KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Ekin Journal of Crop Breeding and Genetics / 2021 / Volume: 7 Issue: 2

Performance of Feed Barley Genotypes Assessed by AMMI Mixed with BLUP for North Western Plains Zone of the India

Ajay Verma(ICAR-Indian Ins titute of Wheat & Barley Research)
Ramesh Pal Singh Verma(ICAR-Indian Ins titute of Wheat & Barley Research,)
Jogendra Sıngh(ICAR-Indian Ins titute of Wheat & Barley Research,)
Lokendra Kumar(ICAR-Indian Ins titute of Wheat & Barley Research,)
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2021-07-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Simultaneous utilization of AMMI and BLUP of genotypes would be more appropriate to recommend high-yielding s table genotypes.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:AMMI analysis for feed barley genotypes evaluated North Wes tern Plains Zone of India had expressed highly significant effects of environments (E), GxE interaction and genotypes (G).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Interaction effects GxE accounted for 23.4 and 26.9%, while environment explained up to tune of 63.4 and 61.4%; during cropping seasons of 2018-19 and 2019-20, respectively.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Simultaneous utilization of AMMI and BLUP of genotypes would be more appropriate to recommend high-yielding s table genotypes.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:2018 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:AMMI · ASV · ASV1

Abstract

AMMI analysis for feed barley genotypes evaluated North Wes tern Plains Zone of India had expressed highly significant effects of environments (E), GxE interaction and genotypes (G). Interaction effects GxE accounted for 23.4 and 26.9%, while environment explained up to tune of 63.4 and 61.4%; during cropping seasons of 2018-19 and 2019-20, respectively. ASTAB measure achieved the desirable lower values for PL906, DWRB137, UPB1080. Composite measure MASV1 found PL906, DWRB137, RD2552, and as per MASV ranks desired PL906, DWRB137, and UPB1080 genotypes would be of choice for these locations of the zone. Superiority index while weighting 0.65 and 0.35 for average yield & s tability found KB1707, PL906, RD2994 as of s table performance with high yield. Biplot graphical analysis as per 73.7% of variation of the measures exhibited MASV1 clubbed with ASTAB, EV, SIPC, Za, W3, WAASB and MASV measures. For the second-year lower value of WAASB measure had observed for KB1707, RD2994. Barley genotypes DWRB137, PL906 were selected as per values of ASTAB measure. MASV1 selected PL906, DWRB137 while PL906, DWRB137 identified by MASV as genotypes of choice. Superiority index pointed towards PL906, DWRB137 feed barley genotypes. About 64.3% of variation among the measures under biplot analysis seen AMMI based IPCA1, Za, W1, W2, W3, ASTAB, WAASB measures grouped in quadrant. Simultaneous utilization of AMMI and BLUP of genotypes would be more appropriate to recommend high-yielding s table genotypes.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Verma, A., Verma, R. P. S., Sıngh, J., Kumar, L. (2021). Performance of Feed Barley Genotypes Assessed by AMMI Mixed with BLUP for North Western Plains Zone of the India. Ekin Journal of Crop Breeding and Genetics, Volume: 7 Issue: 2. https://ajindex.com/articles/1477812

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (19)

  1. Agahi K, Ahmadi J, Oghan HA, Fotokian MH, Orang SF, (2020). Analysis of genotype × environment interaction for seed yield in spring oilseed rape using the AMMI model. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology 20(1):e26502012
  2. Ajay BC, Bera SK, Singh AL, Kumar N, Gangadhar K, Kona P, (2020). Evaluation of Genotype × Environment Interaction and Yield Stability Analysis in Peanut Under Phosphorus Stress Condition Using Stability Parameters of AMMI Model. Agriculture Research 9:477-486.
  3. Ajay BC, Aravind J, Fiyaz RA, Kumar N, Lal C, Kona P, Dagla MC, Bera SK, (2019). Rectification of modified AMMI stability value (MASV). Indian J Genet 79(4):726-731.
  4. Badr A, Sch KMR, El Rabey H, Effgen S, Ibrahim HH, Pozzi C, Rohde W, Salamini F, (2000). On the origin and domestication history of barley (Hordeum vulgare). Molecular Biology and Evolution.17:499-510.
  5. Bocianowski J, Niemann J, Nowosad K, (2019). Genotype-by environment interaction for seed quality traits in interspecific cross-derived Brassica lines using additive main effects and multiplicative interaction model. Euphytica 215(7):1-13.
  6. Farshadfar E, (2008). Incorporation of AMMI stability value and grain yield in a single non-parametric index (GSI) in bread wheat. Pak J Biol Sci 11:1791-1796.
  7. Farshadfar E, Mahmodi N and Yaghotipoor A, (2011). AMMI stability value and simultaneous estimation of yield and yield stability in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Australian Journal of Crop Science 5:1837-1844.
  8. Gauch HG, (2013). A simple protocol for AMMI analysis of yield trials. Crop Science 53:1860- 1869. Kang MS, (1993). Simultaneous selection for yield and stability in crop performance trials: Consequences for growers. Agronomy Journal 85:754-757.
  9. Karkee A, Ghimire KH and Joshi BK, (2020). Evaluation on naked barley landraces foragromorphological traits. Journal of Nepal Agricultural Research Council. 6:34-43.
  10. Kendel M, Dhami NB and Shrestha J, (2019). Performance evaluation of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes in Dolakha, Nepal: from yielding perspective. Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources 2(1):322-337.
  11. Newton AC, Flavell AJ, George TS, Leat P, Mullholland B, Ramsay L, Revoredo-Giha C, Russell J, Steffenson BJ, Swanston JS, Thomas WTB, Waugh R, White PJ, Bingham IJ, (2011).
  12. Crops that feed the world 4. Barley: A resilient crop? Strengths and weaknesses in the context of food security. Food Security. 3:141-178.
  13. Olivoto T, Lucio A Dal’Col, Gonzalez, Silva JA da, Marchioro VS, (2019). Mean performance and stability in multi-environment trials I: Combining features of AMMI and BLUP techniques. Agronomy Journal. 111:1-12.
  14. Oyekunle M, Menkir A, Mani H, Olaoye G, Usman IS, Ado S, (2017). Stability analysis of maize cultivars adapted to tropical environments using AMMI analysis. Cereal Research Communication 45:336-345.
  15. Piepho HP, Mo¨hring J, Melchinger AE, Bu¨chse A, (2008). BLUP for phenotypic selection in plant breeding and variety testing. Euphytica 161(1):209-228.
  16. Rao AR and Prabhakaran VT, (2005). Use of AMMI in simultaneous selection of genotypes for yield and stability. Journal of the Indian Society of Agricultural Statistics 59:76-82.
  17. Sneller CH, Norquest L Kilgore, Dombek D, (1997). Repeatability of yield stability statistics in soybean. Crop Sci. 37:383-390.
  18. Zali H, Farshadfar E, Sabaghpour SH, Karimizadeh R, (2012). Evaluation of genotype × environment interaction in chickpea using measures of stability from AMMI model. Annuals of Biological Research. 3:3126-3136.
  19. Zobel RW, Wright M J, Gauch HG Jr, (1988). Statistical analysis of yield trial. Agronomy Journal 80:388- 393.