KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies / 2026 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1

Successful Aging Scale: Validity and Reliability Study

Çiğdem Demir Çelebi(ISTANBUL SABAHATTIN ZAIM UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-0886-9750
Müge Yukay Yüksel(MARMARA UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-7425-2716
Sayfa
79–90
Yayın Tarihi
2022-01-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The Cronbach alpha internal consistency coefficient of the total score of the SAS was calculated as .96 in the first study group and .90 in the second study group.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The purpose of this research is to develop a successful aging scale specific to Turkey.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The study group formed for exploratory factor analysis consists of 521, and the group for confirmatory factor analysis consists of 243 elderly individuals.By the analyzes carried out, the KMO value of the Successful Aging Scale was found to be .97; validity and reliability analyzes were continued.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The Cronbach alpha internal consistency coefficient of the total score of the SAS was calculated as .96 in the first study group and .90 in the second study group.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Successful aging · scale · elder

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to develop a successful aging scale specific to Turkey. This research was carried out on two different study groups for exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis studies. The study group formed for exploratory factor analysis consists of 521, and the group for confirmatory factor analysis consists of 243 elderly individuals.By the analyzes carried out, the KMO value of the Successful Aging Scale was found to be .97; validity and reliability analyzes were continued. It was observed that the 19-item SAS with item loads varying between .74 and .84 explained 61.42% of the total variance. After the exploratory factor analysis studies of the SAS, the confirmatory factor analysis studies were started and after the two modifications, the model fit indices were found at an acceptable level (χ2 / df = 2.24, RMSEA = .069, CFI = .922, TLI = .911, SRMR =. .067). In order to determine the criterion-based validity of the SAS, Successful Aging Scale and the Aging In-Situ Scale were used. As a result of the analysis, it was seen that the SAS showed a moderate meaningful relationship with both scales. The Cronbach alpha internal consistency coefficient of the total score of the SAS was calculated as .96 in the first study group and .90 in the second study group.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Çelebi, Ç. D., Yüksel, M. Y. (2022). Successful Aging Scale: Validity and Reliability Study. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 79–90. https://ajindex.com/articles/1497348

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (41)

  1. Aydın, A., & Aydın-Sayılan, A. (2014). Aktifyaşlanmaileyaşamboyuöğrenmearasındakiilişkiyeteorikbirbakış. International Journal of Social and Economic Sciences, 4(2), 76-81. http://ijses.org/index.php/ijses/article/view/129/137
  2. Aydın, Z. D. (2006). Toplum ve birey için sağlıklı yaşlanma: Yaşam biçiminin rolü. S.D.Ü. Tıp Fak. Derg., 13(4), 43- 48. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/196662
  3. Baltes P. B., & Baltes M. M. (1990). Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. In Baltes P. B. & Baltes M. M, editors. (Eds.), Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences (pp. 1–34). Cambridge University. 10.1017/CBO97805116656 84.003
  4. Bowling, A., & Dieppe, P. (2005). What is successful ageing and who should define it? BMJ, 331, 24- 31. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7531.1548
  5. Bülöw, M. H., & Söderqvist, T. (2014). Successful aging: A historical overview and critical analysis of a successful concept. Journal of Aging Studies, 31, 139- 149.doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2014.08.009
  6. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Sosyal bilimler için very analizi el kitabı (13. Baskı). Pegem.
  7. Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  8. Çakır, A. (2014). Faktör analizi [Doctoral dissertation]. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi.
  9. Çifçili, S. S. (2012). Aktif yaşlanma: Fiziksel boyut. Turkish Family Physician, 3(1), 6-12.
  10. Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2016). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. Pegem.
  11. De Vellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd ed., Vol. 26). Sage.
  12. Depp, C.A., &Jeste, D.V. (2006). Definitions and predictors of successful ageing: A comprehensive review of larger quantitative studies. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 14, 6-20. doi: 10.1097/01.JGP.0000192501.03069.bc
  13. Eustice-Corwin, A., Missell, R., & Sörensen, S. (2020). Successful aging: Re-conceptualized. Innovation in Aging, 4(1), 655. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igaa057.2258
  14. Görgün- Baran, A. (2008). Yaşlılıkta sosyal izasyon ve yaşam kalitesi. Yaşlı Sorunları Araştırma Dergisi, 2, 86-97. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/203230
  15. Han, K., Lee, Y., Gu., J., Oh, H., Han, J., & Kim, K. (2015). Psychosocial factors for influencing healthy aging in adults in Korea. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 13(31), 1-10. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0225-5
  16. Hazer, O., & Özsungur, F. (2017). Başarılı yaşlanma ölçeği (BYÖ) Türkçe versiyonu. International Journal of Education Technology and Scientific Researches, 4, 184-206. http://www.ijetsar.com/Makaleler/446900940_2.%20184-206%20fahri%20%c3%b6zsungur.pdf
  17. Hewstone, M, Fincham, D. F., & Foster, J. (2005). Adolescence and adulthoods. in M. Hewstone, D. F. Fincham, & J. Foster (Eds.). Psychology. Wiley.
  18. Hsing-Ming, L., Mei-Ju, C., & Ho-Tang, W. (2016). Development and validation of Chinese version Successful Aging Scale of Taiwan. European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences, 4(3), 19-29. https://www.idpublications.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Full-Paper-DEVELOPMENT-AND-VALIDATION-OF-CHINESE-VERSION-SUCCESSFUL-AGING-SCALE-OF-TAIWAN.pdf
  19. Kalınkara, V., & Kapıkıran, Ş. (2017). Yerinde yaşlanma ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi ve psikometrik özellikleri. Yaşlı Sorunları Araştırma Dergisi, 10(2), 54-66. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/365058
  20. Karaman, K. (2003). Şehirleşme sürecinde bireysel ve sosyal ilişkiler (Kayseri örneği). Doğu Anadolu Bölgesi Araştırmaları, 4, 118- 128. http://web.firat.edu.tr/daum/docs/21/23%20%C5%9Eehirle%C5%9Fme%20S%C3%BCrecinde%20Bireysel%20ve.%20Kas%C4%B1m%20KARAMAN%20118-128.doc
  21. Kayış, A. (2010). Güvenilirlik analizi (reliability analysis): SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik uygulamaları. Asil.
  22. Lee, J. H. Kahana, B., & Kahana, E. (2017). Successful Aging from the viewpoint of older adults: Development of a brief successful aging inventory (SAI). Gerontology 63(4). doi: 10.1159/000455252
  23. MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
  24. Özdemirkan, T., Şimşek, Z.B., & Şimşek, A.Ç. (2020).Sağlıklı aktif başarılı yaşlanma.Türkiye Sağlık Okur Yazarlığı Dergisi, 1(1), 61-67 http://www.saglikokuryazarligidergisi.com/index.php/soyd/index
  25. Özmete, E. (2012). Yaşlanırken: Başarılı yaşlanma. Aile ve Sosyal Politikalar Bakanlığı Biz Bir Aileyiz, 1(1), 1-5.
  26. Reker, G. T. (2009). A Brief Manual of the Successful Aging Scale (SAS), doi: 10.13140/2.1.4238.720
  27. Robson, S. M., Hansson, R. O., Abalos, A., & Booth, M. (2006). Successful aging: Criteria for aging well in the workplace. Journal of Career Development, 33(2), 156-177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845306292533
  28. Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (1987). Human aging: Usual and successful. Science, 237, 143-149. doi: 10.1126/science.3299702
  29. Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (1997). Successful aging. The Gerontologist, 37(4), 433-440. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/37.4.433
  30. Ryff, C. D. (1989). Beyond Ponce de Leon and life satisfaction: New directions in quest of successful ageing. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 12, 35-55. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F016502548901200102
  31. Schulz, R., & Heckhausen, J. (1996). A life span model of successful aging. American Psychologist, 51, 702-714. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0003-066X.51.7.702
  32. Sinan, Ö, & Bilgili, N. (2019). Yaşlılıkla ilgili yaygın inanç, tutumlar ve sağlık hizmetlerine yansıması. HEAD, 16(3):246-251. doi:10.5222/HEAD.2019.246
  33. Strawbridge, W. J., Wallhagen, M. I., & Cohen, R.D. (2002). Successful aging and well-being: Self-rated compared with Rowe and Kahn. The Gerontologist, 42(6), 727–733. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/42.6.727
  34. Tabachnick, B. G. & L. S. Fidell. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Allyn and Bacon.
  35. Tarmazdi, M. F., Tagharrobi, Z., Sooki, Z., & Sharifi, K. (2020). Psychometric evaluation of the persian version of the successful aging inventory. Galen Medical Journal, 9, 17-54. https://www.gmj.ir/index.php/gmj/article/view/1754/html
  36. The Research Advisors. (2006). Sample size table. Retrieved from http://research-advisors.com/tools/ SampleSize.htm on 13/01/2016.
  37. Türkiye Statistical Institute. (2020). İstatistiklerle yaşlılar, 2019.https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Istatistiklerle-Yaslilar-2019-33712.
  38. Yapıcıoğlu, A. (2009). Modernleşme süreci ve yaşlılık: İki yerleşim yerinde modernitenin yaşlılığa etkileri [Unpublished master thesis]. Sıtkı Kocaman Üniversitesi, Muğla.
  39. Yazıcı, S. (2018). Başarılı yaşlanma algısı: Farklı yaş gruplarından bireylerin yaşlılığa bakışı. STED / Sürekli Tıp Eğitimi Dergisi, 27(5), 305-316. Zhang, W., Liu, S., & Wu, B. (2018). Defining successful aging: Perceptions from elderly Chinese in Hawai‘i. Gerontology & Geriatric Medicine, 4, 1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2333721418778182
  40. Karaman, K. (2003). Şehirleşme sürecinde bireysel ve sosyal ilişkiler (Kayseri örneği). Doğu Anadolu Bölgesi Araştırmaları, 4, 118- 128. http://web.firat.edu.tr/daum/docs/21/23%20%C5%9Eehirle%C5%9Fme%20S%C3%BCrecinde%20Bireysel%20ve.%20Kas%C4%B1m%20KARAMAN%20118-128.doc
  41. Yazıcı, S. (2018). Başarılı yaşlanma algısı: Farklı yaş gruplarından bireylerin yaşlılığa bakışı. STED / Sürekli Tıp Eğitimi Dergisi, 27(5), 305-316.