KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / ELT Research Journal / 2026 / Volume: 15 Issue: 1

An Investigation into the Lexical Associations of Turkish Learners of English

Hüseyin Güleç(GAZI UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-5689-319X
Kadriye Dilek Bacanak(GAZI UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-3755-3560
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-07-08
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

These findings provide insights into the developmental trajectory of the L2 mental lexicon of Turkish learners and offer pedagogical implications for designing vocabulary instruction that fosters deeper lexical networks.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Vocabulary knowledge is a key dimension of second language (L2) proficiency, yet the network organisation of words in the mental lexicon warrants further exploration.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This study investigated the L2 English lexical associations of Turkish learners to unravel an understudied topic within this specific context.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:These findings provide insights into the developmental trajectory of the L2 mental lexicon of Turkish learners and offer pedagogical implications for designing vocabulary instruction that fosters deeper lexical networks.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:2000 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Mental lexicon · word association task · second language vocabulary acquisition

Abstract

Vocabulary knowledge is a key dimension of second language (L2) proficiency, yet the network organisation of words in the mental lexicon warrants further exploration. This study investigated the L2 English lexical associations of Turkish learners to unravel an understudied topic within this specific context. The study further examined the impact of learner proficiency and lexical properties on participants’ associative patterns. A Word Association Task (WAT), with 96 cue words from three lexical classes (nouns, verbs, adjectives) and two frequency bands (0–1000 and 2000–3000), was administered to 120 tertiary-level learners across two groups (lower vs. higher proficiency). The findings revealed a general dominance of meaning-based (semantic) associations. However, proficiency level and word-related differences were observed for position-based (collocational) and form-based (phonological/orthographic) responses: higher-proficiency learners produced a greater proportion of position-based links, whereas lower-proficiency ones relied more on form-based associations. Lexical class also shaped associative behaviour; while nouns and adjectives elicited largely semantic links, verbs, particularly lower-frequency ones, were more likely to trigger co-occurrence combinations. These findings provide insights into the developmental trajectory of the L2 mental lexicon of Turkish learners and offer pedagogical implications for designing vocabulary instruction that fosters deeper lexical networks.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Güleç, H., Bacanak, K. D. (2026). An Investigation into the Lexical Associations of Turkish Learners of English. ELT Research Journal, Volume: 15 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.71362/eltrj.1869867

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (64)

  1. Aitchison, J. (2012). Words in the mind: An introduction to the mental lexicon (4th ed.). Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
  2. Akbari, N. (2014). Comparing the trends of development in L2 and L1 mental lexicon: Associations, vocabulary size, and reaction time (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Canberra, Australia.
  3. Albrechtsen, D., Haastrup, K., & Henriksen, B. (2008). Vocabulary and writing in a first and second language: Processes and development. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  4. Berger, C. M. (2018). The longitudinal development of lexical network knowledge in L2 learners: Multiple methods and parallel data (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgia State University, USA.
  5. Berger, C. M., Crossley, S. A., & Kyle, K. (2019). Using native-speaker psycholinguistic norms to predict lexical proficiency and development in second-language production. Applied Linguistics, 40(1), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx005
  6. Brown, R., & Berko, J. (1960). Word association and the acquisition of grammar. Child Development, 31(1), 1–14. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  7. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  8. Daller, H., van Hout, R., & Treffers-Daller, J. (2003). Lexical richness in the spontaneous speech of bilinguals. Applied Linguistics, 24(2), 197–222. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.2.197
  9. Davies, M. (2004). British National Corpus (BNC) [Corpus]. https://www.english-corpora.org/bnc/
  10. De Deyne, S., Navarro, D. J., Perfors, A., Brysbaert, M., & Storms, G. (2019). The “Small World of Words” English word association norms for over 12,000 cue words. Behavior Research Methods, 51(3), 987–1006. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1115-7
  11. Deese, J. (1965). The structure of associations in language and thought. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
  12. Dóczi, B. (2020). An overview of conceptual models and theories of lexical representation in the mental lexicon. In S. Webb (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of vocabulary studies (pp. 46–65). Abingdon, England: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429291586-4
  13. Eguchi, M., Suzuki, S., & Suzuki, Y. (2022). Lexical competence underlying second language word association tasks: Examining the construct validity of response type and response time measures. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 44(1), 112–142. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000164
  14. El-Dakhs, D. A. S. (2017). The effect of language exposure and word characteristics on the Arab EFL learners’ word associations. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46, 1033–1052. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-017-9477-z
  15. Entwisle, D. R. (1966). Word associations of young children. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
  16. Ervin, S. M. (1961). Changes with age in the verbal determinants of word association. The American Journal of Psychology, 74(3), 361–372. https://doi.org/10.2307/1419742
  17. Fitzpatrick, T. (2006). Habits and rabbits: Word associations and the L2 lexicon. In S. H. Foster-Cohen, M. Medved Krajnovic, & J. Mihaljevic Djigunovic (Eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook (Vol. 6, pp. 121–45). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
  18. Fitzpatrick, T. (2007). Word association patterns: Unpacking the assumptions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17(3), 319–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2007.00172.x
  19. Fitzpatrick, T. (2009). Word association profiles in a first and second language: puzzles and problems. In T. Fitzpatrick, & A. Barfield (Eds.), Lexical processing in second language learners (pp. 38–52). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
  20. Fitzpatrick, T., & Izura, C. (2011). Word Association in L1 and L2: An exploratory study of response types, response times, and interlingual mediation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(3), 373–398. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263111000027
  21. Fitzpatrick, T., & Munby, I. (2014). Word associations and the L2 lexicon. In J. Milton, & T. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Dimensions of vocabulary knowledge (pp. 92–105). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave McMillan.
  22. Fitzpatrick, T., Playfoot, D., Wray, A., & Wright, M. J. (2015). Establishing the reliability of word association data for investigating individual and group differences. Applied Linguistics, 36(1), 23-50. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt020
  23. Fitzpatrick, T., & Thwaites, P. (2020). Word association research and the L2 lexicon. Language Teaching, 53(3), 237–274. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000105
  24. Hahn, H.-R. (2014). Korean EFL learners’ lexical development: Evidence from a word association test. Modern English Education, 15(1), 27–48.
  25. Higginbotham, G. M. (2010). Individual learner profiles from word association tests: The effect of word frequency. System, 38(3), 379–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2010.06.010
  26. Higginbotham, G. M. (2014). Individual profiling of second language learners through word association (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Swansea University, UK.
  27. Hui, L. (2011). An investigation into the L2 mental lexicon of Chinese English learners by means of word association. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 34(1), 62–76. https://doi.org/10.1515/cjal.2011.005
  28. Jiang, N. (2002). Form–meaning mapping in vocabulary acquisition in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(4), 617–640. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310200404X
  29. Jiang, N., & Zhang, J. (2019). Form prominence in the L2 lexicon: Further evidence from word association. Second Language Research, 37(1), 69-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658319827053
  30. Kilgarriff, A., Baisa, V., Bušta, J., Jakubíček, M., Kovář, V., Michelfeit, J., Rychlý, P., & Suchomel, V. (2014). The Sketch Engine: Ten years on. Lexicography, 1(1), 7–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40607-014-0009-9
  31. Krzemińska-Adamek, M. (2014). Word association patterns in a second/foreign language – what do they tell us about the L2 mental lexicon? Lublin Studies in Modern Languages and Literature, 38(1), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.17951/lsmll.2014.38.1.141
  32. Li, X., & Wang, W. (2016). Word class influence upon L1 and L2 English word association. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 39(4), 440–458. https://doi.org/10.1515/cjal-2016-0028
  33. Meara, P. M. (1983). Word associations in a foreign language. Nottingham Linguistic Circular, 11, 28–38. Meara, P. M. (1984). The study of lexis in interlanguage. In A. Davies, C. Criper, & A. P. R. Howatt (Eds.), Interlanguage (pp. 225–235). UK: Edinburgh University Press.
  34. Meara, P. M. (1996). The dimensions of lexical competence. In G. Brown, K. Malmkjaer, & J. Williams (Eds.), Performance and competence in second language acquisition (pp. 33–55). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  35. Meara, P. M. (2009). Connected words: Word associations and second language vocabulary acquisition. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
  36. Munby, I. (2018). Report on a free continuous word association test (part 3). HOKUGA, 175, 53–75.
  37. Namei, S. (2004). Bilingual lexical development: A Persian–Swedish word association study. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(3), 363–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2004.00070.x
  38. Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Nation, I. S. P. (2020). The different aspects of vocabulary knowledge. In S. Webb (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of vocabulary studies (pp. 15–29). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429291586-2
  39. Nation, I. S. P. (2022). Learning vocabulary in another language (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009093873
  40. Nissen, H. B., & Henriksen, B. (2006). Word class influence on word association test results. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 389–408. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2006.00124.x
  41. Palermo, D. S. (1971). Characteristics of word association responses obtained from children in grades one through four. Developmental Psychology, 5(1), 118–123. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031075
  42. Planchuelo, C., Hinojosa, J. A., & Duñabeitia, J. A. (2024). The nature of lexical associations in a foreign language: Valence, arousal and concreteness. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 27(5), 835–844. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728924000117
  43. Playfoot, D., Balint, T., Pandya, V., Parkes, A., Peters, M., & Richards, S. (2018). Are word association responses really the first words that come to mind? Applied Linguistics, 39(5), 607–624. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw015
  44. Politzer, R. L. (1978). Paradigmatic and syntagmatic associations of first-year French students. In V. Honsa & M. J. Hardman-de-Bautista (Eds.), Papers in linguistics and child language: Ruth Hirsch Weir memorial volume (pp. 203–210). Den Haag, The Netherlands: Mouton de Gruyter.
  45. R Core Team. (2025). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 4.5.2) [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  46. Read, J. (2004). Plumbing the depths: How should the construct of vocabulary knowledge be defined? In P. Bogaards & B. Laufer (Eds.), Vocabulary in a second language: Selection, acquisition, and testing (pp. 209–227). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.10.15rea
  47. Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. W. (2002). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (3rd ed.). London: Pearson Education.
  48. Schmitt, N. (1998). Tracking the incremental acquisition of second language vocabulary: A longitudinal study. Language Learning, 48(2), 281-317. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00042
  49. Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D., & Clapham, C. (2001). Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the vocabulary levels test. Language Testing, 18 (1), 55-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553220101800103
  50. Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230293977
  51. Schmitt, N., & Schmitt, D. (2020). Vocabulary in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  52. Séguin, M. (2015). Exploration of the relationship between word-association and learners’ lexical development with a focus on American L1 and Croatian L2 speakers. Explorations in English Language and Linguistics, 3(2), 80–101. https://doi.org/10.1515/exell-2017-0003
  53. Singleton, D. (1999). Exploring the second language mental lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Sökmen, A. J. (1993). Word association results: A window to the lexicons of ESL students. JALT Journal, 15(2), 135–150.
  54. Söderman, T. (1993). Word associations of foreign language learners and native speakers – different response types and their relevance to lexical development. In B. Hammarberg (Ed.), Problem, Process, Product in Language Learning: Papers from the Stockholm-Abo Conference, 21–22 October 1992 (pp. 157–169). Stockholm, Sweden.
  55. Stolz, W. S., & Tiffany, J. (1972). The production of “child-like” word associations by adults to unfamiliar adjectives. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(1), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80057-4
  56. Thwaites, P. (2018). Lexical and distributional influences on word association response generation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Cardiff University, UK.
  57. Thwaites, P. (2019). Are grammatical class effects on L1 word association responses independent of cue frequency, age-of-acquisition, and concreteness? Korean Journal of Applied Linguistics, 35(2), 105-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.17154/kjal.2019.6.35.2.105
  58. Thwaites, P. (2020). Does verb transitivity influence word association responses? The Mental Lexicon, 15(3), 464–484. https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.20019.thw
  59. Wolter, B. (2001). Comparing the L1 and L2 mental lexicon: a depth of individual word knowledge model. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 41–69. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263101001024
  60. Wolter, B. (2002). Assessing proficiency through word associations: Is there still hope? System, 30(3), 315–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00017-9
  61. Zareva, A. (2007). Structure of the second language mental lexicon: how does it compare to native speakers' lexical organization? Second Language Research, 23(2), 123-153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658307076543
  62. Zareva, A. (2011). Effects of lexical class and word frequency on L1 and L2 English-based lexical connections. The Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, 1(2), 1–17.
  63. Zareva, A., & Wolter, B. (2012). The “promise” of three methods of word association analysis to L2 lexical research. Second Language Research, 28(1), 41–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658311423452
  64. Zhang, D., & Koda, K. (2017). Assessing L2 vocabulary depth with word associates format tests: Issues, findings, and suggestions. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 2(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-017-0024-0