KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 26 Sayı: 3

The Significance of Economic Selection to Labor Productivity Evolution in the Turkish manufacturing industries

Maya Moalla0000-0003-4076-2790
İsmail Tuncer(Mersin University Faculty of Economic and Administrative Sciences Department of Economics)0000-0003-0180-7415
Sayfa
351–364
Yayın Tarihi
2026-07-31
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In the long run, a comprehensive upgrading of the business environment is vital to improve the regulations and support the strategies of innovation incentives such as increasing the expenditure on R&D activities.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this paper, we investigate the nexus between the selection effect and the overall labor productivity evolution in the Turkish manufacturing sector at the firm level.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The data compiled by Turkish Statistical Institute (TSI) that classified according to NACE Rev.2 during the period from 2011 to 2015 at four-digit level is employed.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In the long run, a comprehensive upgrading of the business environment is vital to improve the regulations and support the strategies of innovation incentives such as increasing the expenditure on R&D activities.
🔬Tür:Tez Özeti
📍Kapsam:2011 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:The Price Equation · Labor Productivity Growth · Structural Change

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the nexus between the selection effect and the overall labor productivity evolution in the Turkish manufacturing sector at the firm level. The data compiled by Turkish Statistical Institute (TSI) that classified according to NACE Rev.2 during the period from 2011 to 2015 at four-digit level is employed. We distinguished between three sets of firms. The firms that exist in both pre- and post-evolution populations (C), the firms that exist only in the pre-evolution population (X), namely the exciters and the firms that exist only in the post evolution population (N), namely the entrants. The total number of firms during this period is 65 719. The number of the firms that exist in both 2011 and 2015 is 18 528. The number of the firms those are exist only in 2011 is 21 451 and the number of the firms that exist only in 2015 is 25 740. Both single- (at whole level) and multi-level (at industry level) of the “Price equation” method had been utilized. According to the single-level Price equation, the key sources of the aggregate labor productivity evolution were firm selection effect, innovation and exit effects. However, in the multilevel decomposition the key sources were, industry selection effect, innovation and exit effects. When splitting the whole period into shorter sub periods and summing up the results, we found the tendency for selection was stronger. In the short run, developing the management skills and the productivity-boosting know-how practices may enable firms to increase their labor productivity. In the long run, a comprehensive upgrading of the business environment is vital to improve the regulations and support the strategies of innovation incentives such as increasing the expenditure on R&D activities.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Moalla, M., Tuncer, İ. (2026). The Significance of Economic Selection to Labor Productivity Evolution in the Turkish manufacturing industries. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Cilt: 26 Sayı: 3, 351–364. https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.20260023

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (52)

  1. Acemoglu, Daron, Guerrieri, & Veronica. (2008). Capital deepening and non-balanced economic growth. Journal of Political Economy.
  2. Akkemik, K. (2006). Patterns of industrialisation, structural changes and productivity in Turkish manufacturing (1970-2000). Journal of Economic Cooperation, 27(1), 71-88.
  3. Andersen ES (2004). Population thinking, Price’s equation and the analysis of economic evolution. Evol Inst Econ Rev 1(1):127–148.
  4. Andersen ES, Holm JR (2014). The signs of change in economic evolution: An analysis of directional, stabilizing and diversifying selection based on Price’s equation. J Evol Econ 24(2):291–316.
  5. Baily, M. N., Bartelsman, E. J. and Haltiwanger, J. C. (1996). ‘Downsizing and productivity growth: myth or reality?’, Small Business Economics, 8, pp. 259– 78.
  6. Baily, M., Hulten, C., and Campbell, D. (1992). Productivity dynamics in manufacturing establishments. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics, 187-249.
  7. Baldwin JR (1995) The dynamics of industrial competition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  8. Baldwin, J., Gu, W. (2006). Competition, firm turnover and productivity growth. Statistics Canada, Economic Analysis Research Papers 11F0027MIE No. 04.
  9. Bartelsman EJ, Bassanini A, Haltiwanger J, Jarmin RS, Schank T (2004) The spread of ICT and productivity growth: Is Europe lagging behind in the New Economy? In: Cohen D, Garibaldi P, Scarpetta S (eds) The ICT Revolution: Productivity Differences and the Digital Divide. Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York, pp 1–140
  10. Baumol, W.J., 1967. Macroeconomics of unbalanced growth: the anatomy of an urban crisis. Am. Econ. Rev. 57, 415–426.
  11. Bottazzi, G., Dos, i. G., Jacoby, N., Secchi, A. and Tamagni, F. (2010). Corporate performance and market selection: Some comparative evidence. Ind Corp Chang 19(6), 1953–1996.
  12. Cantner, U., Kruger, J. (2008). Micro-heterogeneity and aggregate productivity development in the German manufacturing sector. J Evol Econ 18(2), 119–133.
  13. Celasun, M. (1983). Sources of Industrial Growth and Structural Change: The Case of Turkey. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.
  14. Chenery, Hollis B., 1960. Patterns of industrial growth. Am. Econ. Rev. 50 (4), 624–654.
  15. Disney, R., Haskel, J., and Heden. Y. (2003). Restructuring and productivity growth in UK manufacturing. Econ J 113 (489), 666–694.
  16. Dosi G, Nelson RR (2010) Technical change and industrial dynamics as evolutionary processes. In: Hall BH, Rosenberg N (eds) Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, vol 1. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 51–127
  17. ECLAC, 2012. Structural Change for Equality. Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, United Nations, Santiago de Chile.
  18. Fabricant, S., 1942. Employment in Manufacturing 1899–1939. National Bureau of Economic Research, New York.
  19. Fisher, Allan G.B., 1939. Primary, secondary and tertiary production. Econ. Record 15, 24–38.
  20. Foster, L., Haltiwanger, J., and Krizan, C. (1998). Aggregate productivity growth: Lessons from microeconomic evidence. NBER Working Paper Series: 6803.
  21. Foster, L., Haltiwanger, J., and Krizan, C. l. (2002). NBER Working Paper Series 9120.
  22. Frank SA (1995) George Price’s contribution to evolutionary genetics. J Theor Biol 175(3):373–388.
  23. Griliches, Z. and Regev, H. (1995). Firm productivity in Israeli industry 1979–1988. Journal of Econometrics, 65(1), 175-203.
  24. Hausmann, Ricardo, Rodrik, Dani, 2003. Economic development as self-discovery. J. Dev. Econ. 72 (2), 603–633.
  25. Herrendorf, B., Herrington, H.and Christopher, V. (2013). Sectoral Technology and Structural Transformation. ’Manuscript.Arizona State University.
  26. Holm, J. R. ( 2014). The Significance of Structural Transformation to Productivity Growth. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 24, 1009–1036.
  27. Kaldor, Nicholas, 1957. A model of economic growth. Econ. J. 67 (268), 591–624.
  28. Kruger, J. (2008). The sources of aggregate productivity growth: US manufacturing industries, 1958-1996. Bull Econ Res 60(4), 405–427.
  29. Lewis, W. Arthur, 1954. Economic development with unlimited supplies of labor. Manchester Sch. Econ. Soc. Stud. 22, 139–191.
  30. Lin, Justin Yinfu, 2012. New Structural Economics A Framework for Rethinking Development and Policy. The World Bank, Washington.
  31. Maudos, J., Pastor, J.M., Serrano, L., 2008. Explaining the US-EU productivity growth gap ‘Structural change vs. intra-sectoral effect’. Econ. Lett. 100, 311–313.
  32. Memedovic, Olga, Iapadre, Lelio, 2009. Structural Change in the World Economy: Main Features and Trends, Working Paper 24/2009. United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), Vienna.
  33. Metcalfe, J. (1994). Competition, Fisher’s principle and increasing returns in the selection process. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 4, 327–346.
  34. McMillan, M., Rodrik, D., 2011. Globalization, structural change and productivity growth. In: Bacchetta, M., Jansen, M. (Eds.), Making Globalization Socially Sustainable. International Labour Organization/World Trade Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  35. Metcalfe, J. (1998). Evolutionary Economics and Creative Destruction. London: Routledge. Moalla, M. (2020). Mechanisms 0f Schumpeterian Competitıon in Turkısh Manufacturıng Industries. Mersin Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 4(1), pp.121-135.
  36. Morris DW, Lundberg P (2011) Pillars of Evolution: Fundamental Principles of the Eco-Evolutionary Process. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  37. Nelson, P., and Winter, S. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge MA and London.: Harvard University Press.
  38. Pasinetti, Luigi, 1981. Structural Change and Economic Growth. A Theoretical Essay on the Dynamics of the Wealth of Nations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  39. Padilla-Pérez, R., & Villarreal, F. (2017). Structural change and productivity growth in Mexico, 1990–2014. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 41, 53-63. doi: 10.1016/j.strueco.2017.02.002.
  40. Price GR (1970) Selection and covariance. Nature 227:520–521.
  41. Ricardo, D., 1817. On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. Bartoche Books, Ontario (republished in 2001).
  42. Rice SH (2004) Evolutionary Theory: Mathematical and Conceptual Foundations. Sinauer Associates, Inc. Publishers, Sunderland.
  43. Rodrik, D., McMillan, M., and Sepulveda, C. (2015). Structural Change, Fundamentals, and Growth: A Framework and Case Studies. International Food Policy Reseach Institute.
  44. Schumpeter, J.A., 1939. Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. McGraw-Hill, New York.
  45. Smith, Adam, 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. The Modern Library, Random House, London (republished in 1937).
  46. Syrquin, M. (2010). Kuznets and Pasinetti on the study of structural transformation: Never the Twain shall meet? Journal of Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 21(4), 248-257.
  47. Szirmai, A., 2012. Industrialisation as an engine of growth in developing countries, 1950–2005. Struct. Change Econ. Dyn. 23, 406–420.
  48. Tuncer, İ., and Altiok, M. (2011). Türkiye imalat sanayinde yapısal değişim ve üretkenlik: 1980 - 2008 dönemi. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi.
  49. Tuncer, İ. and Moalla, M., (2020a). Structural Change and Growth Prospects in the Turkish Manufacturing Industry. Bulletin of Economic Theory and Analysis, 5(1), pp.1-20.
  50. Tuncer, İ. and Moalla, M., (2020b). Structural Change And Aggregate Labour Productivity In The Turkish Non-Farm Business Industries. In Hatirli, S., Koç, Ş. Demirel, O.,Theoretical And Applied Studies On Turkish Economy, IJOPEC, 1, pp.155-173.
  51. UNIDO, 2009. Industrial Development Report 2009. UNIDO, United Nations Vienna.
  52. Bottazzi, G., Dos, i. G., Jacoby, N., Secchi, A. and Tamagni, F. (2010). Corporate performance and market selection: Some comparative evidence. Ind Corp Chang 19(6), 1953–1996.