ampirik bir araştırma [Relationships between workload and performance: An empirical research]. Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 3(1), 101-121. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. Freeman.
  10. Barutçugil, İ. (2002). Performans yönetimi [Performance management]. Kariyer Pub.
  11. Başol, G. & Altay, M. (2009). Eğitim yöneticisi ve öğretmenlerin mesleki tükenmişlik düzeylerinin incelenmesi [Investigation of professional burnout levels of education administrators and teachers]. Educational Management in Theory and Practice, 15(58), 191-216. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/108262
  12. Bogler, R. (2001). The influence of leadership style on teacher job satisfaction. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(5), 662–683. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131610121969460
  13. Bush, T. & Glover, D. (2014) School leadership models: what do we know? School Leadership & Management, 34(5), 553-571, https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2014.928680
  14. Campbell, J. P. Mccloy, R. A. Oppler, S. H. & Sager, C. E. (1993). A theory of performance. In N. Schmitt ve W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (35-70). Jossey-Bass.
  15. Chukwuemeka, A. J. & Sarah, O. N. (2021). Principals’ leadership styles and teachers’ job performance in secondary schools in Anambra State. International Journal of Innovative Social & Science Education Research, 9(2), 88-98. https://seahipaj.org/journals-ci/june-2021/IJISSER/full/IJISSER-J-10-2021.pdf
  16. Clark, D. Martorell, P. & Rockoff, J. (2009). School principals and school performance. Working Paper 38, https://www0.gsb.columbia.edu/faculty/jrockoff/cmr_principals_calder_WP38.pdf
  17. Çelikkaleli, Ö. (2011). Yetişkin eğitimcisi öğretmenlerin tükenmişlik ve mesleki yetkinliklerinin incelenmesi [Examination of burnout and professional competencies of adult educator teachers]. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of SBE, 4, 13-26.
  18. Çöl, G. (2008). Algılanan güçlendirmenin işgören performansı üzerine etkileri [The effects of perceived empowerment on employee performance]. Doğuş University Journal, 9(1), 35-46
  19. Dağlı, A. Elçicek, Z. & Han, B. (2018).Örgütsel Bağlılık Ölçeği’nin Türkçeye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Adaptation of Organizational Commitment Scale into Turkish: Validity and reliability study]. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 17(68), 1765-1777.
  20. Demirbilek, M. & Bakioğlu, A. (2019). Okul müdür yardımcılarının görevlerinden ayrılma nedenleri [Reasons for leaving school assistant principals from their duties]. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 52(3), 737-769. https://doi.org/10.30964/auebfd.505268
  21. Garten, C. (2017). Employee burnout is a problem with the company, not the person. Harvard Business Review Digital Article. https://hbr.org/2017/04/employee-burnout-is-a-problem-with-the-company-not-the-person
  22. Girgin, G. (2011) Bir grup ilköğretim öğretmeninde tükenmişlik sendromu [Burnout syndrome in a group of primary school teachers]. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Medical Sciences, 31, 602- 608.
  23. Giziroğlu, B. (2019). Okul yöneticilerinin psikolojik sermayeleri ve iş performansları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [Examining the relationship between school administrators' psychological capital and job performance]. [Unpublished Master Thesis]. Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University.
  24. Gong, Y. Law, K. S. Chang, S. & Xin, K. R. (2009). Human resources management and firm performance: The differential role of managerial affective and continuance commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013116
  25. Griffin, M. L. Hogan, N. L. Lambert, E. G. Tucker-Gail, K. A.& Baker, D. N. (2010). Job involvement, job stress, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment and the burnout of correctional staff. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(2), 239–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809351682
  26. Halbesleben, J. R. & Buckley, M. R. (2004). Burnout in organizational life. Journal of Management, 30(6), 859–879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.004
  27. Heck, R. H. (1992). Principals' instructional leadership and school performance: implications for policy development. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(1), 21-34. https://doi.org/10.2307/1164525
  28. Huguet, B. C. S. (2017). Effective leadership can positively impact school performance. On the Horizon, 25(2), 96-102. https://doi.org/10.1108/OTH-07-2016-0044
  29. Imhangbe, O. Okecha, R. & Obozuwa, J. (2019). Principals’ leadership styles and teachers’ job performance: Evidence from Edo State, Nigeria. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 47(6), 909–924. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143218764178
  30. Judge, T. A. Thoresen, C. J. Bono, J. E. & Patton, G. K. (2001). The job satisfaction–job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 127(3), 376–407. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.376
  31. Kahya, E. (2007). The effects of job characteristics and working conditions on job performance. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 37(16), 515-523, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2007.02.006
  32. Karakas, F. (2010). Spirituality and performance in organizations: A literature review. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(1), 89-106, 2010.
  33. Karadaş, H. & Akın, M. A. (2023). Examining teachers' organizational happiness and organizational commitment, E-International Journal of Educational Research, 14(2), 289-309. https://doi.org/10.19160/e-ijer.1247022
  34. Kaya, İ. (2007). Otel işletmeleri işgörenlerinin iş tatminini etkileyen faktörler: Geliştirilen bir iş tatmin ölçeği [Factors affecting job satisfaction of hotel business employees: A developed job satisfaction scale]. Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, 7(2), 355-372.
  35. Keefer, P. A. (2007). Job satisfaction in union and nonunion public schools and its effect on academic achievement. [Unpublished Dissertation]. University of Phoenix.
  36. Kesen, İ. Toklucu Sundaram, D. & Abaslı, K. (2019). Instructional leader vs. school principal. Seta Report. https://setav.org/assets/uploads/2019/07/R141.pdf
  37. Kırılmaz, A. Çelen, Ü. & Sarp, N. (2002). İlköğretimde çalışan bir öğretmen grubunda tükenmişlik durumu araştırması [A study of burnout status in a group of teachers working in primary education]. Elementary Online, 2(1), 2-9.http://ilkogretim-online.org.tr/vol2say1/v02s01a.pdf
  38. Korkmaz, Y. D. D. M. (2005). Duyguların ve liderlik stillerinin öğretmenlerin performansı üzerinde etkisi [The effect of emotions and leadership styles on teachers' performance]. Educational Management in Theory and Practice, 43(43), 401-422. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/kuey/issue/10354/126786
  39. Koruklu, N. Feyzioğlu, B. Kiremit, H. Ö. & Aladağ, E. (2012). Öğretmenlerin tükenmişlik düzeylerinin bazı değişkenlere göre incelenmesi [Examination of teachers' burnout levels according to some variables]. Educational Sciences in Theory and Practice, 12(3), 1813-1831.
  40. Kurtul, E. & Özgenel, M. (2021). The predictive level of rotation implementation on the school administrators’ performances. SDU International Journal of Educational Studies, 8(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.33710/sduijes.823625
  41. Leithwood, K. Louis, K. S. Anderson, S. & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). How leadership influences student learning. The Wallace Foundation. http://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/school-leadership/key-research/Documents/How-Leadership-Influences-Student-Learning.pdf
  42. Leithwood, K. C. Day, P. Sammons, A. Harris, & D. Hopkins. (2006). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. DfES.
  43. Limon, İ. (2022). Relationship between empowering leadership and teachers’ job performance: organizational commitment as mediator. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 15(1), 16-41. https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.945201
  44. Liu, H. L. & Lo, V. H. (2018). An integrated model of workload, autonomy, burnout, job satisfaction, and turnover intention among Taiwanese reporters. Asian Journal of Communication, 28(2), 153-169.
  45. Liu, Y. & Bellibaş, M. Ş. (2018). School factors that are related to school principals’ job satisfaction and organizational commitment. International Journal of Educational Research, 90, 1-19, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.04.002
  46. Loan, L. T. M. (2020). The influence of organizational commitment on employees’ job performance: The mediating role of job satisfaction. Management Science Letters, 10, 3307–3312.
  47. Locke, E. A. (1970). Job satisfaction and job performance: A theoretical analysis. Organizational Behavior ve Human Performance, 5(5), 484-500.
  48. Maslach, C. Schaufeli, W. B. & Leiter, M. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397–422. Maslach, C. (1978). The client role in staff burn-out. Journal of Social Issues, 34(4), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1978.tb00778.x
  49. Maslach, C. (1982). Burnout: The cost of caring. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Maslach, C. (2003). Job burnout: New directions in research and intervention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(5), 189-192.
  50. Maslach, C. & Jackson, S. E. (1981). The measurement of experienced burnout. Journal Of Occupational Behaviour, 2(2), 99-113.https://www.jstor.org/stable/3000281
  51. Mealer, M. Moss, M. Good, V. Goza,l D. Kleinpell R. & Sessler, C. (2016). What is burnout syndrome (BOS)? Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 194 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.1941P1
  52. Meyer, J. P. & Allen, N. J. (1984). Testing the "side-bet theory" of organizational commitment: Some methodological considerations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(3), 372–378. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.69.3.372
  53. Meyer, J. P. & Allen, N. J. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1-18.
  54. Meyer, J. P. & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89.
  55. Meyer, J. P. Allen, N. J. & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology. 78, 538-551.
  56. Meyer, J. P. Stanley, D. J. Herscovitch, L. & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 20–52. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842
  57. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı Okul Öncesi Eğitim ve İlköğretim Kurumları Yönetmeliği. (2014). Resmi Gazete, 29072, 26 Temmuz 2014.
  58. Moss, J. (2019). Employee burnout is a problem with the company, not the person. Harvard Business Review Digital Article. https://hbr.org/2017/04/employee-burnout-is-a-problem-with-the-company-not-the-person
  59. Motowidlo, S. J. & Kell, H. J. (2013). Job performance. In handbook of psychology: industrial and organizational psychology; John Wiley & Sons Inc.: Hoboken, 12, 82–103.
  60. Mowday, R. T. Steers, R. M. & Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 224-247.
  61. Mueller, C. W. Wallace, J. E. & Price, J. L. (1992). Employee commitment: Resolving some issues. Work and Occupations, 19(3), 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888492019003001
  62. Neumann, Y. & Finaly-Neumann, E. (1991). Determinants and correlates of faculty burn-out in US research universities. Journal of Educational Administration, 29(3), 80-92.
  63. Obama, M. O. Eunice, L. A. & Orodho, J. A. (2016). Principals’ leadership style and students’ academic performance in public secondary schools in HomaBay County, Kenya. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(7), 1-8. https://core.ac.uk/reader/234675000
  64. Okoji, O. O. (2016). Relationship between secondary school principals’ leadership style and teachers’ job performance in selected rural communities of Ondo State, Nigeria. Annals of Modern Education, 8(1), 27–36. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ame/article/view/129652
  65. Osemeke, M. (2016). Identification of determinants of organizational commitment and employee job satisfaction. An International Multi-disciplinary Journal, 10(2), 81-102.
  66. Özdemir, M. & Yirmibeş, A. (2016). Okullarda liderlik ekibi uyumu ve öğretmen performansı ilişkisinde iş doyumunun aracı etkisi [The mediating effect of job satisfaction on the relationship between leadership team cohesion and teacher performance in schools]. Journal of Gazi Education Faculty, 36(2), 323-348. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/gefad/issue/29793/320352
  67. Özel, Ş. Kaya, A. Ekinci, A. & Yılmaz, O. (2023). Okul müdürlerin iletişim becerilerinin öğretmen performans düzeylerine etkisi: öğretmenlik mesleğine adanmışlık aracılık rolü [The effect of school principals' communication skills on teacher performance levels: the mediating role of commitment to the teaching profession]. National Journal of Education, 3(2), 374–384.https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7691394
  68. Özen, Ş. (1984). Örgütsel araştırmalardaki sosyal beğenirlik etkisinin Türk toplumsal ve bürokratik kültürü bağlamında incelenmesi [Examining the effect of social desirability in organizational research in the context of Turkish social and bureaucratic culture]. https://www.academia.edu/18566438/
  69. Park, V. & Datnow, A. (2022). Principals’ emotions in school improvement: the role of people, practices, policies, and patterns. School Leadership & Management, 42(3), 256-274. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2022.2071863
  70. Parveen, K. Quang, B. Tran P, Kumar, T. & Shah, A. H. (2022). Impact of principal leadership styles on teacher job performance: An empirical investigation. Front. Educ. 7, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.814159 Piko, B. F. (2006). Burnout, role conflict, job satisfaction and psychosocial health among Hungarian health care staff: A questionnaire survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 43(3), 311–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.05.003
  71. Polat, S. Ercengiz, M. & Tetik, H. (2012). Öğretmenlerin mesleki tükenmişliklerinin farklı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi [Examination of teachers' professional burnout in terms of different variables]. Bartın University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 1,152-153.
  72. Powell, D. M. & Meyer, J. P. (2004). Side-bet theory and the three-component model of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65(1), 157–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00050-2 Reichers, A. E. (1985). A review and reconceptualization of organizational commitment. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 465-476.
  73. Robbins, S. P. & Judge, T. A. (2013). Örgütsel davranış [Organizational behaviors]. Nobel Pub.
  74. Sabuncuoğlu, Z. & Tüz, M. (2013). Örgütsel davranış [Organizational behaviors]. Aktüel Pub.
  75. Saiti, A. & Fassoulis, K. (2012). Job satisfaction: factor analysis of Greek primary school principals' perceptions. International Journal of Educational Management, 26(4), 370-380. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513541211227773
  76. Schat, A. C. & Frone, M. R. (2011). Exposure to psychological aggression at work and job performance: The mediating role of job attitudes and personal health. Work & Stress, 25(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2011.563133
  77. Somers, M.J. (1995). Organizational commitment, turnover and absenteeism: An examination of direct and interaction effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 49-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.4030160107
  78. Sonnentag, S. Volmer. J. & Spychala, A. (2008). Job performance. In J. Barling & C. L. Cooper (Eds.). The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Behavior Volume One: Micro Approaches, 1, 427–447. SAGE Publications Ltd. http://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200455
  79. Soysal, N. G. (2006). Yönetim bilgi sistemlerinin okul yöneticilerinin performansları üzerindeki etkileri [The effects of management information systems on the performance of school administrators]. [Unpublished Master Thesis]. Trakya University.
  80. Starnes, B. J. & Truhon, S. (2006). A primer on organizational commitment. Human Development and Leadership Division. http://asqhdandl.org/index.html
  81. Tsui, A. S. Nifadkar, S. S. & Ou, A.Y. (2007). Cross-national, cross-cultural organizational behavior research: Advances, gaps and recommendations. Journal of Management, 33, 426–478.
  82. Tümkaya, S. Sabahattin, Ç. A. M. & Çavuşoğlu, I. (2009). Tükenmişlik ölçeği kısa versiyonu’nun Türkçe’ye uyarlama, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [The Turkish adaptation, validity and reliability study of the short version of the burnout scale]. Çukurova University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 18(1), 387-398.
  83. Uludağ, G. (2018). Örgütsel bağlılık ile işgören performansı ilişkisini incelemeye yönelik bir alan araştırması [A field study to examine the relationship between organizational commitment and employee performance]. Bitlis Eren University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 7(1), 171-193.
  84. Van Dick, R. Christ, O. Stellmacher, J. Wagner, U. Ahlswede, O. Grubba, C. & Tissington, P. A. (2004). Should I stay or should I go? Explaining turnover intentions with organizational identification and job satisfaction. British Journal of Management, 15(4), 351–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2004.00424.x
  85. Varotsis, N. (2019). Motivation in public autonomous organizations: The case of I.A.P.R. Open Journal of Business and Management, 7, 1617-1636. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2019.74112
  86. Yavuzkılıç, S. (2021). Bağımsız anaokullarında görev yapan okul öncesi öğretmenlerinin örgütsel bağlılıkları ile iş performansları arasındaki ilişki. [The relationship between the organizational commitment and job performance of preschool teachers working in independent kindergartens]. Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Education Journal of Educational Sciences, 12(1), 33-48. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/aduefebder/issue/63241/833606
  87. Varotsis, N. (2019). Motivation in public autonomous organizations: The case of I.A.P.R. Open Journal of Business and Management, 7, 1617-1636. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2019.74112