KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / International Journal of Aviation Science and Technology / 2024 / Volume: 05 Issue: 02

Aerodynamic Investigation of Fixed Pitch Aircraft Propeller

Erdogan Kaygan(Lentatek Uzay Havacılık ve Teknoloji A.Ş.)0000-0003-3319-3657
Dogukan Dogan(Lentatek Uzay Havacılık ve Teknoloji A.Ş.)0009-0009-6993-0242
Ozan Mahir Alpagut(Lentatek Uzay Havacılık ve Teknoloji A.Ş.)0009-0008-7913-0276
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2024-12-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The CFD results indicated that there is a good agreement with the experimental results.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:An investigation of fixed pitch propeller aerodynamics is described in this paper.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:During the simulation process, velocity set to 60 knots (30.87 m/s) and initially RPM (Revolution per Minute) kept constant at 3100 to specify efficiency at that point.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The CFD results indicated that there is a good agreement with the experimental results.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Aerodynamics · CFD simulation · Propeller

Abstract

An investigation of fixed pitch propeller aerodynamics is described in this paper. The impetus for the work was to identify proposed propeller’s efficiency, thrust coefficient, power coefficient and pressure contours are characterized. All computational analysis were performed using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) software called Cradle scFLOW. During the simulation process, velocity set to 60 knots (30.87 m/s) and initially RPM (Revolution per Minute) kept constant at 3100 to specify efficiency at that point. Following that RPM value was varied to achieve thrust force. According to results, with increase in advance ratio was found to raise propeller efficiency at some point and then reduction was observed in terms of efficiency due to thrust reduction. Subsequent to these investigations, obtained thrust force was compared with an experimental data. The CFD results indicated that there is a good agreement with the experimental results.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Kaygan, E., Dogan, D., Alpagut, O. M. (2024). Aerodynamic Investigation of Fixed Pitch Aircraft Propeller. International Journal of Aviation Science and Technology, Volume: 05 Issue: 02. https://ajindex.com/articles/1493688

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (30)

  1. Alakashi, A. M. and Basuno, I. B. (2014). Comparison between Structured and Unstructured Grid Generation on Two Dimensional Flows Based on Finite Volume Method (FVM), Int. J. Mining, Metall. Mech. Eng.
  2. Asl, H. H., Monfared, A. R. K. and Manouchehr, R. (2017). Experimental investigation of blade number and design effects for a ducted wind turbine., Renewable Energy 105.
  3. Bertetta, D., Brizzolara, S., Gaggero, S., Viviani, M., & Savio, L. (2012). CPP propeller cavitation and noise optimization at different pitches with panel code and validation by cavitation tunnel measurements. Ocean Engineering, 53, 177 195.
  4. Brandt, J. and Selig, M. (2011). Small-Scale Propeller Performance at Low Speeds – Online Database, 49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Orlando, FL.
  5. François G. Schmitt. (2007). About Boussinesq’s turbulent viscosity hypothesis: historical remarks and a direct evaluation of its validity. Comptes Rendus Mécanique, 335 (9-10), pp.617-627. ff10.1016/j.crme.2007.08.004ff. ffhal-00264386
  6. Glauert, H. (1935). “Airplane Propellers,” Aerodynamic Theory: A General Review of Progress, edited by Durand, F. W., Vol. 4, Springer, Berlin.
  7. Gur, O. (2013). Practical Propeller Efficiency Model, Proceedings of the 53rd Israel Annual Conference on Aerospace Sciences, Technion–Israel Institute of Technology Haifa, Israel.
  8. Houghton and Carpenter. (2005). Aerodynamics for Engineering students, fourth edition.
  9. Kaidi, S., Smaoui, H. and Sergent, P. (2012). CFD Investigation of Mutual Interaction between Hull, Propellers, and Rudders for an Inland Container Ship in Deep, Very Deep, Shallow, and Very Shallow Waters, J. Waterw. Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng., vol. 144, no. 6.
  10. Kang, T., and Park., W.G. (2013). “Numerical investigation of active control for an S809 wind turbine airfoil,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1037–104.
  11. Krishnan, P.S., Sathian, S. P. (2009). Numerical Investigation of VE-7 Airplane Propeller through CFD, Proceedings of ICEAE 2009.
  12. Kutty, H. A., Parvathy, R. and Akshay, M. (2017). Performance analysis of small scale UAV propeller with slotted design. 2nd International Conference for Convergence in Technology (I2CT), pp. 695-700. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/i2ct.2017.8226219
  13. Lieser, J. A., Lohmann, D. and Rohardt, C. H. (1997). "Aeroacoustic design of a 6-bladed propeller." Aerospace science and technology1, no. 6: 381-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1270-9638(97)90012-2
  14. Marcus, E. A. P., Vries, R. de, Kulkarni, A. Raju and Veldhuis, L. L. M. (2018). Aerodynamic Investigation of an Over-the-Wing Propeller for Distributed Propulsion, AIAA, Doi: 10.2514/6.2018-2053
  15. McCormick, B. W. (1994). Aerodynamics, Aeronautics and Flight Mechanics, Johnwiley & sons Inc., second edition.
  16. Ol, M., Zeune, C., and Logan, M. (2008). Analytical/Experimental Comparison for Small Electric Unmanned Air Vehicle Propellers, AIAA Paper 2008–7345,
  17. Osborne, Reynolds (1895). On the Dynamical Theory of Incompressible Viscous Fluids and the Determination of the Criterion. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A. 186: 123164. doi:10.1098/rsta.1895.0004. JSTOR 90643
  18. Ramzi, M., Bois, G., Abderrahmane, G. and De Constantine, R. (2011). “Numerical Study of Passive Control with Slotted Blading in Highly Loaded Compressor Cascade at Low Mach Number,” Int. J. Fluid Mach. Syst., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 97–103.
  19. Rezaeiha, A., Hamid M. and Bert B. (2019). On the accuracy of turbulence models for CFD simulations of vertical axis wind turbines. Energy180: 838-857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.05.053
  20. Sanjeevi, K., Sathish, P. & Sathian, Sarith. (2009). Numerical Investigation of VE-7 Airplane Propeller through CFD. IISc Centenary International Conference and Exhibition on Aerospace Engineering (ICEAE 2009), Bangalore, India
  21. Seeni, A. (2019). Aerodynamic Performance Characterization of Slotted Propeller: Part B Effect of Angle. INCAS Bulletin11, no. 4: 155-170. https://doi.org/10.13111/2066-8201.2019.11.4.14
  22. Seeni, A. and Rajendran, P. (2020). CFD Analysis of a Novel Propeller Design Operating at Low Reynolds Number. In: Rajendran, P., Mazlan, N., Rahman, A., Suhadis, N., Razak, N., Abidin, M. (eds) Proceedings of International Conference of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering 2019, Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4756-0_13
  23. Seeni, A., Ismail, F., and Rajendran, P. (2020). The Aerodynamic Performance Characteristics of a Grooved Propeller Using a RANS solver: Effect of Groove Geometry and Positioning of Multiple Grooves. Proceedings of the International Conference on Innovations in Thermo-Fluid Engineering and Sciences [ICITFES - 2020] NIT Rourkela, India.
  24. Singh, P. and Nestmann, F. (2011). "Experimental investigation of the influence of blade height and blade number on the performance of low head axial flow turbines." Renewable Energy36, no. 1: 272-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2010.06.033
  25. Song X, Qi Y, Zhang M, Zhang G, Zhan W (2019) Application and optimization of drag reduction characteristics on the flow around a partial grooved cylinder by using the response surface method. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech 13(1):158–176
  26. Tian, W., Song, B., Van Zwieten, J. H. and Pyakurel, P. (2015). Computational fluid dynamics prediction of a modified savonius wind turbine with novel blade shapes, Energies, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 7915–7929.
  27. Versteeg, H. and Malalasekera, W. (1995). An introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics. Pearson Prentice Hall.
  28. Wald, Q. R. (2006). The aerodynamics of propellers, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, Volume 42, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 85-128
  29. Xie, Y., Chen, J., Qu, H., Xie, G., Zhang, D., and Moshfeghi, M. (2013). Numerical and Experimental Investigation on the Flow Separation Control of S809 Airfoil with Slot, Math. Probl. Eng., vol. 2013.
  30. Zao, N., Dhanak, M., and Su, T. (2019). "Improved performance of a slotted blade using a novel slot design." Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics189: 34-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.309