KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Higher Education Governance and Policy / 2025 / Volume: 6 Issue: 2

Comparative Analysis of Higher Education Accreditation Criteria of Turkish and German Accreditation Bodies

Furkan Şimşek(Fatih Sultan Mehmet Foundation University)0000-0003-2028-8139
Gülşah Taşçı(Istanbul 29 May University)0000-0003-0701-2824
Salih Şahin(Fenerbahçe University)0009-0004-7661-5260
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2025-12-31
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

As a result of the research, by comparing the accreditation criteria of the health sciences education programmes determined by the selected accreditation bodies for higher education, the similarities and differences of the higher education accreditation processes are mutually revealed and the main points that stand out as a result of the comparative analysis of higher education accreditation are discussed.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Accreditation in higher education is the process of assessing and assuring the quality of educational institutions and programmes.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The scope of the research is limited to the Evaluation Criteria for Health Sciences Education Programmes dated June 2022 of the Association for Evaluation and Accreditation of Health Sciences Education Programmes and the Accreditation Agency in Health and Social Sciences' Accreditation Criteria for Health Education dated November 2023 and the comparative analysis of the criteria of these two organisations.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:As a result of the research, by comparing the accreditation criteria of the health sciences education programmes determined by the selected accreditation bodies for higher education, the similarities and differences of the higher education accreditation processes are mutually revealed and the main points that stand out as a result of the comparative analysis of higher education accreditation are discussed.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:2022 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Health sciences · Higher education · Quality management

Abstract

Accreditation in higher education is the process of assessing and assuring the quality of educational institutions and programmes. The importance of accreditation is increasing for Türkiye. Therefore, the main purpose of this study is to reveal the similarities and differences between the criteria developed by the internationally recognised accreditation body and the local accreditation body for quality management and their perspectives on quality management. In this context, this study was carried out using a comparative document analysis design from qualitative research methods in accordance with the nature of the research. Thematic analysis was used for data analysis. The scope of the research is limited to the Evaluation Criteria for Health Sciences Education Programmes dated June 2022 of the Association for Evaluation and Accreditation of Health Sciences Education Programmes and the Accreditation Agency in Health and Social Sciences' Accreditation Criteria for Health Education dated November 2023 and the comparative analysis of the criteria of these two organisations. As a result of the research, by comparing the accreditation criteria of the health sciences education programmes determined by the selected accreditation bodies for higher education, the similarities and differences of the higher education accreditation processes are mutually revealed and the main points that stand out as a result of the comparative analysis of higher education accreditation are discussed.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Şimşek, F., Taşçı, G., Şahin, S. (2025). Comparative Analysis of Higher Education Accreditation Criteria of Turkish and German Accreditation Bodies. Higher Education Governance and Policy, Volume: 6 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.55993/hegp.1729205

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (62)

  1. Abou Neel, E. A., & Frick, W. C. (2024). Addressing challenges, approaches, and outcomes of university accreditation: Faculty and administrative insights from a college of dental medicine. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(8), Article 5677. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i8.5677
  2. Acevedo-De-los-Ríos, A., & Rondinel-Oviedo, D. R. (2021). Impact, added value and relevance of an accreditation process on quality assurance in architectural higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 28(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2021.1977482 AHPGS. (2023). Handbook for The Accreditation of Medical Education Programs. https://www.ahpgs.de/assets/WFME/Handbook_ESG_WFME_2023.pdf
  3. Bakioğlu, A. (1996). Üniversitelerde kalite yönetimi ve özdeğerlendirme [Quality management and self-assessment in universities]. Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(1), 49-65. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/maruaebd/issue/363/2028
  4. Batdı, V., Aslan, A., & Elaldı, Ş. (2024). Meta-Tematik analiz örnek uygulamalar (2. Baskı). Anı Publishing.
  5. Boelen, C., & Woollard, B. (2009). Social accountability and accreditation: A new frontier for educational institutions. Medical Education, 43(9), 887-894. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03413.x
  6. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
  7. Braun, V., & Clarke V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.
  8. Bryson, J. M., Anderson, S. R., & Alston, F. K. (2011). Implementing and sustaining your strategic plan: A workbook for public and nonprofit organizations. John Wiley & Sons.
  9. Carbone, F., Oosterbeek, L., Costa, C., & Ferreira, A. M. (2020). Extending and adapting the concept of quality management for museums and cultural heritage attractions: A comparative study of southern European cultural heritage managers' perceptions. Tourism Management Perspectives, 35, Article 100698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100698
  10. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  11. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2023). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  12. Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. MIT Press.
  13. Duarte, N., & Vardasca, R. (2023). Literature review of accreditation systems in higher education. Education Sciences, 13(6), Article 582. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13060582
  14. Duffy, G. L. (2014). Modular kazien: Continuous and breakthrough improvement. ASQ Quality Press.
  15. Eaton, J. S. (2015). An overview of US accreditation. Council for Higher Education Accreditation.
  16. ENQA. (2015). Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG). https://www.enqa.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/ESG_2015.pdf
  17. Fitch, K. (2014). Professionalisation and public relations education: Industry accreditation of Australian university courses in the early 1990s. Public Relations Review, 40(4), 623-631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.02.015
  18. Frank, J. R., Taber, S., van Zanten, M., Scheele, F., & Blouin, D. (2020). The role of accreditation in 21st century health professions education: Report of an International Consensus Group. BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02121-5
  19. Freeman, J., Simonsen, B., Briere, D. E., & MacSuga-Gage, A. S. (2014). Pre-service teacher training in classroom management: A review of state accreditation policy and teacher preparation programs. Teacher Education and Special Education, 37(2), 106-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406413507002
  20. Gaston, P. L. (2023). Higher education accreditation: How it's changing, why it must. Routledge.
  21. Golowko, N., Kopia, J., Geldmacher, W., & Förster-Pastor, U. S. (2017). Comparative study on quality management at German private universities. Quality-Access to Success, 18(157). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317358836
  22. Greenfield, D., & Braithwaite, J. (2008). Health sector accreditation research: a systematic review. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 20(3), 172-183. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18339666/
  23. Harvey, L. (2004). The power of accreditation: Views of academics. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 26(2), 207–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080042000218267 Harvey, L., & Green, D. (1993). Defining quality. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1), 9-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293930180102
  24. Harvey, L., & Knight, P. T. (1996). Transforming higher education. Open University Press.
  25. Harvey, L., & Newton, J. (2004). Transforming quality evaluation: Moving on. In D. F. Westerheijden, B. Stensaker, & M. J. Rosa (Eds.), Quality assurance in higher education: Trends in regulation, translation and transformation (pp. 225–245). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6012-0_9
  26. Huisman, J., & Westerheijden, D. F. (2010). Bologna and quality assurance: Progress made or pulling the wrong cart? Quality in Higher Education, 16(1), 63–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538321003679531 Imai, M. (1986). Kaizen: The key to Japan’s competitive success. McGraw-Hill Education.
  27. Johnson, J. D. (2020). Administrative bloat in higher education. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  28. Jongbloed, B., Vossensteyn, H., van Vught, F., & Westerheijden, D. F. (2018). Transparency in higher education: The emergence of a new perspective on higher education governance. In A. Curaj, L. Deca, & R. Pricopie (Eds.), European higher education area: The impact of past and future policies (pp. 441-455). Springer.
  29. Kayyali, M. (2024). Quality assurance and accreditation in higher education: Issues, models, and best practices. Springer.
  30. Kirk, J., & Miller, M. L. (1991). Reliability and validity in qualitative research (8th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  31. Kondakçı, Y., Zayim Kurtay, M., & Çalışkan, O. (2019). Antecedents of continuous change in educational organizations. International Journal of Educational Management, 33(6), 1366-1380. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1225532
  32. Kondakçı, Y., Zayim Kurtay, M., Kaya-Kaçıkçı, S., Şenay, H. H., & Kulakoğlu, B. (2021). 'Scaling' the academia: Perspectives of academics on the impact of their practices. Research Evaluation, 30(2), 370-381. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvab015
  33. Kumar, P., Shukla, B., & Passey, D. (2020). Impact of accreditation on quality and excellence of higher education institutions. Revista Investigación Operacional, 41(2), 151-167. https://rev-inv-ope.pantheonsorbonne.fr/sites/default/files/inline-files/41220-01.pdf
  34. Leung, L. (2015) Validity, reliability, and generalizability in qualitative research. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 4(3), 324-327. https://doi.org/10.4103/2249-4863.161306
  35. Lim, D. (2018). Quality assurance in higher education: A study of developing countries. Routledge.
  36. Maguire, M., & Delahunt, B. (2017). Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 8(3), 3351-3364. http://ojs.aishe.org/index.php/aishe-j/article/view/335
  37. Makhoul, S. A. (2019). Higher education accreditation, quality assurance and their impact to teaching and learning enhancement. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 35(4), 235-250. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEAS-08-2018-0092
  38. MSTI. (2005). A framework for qualifications of the European Higher Education Area Bologna Working Group on qualifications frameworks. https://ehea.info/media.ehea.info/file/WG_Frameworks_qualification/71/0/050218_QF_EHEA_580710.pdf
  39. MYK. (2015). Türkiye Yeterlilikler Çerçevesi. https://www.yokak.gov.tr/documents/enqa/TYC_teblig_Tr.pdf
  40. Neuman, L. W. (2019). Social research methods, qualitative and quantitative approaches. Pearson.
  41. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
  42. Paradeise, C., Reale, E., Bleiklie, I. & Ferlie, E. (Eds.). (2009). University governance: Western comparative perspectives. Springer.
  43. Parscale, S. (2023). Accreditation as quality management theory and assessing student learning outcomes in higher education. Peter A. Okebukola & Stamenka Uvalić-Trumbić (Eds.), Quality assurance in higher education across the World, (pp. 60-76). CHEA.
  44. SABAK. (2022). Sağlık Bilimleri Eğitim Programları Değerlendirme Ölçütleri – R4. https://www.sabak.org.tr/images/Genel_De%C4%9Ferlendirme_%C3%96l%C3%A7%C3%BCtleri_-_R4_5_Haziran_2022.pdf
  45. Sallis, E. (2002). Total Quality Management in Education (3rd ed.). Routledge.
  46. Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  47. Shaw, C. D. (2003). Evaluating accreditation. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 15(6), 455-456. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzg092
  48. Srikanthan, G., & Dalrymple, J. F. (2002). Developing a Holistic Model for Quality in Higher Education. Quality in Higher Education, 8(3), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/1353832022000031656
  49. Stensaker, B. (2008). Outcomes of quality assurance: A discussion of knowledge, methodology and validity. Quality in Higher Education, 14(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538320802011532
  50. Stensaker, B., Langfeldt, L., Harvey, L., Huisman, J., & Westerheijden, D. (2011). An in‐depth study on the impact of external quality assurance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(4), 465–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903432074
  51. Sziegat, H. (2022). Transforming governance of German higher education institutions. Research in Educational Administration & Leadership, 7(3), 472-517. https://doi.org/10.30828/real.1164190
  52. Taşçı, G., & Kenan, S. (2021). Yükseköğretimde uluslararasılaşma: Teoriden uygulamaya. Pegem.
  53. THEQC. (2024). Higher Education Evaluation and Quality Assurance Status Report 2023. https://www.yokak.gov.tr/documents/StatusReports/StatusReport_2023.pdf
  54. Toprak, E., & Şakar, A. N. (2020). Need for accreditation agencies as stakeholders in open and distance learning: Case of “Audak” in Turkish higher education system. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21(Special Issue-IODL), 29-48. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.770904
  55. Wang, Z., Hisatomi, T., Li, R., Sayama, K., Liu, G., Domen, K., Li, C. & Wang, L. (2021). Efficiency accreditation and testing protocols for particulate photocatalysts toward solar fuel production. Joule, 5(2), 344-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2021.01.001
  56. WFME. (2023). Agencies with recognition status. https://wfme.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/List-of-Agencies-with-Recognition-Status-and-applying-1.pdf
  57. Yakoub-Agha, I., Chabannon, C., Bader, P., Basak, G. W., Bonig, H., Ciceri, F., Corbacioglu, S., Duarte, R.F., Einsele, H., Hudecek, M., Kersten. M.J., Köhl, U., Kuball, J., Mielke, S., Mohty, M., Murray, J., Nagler, A., Robinson S, Saccardi, R., Sanchez-Guijo, F., Snowden, J.A., Srour, M,, Styczynski, J., Urbano-Ispizua, A., Hayden, P.J., & Kröger, N. (2020). Management of adults and children undergoing chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy: Best practice recommendations of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) and the Joint Accreditation Committee of ISCT and EBMT (JACIE). Haematologica, 105(2), 297-316. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2019.229781
  58. Yıldırım, K., & Yenipınar, Ş. (2022). Uluslararası kalite standartlarına uyum: Türk yükseköğretim kurumlarının yönetimsel boyutlar açısından değerlendirilmesi [Compliance with international quality standards: Evaluation of Turkish Higher Education Institutions in terms of management dimensions]. Eğitim ve Bilim, 47(211), 223–247. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2022.10640
  59. YÖKAK. (2020). 2019 Yılı Akreditasyon Kuruluşları Genel Değerlendirme Raporu. https://www.yokak.gov.tr/documents/diger/2019GenelDegerlendirme.pdf
  60. YÖKAK. (2021). Faaliyet Raporu. https://www.sabak.org.tr/images/SABAK_2021_Faaliyet_Raporu.pdf
  61. YÖKAK. (2025). Tanınan Uluslararası Akreditasyon Kuruluşları. https://www.yokak.gov.tr/taninan-uluslararasi-akreditasyon-kuruluslari/
  62. Yükseköğretim. (1981). Yükseköğretim Kanunu [Higher Education Act] (Decision No: 1981/17506). http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/