KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Endoüroloji Bülteni / 2025 / Cilt: 17 Sayı: 3

YouTube’daki Laparoskopik Radikal Nefrektomi Videolarının LAP-VEGaS Kriterleri Kullanılarak Değerlendirilmesi: Kesitsel Bir Analiz

Assessment of Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy Videos on YouTube Using LAP-VEGaS Criteria: A Cross-Sectional Analysis

Resul Sobay(UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, İSTANBUL ÜMRANİYE HEALTH RESEARCH CENTER)0000-0002-6219-9655
Hasan Samet Güngör(UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, İSTANBUL ÜMRANİYE HEALTH RESEARCH CENTER)0000-0002-7632-1199
Abdurrahman İnkaya(UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, İSTANBUL ÜMRANİYE HEALTH RESEARCH CENTER)0000-0002-2536-691X
Murat Beyatlı(UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, İSTANBUL ÜMRANİYE HEALTH RESEARCH CENTER)0000-0003-0945-0051
Mehmet Umut Evci(UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, İSTANBUL ÜMRANİYE HEALTH RESEARCH CENTER)0000-0002-1119-7158
Ahmet Tahra(UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, İSTANBUL ÜMRANİYE HEALTH RESEARCH CENTER)0000-0002-5158-5630
Eyüp Veli Küçük(UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, İSTANBUL ÜMRANİYE HEALTH RESEARCH CENTER)0000-0003-1744-8242
Sayfa
170–177
Yayın Tarihi
2025-09-30
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bulgular: Yirmi bir video dahil edildi.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Amaç: YouTube cerrahi eğitimde giderek artan önemde bir platform haline gelmiştir, ancak laparoskopik cerrahi videolarının kalitesi değişkendir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) cerrahi video kalitesini değerlendirmek için standart bir çerçeve sağlar.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bulgular: Yirmi bir video dahil edildi.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:laparoskopik cerrahi · LAP- VEGaS · nefrektomi

Özet

Amaç: YouTube cerrahi eğitimde giderek artan önemde bir platform haline gelmiştir, ancak laparoskopik cerrahi videolarının kalitesi değişkendir. LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) cerrahi video kalitesini değerlendirmek için standart bir çerçeve sağlar. Gereç ve Yöntem: YouTube’da ilgili arama terimleri kullanılarak sistematik arama yapıldı. İngilizce açıklamalı laparoskopik radikal nefrektomi videoları dahil edildi. Her video 9 maddelik LAP-VEGaS temel kontrol listesi kullanılarak değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Yirmi bir video dahil edildi. Ortalama LAP-VEGaS skoru 9.14±3.72 (aralık 3-16) idi. Videolar 11 farklı ülke kaynaklıydı, Hindistan %38.1 (n=8) katkı sağladı. Popülerlik metrikleri ile eğitimsel kalite arasında anlamlı korelasyon bulunmadı (p>0.05). Sonuç: YouTube’daki laparoskopik radikal nefrektomi videoları orta düzeyde eğitimsel kalite göstermektedir. Popülerlik ve eğitimsel değer arasındaki bağlantısızlık, cerrahi eğitimde kalite değerlendirme araçlarının gerekliliğini vurgulamaktadır.

Abstract

Objective: YouTube has become an increasingly important platform for surgical education; however, the quality of laparoscopic surgery videos is variable. The LAParoscopic Surgery Video Educational Guidelines (LAP-VEGaS) provides a standardized framework for assessing surgical video quality. Material and Methods: A systematic search was conducted on YouTube using relevant search terms. English-narrated laparoscopic radical nephrectomy videos were included. Each video was evaluated using the 9-item core LAP-VEGaS checklist. Results: Twenty-one videos were included. The mean LAP-VEGaS score was 9.14 ± 3.72 (range 3–16). Videos originated from 11 different countries, with India contributing 38.1% (n=8). No significant correlation was found between popularity metrics and educational quality (p>0.05). Conclusion: Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy videos on YouTube demonstrate a moderate level of educational quality. The lack of association between popularity and educational value highlights the necessity of quality assessment tools in surgical education.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Sobay, R., Güngör, H. S., İnkaya, A., Beyatlı, M., Evci, M. U., Tahra, A., Küçük, E. V. (2025). YouTube’daki Laparoskopik Radikal Nefrektomi Videolarının LAP-VEGaS Kriterleri Kullanılarak Değerlendirilmesi: Kesitsel Bir Analiz. Endoüroloji Bülteni, Cilt: 17 Sayı: 3, 170–177. https://doi.org/10.54233/endourolbull-1757629

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (22)

  1. Wille AH, Roigas J, Deger S, et al. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: techniques, results and oncological outcome in 125 consecutive cases. Eur Urol. 2004;45(4):483-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2003.10.019
  2. Reznick RK, MacRae H. Teaching surgical skills--changes in the wind. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(25):2664-9. https:// doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra054785
  3. Madathil KC, Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Greenstein JS, Gramopadhye AK. Healthcare information on YouTube: A systematic review. Health Inform J. 2015;21(3):173-94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458213512220
  4. Rodriguez HA, Young MT, Jackson HT, Oelschlager BK, Wright AS. Viewer discretion advised: is YouTube a friend or foe in surgical education? Surg Endosc. 2018;32(4):1724-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5853-x
  5. Drozd B, Couvillon E, Suarez A. Medical YouTube videos and methods of evaluation: literature review. JMIR Med Educ. 2018;4(1):e3. https://doi.org/10.2196/mededu.8527
  6. Celentano V, Smart N, Cahill RA, et al. Development and validation of a recommended checklist for assessment of surgical videos quality: the LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) video assessment tool. Surg Endosc. 2021;35(3):1362-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07517-4
  7. de’Angelis N, Gavriilidis P, Martínez-Pérez A, et al. Educational value of surgical videos on YouTube: quality assessment of laparoscopic appendectomy videos by senior surgeons vs. novice trainees. World J Emerg Surg. 2019;14:22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-019-0241-6
  8. Helming AG, Adler DS, Keltner C, et al. The content quality of YouTube videos for professional medical education: a systematic review. Acad Med. 2021;96(10):1484-93. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004121
  9. Hewitt JN, Kovoor JG, Ovenden CD, et al. Quality of YouTube videos on laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patient education. Minim Invasive Surg. 2021;2021:2462832. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2462832
  10. Haslam RE, Seideman CA. Educational value of YouTube surgical videos of pediatric robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a qualitative assessment. J Endourol. 2020;34(11):1129-33. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.0102
  11. Baturu M, Öztürk M, Bayrak Ö, et al. Assessing the educational value of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy videos on YouTube®: a comparative analysis of short versus long videos. J Minim Access Surg. 2024;21(2):119-25. https:// doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_355_23
  12. Kayar R, Kayar K, Tokuç E, et al. Educational level of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy videos on YouTube. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2024;34(8):731-5. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0175
  13. Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Lane BR, et al. Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors. J Urol. 2007;178(1):41-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.038
  14. White MA, Autorino R, Spana G, et al. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site radical nephrectomy: surgical technique and comparative outcomes. Eur Urol. 2011;59(5):815-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.02.020
  15. Ozsoy HE. Evaluation of YouTube videos about smile design using the DISCERN tool and Journal of the American Medical Association benchmarks. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;125(1):151-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.12.016
  16. Wang H, Yan C, Wu T, et al. YouTube online videos as a source for patient education of cervical spondylosis—a reliability and quality analysis. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1):1831. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16495-w
  17. Colombo Jr JR, Haber GP, Jelovsek JE, et al. Seven years after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: oncologic and renal functional outcomes. Urology. 2008;71(6):1149-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2007.11.081
  18. Kaouk JH, Khalifeh A, Hillyer S, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: step-by-step contemporary technique and surgical outcomes at a single high-volume institution. Eur Urol. 2012;62(3):553-61. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.021
  19. Augestad KM, Butt K, Ignjatovic D, et al. Video-based coaching in surgical education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(2):521-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07265-0
  20. Young JU, Merrienboer JV, Durning S, et al. Cognitive load theory: implications for medical education: AMEE guide no.86. Med Teach. 2014;36(5):371-84. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.889290
  21. Bai G, Pan X, Zhao T, et al. Quality assessment of YouTube videos as an information source for testicular torsion. Front Public Health. 2022;10:905609. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.905609
  22. Kara M, Ozduran E, Kara MM, et al. Assessing the quality and reliability of YouTube videos as a source of information on inflammatory back pain. PeerJ. 2024;12:e17215. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.17215