Dergiler / Ekoist: Journal of Econometrics and Statistics / 2023 / Sayı: 39

A Comparative Perspective on Multivariate Modeling of Insurance Compensation Payments with Regression-Based and Copula-Based Models

Övgücan Karadağ Erdemir(HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF SCIENCE, DEPARTMENT OF ACTUARIAL SCIENCES)0000-0002-4725-3588
Sayfa
161–171
Yayın Tarihi
2023-12-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Based on the comparison of model results, a mixture of copula-based models is found to be more suitable for the multivariate modeling of insurance compensation payments.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, compensation payments for Turkish motor vehicles’ compulsory third-party liability insurance between 2018 and 2022 are modeled from a comparative perspective using regression-based and copula-based multivariate statistical methods.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The assumption of gamma distribution for logarithmic compensation payment variables is carried out in both approaches.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Based on the comparison of model results, a mixture of copula-based models is found to be more suitable for the multivariate modeling of insurance compensation payments.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:2018 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Bivariate Gamma Distribution · Copula · Generalized Linear Model

Abstract

In this study, compensation payments for Turkish motor vehicles’ compulsory third-party liability insurance between 2018 and 2022 are modeled from a comparative perspective using regression-based and copula-based multivariate statistical methods. The assumption of gamma distribution for logarithmic compensation payment variables is carried out in both approaches. Bivariate gamma regression is established using the bivariate gamma distribution, and the mixture of experts, one of the machine learning techniques, is employed to form the mixture of bivariate gamma regressions. The bivariate copula regression and finite mixture of copula regression models are designed using the Gumbel and Frank copula functions. The computational analyses were conducted using the mvClaim package in R. Based on the comparison of model results, a mixture of copula-based models is found to be more suitable for the multivariate modeling of insurance compensation payments.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Erdemir, Ö. K. (2023). A Comparative Perspective on Multivariate Modeling of Insurance Compensation Payments with Regression-Based and Copula-Based Models. Ekoist: Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, Sayı: 39, 161–171. https://ajindex.com/articles/1478100

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (42)

  1. Abdelhadi, S., Elbahnasy, K. & Abdelsalam, M. (2020). A Proposed Model to Predict Auto Insurance Claims Using Machine Learning Techniques. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 98(22). google scholar
  2. Alpaydin, E. (2020). Introduction to machine learning. MIT press. google scholar
  3. Arvidsson, H. & Francke, S. (2007). Dependence in Non-Life Insurance. UUDM Project Report. 0 google scholar
  4. Baldacchino, T., Cross, E.J., Worden, K. & Rowson, J. (2016). Variational Bayesian Mixture of Experts Models and Sensitivity Analysis for Nonlinear Dynamical Systems. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 66, 178-200. google scholar
  5. Boateng, M.A., Omari-Sasu, A.Y., Avuglah, R.K. & Frempong, N.K. (2017). On Two Random Variables and Archimedean Copulas. International Journal of Statistics and Applications, 7(4), 228. google scholar
  6. Czado, C., Kastenmeier, R., Brechmann E.C. & Min, A. (2012). A Mixed Copula Model for Insurance Claims and Claim Sizes. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 4, 278. google scholar
  7. Dempster, A.P., Laird, N.M. & Rubin, D.B. (1977). Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data via the EM Algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological), 39, 1-38. google scholar
  8. Dewi, K.C., Murfi, H. & Abdullah, S. (2019). Analysis Accuracy of Random Forest Model for Big Data-A Case Study of Claim Severity Prediction in Car Insurance. 5th International Conference on Science in Information Technology (ICSITech), 60-65. google scholar
  9. Emekliler, N.A. (2017). Karayolları Motorlu Araçlar Zorunlu Mali Sorumluluk Sigortasında Hasar Oranlarının Hesaplanması ve Hasar Oranlarının Tahmini Emekliler Sigorta Örneği. Master Dissertation in Turkish, Başkent Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Turkey. google scholar
  10. Erdemir, Ö.K. & Sucu, M. (2022). A Modified Pseudo-Copula Regression Model for Risk Groups with Various Dependency Levels. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 92(5), 1092-1112. google scholar
  11. Eryılmaz, S. (2017). On Compound Sums Under Dependency. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 72, 228. google scholar
  12. Frees, E.W., Myers G. & David, C. (2010). Dependent Multi-peril Ratemaking Models. ASTIN Bulletin, 40, 699. google scholar
  13. Garrido, J., Genest, C. & Schulz, J. (2016). Generalized Linear Models for Dependent Frequency and Severity of Insurance Claims. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 70, 205. google scholar
  14. Hanafy, M. & Ming, R. (2021). Machine Learning Approaches for Auto Insurance Big Data. Risks, 9(2), 42. google scholar
  15. Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Friedman, J. H., & Friedman, J. H. (2009). The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction (Vol. 2, pp. 1-758). New York: springer. google scholar
  16. Hu, S., Murphy, T.B. & O’Hagan, A. (2019). Bivariate Gamma Mixture of Experts Models for Joint Insurance Claims Modelling. Cornell University, arXiv: arxiv.org/abs/1904.04699. google scholar
  17. Hu, S., Murphy, T.B. & O’Hagan, A. (2021). MvClaim: An R Package for Multivariate General Insurance Claims Severity Modelling. Annals of Actuarial Science, 15(2), 441-457. google scholar
  18. Jeong, H., Valdez, E. A., Ahn, J. Y. & Park, S. (2017). Generalized Linear Mixed Models for Dependent Compound Risk Models. SSRN 3045360. google scholar
  19. Klugman, S.A., Panjer, H.H. & Willmot, G.E. (2012). Loss models: from data to decisions. John Wiley & Sons, 715. google scholar
  20. Kramer, N., Brechmann, E.C., Silvestrini, D. & Czado, C. (2013). Total Loss Estimation Using Copula-Based Regression Models. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 53, 829. google scholar
  21. Masarotto, G. & Varin, C. (2017). Gaussian Copula Regression in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 77 (8). google scholar
  22. Murphy, K. P. (2012). Machine learning: a probabilistic perspective. MIT press. google scholar
  23. Nelsen, R.B. (2007). An Introduction to Copulas. Springer science & business media. google scholar
  24. Parsa R.A. & Klugman, S.A. (2011). Copula Regression. Variance Advancing and Science of Risks, 5, 45. google scholar
  25. Purhadi, B. & Purnami, S. (2018). Parameter Estimation and Statistical Test in Bivariate Gamma Regression Model. 8th Annual Basic Science Onternational Conference. google scholar
  26. Ren, J. (2012). A Multivariate Aggregate Loss Model. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 51, 402. google scholar
  27. Singh, R., Ayyar, M.P., Pavan, T.V.S., Gosain, S. & Shah, R.R. (2019). Automating Car Insurance Claims Using Deep Learning Techniques. google scholar
  28. IEEE fifth international conference on multimedia big data (BigMM), 199-207. google scholar
  29. Sklar, A. (1959). Fonctions de repartition a n dimensions et leurs marges. Publications de l’Institut Statistique de l’Universite de Paris, 8, 229-231. google scholar
  30. Song, P.X.K (2007). Correlated Data Analysis: Modeling, Analytics, And Applications. Springer Science & Business Media, Ontario, Canada. google scholar
  31. Song, P.X.-K., Li, M. & Yuan, Y. (2009). Joint Regression Analysis of Correlated Data Using Gaussian Copulas. Biometrics, 65(1), 60-68. google scholar
  32. Su, J. & Furman, E. (2017). A Form of Multivariate Pareto Distribution with Applications to Financial Risk Measurement. ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA, 47(1), 331-357. google scholar
  33. Şahin, Ş., Nevruz, E., Karageyik, B. B., & Simsek, G. (2020). Destekten Yoksun Kalma Tazminatı Hesaplama Yöntemleri, Şeçkin Yayıncılık, Türkiye. google scholar
  34. Şahin, Ş., Karageyik, B. B., Nevruz, E., & Simsek, G. (2021). Aktüerya Bilirkişiliği-İş Göremezlik Tazminatı Hesaplama Yöntemleri, Şeçkin Yayıncılık, Türkiye. google scholar
  35. Tatlidil, H. (1996). Uygulamalı Çok Degiskenli İstatistiksel Analiz. Cem Web Ofset Ltd. Sti, Ankara. google scholar
  36. Vernic, R. (2000). A Multivariate Generalization of The Generalized Poisson Distribution. ASTIN Bulletin, 30(1), 57-67. google scholar
  37. Vernic, R., Bolance, C. & Alemany, R. (2022). Sarmanov Distribution for Modeling Dependence Between the Frequency and the Average Severity of Insurance Claims. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 102, 111-125. google scholar
  38. Weerasinghe, K.P.M.L.P. & Wijegunasekara, M.C. (2016). A Comparative Study of Data Mining Algorithms in The Prediction of Auto Insurance Claims. European International Journal of Science and Technology, 5(1), 47-54. google scholar
  39. Yolal, H.E. (2019). Karayolları Motorlu Araçlar Zorunlu Mali Sorumluluk (Trafik) Sigortalarında Sigorta Tazminatının Ödenmesinde Kusurun Etkisi. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. google scholar
  40. Zadeh, A. H. & Bilodeau, M. (2013). Fitting Bivariate Losses with Phase-Type Distributions. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 4, 241. google scholar
  41. https://www.tsb.org.tr/tr/istatistikler Access date: 06.04.2023 google scholar
  42. https://www.tsb.org.tr/media/attachments/Trafik_Genel_%C5%9Eartlar%C4%B1_06122021__Ekler_Dahil.pdf,Trafik Sigortası Genel Şartları, Access date: 21.08.2023 google scholar