KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 16 Sayı: 2

Kırılgan Beşlide Tasarruf-Yatırım Açığının Ekonomik Büyümeye Etkileri: Yeni Nesil Bir Ekonometrik Analiz

The Effects of Saving-Investment Gap on Economic Growth in the Fragile Five: A New Generation Econometric Analysis

İsmet Göçer(Doç. Dr. İsmet Göçer, Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi,)
Tuğba Akın(Doktora Öğrencisi, Tuğba AKIN, Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi,)
Sayfa
197–210
Yayın Tarihi
2016-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Çalışma sonucunda; tasarruf-yatırım açığının, ülkelerin ekonomik büyümeleri negatif etkilediği bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışmada; Hindistan, Brezilya, Endonezya, Türkiye ve Güney Afrika’da tasarruf- yatırım açığı ile ekonomik büyüme arasındaki ilişki, yeni nesil zaman serisi yöntemleriyle analiz edilmiştir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Çalışma sonucunda; tasarruf-yatırım açığının, ülkelerin ekonomik büyümeleri negatif etkilediği bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Modellerin hata düzeltme mekanizmaları çalışmaktadır
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Tasarruf-Yatırım Açığı Ekonomik Büyüme · Kırılgan Beşli. · Saving-Investment Gap

Özet

Bu çalışmada; Hindistan, Brezilya, Endonezya, Türkiye ve Güney Afrika’da tasarruf- yatırım açığı ile ekonomik büyüme arasındaki ilişki, yeni nesil zaman serisi yöntemleriyle analiz edilmiştir. Çalışma sonucunda; tasarruf-yatırım açığının, ülkelerin ekonomik büyümeleri negatif etkilediği bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır. Modellerin hata düzeltme mekanizmaları çalışmaktadır

Abstract

In this study, the relationship between savinginvestment gap and economic growth in India, Brazil, Indonesia, Turkey and South Africa was analyzed via a new generation time series analysis method. In conclusion; it was found that savinginvestment deficit of countries affects their economic growth negatively. Error correction mechanisms of models are working

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Göçer, İ., Akın, T. (2016). Kırılgan Beşlide Tasarruf-Yatırım Açığının Ekonomik Büyümeye Etkileri: Yeni Nesil Bir Ekonometrik Analiz. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 2, 197–210. https://ajindex.com/articles/1476474

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (80)

  1. Aghion, P. ve Howitt, P (1992) “A Model of Growth
  2. Through Creative Destruction” Econometrica, 60(2): 351. Ahmed, S. ve Zlate, A. (2014) “Capital Flows to
  3. Emerging Market Economies: A Brave New World?” Journal of International Money and Finance, 48, 221- Aizenman, J., Binici, M. ve Hutchison, M. M. (2014)
  4. “The Transmission of Federal Reserve Tapering News to Emerging Financial Markets” National Bureau of Economic Research (No. w19980).
  5. Bacha, E. L. (1990) “A Three-Gap Model of Foreign
  6. Transfers and The GDP Growth Rate in Developing Countries” Journal of Development economics, 32(2): 296. Bai, J. ve Perron, P. (1998) “Estimating and Testing
  7. Linear Models with Multiple Structural Changes” Econometrica, 66(1): 47-78. Banerjee, A., H. (1992) “Recursive and Sequential Tests of The Unit Root and Trend Break Hypotheses: Theory and International Evidence” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 10: 271–288. ve by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods” Econometrica, 37(3): 424–438.
  8. Bernanke, B. S. (2005) “ The Global Saving Glut and the U.S. Current Account Deficit” Homer Jones Lecture, St.
  9. Louis, Missouri, April 2005. http://www.federalreserve. gov/boarddocs/speeches/2005/20050414/default. htm
  10. Buiter, W. H. (1981) “Time Preference and International
  11. Lending and Borrowing in an Overlapping- Generations Model” Journal of Political Economy, 89: 797. Cass, D. (1965) “Optimum Growth in an Aggregative
  12. Model of Capital Accumulation” The Review of economic studies: 233-240. CEBR (2014). World Economic League Table 2015
  13. Highlights, December 26,2014. http://www.cebr. com/reports/world-economic-league-table-2015/.
  14. Cheung, C., Furceri, D. ve Rusticelli, E. (2013) “Structural and Cyclical Factors Behind Current Account
  15. Balances” Review of International Economics, 21(5): 944. Cullison, W. E. (1993) “Saving Measures as Economic
  16. Growth Indicators” Contemporary Economic Policy, 11 (1): 1-8. Deaton, A. ve Paxson, C. (2000) “Growth and Saving among Individuals and Households”
  17. Economics and Statistics, 82(2): 212-225. Review of De Gregorio, J. (1992) “Economic Growth in Latin
  18. America” Journal of development economics, 39(1): 84. Eğilmez, M. (2013) “Kırılgan Beşli”, http://www. mahfiegilmez.com/2013/11/krlgan-besli.html (05.04.2015)
  19. Feyrer, J. ve Shambaugh, J. (2012) “Global Savings and Global Investment: The Transmission of Identified
  20. Fiscal Shocks” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, 4(2): 95-114. Gallagher, K. (2012) “The Myth of Financial
  21. Protectionism: The New (and Old) Economics Of Capital Controls” Political Economy Research Institute Working Paper, 278. Gente, K., León-Ledesma, M. A. ve Nourry, C. (2014)
  22. “External Constraints and Endogenous Growth: Why Didn’t Some Countries Benefit From Capital Flows?” Journal of International Money and Finance,10. Howitt, P. ve Aghion, P. (1998) “Capital Accumulation and Innovation as Complementary Factors in Long
  23. Run Growth” Journal of Economic Growth, 3(2): 111- IMF (2012) “The Liberalization and Management of
  24. Capital Flows: An Institutional View” November 2012.
  25. İnsel, A. ve Sungur, N. (2003) “Sermaye Akımlarının
  26. Temel Makroekonomik Göstergeler Üzerindeki Etkileri: Türkiye Örneği1989-: III1999-: IV” Turkish
  27. Economic Association, Discussion Paper, (No. 2003/8).
  28. Jappelli, T. ve Pagano, M. (1994) “Saving, Growth, and Liquidity Constraints” The Quarterly Journal of Economics: 83-109.
  29. Kalkınma Bakanlığı, (2012) “Yüksek Büyümenin
  30. Sürdürülebilirliği: Yurtiçi Tasarrufların Rolü Türkiye Ülke Ekonomik Raporu”, Dünya Bankası’nın aynı başlıklı raporundan çeviri, http:// siteresources.worldbank.org/turkeyinturkishextn/ R e s o u r c e s / 4 5 5 6 8 7 - 1 3 3 1 6 2 6 5 8 0 7 6 4 / c e m _ yurticitasarruflar_tammetin.pdf, (17.06.2015).
  31. Kapetanios, G. (2005) “Unit‐Root Testing Against the Alternative Hypothesis of Up to M Structural
  32. Breaks” Journal of Time Series Analysis, 26(1): 123-133. Kaya, V., Yılmaz, Ö. ve Talaş, E. (2009) “Yükselen
  33. Piyasa Ekonomileri ve Türkiye,1990–2006:
  34. Neredeyiz?Emerging Market Economies and Turkey, 2006: Where are we?” Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal
  35. Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 13(1): 315-342. Koopmans, T.C. (1965) “On the Concept of Optimal
  36. Economic Growth” In The Econometric Approach to Development Planning, Amsterdam: North-Holland. Kynge, J. (2014) “EM’s “Fragile Five” Back Under
  37. Pressure” Financial Times, 28 August,2014.http://www. ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/7dc3688c-2ea6-11e4-bffa-00144 feabdc0.html#axzz3WnxP2ak3 (09.04.2015).
  38. Landon, T. J. (2014) “Fragile Five is the Latest Club of Emerging Nations in Turmoil” New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/29/business/ international/fragile-five-is-the-latest-club-of- emerging-nations-in-turmoil (07.04.2015).
  39. Lane, P.R. ve Pels, B. (2012) “Current Account Imblances in Europe” IIIS Discussion Paper No.397/April 2012
  40. Lee, J. ve Strazicich, M.C. (2003) “Minimum Lagrange
  41. Multiplier Unit Root Test with Two Structural Breaks” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(4): 1082
  42. Looney, R. E. (1996) “National Savings İn Pakistan:
  43. Causal Linkages with The Macroeconomy” Savings and Development,20: 461–475. Lumsdaine, R. L. and Papell, D. H. (1997). Multiple trend breaks and the unit root hypothesis. Review of
  44. Economics and Statistics, 79(2), 212–217. Maki, D. (2012) “Tests for Cointegration Allowing for an Unknown Number Of Breaks” Economic Modelling, (5): 2011-2015.
  45. Mercan, M. ve Göçer, İ. (2012) “Zamanlararası Dış
  46. Denge Ve Optimizasyon Yaklaşımları Çerçevesinde Türkiye’de Cari Açığın Sürdürülebilirliği” Akdeniz Universitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(24): 73-101. Mohan, R. (2008) “Growth Record of the Indian
  47. Economy, 1950-2008: A Story Of Sustained Savings and Investment” Economic and Political Weekly: 61-71.
  48. Morgan Stanley (2013) “FX Pulse Preparing for
  49. Volatility” Global Outlook, 01.08.2013 http://www. morganstanleyfa.com/public/projectfiles/dce4d168- f9-4245-9605-e37e2caf114c.pdf (05.02.2015)
  50. Ng, S. ve Perron, P. (2001). Lag Length Selection and The Construction of Unit Root Tests With Good Size and Power. Econometrica, 69: 1519-1554.
  51. Obstfeld, M. (1982a) “Transitory Terms of Trade Shocks and The Current Account: The Case of Constant Time
  52. Preference” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series,(No: 834). Obstfeld, M. (1982b) “Aggregate Spending and the Terms of Trade: Is There a Laursen-Metzler Effect?”
  53. Quarterly Journal of Economics 97: 251-270. Obstfeld, M. (2012) “Financial Flows, Financial Crises, and Global Imbalances” Journal of International
  54. Money and Finance, 31(3): 469-480. OECD (2013) http://www.oecd.org/eco/surveys/
  55. Brazil_2013_Overview_ENG.pdf
  56. Örnek, İ. (2008) “Yabancı Sermaye Akımlarının Yurtiçi
  57. Tasarruf ve Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerine Etkisi: Türkiye Örneği” Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi,63(02): 199- Öz, S. (2007) “Küresel Rekabette Yeni Bir Güç:
  58. Hindistan” TUSİAD-Sabancı Üniversitesi Rekabet Forumu, Kasım,2007.
  59. Prasad, E. S., Rajan, R. G. ve Subramanian, A. (2007) “Foreign Capital and Economic Growth”
  60. National Bureau of Economic Research (No. w13619).
  61. Perron, P. (1989) “The Great Crash, The Oil Price Shock, and The Unit Root Hypothesis” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society,57(6): 1361-1401
  62. Perron, P. (1997) “Further Evidence on Breaking Trend
  63. Functions in Macroeconomic Variables” Journal of Econometric, 80: 355-385. Romer, P. M. (1986) “Increasing Returns and Long-Run
  64. Growth” The Journal of Political Economy,94(5): 1002
  65. Romer, P.M. (1990) “Endogenous Technological
  66. Change” Journal of Political Economy, 98(5): 71-102. Sachs, J. (1981) “The Current Account and Macroeconomic Adjustment in The 1970s” Brookings
  67. Papers on Economic Activity, 1: 201-282. Saikonen, P. (1991) “Asymptotic Efficient Estimation of Cointegration Regressions” Economteric Theory, 7: 21.
  68. Solow, R. (1956) “A Contribution to The Theory of
  69. Economic Growth” Quarterly Journal of Economics, (1): 65-94. Stakénas, P. (2010) “Dynamic OLS Estimation of
  70. Fractionally Cointegrated Regressions”, Amsterdam School of Economics, Discussion Paper, No: 11. Steiner, A. (2013) “The Accumulation of Foreign
  71. Exchange by Central Banks: Fear of Capital Mobility?” Journal of Macroeconomics, 38: 409-427. Stock, J. H. ve Watson, M. W. (1993) “A Simple Estimator of Cointegrating Vectors in Higher Order Integrated
  72. Systems” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 61(4): 783-820. Svensson, L. E. ve Razin, A. (1983) “The Terms of Trade and The Current Account: The Harberger-Laursen
  73. Metzler Effect” The Journal of Political Economy, 91(1): 125. Tang, C.F. ve Chua, S.Y.(2012) “The savings-growth nexus for the Malaysian economy: a viewthrough rolling sub-samples” Applied Economics,44(32): 4173
  74. Toda, H. Y. Ve Yamamoto, T. (1995). “Statistical
  75. Inference in Vector Autoregressions with Possibly Integrated Processes” Journal of Econometrics, 66(1): 250. Van, C. L., Nguyen, T. A. ve Tuan, T. D. (2014) “Saving
  76. Rate, Total Factor Productivity and Growth Process for Developing Countries” Department of Research, (No. 424), Ipag Business School. Yeldan, E. (2009) “Kapitalizmin Yeniden Finansallaşması ve 2007/2008 Krizi: Türkiye Krizin Neresinde?” Çalışma ve Toplum, 1: 11-28.
  77. Yılancı, V. ve Özcan, B. (2010) “Yapısal Kırılmalar
  78. Altında Türkiye için Savunma Harcamaları ile GSMH Arasındaki İlişkinin Analizi” C.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 11(1): 21-33. Zivot, A. ve Andrews, D.W.K. (1992) “Further Evidence on The Great Crash The Oil Price Shock and The Unit
  79. Root Hypothesis” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 10(3): 270–251.
  80. Ng, S. ve Perron, P. (2001). Lag Length Selection and The Construction of Unit Root Tests With Good Size and Power. Econometrica, 69: 1519-1554.