KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Eurasian Journal of English Language and Literature / 2026 / Volume: 8 Issue: 1

Censorship as Ideological Anxiety: A New Historicist and Deconstructive Reading of George Orwell’s Animal Farm

Ayman Dawood Najim Sallawy Alhalb(KARABÜK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-7426-2666
Abdul Serdar Öztürk(KARABÜK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-7780-7107
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Ultimately, the banning of Animal Farm reveals not the power of the censor but the anxiety of ideological systems confronted with their own fragility.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The Literary censorship of literature has long served as a political and ideological instrument of oppression, reducing opposition and consolidating dominant narratives.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Even though the phenomenon of banning a novel in the twentieth century is not new, this paper discusses George Orwell's Animal Farm (1945) to analyze why the novel was banned in certain political situations and why its banning is not only linked to the danger of literature but also to the insecurity of a certain ideology.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Ultimately, the banning of Animal Farm reveals not the power of the censor but the anxiety of ideological systems confronted with their own fragility.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Animal Farm · Censorship · New Historicism

Abstract

The Literary censorship of literature has long served as a political and ideological instrument of oppression, reducing opposition and consolidating dominant narratives. Even though the phenomenon of banning a novel in the twentieth century is not new, this paper discusses George Orwell's Animal Farm (1945) to analyze why the novel was banned in certain political situations and why its banning is not only linked to the danger of literature but also to the insecurity of a certain ideology. This paper is based on New Historicism theory, using the writings of Stephen Greenblatt and Michel Foucault to show how literature constructs and is constructed by the structures of power, seen in the works of Animal Farm, as situated in the Cold War and totalitarianism context. The paper presents a deconstructive reading of the text based on the concepts of binary opposition and aporia as proposed by Jacques Derrida. The article shows that Orwell's text shows the authoritarian discourse unstable by revealing contradictions in the language of revolution itself. The paper suggests that censorship does not work due to the instability of meaning; it is historically contingent and linguistically volatile. Ultimately, the banning of Animal Farm reveals not the power of the censor but the anxiety of ideological systems confronted with their own fragility.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Alhalb, A. D. N. S., Öztürk, A. S. (2026). Censorship as Ideological Anxiety: A New Historicist and Deconstructive Reading of George Orwell’s Animal Farm. Eurasian Journal of English Language and Literature, Volume: 8 Issue: 1. https://ajindex.com/articles/1482025

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (34)

  1. Althusser, L. (1971). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. In Lenin and philosophy and other essays (pp. 127–186). New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.
  2. Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London, UK: Verso.
  3. Barnes, J. (2003). The Roman censor and public morality. London, UK: Classical Press.
  4. Culler, J. (2007). On deconstruction: Theory and criticism after structuralism. London, UK: Routledge.
  5. Darnton, R. (2014). Censors at work: How states shaped literature. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
  6. Derrida, J. (1988). Limited Inc (G. Graff, Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
  7. Derrida, J. (1993). Aporias (T. Dutoit, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  8. Derrida, J. (1997). Of grammatology (G. C. Spivak, Trans., Corrected ed.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. (Original work published 1967)
  9. Eagleton, T. (2011). Literary theory: An introduction (2nd ed.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  10. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge (A. M. Sheridan Smith, Trans.). New York, NY: Pantheon Books. (Original work published 1969)
  11. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York, NY: Pantheon Books. (Original work published 1975)
  12. Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality: Vol. 1. An introduction (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
  13. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977 (C. Gordon, Ed.). New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
  14. Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 87–104). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  15. Gallagher, C., & Greenblatt, S. (2000). Practicing New Historicism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  16. Greenblatt, S. (1980). Renaissance self-fashioning: From More to Shakespeare. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  17. Greenblatt, S. (1988). Shakespearean negotiations: The circulation of social energy in Renaissance England. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  18. Jideofor, A. (2018). Plato and the question of censorship in The Republic. Classical Studies Review.
  19. Martínez de Bujanda, J. (2002). Index Librorum Prohibitorum, 1600–1966. Geneva, Switzerland: Librairie Droz.
  20. Meyers, J. (2000). Orwell: Wintry conscience of a generation. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
  21. Mosse, G. L. (2003). Nazi culture: Intellectual, cultural, and social life in the Third Reich. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
  22. Mundhra, T. (2022). Political satire and contemporary relevance in Orwell’s Animal Farm. Modern Literary Studies Journal.
  23. Norris, C. (2002). Deconstruction: Theory and practice (3rd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
  24. Oxford English Dictionary. (2023). Censorship. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://www.oed.com
  25. Orwell, G. (1945). Animal farm: A fairy story. London, UK: Secker & Warburg.
  26. Petley, J. (2009). Censorship: A beginner’s guide. Oxford, UK: Oneworld Publications.
  27. Putnam, G. H. (2009). The censorship of the Church of Rome. Charleston, SC: BiblioBazaar.
  28. Rodden, J. (1999). The politics of literary reputation: The making and claiming of “St. George” Orwell. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  29. Rodden, J. (2007). The Cambridge companion to George Orwell. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  30. Rodden, J. (2011). The reception of Animal Farm in the Cold War context. Journal of Cold War Studies, 13(2), 34–58.
  31. Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
  32. Saussure, F. de. (1983). Course in general linguistics (R. Harris, Trans.). London, UK: Duckworth. (Original work published 1916)
  33. Steel, J., & Petley, J. (2023). Censorship and state control in modern democracies. Media & Cultural Studies Review, 18(1), 1–20.
  34. Spivak, G. C. (1988). In other worlds: Essays in cultural politics. New York, NY: Routledge.