KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 4

COMPETITIVE INDUSTRIAL PERFORMANCE INDEX AND ITS DRIVERS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ON TURKEY AND SELECTED COUNTRIES

Çağaçan Değer(Middle East Technical University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of Economics,)
Burcu Türkcan(Ege University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of Economics)
Neşe Kumral(Ege University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of Economics,)
Sayfa
1375–1398
Yayın Tarihi
2009-11-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conducted analysis reveals Turkish manufacturing industry to be lagging behind many of the sample countries and presents a grim picture for sustainable development in medium and long run

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Competitiveness of manufacturing industry is regarded as one of the basic determinants of long run sustainable growth of a country.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The competitive industrial performance (CIP) index, taken to be an indicator of relative competitive ability, has been calculated for a sample of 33 countries for years 1985, 1990, 1998 and 2002.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conducted analysis reveals Turkish manufacturing industry to be lagging behind many of the sample countries and presents a grim picture for sustainable development in medium and long run
🔬Tür:Makale
📍Kapsam:2002 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:manufacturing industry · competition · technological progress

Abstract

Competitiveness of manufacturing industry is regarded as one of the basic determinants of long run sustainable growth of a country. Therefore it is important to have an understanding of relative positions of countries in terms of competitiveness and determinants of competitive ability. This study aims to reveal the standing of Turkey in a group of countries and analyze determinants of competitive ability. The competitive industrial performance (CIP) index, taken to be an indicator of relative competitive ability, has been calculated for a sample of 33 countries for years 1985, 1990, 1998 and 2002. Panel data methods then have been employed to reveal sources of competitive ability. Conducted analysis reveals Turkish manufacturing industry to be lagging behind many of the sample countries and presents a grim picture for sustainable development in medium and long run

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Değer, Ç., Türkcan, B., Kumral, N. (2009). COMPETITIVE INDUSTRIAL PERFORMANCE INDEX AND ITS DRIVERS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ON TURKEY AND SELECTED COUNTRIES. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 4, 1375–1398. https://ajindex.com/articles/1476811

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (17)

  1. Baltagi, B. H., Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Sussex, England, (1995).
  2. Barro, R. J. and Sala-i-Martin, X., Economic Growth, McGraw Hill: New York USA, (1995).
  3. Barro, R.J. and Lee, J-W., ―International Data on Educational Attainment: Updates and Implications‖, CID Working Paper No.42, Harvard University, (2000).
  4. Bils, M. and Klenov, P.J., ―Does Schooling Cause Growth?‖, American Economic Review, 90(5), (2000).
  5. Erlat, H., Panel Data: A Selective Survey, Unpublished Lecture Notes, (2008).
  6. European Commission Staff, Eropean Competitiveness Report 2004, European Commission Staff Staff Working Document SEC(2004), 1397, (2004).
  7. Greene, W. H., Econometric Analysis, Prentice Hall: New Jersey, USA, (2003).
  8. Hausman, J. A., ―Specification Tests in Econometrics‖, Econometrica, 46, (1978), Pp: 1251-1271.
  9. Hsiao, C., Analysis of Panel Data, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, (2003).
  10. Johnston, J. and DiNardo, J., Econometric Methods, McGraw-Hill Book Co., (1997).
  11. Kennedy, P., A Guide to Econometrics, Blackwell Publishing: Oxford: UK, (2003).
  12. Swamy, P. A. V. B. and Arora, S.S., ―The Exact Finite Sample Properties of the Estimators of Coefficients in the Error Components Regression Models‖, Econometrics, 40, (1972), Pp: 261-275.
  13. Szirmai, A., ―Explaining Success and Failure in Development‖, United Nations University Working Paper Series, No. 2008-13, (2008).
  14. Temple, J. R. W., ―Generalizations That Aren’t? Evidence on Education and Growth‖, European Economic Review 45(4-6), (2001).
  15. Ul Haque, I., Trade, Technology and International Competitiveness, World Bank, (1995).
  16. UNIDO, ―Industrial Development Report 2002/2003: Competing through Innovation and Learning‖, http://www.unido.org, (2002).
  17. UNIDO, ―Industrial Development Report 2005: Capacity Building for Catching Up; Historical, Empirical and Policy Dimesions‖, UNIDO Publication No. 454, http://www.unido.org, (2005).