Dergiler / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2019 / Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 5

Effectiveness of posterior structures in the development of proximal junctional kyphosis following posterior instrumentation: A biomechanical study in a sheep spine model

Sayfa
385–389
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Based on our literature review, this is the first biomechanical study that reveals interspinosus ligament complex are more effective on preventing PJK development than facet joints

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Introduction: Proximal junctional kyphosis e PJK has been defined by a 10 or greater increase in kyphosis at the proximal junction as measured by the Cobb angle from the caudal endplate of the uppermost instrumented vertebrae (UIV) to the cephalad endplate of the vertebrae 1 segments cranial to the UIV.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and methods: Posterior instrumentation applied between T2 e T7 vertebrae using pedicle screws to randomly selected 21 sheeps, divided into 3 groups.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Based on our literature review, this is the first biomechanical study that reveals interspinosus ligament complex are more effective on preventing PJK development than facet joints
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Introduction: Proximal junctional kyphosis e PJK has been defined by a 10 or greater increase in kyphosis at the proximal junction as measured by the Cobb angle from the caudal endplate of the uppermost instrumented vertebrae (UIV) to the cephalad endplate of the vertebrae 1 segments cranial to the UIV. In this biomechanical study, it is aimed to evaluate effects of interspinosus ligament complex distruption and facet joint degeneration on PJK development. Materials and methods: Posterior instrumentation applied between T2 e T7 vertebrae using pedicle screws to randomly selected 21 sheeps, divided into 3 groups. First group selected as control group (CG), of which posterior soft tissue and facet joints are protected. In second group (spinosus group, SG) interspinosus ligament complex which 1 segment cranial to UIV has been transected, and third group (faset group-FG) was applied facet joint excision. 25 N, 50 N, 100 N, 150 N and 200 N forces applied at frequency of 5 Hertz as 100 cycles axial to the samples. Then, 250 N, 275 N and 300 N forces applied static axially. Interspinosus distance, kyphosis angle and discus heights was measured in radiological evaluation. Abnormal PJK was defined by a proximal junctional angle greater than 100 and at least 100 greater than the corresponding preoperative measurement. Results: In CG group, average interspinosus distance was 6,6 ±1.54 mm and kyphosis angle was 2,2 ± 0.46 before biomechanical testing, and they were measured as 9,4 ± 1.21 mm and 3,3 ±0.44 respectively after forces applied to samples. In SG group, average interspinosus distance was 6,2 ± 1.72 mm and kyphosis angle was 2,7 ± 1.01 before experiment, and they were measured as 20,8 ± 5.66 mm and 15,1 ± 2.34 respectively after forces applied to samples. In FG group, average interspinosus distance was 4,8 ± 1.15 mm and kyphosis angle was 1 ± 4.14 before experiment, and they were measured as 11,1 ± 1:96 mm and 11 ± 2.87 respectively after forces applied to samples. In comparison to group CG, statistically significant junctional kyphosis was seen on both FG and SG group after statistical analysis. (p 0.05) Conclusions: Protecting interspinosus ligament complex and facet joint unity during posterior surgical treatment for spine deformation is vital to prevent PJK development. Based on our literature review, this is the first biomechanical study that reveals interspinosus ligament complex are more effective on preventing PJK development than facet joints

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KORKMAZ, M., AKGÜL, T., SARIYILMAZ, K., OZKUNT, O., DİKİCİ, F., YAZICIOĞLU, Ö. (2019). Effectiveness of posterior structures in the development of proximal junctional kyphosis following posterior instrumentation: A biomechanical study in a sheep spine model. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 5, 385–389. https://ajindex.com/articles/146377

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Cotrel Y, Dubousset J, Guillaumat M. New universal instrumentation in spinal surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;(227):10e23
  2. Edmonston SJ, Singer KP, Day RE, Breidahl PD, Price RI. Formalin fixation effects on vertebral bone density and failure mechanics: an study of human and sheep vertebrae. Clin Biomech. 1994 May;9(3):175e179
  3. Eggli S, Schl€ apfer F, Angst M, Witschger P, Aebi M. Biomechanical testing of three newly developed transpedicular multisegmental fixation systems. Eur Spine J. 1992 Sep;1(2):109e116
  4. Hostin R, McCarthy I, OʼBrien M, et al. Incidence, mode, and location of acute proximal junctional failures following surgical treatment for adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 May 20;38(12):1008e1015
  5. Yagi M, Akilah KB, Boachie-Adjei O. Incidence, risk factors and classification of proximal junctional kyphosis: surgical outcomes review of adult idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(1):E60eE68
  6. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Glattes CR, Rhim S, Cheh G. Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity after segmental posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion: minimum five-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(20):2179e2184
  7. Helgeson MD, Shah SA, Newton PO, et al. Evaluation of proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis following pedicle screw, hook, or hybrid instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(2):177e181
  8. Sucato DJ, Kassab F, Dempsey M. Analysis of screw placement relative to the aorta and spinal canal following anterior instrumentation for thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004;29(5):554e559. discussion 559
  9. Glattes RC, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Kim YJ, Rinella A, Edwards 2nd C. Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity following long instrumented posterior spinal fusion: incidence, outcomes, and risk factor analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(14):1643e1649
  10. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Kim J, Cho SK. Proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis following segmental posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion: minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(18):2045e2050
  11. Yang SH, Chen PQ. Proximal kyphosis after short posterior fusion for thoracolumbar scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;411:152e158
  12. Coe JD, Arlet V, Donaldson W, et al. Complications in spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in the new millennium. A report of the scoliosis research so