Dergiler / International Journal of Agriculture Forestry and Life Sciences / 2019 / Volume: 3 Issue: 2

An assessment of livestock breeding and livestock production in turkey

Figen Ceylan(FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE)0000-0003-0459-7521
Metin Göksel Akpınar(FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE)
Çağrı Bayraktar(AKDENİZ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, FEN BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ)0000-0003-0459-7521
Duygu Bayraktar(AKDENİZ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, FEN BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ)
Esra Mülazımoğulları(AKDENİZ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, FEN BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ)0000-0003-0947-845X
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2019-12-23
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This is related with the input characteristics of milk for the food industry.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Human nutrition should be composed of a balanced daily intake of glutens, vitamins and proteins.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The findings of supply response analyses of meat and milk supplies for the years between 2001 and 2017 indicated that price mostly affects supply in the long term as the breeder can change the aim of keeping animals.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This is related with the input characteristics of milk for the food industry.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:2001 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:livestock breeding · milk · meat

Abstract

Human nutrition should be composed of a balanced daily intake of glutens, vitamins and proteins. In contrast to gluten and vitamins, proteins can be retrieved only from animal based products. Accordingly, bovine breeding and poultry are important to secure protein requirements of societies. With changing climatic conditions and declining interest to maintain livestock breeding, the supply has been in declination recently which corresponded to rising consumer prices in Turkey. Within this study, it was aimed to measure the impact of prices of animals per head and changing milked or slaughtered animal stocks on the supply of main outputs of animal breeding, milk and meat. The findings of supply response analyses of meat and milk supplies for the years between 2001 and 2017 indicated that price mostly affects supply in the long term as the breeder can change the aim of keeping animals. Yet, short term impact is also visible, despite being lower. However, the analyses showed us that most of the fluctuation in supplies is related with non-price factors. Analysis interrelated with sector supports and international trade is essential for proper inferences specifically for milk supplies. This is related with the input characteristics of milk for the food industry.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Ceylan, F., Akpınar, M. G., Bayraktar, Ç., Bayraktar, D., Mülazımoğulları, E. (2019). An assessment of livestock breeding and livestock production in turkey. International Journal of Agriculture Forestry and Life Sciences, Volume: 3 Issue: 2. https://ajindex.com/articles/1493504

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (23)

  1. Anonymous, 2019a. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization), http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, retrieved on 10.07.2019.
  2. Anonymous, 2019b. Milk Report 2018, Chamber of Agricultural Engineers, http://www.zmo.org.tr/genel/bizden_detay.php?kod=31590&tipi=17&sube=0, retrieved on 10.07.2019.
  3. Anonymous, 2019c. TUIK (Turkish Statistical Institute), https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/disticaretapp/disticaret.zul?param1=21&param2=0&sitcrev=0&isicrev=0&sayac=5802, retrieved on 10.07.2019.
  4. Askan, E., Dagdemir, V. (2016). TRA1 Düzey 2 Bölgesinde Destek ve Teşvik Alan Süt Sığırcılığı İşletmelerinde Süt Üretim Maliyeti ve Karlılık Durumu (Milk Production Cost and Profitability in Dairy Cattle Farms Supported and Encouraged in TRA1 Level 2 Region). Tarım Ekonomisi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(1), 1-12 (Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, 2 (1): 1-12). Banerjee, A., Dolado, J.J., Mestre, R. (1998). Error-Correction Mechanism tests for cointegration in a single equation framework. Journal of Time Series Analysis 19(3), 267-283.
  5. Ceylan, R.F., Ilbasmis, E., Ozkan. B., (2018). Is price significant in planning for sugar beet production? An example from Turkey. Mediterranean Agricultural Sciences, 31(2), 117-122. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.29136/mediterranean.396526.
  6. Dickey, D.A., Fuller, W.A. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica, 49(4), 1057-1072.
  7. Engle, R.F., Granger, C.W.J. (1987). Cointegration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251-276.
  8. Granger, C.W.J. (1981). Some properties of time series data and their use in econometric model specification. Journal of Econometrics, 16(1), 121-130.
  9. Griffiths, W.E., Hill, R.C., Lim, G.C. (2008). Using EViews for Principles of Econometrics. Wiley Int. 5th ed. pp.878.
  10. Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical analysis of cointegrating vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(2-3), 231-254.
  11. Karagoz, H. (2009). Türkiye’de ve Konya’da hayvancılık sektörü, sektörün sorunları ve çözüm önerileri. (Animal Breeding Sector in Turkey and Konya, Problems of the Sector and Solution Recommendations) Konya Ticaret Odası, Etüd Araştırma Servisi, Konya.
  12. Kiymaz, T. Sacli, Y. (2008). Tarım ve Gıda Ürünleri Fiyatlarında Yaşanan Sorunlar ve Öneriler (Problems and Solution Recommendations in Prices of Food and Agricultural Products). Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı Yayın ve Temsil Dairesi Başkanlığı Basım Şube Müdürlüğü Yayınları. Ankara, 5.
  13. Levin, A., Lin, C.-F., Chu, C.-S.J. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics 108(1), 1–24
  14. Mohammad, S., Javed, M.S., Bashir, A., Mushtaq, K. (2007). Price and non-price factors affecting acreage response of wheat in different agro-ecological zones in Punjab: A co-integration analysis Park J. Agri Science 44(2), 370-377.
  15. Nerlove, M. (1958). The Dynamic of Supply: Estimation of Farmers Response to Prices. The Johns Hopkins University press, 41(2), 452-455.
  16. Ozkan, B., Ceylan, F., Kızılay, H. (2011). Supply response for wheat in Turkey: A vector error correction approach. Mediterranean Journal of Economics: Agriculture and Environment, 10(3), 34-38.
  17. Saygin, O., Demirbas, N., (2017). Türkiye’de Kırmızı Et Sektörünün Mevcut Durumu ve Çözüm Önerileri. (The Current Situation of Red Meat Sector in Turkey and Solution Recommendations) Hayvansal Uretim, Cilt: 58(1), 74-80.
  18. Semerci, A., Celik, A. (2016). Türkiye’de Küçükbaş Hayvan Yetiştiriciliğinin Genel Durumu (General Situation of Small Ruminant Breeding in Turkey). Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(2), 182-196 (Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Agriculture, 21 (2), 182-196).
  19. Simsek, E., (2018). Türkiye ve AB Ülkelerinde Kırmızı Et Üretiminde İşgücü Verimliliğinin Karşılaştırılması (Comparison of Labor Productivity in Red Meat Production in Turkey And EU Countries). Tarım Ekonomisi Dergisi, 24(1), 85-97 (Turkish Journal of Agricultural Economics, 24 (1),85-97).
  20. Tripathi, A., Prasad, A.R. (2009). Estimation of agricultural supply response by cointegration approach. The Indian Economic Journal, 57(1), 106-131. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0019466220090106.
  21. Turan, Z., Sanver, D. Ozturk, K. (2017). The Importance of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the Livestock Sector in Turkey, Contribution to Domestic Output and Comparison wıth Foreign Countries. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi Yıl: Temmuz 2017 Cilt-Sayı: 10(3) ss: 60-74. DOI: 10.25287/ohuiibf.309212.
  22. Askan, E., Dagdemir, V. (2016). TRA1 Düzey 2 Bölgesinde Destek ve Teşvik Alan Süt Sığırcılığı İşletmelerinde Süt Üretim Maliyeti ve Karlılık Durumu (Milk Production Cost and Profitability in Dairy Cattle Farms Supported and Encouraged in TRA1 Level 2 Region). Tarım Ekonomisi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(1), 1-12 (Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, 2 (1): 1-12).
  23. Simsek, E., (2018). Türkiye ve AB Ülkelerinde Kırmızı Et Üretiminde İşgücü Verimliliğinin Karşılaştırılması (Comparison of Labor Productivity in Red Meat Production in Turkey And EU Countries). Tarım Ekonomisi Dergisi, 24(1), 85-97 (Turkish Journal of Agricultural Economics, 24 (1),85-97).