KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / International Journal of Innovative Research and Reviews / 2025 / Volume: 9 Issue: 2

A Comprehensive Review of Nanocomposite Geopolymers: Mechanism, Properties, and Industrial Potential

Turgay Tehçi(SAKARYA UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES)0000-0003-4831-0668
Atamer Akbay0009-0005-7272-4520
Fatih Çalışkan(SAKARYA UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES)0000-0002-9568-7049
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2025-12-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Future research should focus on adapting these materials to large-scale production processes, ensuring the even distribution of additives, and evaluating their long-term durability from environmental and economic perspectives.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Geopolymers are inorganic polymers with amorphous or semi-crystalline structures formed by alkali activation of aluminosilicate-based materials.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:To address these issues, nanocomposite geopolymers integrated with nanotechnology have been developed.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Future research should focus on adapting these materials to large-scale production processes, ensuring the even distribution of additives, and evaluating their long-term durability from environmental and economic perspectives.
🔬Tür:Review
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Nanocomposite · Geopolymers · New application areas

Abstract

Geopolymers are inorganic polymers with amorphous or semi-crystalline structures formed by alkali activation of aluminosilicate-based materials. They are presented as a durable alternative to traditional Portland cement because of their low carbon footprint, high mechanical strength, and superior chemical and thermal resistance. However, their limited toughness and crack resistance restrict their application. To address these issues, nanocomposite geopolymers integrated with nanotechnology have been developed. The function of the nanoadditives used in the geopolymer matrix is twofold: (i) a nucleation effect that accelerates polycondensation and increases microstructure density; and (ii) a reinforcement effect that improves load transfer and limits microcrack propagation thanks to the high surface area and strong interface bonds. As a result, these mechanisms lead to significant improvements in compressive and flexural strength, toughness, and wear resistance. Additionally, nano additives enhance durability, particularly against freeze-thaw cycles, sulphate attack, and acid resistance, by reducing porosity. Functional additives, on the other hand, impart properties to geopolymers beyond their role as conventional building materials. For example, carbon nanotubes enhance electrical conductivity, electromagnetic wave attenuation, and piezoresistive sensor capabilities. Consequently, nanocomposite geopolymers are drawing attention not only in the construction industry but also in fields such as electronics, energystorage, catalysis, and advanced insulation. Overall, these materials show great promise due to their multifunctionality, strength, and durability. Future research should focus on adapting these materials to large-scale production processes, ensuring the even distribution of additives, and evaluating their long-term durability from environmental and economic perspectives.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Tehçi, T., Akbay, A., Çalışkan, F. (2025). A Comprehensive Review of Nanocomposite Geopolymers: Mechanism, Properties, and Industrial Potential. International Journal of Innovative Research and Reviews, Volume: 9 Issue: 2. https://ajindex.com/articles/1496387

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (98)

  1. Scrivener KL, John VM, Gartner EM. Eco-efficient cements: Potential economically viable solutions for a low-CO2 cement-based materials industry. Cement and Concrete Research(2018) 114:2–26. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.03.015.
  2. Davidovits J. Geopolymers. Journal of Thermal Analysis(1991) 37(8):1633–1656. doi:10.1007/BF01912193.
  3. Davidovits J. Geopolymer Chemistry and Applications(2008).
  4. Duxson P, Fernández-Jiménez A, Provis JL, Lukey GC, Palomo A, van Deventer JSJ. Geopolymer technology: the current state of the art. Journal of Materials Science(2007) 42(9):2917–2933. doi:10.1007/s10853-006-0637-z.
  5. Fernández-Jiménez A, Palomo A. Composition and microstructure of alkali activated fly ash binder: Effect of the activator. Cement and Concrete Research(2005) 35(10):1984–1992. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2005.03.003.
  6. Provis JL. Alkali-activated materials. Cement and Concrete Research(2018) 114:40–48. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.02.009.
  7. Rickard WD, Temuujin J, van Riessen A. Thermal analysis of geopolymer pastes synthesised from five fly ashes of variable composition. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids(2012) 358(15):1830–1839. doi:10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2012.05.032.
  8. McLellan BC, Williams RP, Lay J, van Riessen A, Corder GD. Costs and carbon emissions for geopolymer pastes in comparison to ordinary portland cement. Journal of Cleaner Production(2011) 19(9-10):1080–1090. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.02.010.
  9. Allahverdi A, Škvára F. Nitric acid attack on hardened paste of geopolymeric cements. Ceramics -Silikaty(2001) 45(4):143–149.
  10. Adewuyi YG. Recent Advances in Fly-Ash-Based Geopolymers: Potential on the Utilization for Sustainable EnvironmentalRemediation. ACS Omega(2021) 6(24):15532–15542. doi:10.1021/acsomega.1c00662.
  11. Houhou M, Leklou N, Ranaivomanana H, Penot J, Barros S de. Geopolymers in nuclear waste storage and immobilization: mechanisms, applications, and challenges. Discover Applied Sciences(2025) 7(2):126. doi:10.1007/s42452-025-06536-x.
  12. Lyon RE, Balaguru PN, Foden A, Sorathia U, Davidovits J, Davidovics M. Fire-resistant Aluminosilicate Composites. Fire and Materials(1997) 21(2):67–73. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1018(199703)21:2 3.0.CO;2-N.
  13. Provis JL, Bernal SA. Geopolymers and Related Alkali-Activated Materials. Annual Review of Materials Research(2014) 44(1):299–327. doi:10.1146/annurev-matsci-070813-113515.
  14. Duxson P, Provis JL, Lukey GC, van Deventer JS. The role of inorganic polymer technology in the development of ‘green concrete’. Cement and Concrete Research(2007) 37(12):1590–1597. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.08.018.
  15. Singh B, Ishwarya G, Gupta M, Bhattacharyya SK. Geopolymer concrete: A review of some recent developments. Construction and Building Materials(2015) 85:78–90. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.036.
  16. Li Z, Zhang J, Wang M. Structure, Reactivity, and Mechanical Properties of Sustainable Geopolymer Material: A Reactive Molecular Dynamics Study. Frontiers in Materials(2020) 7. doi:10.3389/fmats.2020.00069.
  17. Siyal AA, Radin Mohamed, Radin Maya Saphira, Shamsuddin R, Ridzuan MB. A comprehensive review of synthesis kinetics and formation mechanism of geopolymers. RSC Advances(2024) 14(1):446–462. doi:10.1039/D3RA06205H.
  18. Samuvel Raj R, Prince Arulraj G, Anand N, Kanagaraj B, Lubloy E, Naser MZ. Nanomaterials in geopolymer composites: A review. Developments in the Built Environment(2023) 13:100114. doi:10.1016/j.dibe.2022.100114.
  19. Drabczyk A, Kudłacik-Kramarczyk S, Korniejenko K, Figiela B, Furtos G. Review of Geopolymer Nanocomposites: Novel Materials for Sustainable Development. Materials(2023) 16(9):3478. doi:10.3390/ma16093478.
  20. Rahmawati C, Aprilia S, Saidi T, Aulia TB, Hadi AE. The Effects of Nanosilica on Mechanical Properties and Fracture Toughness of Geopolymer Cement. Polymers(2021) 13(13):2178. doi:10.3390/polym13132178.
  21. Tay CH, Norkhairunnisa M. Mechanical Strength of Graphene Reinforced Geopolymer Nanocomposites: A Review. Frontiers in Materials(2021) 8. doi:10.3389/fmats.2021.661013.
  22. Rathee M, Surendran HK, Thakur A, Narayana C, Lo R, Misra A, et al. Tailoring Functional Graphene-Derived Geopolymer Nanocomposites: Interfacial Interactions and Mechanical Strength Enhancement. ACS Materials Au(2025) 5(4):698–708. doi:10.1021/acsmaterialsau.5c00028.
  23. Althoey F, Zaid O, Martínez-García R, Alsharari F, Ahmed M, Arbili MM. Impact of Nano-silica on the hydration, strength, durability, and microstructural properties of concrete: A state-of-the-art review. Case Studies in Construction Materials(2023) 18:e01997. doi:10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e01997.
  24. Luhar I, Luhar S. A Comprehensive Review on Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer. Journal of Composites Science(2022) 6(8):219. doi:10.3390/jcs6080219.
  25. Alipoor M, Eshghi M, Sever R. Monte Carlo Simulation of Gamma and Neutron Shielding with High-performance Ultra-heavy Cement Composite. Journal of Medical Physics(2024) 49(4):661–672. doi:10.4103/jmp.jmp_91_24.
  26. Al-Buriahi MS, Yılmaz E, Alzahrani JS, Çalışkan F, Alzahrani HS, Alshahrani B, et al. Effects of Bi2O3 and Y2O3 addition on metakaolin-based geopolymers: physical-microstructure properties and shielding performance against ionizing radiation. Ceramics International(2026) 52(1):942–951. doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2025.11.393.
  27. Cong P, Du R, Gao H, Chen Z. Comparison and assessment of carbon dioxide emissions between alkali-activated materials and OPC cement concrete. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition)(2024) 11(5):918–938. doi:10.1016/j.jtte.2023.07.011.
  28. Khasawneh MA. Geopolymer concrete in construction projects: a review. Discover Civil Engineering(2025) 2(1):124. doi:10.1007/s44290-025-00281-1.
  29. Mohan Kumar, Sri Ganesh Kumar, Kinuthia JM, Oti J, Adeleke BO. Geopolymer Chemistry and Composition: A Comprehensive Review of Synthesis, Reaction Mechanisms, and Material Properties—Oriented with Sustainable Construction. Materials(2025) 18(16):3823. doi:10.3390/ma18163823.
  30. Ponomar V, Luukkonen T, Yliniemi J. Revisiting alkali-activated and sodium silicate-based materials in the early works of Glukhovsky. Construction and Building Materials(2023) 398:132474. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132474.
  31. Xu X, Bao S, Guo Z, Tian X. A clean approach to high-strength fly ash-based geopolymers: Multi-granular screening with NaAlO2 enhancement. Journal of Cleaner Production(2024) 464:142733. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142733.
  32. Chen S, Ruan S, Zeng Q, Liu Y, Zhang M, Tian Y, et al. Pore structure of geopolymer materials and its correlations to engineering properties: A review. Construction and Building Materials(2022) 328:127064. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127064.
  33. Chuewangkam N, Kidkhunthod P, Pinitsoontorn S. Direct evidence for the mechanism of early-stage geopolymerization process. Case Studies in Construction Materials(2024) 21:e03539. doi:10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03539.
  34. El Alouani M, Saufi H, AouanB, Bassam R, Alehyen S, Rachdi Y, et al. A comprehensive review of synthesis, characterization, and applications of aluminosilicate materials-based geopolymers. Environmental Advances(2024) 16:100524. doi:10.1016/j.envadv.2024.100524.
  35. Andrew RM. Global CO 2 emissions from cement production. Earth System Science Data(2018) 10(1):195–217. doi:10.5194/essd-10-195-2018.
  36. Provis JL. Geopolymers and other alkali activated materials: why, how, and what? Materials and Structures(2014) 47(1-2):11–25.doi:10.1617/s11527-013-0211-5.
  37. Verma M, Meena RK, Singh I, Gupta N, Saxena KK, Reddy MM, et al. Investigation on the impact of elevated temperature on sustainable geopolymer composite. Advances in Mechanical Engineering(2023) 15(9). doi:10.1177/16878132231196402.
  38. Habert G, d’Espinose de Lacaillerie JB, Roussel N. An environmental evaluation of geopolymer based concrete production: reviewing current research trends. Journal of Cleaner Production(2011) 19(11):1229–1238. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.03.012.
  39. Salas DA, Ramirez AD, Ulloa N, Baykara H, Boero AJ. Life cycle assessment of geopolymer concrete. Construction and Building Materials(2018) 190:170–177. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.123.
  40. Zhuang XY, Chen L, Komarneni S, Zhou CH, Tong DS, Yang HM, et al. Fly ash-based geopolymer: clean production, properties and applications. Journal of Cleaner Production(2016) 125:253–267. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.019.
  41. Tian Q, Pan Y, Bai Y, Yao S, Sun S. A Bibliometric Analysis of ResearchProgress and Trends on Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer. Materials(2022) 15(14):4777. doi:10.3390/ma15144777.
  42. Steinerova M, Matulova L, Vermach P, Kotas J. The Brittleness and Chemical Stability of Optimized Geopolymer Composites. Materials(2017) 10(4):396. doi:10.3390/ma10040396.
  43. Trindade ACC, Heravi AA, Curosu I, Liebscher M, Andrade Silva F de, Mechtcherine V. Tensile behavior of strain-hardening geopolymer composites (SHGC) under impact loading. Cement and Concrete Composites(2020) 113:103703. doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103703.
  44. Shilar FA, Ganachari SV, Patil VB, Khan TMY, Almakayeel NM, Alghamdi S. Review on the Relationship between Nano Modifications of Geopolymer Concrete and Their Structural Characteristics. Polymers(2022) 14(7):1421. doi:10.3390/polym14071421.
  45. Paruthi S, Rahman I, Husain A, Hasan MA, Khan AH. Effects of Chemicals Exposure on the Durability of Geopolymer Concrete Incorporated with Silica Fumes and Nano-Sized Silica at Varying Curing Temperatures. Materials(2023) 16(18):6332. doi:10.3390/ma16186332.
  46. Kishore K, Pandey A, Wagri NK, Saxena A, Patel J, Al-Fakih A. Technological challenges in nanoparticle-modified geopolymer concrete: A comprehensive review on nanomaterial dispersion, characterization techniques and its mechanical properties. Case Studies in Construction Materials(2023) 19:e02265. doi:10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02265.
  47. Jin Q, Zhang P, Wu J, Sha D. Mechanical Properties of Nano-SiO2 Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete under the Coupling Effect of a Wet–Thermal and Chloride Salt Environment. Polymers(2022) 14(11):2298. doi:10.3390/polym14112298.
  48. Rani JJ, Gladston H. Study on durability of fly ash geo-polymer concrete with nano alumina. Matéria (Rio de Janeiro)(2024) 29(4). doi:10.1590/1517-7076-rmat-2024-0412.
  49. Górski M, Czulkin P, Wielgus N, Boncel S, Kuziel AW, Kolanowska A, et al. Electrical Properties of the Carbon Nanotube-Reinforced Geopolymer Studied by Impedance Spectroscopy. Materials(2022) 15(10):3543. doi:10.3390/ma15103543.
  50. Kanagaraj B, Anand N, Lubloy E, Andrushia A D. Influence of Multi-walled Carbon Nanotube (MWCNT) on flexural behavior and microstructure characteristics of geopolymer concrete beams. Case Studies in Construction Materials(2024) 20:e03317. doi:10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03317.
  51. Saafi M, Andrew K, Tang PL, McGhon D, Taylor S, Rahman M, et al. Multifunctional properties of carbon nanotube/fly ash geopolymeric nanocomposites. Construction and Building Materials(2013) 49:46–55. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.08.007.
  52. Yan S, He P, Jia D, Duan X, Yang Z, Wang S, et al. Effects of graphene oxide on the geopolymerization mechanism determined by quenching the reaction at intermediate states. RSC Advances(2017) 7(22):13498–13508. doi:10.1039/C6RA26340B.
  53. Muhammad Rashid Naveed Umm e Habiba, Aqsa Nisar Muhammad Yousaf Raza Taseer. IMPACT OF NANO-SILICA ON THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF GEOPOLYMER CONCRETE: Zenodo (2025). doi:10.5281/zenodo.16719163.
  54. Nanthini M, Ganesan R, Jaganathan V. Nano-Silica integration for superior properties in potassium feldspar-based phosphoric acid activated geopolymers: A sustainable approach. Turkish Journal of Engineering(2025) 9(2):211–221. doi:10.31127/tuje.1536718.
  55. Ambikakumari Sanalkumar KU, Yang E-H. Self-cleaning performance of nano-TiO2 modified metakaolin-based geopolymers. Cement and Concrete Composites(2021) 115:103847. doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103847.
  56. Shi G, Cui B, Ong SK, Wang K. Magnetic fly-ash geopolymer for heavy metal removal in aqueous solutions. Water Science & Technology(2025) 91(12):1330–1344. doi:10.2166/wst.2025.077.
  57. Chiranjeevi K, Abraham M, Rath B, Praveenkumar TR. Enhancing the properties of geopolymer concrete using nano-silica and microstructure assessment: a sustainable approach. Scientific Reports(2023) 13(1):17302. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-44491-y.
  58. Vanitha N, Thanigaiselvan R, Manivannan M, Jeyalakshmi R, Megha SN, Kesavan M. Expounding the application of nano and micro silica as a complementary additive in metakaolin phosphate geopolymer for ceramic applications—micro and nanoscale structural investigation. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Engineering(2024) 19(1):32. doi:10.1186/s40712-024-00176-6.
  59. AssaediH, Shaikh F, Low IM. Effect of nano-clay on mechanical and thermal properties of geopolymer. Journal of Asian Ceramic Societies(2016) 4(1):19–28. doi:10.1016/j.jascer.2015.10.004.
  60. Jia X-T, Xing H-W, Cheng X-W, Zhang Z-H, Wang Q, Zhou J-Z, et al. Two-Dimensional Nanostructured Ti3C2Tx MXene for Ceramic Materials: Preparation and Applications. Nanomaterials(2025) 15(3):204. doi:10.3390/nano15030204.
  61. Xu S, Zhao C, Li G, Shi Z, Liu B. In situ oxidized TiO 2 /MXene ultrafiltration membrane with photocatalytic self-cleaning and antibacterial properties. RSC Advances(2023) 13(23):15843–15855. doi:10.1039/D3RA02230G.
  62. Dong B, Liu C, Shumuye ED, Zhang Y, Zhong H, Fang G. Effect of nano-silica on mechanical properties and microstructure of engineeredgeopolymer composites. Cement and Concrete Composites(2025) 156:105849. doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2024.105849.
  63. Nazarlou Z, Hosseini SF, Seyed Dorraji MS, Rasoulifard MH, Aydemir U. Ti 3 C 2 MXene/Polyaniline/Montmorillonite Nanostructures toward Solvent-Free Powder Coatings with Enhanced Corrosion Resistance and Mechanical Properties. ACS Applied Nano Materials(2023) 6(10):8804–8818. doi:10.1021/acsanm.3c01214.
  64. Marsh A, Heath A, Patureau P, Evernden M, Walker P. Alkali activation behaviour of un-calcined montmorillonite and illite clay minerals. Applied Clay Science(2018) 166:250–261. doi:10.1016/j.clay.2018.09.011.
  65. Wu D, Cao K, Chen K, Mao N. Interfacial characteristics and mechanical behavior of geopolymer stabilizers with clay mineral: Amolecular dynamics study. Applied Clay Science(2024) 250:107286. doi:10.1016/j.clay.2024.107286.
  66. Krishna RS, Saha S, Korniejenko K, Qureshi TS, Mustakim SM. Investigation of the Electrical Properties of Graphene-Reinforced Geopolymer Composites. In:10th MATBUD’2023 Scientific-Technical Conference. Basel Switzerland: MDPI (2023). p. 34.
  67. Li S, Shen P, Zhou H, Du S, Zhang Y, Yan J. Synergistic effects of CNTs/SiO 2 composite fillers on mechanical properties of cement composites. RSC Advances(2022) 12(42):27253–27266. doi:10.1039/D2RA04127H.
  68. Štengl V, Bakardjieva S, Grygar TM, Bludská J, Kormunda M. TiO2-graphene oxide nanocomposite as advanced photocatalytic materials. Chemistry Central Journal(2013) 7(1):41. doi:10.1186/1752-153X-7-41.
  69. Bajpai A, Carlotti S. The Effect of Hybridized Carbon Nanotubes, Silica Nanoparticles, and Core-Shell Rubber on Tensile, Fracture Mechanics and Electrical Properties of Epoxy Nanocomposites. Nanomaterials(2019) 9(7):1057. doi:10.3390/nano9071057.
  70. Rommozzi E, Zannotti M, Giovannetti R, D’Amato CA, Ferraro S, Minicucci M, et al. Reduced Graphene Oxide/TiO2 Nanocomposite: From Synthesis to Characterization for Efficient Visible Light Photocatalytic Applications. Catalysts(2018) 8(12):598. doi:10.3390/catal8120598.
  71. Zidi Z, Ltifi M, Ben Ayadi Z, El Mir L. Synthesis of nano-alumina and their effect on structure, mechanical and thermal properties of geopolymer. Journal of Asian Ceramic Societies(2019) 7(4):524–535. doi:10.1080/21870764.2019.1676498.
  72. Han Q, Zhang P, Wu J, Jing Y, Zhang D, Zhang T. Comprehensive review of the properties of fly ash-based geopolymer with additive of nano-SiO 2. Nanotechnology Reviews(2022) 11(1):1478–1498. doi:10.1515/ntrev-2022-0092.
  73. Gao K, Lin K-L, Wang D, Shiu H-S, Hwang C-L, Cheng T-W. Effects of Nano-SiO2 on Setting Time and Compressive Strength of Alkaliactivated Metakaolin-based Geopolymer. The Open Civil Engineering Journal(2013) 7(1):84–92. doi:10.2174/1874149501307010084.
  74. Alvee AR, Malinda R, Akbar AM, Ashar RD, Rahmawati C, Alomayri T, et al. Experimental study of the mechanical properties and microstructure of geopolymer paste containing nano-silica from agricultural waste and crystalline admixtures. Case Studies in Construction Materials(2022) 16:e00792. doi:10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00792.
  75. Sekkal W, Zaoui A. Residual water and interfacial bonding effects on the mechanical performance of CNT /fly ash geopolymer binder. Structural Concrete(2024) 25(5):3648–3661. doi:10.1002/suco.202301055.
  76. Zhang P, Shi B, Dai X, Chen C, Lai C. A State-of-the-Art Review on the Freeze–Thaw Resistance of Sustainable Geopolymer Gel Composites: Mechanisms, Determinants, and Models. Gels(2025) 11(7):537. doi:10.3390/gels11070537.
  77. Paruthi S, Rahman I, Husain A, Khan AH, Manea-Saghin A-M, Sabi E. A comprehensive review of nano materials in geopolymer concrete: Impact on properties and performance. Developments in the Built Environment(2023) 16:100287. doi:10.1016/j.dibe.2023.100287.
  78. Wan L, Zhao Y, Yu M, Tian Y, Wang Y. Durability and Mechanical Properties of Nano-SiO2 and Polyvinyl Alcohol Fiber-Reinforced Cementitious Composites Subjected to Saline Freeze–Thaw Cycles. Materials(2024) 17(11):2542. doi:10.3390/ma17112542.
  79. Buasiri T, Habermehl-Cwirzen K, Krzeminski L, Cwirzen A. Role of Carbon Nanofiber on the Electrical Resistivity of Mortar under Compressive Load. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board(2021) 2675(9):32–37. doi:10.1177/0361198120947417.
  80. Ahmadi H, Khalaj G, Najafi A, Abbasi SM, Safari M. Metakaolin-red mud/carbon nanotubes geopolymer nanocomposite: mechanical properties and structural studies. Materials Research Express(2022) 9(2):25011. doi:10.1088/2053-1591/ac54d6.
  81. Lesbayev A, Akalim D,Kalauov B, Yerezhep D. An Investigation into Fe3O4 Nanoparticle-Based Composites for Enhanced Electromagnetic Radiation Shielding. Journal of Composites Science(2025) 9(5):226. doi:10.3390/jcs9050226.
  82. Sharma R, Clower W, Amritphale S, Alam S, Matthews J, Radadia AD. Development of geopolymer composites for EMI shielding from steel industry waste. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics(2022) 33(8):4847–4861. doi:10.1007/s10854-021-07674-9.
  83. Sharma R, Hussain S, Seetala N, MatthewsJ, Edwards R, Amritphale S, et al. Simultaneous use of bismuth trioxide and mill scale for ternary blended geopolymer composite in radiation shielding applications. Progress in Nuclear Energy(2024) 172:105213. doi:10.1016/j.pnucene.2024.105213.
  84. Jaramillo-Fierro X, Gaona S, Ramón J, Valarezo E. Porous Geopolymer/ZnTiO3/TiO2 Composite for Adsorption and Photocatalytic Degradation of Methylene Blue Dye. Polymers(2023) 15(12):2697. doi:10.3390/polym15122697.
  85. Ahmed DA, Aly AA, El-Apasery MA. Sustainable construction: development of self-cleaning geopolymer composite with fly ash, and bentonite incorporated with nano-ZnO. Sustainable Environment Research(2025) 35(1):20. doi:10.1186/s42834-025-00256-y.
  86. Ma H, Li Y, Wang C, Li Y, Zhang X. TiO2-Based Photocatalysts for Removal of Low-Concentration NOx Contamination. Catalysts(2025) 15(2):103. doi:10.3390/catal15020103.
  87. Peturai P, Sanguanpak S, Chiemchaisri C, Chiemchaisri W, Lu MC. Photocatalytic removals of imidacloprid insecticide in TiO2-and Fe2O3-immobilized porous geopolymer granules. Chemosphere(2024) 362:142940. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.142940.
  88. Jaramillo-Fierro X, Cuenca G. Enhancing Methylene Blue Removal through Adsorption and Photocatalysis—A Study on the GO/ZnTiO3/TiO2 Composite. International Journal of Molecular Sciences(2024) 25(8):4367. doi:10.3390/ijms25084367.
  89. Al-Buriahi MS, Alzahrani JS, Owoeye SS, Yılmaz E, Çalıskan F. Fabrication, physical properties and radiation shielding performance of geopolymers reinforced by B2O3: Eco-friendly building material. Radiation Physics and Chemistry(2025) 237:112982. doi:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2025.112982.
  90. Mokhtari Dorostkar M, Abdi Saray A. Development of PMMA based polymer composite incorporating WO3 for gamma radiation shielding using synthesis and Monte Carlo simulation. Scientific Reports(2025) 15(1):27346. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-11155-y.
  91. Alomayrah N, Alrowaili ZA, Alalawi A, Al-Buriahi MS. Gamma and neutron attenuation of ASM geopolymers for radiation shielding applications: Theoretical study. Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences(2024) 17(2):100876. doi:10.1016/j.jrras.2024.100876.
  92. Maestre CV, Santos GN. Effect of bismuth oxide nanoparticle on the electromagnetic interference shielding and thermal stability of industrial waste based-geopolymer composites. Scientific Reports(2023) 13(1):1787. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-27623-2.
  93. Liu J-H, Yang J-L, Yang F, Feng J, Yuan X-Y, Zhou J, et al. A renewable bifunctional structural supercapacitor using the recycled geopolymer membrane and MnO2/CNTs electrode. Journal of Energy Storage(2024) 102:114203. doi:10.1016/j.est.2024.114203.
  94. Jeon IK, Gan Y, Wei C, Kim Y-R, Wu C. Biochar-geopolymer composite for structural capacitors. Materials Letters(2024) 371:136856. doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2024.136856.
  95. Pour GB, Ashourifar H, Aval LF, Solaymani S. CNTs-Supercapacitors: A Review of Electrode Nanocomposites Based on CNTs, Graphene, Metals, and Polymers. Symmetry(2023) 15(6):1179. doi:10.3390/sym15061179.
  96. Hou D, Zhang J, Pan W, Zhang Y, Zhang Z. Nanoscale mechanism of ions immobilized by the geopolymer: A molecular dynamics study. Journal of Nuclear Materials(2020) 528:151841. doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.151841.
  97. Balina K, Gailitis R, Sinka M, Argalis PP, Radina L, Sprince A. Prospective LCA for 3D-Printed Foamed Geopolymer Composites Using Construction Waste as Additives. Sustainability(2025) 17(14):1–21.
  98. Krishna RS, Rehman AU, Mishra J, Saha S, KorniejenkoK, Rehman RU, et al. Additive manufacturing of geopolymer composites for sustainable construction: critical factors, advancements, challenges, and future directions. Progress in Additive Manufacturing(2025) 10(2):1003–1061. doi:10.1007/s40964-024-00703-z.