Gender and age impact on plantar pressure distribution in early adolescence

İLKŞAN DEMİRBÜKEN; BAHAR ÖZGÜL; EREN TİMURTAŞ; SAADET UFUK YURDALAN; MURAT DİNÇER ÇEKİN; MİNE GÜLDEN POLAT

Dergiler / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2019 / Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 3

Gender and age impact on plantar pressure distribution in early adolescence

Dergi: Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica
Sayı: 2019 · Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 3
Sayfa: 215–220
DOI: —

🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.

DergiPark Kaydı ↗

✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight

⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

We suggest that gender and age impact on toes plantar pressure alterations in early adolescence maybea possible risk factor forfurther foot impairments.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯

Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: The aim of the study was to investigate gender and age effect on dynamic plantar pressure distribution in early adolescence.

📊

Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: Atotalof524adolescents(211womenand313men;meanage:12.58±1.11years(range:11e14 years)) participated in pedobarographic measurements during gait at self-selected speed.

💡

Sonuç & Katkı:We suggest that gender and age impact on toes plantar pressure alterations in early adolescence maybea possible risk factor forfurther foot impairments.

🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi

📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem

⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: The aim of the study was to investigate gender and age effect on dynamic plantar pressure distribution in early adolescence. Methods: Atotalof524adolescents(211womenand313men;meanage:12.58±1.11years(range:11e14 years)) participated in pedobarographic measurements during gait at self-selected speed. Data of peak pressure(PP),maximumforce(MaxF-Newton),bodyweightcorrectedmaximumforce(BW_MaxF),contact area (CA-cm2) were analyzed for total foot and four plantar regions (hindfoot, midfoot, forefoot and toes). Results: Higher toes PP was found in the ages of 12e14 years in females compared to males (253.79 ± 104.93 vs 216.00 ± 81.12 for the age of 12, p¼0.011, 264.40 ± 65.02 vs227.21 ± 83.4 for the age of 13, p ¼ 0.044, 299.75 ± 140.60 vs 238.75 ± 103.32 for the age of 14, p ¼ 0.005). Females' higher MaxF especially for toes (136.24 ± 48.54 vs 115.33 ± 46.03, p ¼ 0.008) and smaller CA especially for forefoot (50.12 ± 5.79 vs 54.4893 ± 6.80, p ¼ 0.001) were considerable in the late of early adolescence. Forefoot (305.66 ± 82.14 females p ¼ 0.001, 281.35 ± 79.59 males p < 0.001) and total foot PP (374.08 ± 113.93 females, p ¼ 0.035, 338.61 ± 85.85 males p ¼ 0.009) at the age of 14 was signiﬁcantly higher than in younger ages in both gender groups. Conclusion: The results indicate thatespecially the age of 14 years in earlyadolescence is a critical age for alteration in plantar pressure distribution. Interestingly females tended to increase their toe and forefoot plantar pressures compared to males by increasing age. We suggest that gender and age impact on toes plantar pressure alterations in early adolescence maybea possible risk factor forfurther foot impairments.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DEMİRBÜKEN, İ., ÖZGÜL, B., TİMURTAŞ, E., YURDALAN, S. U., ÇEKİN, M. D., POLAT, M. G. (2019). Gender and age impact on plantar pressure distribution in early adolescence. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 3, 215–220. https://ajindex.com/articles/148910

Kaynakça (1)

Periyasamy R, Mishra A, Anand S, Ammini AC. Preliminary investigation of foot pressure distribution variation in men and women adults while standing. Foot (Edinb). 2011;21(3):142e148. Putti AB, Arnold GP, Abboud RJ. Foot pressure differences in men and women. Foot Ankle Surg. 2010;16(1):21e24. Dugan SA. Sports-related knee injuries in female athletes: what gives? Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;84(2):122e130. Tong JWK, Kong PW. Association between foot type and lower extremity injuries: systematic literature review with meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013;43(10):700e714 Kaufman KR, Brodine SK, Shaffer RA, Johnson CW, Cullison TR. The effect of foot structure and range of motion on musculoskeletal overuse injuries. Am J Sport Med. 1999;27(5):585e593. Bosch K, Gerss J, Rosenbaum D. Preliminary normative values for foot loading parameters of the developing child. Gait Posture. 2007;26(2):238e247. Bennett PJ, Duplock LR. Pressure distribution beneath the human foot. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1993;83(12):674e678. Steele DG. The estimation of sex on the basis of the talus and calcaneus. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1976;45(3):581e588. Smith SL. Attribution of foot bones to sex and population groups. J Forensic Sci. 1997;42(2):186e195. Kandil OD, Aboelazm SN, Mabrouk MS. Foot biometrics: gender differences in plantar pressure distribution in standing position. Am J Biomed Eng. 2014;4(1): 1e9. Chang JH, Wang SH, Kuo CL, Shen HC, Hong YW, Lin LC. Prevalence of ﬂexible ﬂatfoot in Taiwanese school-aged children in relation to obesity, gender, and age. Eur J Pediatr. 2010;169(4):447e452. Liu XC, Lyon R, Thometz JG, Curtin B, Tarima S, Tassone C. Insole-pressure distribution for normal children in different age groups. J Pediatr Orthop. 2011;31(6):705e709. Phethean J, Nester C. The inﬂuence of body weight, body mass index and gender on plantar pressures: results of a cross-sectional study of healthy children's feet. Gait Posture. 2012;36(2):287e290. Matthews BL, Bennell KL, McKay HA, et al. The inﬂuence of dance training on growthandmaturationofyoung females: amixed longitudinalstudy. Ann Hum Biol. 2006;33(3):342e356. Soliman A, De Sanctis V, Elalaily R, Bedair S. Advances in pubertal growth and factors inﬂuencing it: can we increase pubertal growth? Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2014;18(Suppl 1):53. Lai YC, Lin HS, Pan HF, Chang WN, Hsu CJ, Renn JH. Impact of foot progression angle on the distribution of plantar pressure in normal children. Clin Biomech. 2014;29(2):196e200.