KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Bilgisayar Bilimleri / 2021 / Cilt: IDAP-2021 : 5th International Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing symposium Sayı: Special Özel Sayı

A Comparative Study of SC and MC Underwater Acoustic Communication Systems

Burak Besceli(NUH NACI YAZGAN UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF ENGINEERING)0000-0003-0897-0223
Mehmet Murat Güçlü(NUH NACI YAZGAN UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF ENGINEERING)0000-0002-4910-2820
Efecan Polat(NUH NACI YAZGAN UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF ENGINEERING)0000-0001-7322-9840
Timurhan Devellioğlu(NUH NACI YAZGAN UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF ENGINEERING)0000-0002-8302-0351
Taha Moğol(NUH NACI YAZGAN UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF ENGINEERING)0000-0002-9431-6991
Nuh Mehmet Küçükusta(NUH NACI YAZGAN UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF ENGINEERING)0000-0001-6808-2477
Enver Faruk Tanrıkulu(NUH NACI YAZGAN UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF ENGINEERING)0000-0002-2667-1262
Ali Özen(NUH NACI YAZGAN UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF ENGINEERING)0000-0003-3232-3181
Sayfa
27–34
Yayın Tarihi
2021-10-20
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

From the acquired outcomes, it is perceived that the MC-UWAC communication scheme has approximately 3 dB better achievement than the SC-UWAC communication scheme.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, comparative performance analyzes of single carrier (SC) and multi carrier (MC) underwater acoustic communication (UWAC) schemes are performed in underwater acoustic channel environments.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Computer simulation studies are carried out to compare SC and MC UWAC communication systems in multi-path underwater acoustic channel environments based on bit error rate (BER) and mean square error (MSE) accomplishment benchmarks.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:From the acquired outcomes, it is perceived that the MC-UWAC communication scheme has approximately 3 dB better achievement than the SC-UWAC communication scheme.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:underwater acoustic communications · channel equalization · underwater acoustic channel

Özet

In this study, comparative performance analyzes of single carrier (SC) and multi carrier (MC) underwater acoustic communication (UWAC) schemes are performed in underwater acoustic channel environments. Computer simulation studies are carried out to compare SC and MC UWAC communication systems in multi-path underwater acoustic channel environments based on bit error rate (BER) and mean square error (MSE) accomplishment benchmarks. From the acquired outcomes, it is perceived that the MC-UWAC communication scheme has approximately 3 dB better achievement than the SC-UWAC communication scheme.

Abstract

In this study, comparative performance analyzes of single carrier (SC) and multi carrier (MC) underwater acoustic communication (UWAC) schemes are performed in underwater acoustic channel environments. Computer simulation studies are carried out to compare SC and MC UWAC communication systems in multi-path underwater acoustic channel environments based on bit error rate (BER) and mean square error (MSE) accomplishment benchmarks. From the acquired outcomes, it is perceived that the MC-UWAC communication scheme has approximately 3 dB better achievement than the SC-UWAC communication scheme.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Besceli, B., Güçlü, M. M., Polat, E., Devellioğlu, T., Moğol, T., Tanrıkulu, E. F., Özen, A. (2021). A Comparative Study of SC and MC Underwater Acoustic Communication Systems. Bilgisayar Bilimleri, Cilt: IDAP-2021 : 5th International Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing symposium Sayı: Special Özel Sayı, 27–34. https://doi.org/10.53070/bbd.990807

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Baggeroer A. (1984), Acoustic telemetry – an overview, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, vol. 9, 229-235.
  2. Besceli B. (2021), Investigation and Implementation of SC and MC Underwater Acoustic Communication Syetems in Multipath Underwater Acoustic Channel Environments, Bachelor Degree Thesis, Nuh Naci Yazgan University – HARGEM, Kayseri, TURKEY, June 2021.
  3. Erdoğan M., Şenol H., Panayırcı E. and Uysal M. (2012), Sparse Underwater Acoustic Channel Estimation in Colored Gaussian Noise, IEEE 20th Signal Processing and Communications Applications SIU 2012, 1-4.
  4. Kaya A. and Yauchi T. (1989), An acoustic communication system for subsea robot, OCEANS’89, 765-770.
  5. Kuzlu M. (2010), Implementation of Underwater Communication with DSP, Ph.D. Thesis, Kocaeli University, The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, September 2010, Kocaeli, Turkey.
  6. Mahmutoğlu Y. (2013), Performance Analysis of Underwater Acoustic Channels with Decision Feedback Equalizer, Ms.C. Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, May 2013, Trabzon, Turkey.
  7. Quazi A. and Konrad W. (1982), Underwater Acoustic Communications, IEEE Communication Magazine, 24-29.
  8. Stojanovic M. (2006), On the Relationship Between Capacity and Distance in an Underwater Acoustic Channel, First ACM International Workshop on Underwater Networks (WUWNeT’06), Los Angeles.
  9. Stojanovic M., Catipovic J. A. and Proakis J. G. (1994), Adaptive multichannel combining and equalization for underwater acoustic communications, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 3, 1621-1631.
  10. Suzuki M. and Sasaki T. (1992), Digital acoustic image transmission system for deep sea research submersible, OCEANS’92, 567-570.
  11. Yaşar S., Sinop H., Tek Y. İ., Tuna E. B., Karaerik K. and Özen A. (2020), Investigation of the Performance of Single Carrier Visible Light Communication Systems in Multi-Path Fading Optical Channels, IEEE 28th Signal Processing and Communications Applications SIU 2020, pp. 1-4.
  12. Yılmaz A., Çekli E., Kuzlu M. and Uysal E. (2008), Akustik Sualtı İletişimi DSP Uygulaması, Elektrik - Elektronik ve Bilgisayar Mühendisliği Sempozyumu (ELECO 2008), Bursa, pp. 26-30.
  13. Zielinski A. (2004), Communications Underwater, Inv. P, Journal of Hydroacoustics, vol. 7, pp. 235-252.